Talk:2011 Cricket World Cup/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Bill william compton in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bill william compton (talk · contribs) 15:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Article is lacking inline citations for many facts, including several entire paragraphs and sections. There is still too much work to do. I'm failing this article.
- Pass/Fail:
- Few points for the betterment
- Use properly formatted inline citation for each and every fact.
- The prose still needs quite a bit of work, including through copy editing.
- Expand sections like "Format", "Opening ceremony", "Venues", "Squads", etc. Add a section for the closing ceremony.
- Can you kindly explain? Then I'll see what I can do. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 16:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- This article still needs a lot of work. Please reevaluate WP:WIAGA before renominating. I'd love to see a cricket world cup article as a GA. — Bill william comptonTalk 16:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Can you kindly explain? Then I'll see what I can do. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 16:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC)