User contributions for 198.53.108.48

13 August 2021

• 02:1602:16, 13 August 2021 diff hist +2 User talk:198.53.108.48 spacing
• 02:1402:14, 13 August 2021 diff hist +2,216 User talk:198.53.108.48 i am not going to dispute the reason given by highinbc, but people are making such a fuss about the username thing. my thing is this: give me the username i want. i showed the 'play on words' is not racist if people want to interpret negatively.
• 02:0002:00, 13 August 2021 diff hist +2,038 User talk:198.53.108.48 now i have seen it all. instead of rebutting the claim with evidence, a threat of an indefinite ban looms for demonstrating wigger is not racist. not a good look, if you ask me.
• 01:5001:50, 13 August 2021 diff hist +120 User talk:198.53.108.48 lol
• 01:1601:16, 13 August 2021 diff hist +339 Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations it seems some users want to make large claims about a term being racist, which i demonstrated was provably false, then run away from their own argument. it is undeniably low intelligence to start off sourcing an argument and then remove others' better sources because you've been defeated.
• 01:1301:13, 13 August 2021 diff hist +107 User talk:Jacona →3RR, come on "hero": new section Tag: Reverted
• 01:1201:12, 13 August 2021 diff hist +6,587 Talk:Wigger you have no right to remove well-sourced statements disputing your foolish claims, "hero" Tags: Undo Reverted
• 00:1800:18, 13 August 2021 diff hist +149 Talk:Wigger just expressing my shock and awe at whatever mental discourse was exercised by the intervenor prior to their unjustified, unfounded and rude statements. Tag: Reverted
• 00:1500:15, 13 August 2021 diff hist +6,438 Talk:Wigger →the etymology of the term wigger: new section Tag: Reverted

12 August 2021

• 23:2423:24, 12 August 2021 diff hist +195 Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations letting this foolish person know that his claim there are "many more available" sources means nothing, and that providing two does not make his/her case. go make your argument on the wigger talk page and have it changed, then i'll concede. cheapskate
• 23:1923:19, 12 August 2021 diff hist +318 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard just stating i'd like robert mcclenon to act as a judge if necessary. otherwise it's off to the "court of appeal wannabes" aka arbitration committee. their WP:ANI discussions are so funny lol. calm down guys, you aren't the second highest court of last resort lol
• 22:0422:04, 12 August 2021 diff hist +431 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard just a question about the avenues available should i elect to do RfC or 'failed'
• 21:0221:02, 12 August 2021 diff hist −499 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard better? i reduced a bit. not much i can do here. the quotes are what are throwing you off. but they are important since it seems to me you're not reading the original talk page stuff
• 20:5420:54, 12 August 2021 diff hist +201 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard !?
• 18:3218:32, 12 August 2021 diff hist +4,429 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard wasn't aware i had to participate in the second round, i thought my original response would be analysed in conjunction with their expected responses. no matter.
• 18:0318:03, 12 August 2021 diff hist +15 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard just add a tag

10 August 2021

• 23:1823:18, 10 August 2021 diff hist +285 Lost Souls (Doves album) what an album. over 18 months after my first thorough listen i'm still left mesmerised. truly worthy of comparison to definitely maybe.
• 23:0223:02, 10 August 2021 diff hist +630 Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations sorry bud. two sources don't make a wp:npov valid
• 18:0718:07, 10 August 2021 diff hist +892 Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations just using wikipedia's own pages to prove my point. wigger is neither a racial epithet or slur.
• 17:4817:48, 10 August 2021 diff hist 0 User talk:Acroterion sometimes you just get fired up reading stuff
• 17:3717:37, 10 August 2021 diff hist +945 User talk:Acroterion →whigger is not a racial insult: new section

7 August 2021

• 21:0721:07, 7 August 2021 diff hist +81 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster he's so weird. spacing wins every time. i don't know who likes paragraphs over well-spaced bulleted text
• 18:4518:45, 7 August 2021 diff hist +2,632 Bob Rae remove bland sentence describing scattish bob's radical shift from 1991-1993, providing an a brief+fair of the genesis for his social contract, which, as i understand it, was caused by a davos visit. i welcome improved placement of the text, since page fragments the temporal organisation by categorising events by policy. there's no doubt this text deserves to be here.
• 01:2701:27, 7 August 2021 diff hist +234 Product Red torn, fkn number 2. i hate you. but i love you. but then i hate you. but then i realised you could have died and i would have cried, so i can't hate you. but i do. what do i do. arse

6 August 2021

• 18:1618:16, 6 August 2021 diff hist −1 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster fix typo
• 18:1518:15, 6 August 2021 diff hist +3,460 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster my own response to the recommended compromise, which i am not happy with. i explain why.

