Talk:Battersea Park

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Festivals Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Strong

I couldn't find the song lyrics, but this line looks like a typo:

We'll strong along by the riverside in sunshine or after it's dark

A good guess would be "string" or "stroll" instead of "strong".Art LaPella 17:40, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

You are correct, I shall amend it.

Fair use rationale for Image:Petulainbatterseapark.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Petulainbatterseapark.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

When and by whom was it reopened?

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"Over the course of 2002-4, the park underwent an £11m refurbishment funded in part by the Heritage Lottery Fund, and was re-opened on 4 June 2004 by Prince Phillip."

This does not agree with a plaque in the park:

Plaque

QuentinUK (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Changed in the article. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Specifics of Big Dipper disaster

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I'm fairly sure (from my memory of news articles at the time) that the train did not derail — what happened, after the breakage of the lift chain, was that the anti-rollback mechanism failed. Somebody should find an online citation.

I'm certain (due to this coinciding with a landmark year in my own life) that the closure of this park (though not the Park overall) was at the end of the 1974 season, not 1977 as stated; certainly it had closed by the time of the 25th anniversary of the Festival of Britain in 1976, and in 1977 (as part of the Silver Jubilee) the former fairground hosted the British Genius exhibition. — Korax1214 (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just found and added such a citation, and amended the article accordingly. — Korax1214 (talk) 00:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The funfair

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

My family visited the funfair in the 1950s travelling to the funfare by the "water bus" from Greenwich though and the visit has left me with some strong memories.

The first was the sheer cost of everything. There always seemed to be far more people watching rather using or going on anything. My father reckoned that a working mans weeks wages could be gone in an hour so it was a rare visit by any working class family.

There was a stand where a spring gun fired tennis balls at moving model tanks at the back of the stall. Another was two seater aeroplanes which as they rotated around a centre spindle also periodically turned upside down.

Even in the 1950s the "scenic railway" was known for its violent curves and dips. Around the exit were plenty of benches and buckets for help in recovering from those same violent motions.AT Kunene (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battersea Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.number10.gov.uk/history-and-tour/prime-ministers-in-history/duke-of-wellington

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Battersea Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battersea Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140922094724/http://www.london-today.net/web/events/may/30/00003005/3076205540.html to http://www.london-today.net/web/events/may/30/00003005/3076205540.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/info/200073/parks_and_open_spaces/266/battersea_park/8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic