 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
Coconut cup, silver, English, 1780
- ... that coconut cups were believed to have medical benefits?
- Source: "Cup with cover, Hans van Amsterdam, 1533/34", Metropolitan Museum of Art
Johnbod (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC).
- @Johnbod: Please provide a QPQ, or this may be closed as rejected, due to being incomplete. Z1720 (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Do you really think I don't know that, or how long the accepted time is per the rules? Johnbod (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: WP:QPQ says, "Your QPQ review should ideally be made at the time of your nomination. A nomination which doesn't include a QPQ (and is not from an exempt nominator) may be closed as "incomplete" without warning." Although this ping was not necessary, and I could have closed this nomination without warning, I like reminding nominators so that the QPQ can be completed. If an editor thinks this should be changed or the accepted time for a QPQ needs to be clarified, I invite them to post at WT:DYK. Z1720 (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Your removal after some 30 hours, on a day I added 2 noms, would certainly have been reverted, as I expect you know. I know you relish reminding people of things. Johnbod (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- You should've said that this rule has been in place for a few months now, so that the nom knows that it used to be the case where you could provide a QPQ until a week after nomination or after being told to do so. But anyways, if its been over 24 hours since this comment was published and the nom fails to provide a QPQ, feel free to close. JuniperChill (talk) 17:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I missed this change, which frankly seems foolish to me (especially in its vagueness), and was counting on a week to qpq. Now done. Johnbod (talk) 18:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Good, now someone will review this eventually. JuniperChill (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I missed this change, which frankly seems foolish to me (especially in its vagueness), and was counting on a week to qpq. Now done. Johnbod (talk) 18:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
: have made some edits to the lead (replacing a "showy form of cup" with "prestigious form of cup", and merged connected paragraphs. Have an interest in this area (applied medieval arts) so followed the articles development over last few weeks. High quality sourcing, clear prose, hook backed by sources. Ceoil (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
