Talk:Brain

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Queen of Hearts in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleBrain was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 29, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
November 14, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2005Good article nomineeListed
January 28, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 3, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 28, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 23, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
December 17, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 13, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There is uncited text, including the entire "Birds" section.
  • At just over 9,000 words, this article might be too long. I do not think information needs to be removed, but perhaps information can be summarised more effectively, and the block quotes evaluated to see if they are still needed.
  • The "Society and culture" section is underdeveloped, with only one line about its use in food and no information about its use in literature or the arts, especially its use as an allegory.

Is anyone willing to address the above, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 22:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

There are uncited statements, including almost the entire "Birds" section. At over 9,000 words, WP:TOOBIG recommends splitting off the article; since this is such a big topic, it might not be possible but should probably be considered after a subject-matter expert tries making this more concise. The "Society and culture" section is underdeveloped, with only one line about its use in food and no information about its use in literature or the arts, especially its use as an allegory. Z1720 (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.