Talk:B. Kwaku Duren

Neutrality box

Box was added October 2010; no issues identified on discussion page. Any objection to removing box? David Watson (talk) 08:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I added the POV tag. The POV of the article is self-evident and I was hoping to attract editors willing to work on the lack of refs and POV. Perhaps a WP:PUFF tag would be more appropriate. Either way, the article needs work.--S. Rich (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)01:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

To give one example of the self-evident (e.g., "egregious") POV in this article, please look at footnote 8. "For another example of an egregious police killing . . .." Removal of the POV tag is not appropriate.--S. Rich (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on B. Kwaku Duren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130323112047/http://wavenewspapers.com:80/opinion/bottom_line/article_fa0d14ac-8cd0-11e2-8e55-0019bb30f31a.html to http://wavenewspapers.com/opinion/bottom_line/article_fa0d14ac-8cd0-11e2-8e55-0019bb30f31a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)