Talk:Anti-personnel weapon

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anti-personnel weapon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

What to do?

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What should we do w/ this article? It doesn't have any sources or much interest, seemingly. :( Maybe it should be deleted? Or roll much of its text into bigger, more established articles? idk... Az x2 16:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If kept it would benefit from aggressive copy-editing. Stylistically it is rather chatty, not the right tone for an encyclopedia article. DCDuring (talk) 15:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic