User contributions for Keted6

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

18:31, 1 May 2013 Master of Puppets talk contribs blocked Keted6 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Edit warring)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:4518:45, 1 May 2013 diff hist +101 User talk:Keted6 →April 2013
17:2217:22, 1 May 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ Undid revision 552261611 by DD2K (talk) they weren't given on the talk page. it was all off-topic and didn't address this removal. nothing in the edit summaries does either
17:2117:21, 1 May 2013 diff hist −33 Pythagoras (freedman) Undid revision 551830769 by Pass a Method (talk) not enough info on him for this category, all that's known is that he was married to Nero
17:1917:19, 1 May 2013 diff hist +108 Talk:Barack Obama →FAQ

11:0111:01, 26 April 2013 diff hist −8 History of the United States →Great Recession and Barack Obama: removed repetitive word
10:5710:57, 26 April 2013 diff hist −8,456 User talk:Keted6 ←Blanked the page
10:5610:56, 26 April 2013 diff hist −553 User talk:Keted6 Undid revision 552205346 by Pass a Method (talk) your blind reverts are disruptive
10:5510:55, 26 April 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ Undid revision 552204837 by Pass a Method (talk) still no reason given. literally nobody has given a reason for this to stay

23:4723:47, 25 April 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ how consensus works? there hasn't been any arguments in favour of keeping this either in the edit summaries of this page or the discussion on the talk page. go ahead and check; no arguments at all
22:4422:44, 25 April 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ as only 2 people responded and they were off-topic i'm removing again - "the FAQ shouldn't make out as if people ask for less criticism/controversy when that doesn't and cannot happen"
20:5620:56, 25 April 2013 diff hist 0 Les Misérables (2012 film) most (a majority) of critics didn't criticise Crowe's performance
20:5420:54, 25 April 2013 diff hist +7 Les Misérables (2012 film) →Critical response: 70% isn't critical acclaim

17:1917:19, 24 April 2013 diff hist −34 Alexander the Great Undid revision 551830018 by Pass a Method (talk) there's very little evidence (arguably none) that he had homosexual relationships so the category is inappropriate

23:5023:50, 23 April 2013 diff hist +156 Talk:Barack Obama →"Kill list"
23:4523:45, 23 April 2013 diff hist +122 Talk:Barack Obama →"Kill list"
19:0419:04, 23 April 2013 diff hist +538 Talk:Barack Obama →Proposal
18:5718:57, 23 April 2013 diff hist −13 Gonzales v. Carhart →Decision: changed to what the statement said
17:4617:46, 23 April 2013 diff hist +148 Gonzales v. Carhart Undid revision 551827980 by Strike Eagle (talk) this belongs in the lead
16:4616:46, 23 April 2013 diff hist +39 Talk:Barack Obama →Proposal: clearer
16:4316:43, 23 April 2013 diff hist +148 Gonzales v. Carhart taken form main body
16:3916:39, 23 April 2013 diff hist +669 Talk:Barack Obama →FAQ
16:3516:35, 23 April 2013 diff hist +273 Talk:Barack Obama →Proposal
00:3900:39, 23 April 2013 diff hist −499 Boy Scouts of America membership controversies →Local Adaptations: as individual troops don't decide policy or have any influence on its practice in local chapters, this is irrelevant
00:3700:37, 23 April 2013 diff hist −54 Boy Scouts of America membership controversies →2012 — Present: removed part of Gates' statement as that bit holds little value. i went to the source and the word negatively isn't bold
00:2100:21, 23 April 2013 diff hist −310 Gonzales v. Carhart that's potentially misleading, as it can easily be read to mean that the procedure was preventing harm to the woman (due to the wide association of abortion in cases that threat to the woman's life), which is not true, according to the legislation

23:0323:03, 22 April 2013 diff hist +337 Talk:Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki →which
22:1522:15, 22 April 2013 diff hist +468 Talk:Barack Obama →have the objecting editors been satisfied?
22:0922:09, 22 April 2013 diff hist +471 Talk:Barack Obama →FAQ
21:5421:54, 22 April 2013 diff hist +769 Talk:Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki →which
21:4621:46, 22 April 2013 diff hist +829 Talk:Barack Obama →FAQ: new section
21:2921:29, 22 April 2013 diff hist −438 Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki just did. the image and story don't say it was in response to any officials. even if you correct it by changing it to "reports", it's too vague and irrelevant
21:2521:25, 22 April 2013 diff hist −12 Christianity and homosexuality →The Bible and homosexuality: don't have to be conservative to interpret this the usual way

22:1022:10, 21 April 2013 diff hist 0 m User talk:Keted6 →Blocked
22:0922:09, 21 April 2013 diff hist +229 User talk:Keted6 →Blocked: evil has been done this day
20:2420:24, 21 April 2013 diff hist +7 User talk:Bbb23 →Can: clarify
20:2320:23, 21 April 2013 diff hist +186 User talk:Bbb23 →Can
20:1920:19, 21 April 2013 diff hist +281 User talk:Bbb23 →Can
20:1220:12, 21 April 2013 diff hist +28 Adoption it says in plain English that it look the role of "adopter" which means it practiced adoption. definitely belongs in the lead considering this it's the origin of adoption in Europe
20:0720:07, 21 April 2013 diff hist −11 Bridegroom word repetition and this is simpler wording
19:5919:59, 21 April 2013 diff hist +28 Adoption here's from the main body: "many of Europe's abandoned and orphaned children became alumni of the Church, which in turn took the role of adopter"
19:5719:57, 21 April 2013 diff hist −438 Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki no, it simply has an image of a birth certificate, it doesn't say it was used to refute anything and the source I gave in the last edit summary contradicts the un-sourced statement you're trying to add
19:4019:40, 21 April 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ "slanted both way" doesn't reveal much. if there's no criticism or controversy then no question will come up asking for less, so it shouldn't be in FAQ (frequently asked questions)
19:3819:38, 21 April 2013 diff hist −438 Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki Undid revision 551503529 by Pass a Method (talk) source isn't good enough, also see this for a different reason: [http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2097899,00.html] given
19:3119:31, 21 April 2013 diff hist +28 Adoption Undid revision 551501816 by Dominus Vobisdu (talk) no, it forms the lead as a summary of the main body. there is enough info on the Catholic Church in the main body for these 4 words
19:2919:29, 21 April 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ Undid revision 551501061 by Dominus Vobisdu (talk) still no reason given
19:2819:28, 21 April 2013 diff hist −438 Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki Undid revision 551497497 by Pass a Method (talk) that's not why i removed it though. also, see sources, second is just an image so cannot be used for that claim
19:0419:04, 21 April 2013 diff hist −15 Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ Undid revision 551496933 by Pass a Method (talk) ??? if there's no criticism or controversy mentioned then nobody can ask that there be much less
18:2518:25, 21 April 2013 diff hist −1 Ban Ki-moon →LGBT rights: only homosexuality is mentioned
18:0218:02, 21 April 2013 diff hist +1 m Mining in Australia No edit summary
17:3917:39, 21 April 2013 diff hist +28 Adoption the Roman Empire is un-sourced at that spot too but you only removed the Catholic one... there's information in the main body about the Church and it's history of adoption

User contributions for Keted6

1 May 2013

26 April 2013

25 April 2013

24 April 2013

23 April 2013

22 April 2013

21 April 2013