User contributions for NuclearUmpf

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

19:30, 11 July 2010 Tiptoety talk contribs changed block settings for NuclearUmpf talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Promised intent to disrupt per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NuclearUmpf&curid=9065305&diff=109589639&oldid=109589213)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

16:1516:15, 20 February 2007 diff hist +2 Talk:September 11 attacks →Comments on draft (continued): refactored per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2006/Candidate_statements/Questions_for_MONGO]
14:3414:34, 20 February 2007 diff hist +43 Views on military action against Iran cited who
14:3314:33, 20 February 2007 diff hist +978 Views on military action against Iran readded poll, polls are valid sources when its stated who did the poll and its a WP:RS source as Rueters and Zogby are. I added the 56% as noted by GabrielF, complete information is required as noted.
14:2014:20, 20 February 2007 diff hist −302 9/11 conspiracy theories →Origins and reception: rv bad faith edit.
13:5413:54, 20 February 2007 diff hist +1,193 Talk:September 11 attacks →Comments on draft (continued): possible middleground

19:2619:26, 18 February 2007 diff hist +78 Jeff Rense provided citations, luckily people are WP:RS for what they say and do.
15:3415:34, 18 February 2007 diff hist +133 Operation Gladio he is also a catholic, but its not relevant to the article.
15:2215:22, 18 February 2007 diff hist +37 Hijackers in the September 11 attacks →The Hamburg cell and other conspirators: wikilink to aq summit article

20:3620:36, 17 February 2007 diff hist +177 September 11 attacks rv
16:3216:32, 17 February 2007 diff hist +179 September 11 attacks external links are not limited to 1 article, and its BBC so it passes WP:RS. Thank you for the suggestion however
16:2616:26, 17 February 2007 diff hist −576 World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories addressed already, please do not ignore your fellow editors
11:5611:56, 17 February 2007 diff hist +434 User talk:Snowolfd4 →[[Allegations of mass graves at Chemmani]]: note
11:5111:51, 17 February 2007 diff hist +125 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Possible COI to edit protected article: +1 link
11:5011:50, 17 February 2007 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Possible COI to edit protected article: typo
11:5011:50, 17 February 2007 diff hist +2,092 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Requesting immediate semi-protect: +1
02:1502:15, 17 February 2007 diff hist −32 Template:911ct better yet
02:1402:14, 17 February 2007 diff hist −35 Template:911ct middleground?
01:2501:25, 17 February 2007 diff hist +330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starslip Crisis (2nd nomination) →[[Starslip_Crisis]]: note x2
01:2301:23, 17 February 2007 diff hist +191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starslip Crisis (2nd nomination) →[[Starslip_Crisis]]: K
00:1900:19, 17 February 2007 diff hist +387 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Suppression of Notification to Users Whose Edits are Subject to AfD/DRV: response

21:5821:58, 16 February 2007 diff hist +1,310 Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons →Reason for distinction between living vs. dead people?: questions
21:4721:47, 16 February 2007 diff hist +243 Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories →Request from user talk page: response
21:4421:44, 16 February 2007 diff hist +266 Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories →Request from user talk page: response
21:2021:20, 16 February 2007 diff hist +1,113 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Suppression of Notification to Users Whose Edits are Subject to AfD/DRV: response
20:2420:24, 16 February 2007 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction →Community discussion on [[User:NuclearUmpf]]: typo
20:2420:24, 16 February 2007 diff hist +608 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction →Community discussion on [[User:NuclearUmpf]]: add
20:2020:20, 16 February 2007 diff hist +2,696 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction →Community discussion on [[User:NuclearUmpf]]: stop lying
20:1820:18, 16 February 2007 diff hist −3 User:Zer0faults sigh, your gonig to get a block for vandalism 3RR does not extend to users keeping their talk page how they want it
20:1620:16, 16 February 2007 diff hist −3 User:Zer0faults dont touch =)
20:1320:13, 16 February 2007 diff hist +1,344 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Suppression of Notification to Users Whose Edits are Subject to AfD/DRV: responses
20:0220:02, 16 February 2007 diff hist +825 Killian documents authenticity issues →Inter-character spacing: readded newcomer information + provided citation for claim that is his a pioneer in the field.
19:5019:50, 16 February 2007 diff hist +300 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Suppression of Notification to Users Whose Edits are Subject to AfD/DRV: add
19:4919:49, 16 February 2007 diff hist +48 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Suppression of Notification to Users Whose Edits are Subject to AfD/DRV: little clarity
19:4819:48, 16 February 2007 diff hist +774 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Suppression of Notification to Users Whose Edits are Subject to AfD/DRV: possibly you were
18:0718:07, 16 February 2007 diff hist +706 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →How RunedChozo was and should be handled: +1
17:5617:56, 16 February 2007 diff hist +1,003 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →How RunedChozo was and should be handled: +1
17:4217:42, 16 February 2007 diff hist +556 Wikipedia:Adminship survey/O →Agree: +1
17:3917:39, 16 February 2007 diff hist +911 Wikipedia:Adminship survey/N →Yes: +1
17:3617:36, 16 February 2007 diff hist +299 Wikipedia:Adminship survey/M →Admins are doing a good job, but there are some bad eggs that should be removed: +1
17:3317:33, 16 February 2007 diff hist +183 Wikipedia:Adminship survey/I →Agree: +1
17:3217:32, 16 February 2007 diff hist +129 Wikipedia:Adminship survey/H →No: +1
17:2917:29, 16 February 2007 diff hist +438 Wikipedia:Adminship survey/G →No: +1

User contributions for NuclearUmpf

20 February 2007

19 February 2007

18 February 2007

17 February 2007

16 February 2007