This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset
Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Having produced an "improved" version of the diagram for this line, including the "plumbing" for the Yeovil area, I find it necessary to remove the dates to stop the width of the diagram from dominating the article. Rather than just stick it in I'm seeking opinions as to whether the new version, available on My Page, is better. My opinion is that the layout at Yeovil is more within the scope of a diagram than the dates are anyway, but I'd like your opinion before deciding what to do next. Thanks! Britmax00:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I think your diagram is an improvement. I think I can probably get away with straightening the central line, which may narrow it too - I'll make a copy and put it here. AlexTiefling10:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that. I'll look out for the diagram. I've tweaked the one on My Page, to reflect the adding of the connection east of Yeovil Town in 1967 to maintain the link between the two lines. I'm not being awkward - it was something I planned to do anyway....honest... Britmax12:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
My version is now in place. I'm not sure what the 'LUECKE' icon in your new version indicates, so I haven't been able to add it to mine. Let me know what you think. Many thanks! AlexTiefling13:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The 'LUECKE' was supposed to key into the note to the right to point out that the similar link in the diagram was recent (1967). I couldn't get it to work very well. I must admit I'm not keen on moving Clifton Maybank and Yeovil Junction apart, as their proximity was an anomaly created by railway rivalry. The GWR couln't call it Yeovil Junction Goods, you see, for that was an L&SWR station ! I might be being picky, though. If you think so, just say so. Britmax18:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