5 August 2021

• 20:2720:27, 5 August 2021 diff hist +2,377 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster add some more on safety in fletcher's own words using a philadelphia inquirer article that states "safety was never a concern". like, outrageous.
• 20:1420:14, 5 August 2021 diff hist −3,173 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster Undid revision 1037312197 by 198.53.108.48 (talk) i'll wait. maybe they can fit it in elsewhere. i'm going to do more research. Tags: Undo section blanking
• 19:5519:55, 5 August 2021 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard fix small linking issue.
• 19:5419:54, 5 August 2021 diff hist +3,173 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster i think you're missing the point here. the only way for the competitors to voice this concern, if i understand correctly, was through the RFP complaint process. there was no other official avenue to lodge this concern. anyway i've put this to DR Tags: Undo Reverted
• 19:5319:53, 5 August 2021 diff hist +3,570 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster: new section
• 19:4419:44, 5 August 2021 diff hist +342 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster just making it abundantly clear that, from what i understand, you cannot launch a complaint to nasa in response to an RFP. this is the whole point of the GAO: to investigate the complaint.
• 19:4119:41, 5 August 2021 diff hist +194 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster going to dispute resolution
• 18:0118:01, 5 August 2021 diff hist +265 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster add gao report ref. fix typo and spacing. this fits perfectly now since it's temporally consistent and should rightly be the "first point of concern" when discussing the disaster, especially when concerns about multiple aspects of the design. Tag: Reverted
• 17:5717:57, 5 August 2021 diff hist +2,908 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster re-introduce text discussing the contested SRB RFP that was investigated by the GAO. this time with the requested evidence that another company voiced concern over the O-ring design in 1973 during the process, ultimately establishing the causative element requested by two editors on the talk page. Tag: Reverted
• 17:5617:56, 5 August 2021 diff hist +2,030 Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster per PRI-21-182 from the GAO, apparently they have no documents on file for B-173677. found another source from the nytimes that states exactly what is needed anyways. notifying about insertion.
• 01:1901:19, 5 August 2021 diff hist +742 User talk:Oshwah →checkuser request?: new section
• 01:1601:16, 5 August 2021 diff hist −778 User talk:198.53.108.48 responded on your talk page. i just feel more comfortable that way, mr admin. hopefully ol' wally gorlitz of ottawa will not engage in such conduct again :) Tag: Manual revert
• 01:1501:15, 5 August 2021 diff hist +2,043 User talk:Acroterion →hi friend: new section
• 00:2900:29, 5 August 2021 diff hist −4 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents format Tag: Reverted
• 00:2900:29, 5 August 2021 diff hist +3,075 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents respond to vquakr and then make a ping to acroterion. vacuous invocations of a warning are a violation. how is that not a threat? even if it is not "actionable" in the sense of sanction, it must be discouraged. oh look quakr, i wasn't banned. stop acting like you know everything Tag: Reverted

4 August 2021

• 23:5723:57, 4 August 2021 diff hist +963 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents my unease, with respect to the erratic user's sudden participation, has subsided. though i do find their contributions contributions equally erratic and puzzling, but that is neither here nor there. sorry for that little interruption.
• 23:3523:35, 4 August 2021 diff hist +730 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents very interesting user who hasn't edited in a month coming out of the woodwork. who is this person? they have little activity and show up rarely. can anyone checkuser?
• 23:1323:13, 4 August 2021 diff hist −1,480 User talk:198.53.108.48 telling someone to lighten up is not a personal attack, nor is it a basis to warn someone and inflate the warning count. in my view, this should be interpreted as a threat by weaponising wikipedia policy, something it seems you have frequently done in the past. Tag: Manual revert
• 23:1223:12, 4 August 2021 diff hist +820 User talk:Walter Görlitz/Archived Talk to 2021-12 →allegation of personal attack: new section Tag: Reverted
• 23:1223:12, 4 August 2021 diff hist +2,318 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Walter Görlitz attempting to inflate the unofficial 'warning count' on my talk page: new section
• 22:5322:53, 4 August 2021 diff hist +273 User talk:198.53.108.48 lol wtf? where is the personal attack? it seemed like a pretty reasonable response Tag: Reverted
• 20:5520:55, 4 August 2021 diff hist −25 Dimitri Bertsekas remove the COI tag. yes dr bertsekas probably did edit this article under 'bdpmit' in 2013, 2015, and far less under dpbert (last edit 2019). either way the article is very brief, accurate, does not use flowery language and probably underemphasises his influence in the listed areas. Tag: COI template removed
• 20:0520:05, 4 August 2021 diff hist +692 Talk:Probability theory just providing people the actual diff that has been used on multiple pages, usually in the history section, to support a flawed and inaccurate POV. this should be used by other editors to keep a keen eye on the problem. it may happen again.
• 20:0020:00, 4 August 2021 diff hist −426 Timeline of scientific discoveries remove spurious citations that are derived from a flawed basis that originated from the 20 april 2019 edit on the cryptography page that perverted the Kahn citation and used the inaccurate/grandiose broemeling citation to bolster the unsubstantiated claim. Tag: section blanking