Lived experience leadership

Lived experience leadership (or consumer leadership, service user leadership, or patient leadership) in development, delivery, or evaluation of health policy, services, research or education refers to the application of collective experiential knowledge and expertise to decision-making and agenda-setting processes in health services and systems. [1] It differs from patient engagement and involvement initiatives, in which people with lived experience are more tokenistically consulted in initiatives with other health professionals maintaining decision-making power. [2]

Definitions and Origin

edit

There is a history of advocacy to redress systemic oppression against mental health consumers going back at least to civil rights movements of the 1960s. While mental health policies and services started to consider consumer engagement at this time,[3]and the world's first identified lived experience academic position was developed and implemented at the University of Melbourne in 2000,[4] it was not until 2005 that the concept of consumer leadership was first explicitly proposed in the academic literature by Sarah Gordon, a service user academic based at the University of Otago.[5] Gordon identified that a paradigm shift from engagement or participation to leadership - such that people with lived experience could use that in decision-making processes - would be needed to realise the benefits of lived experiential expertise and to meet policy directives for lived experience involvement.

The concept and practice of lived experience leadership has largely developed within the mental health space.[3] However, across other marginalised groups and advocates, there has been increasing interest in lived experience leadership, including in other parts of the sector such as palliative care[6] or health more broadly,[7] and among, for instance, others who have been marginalised such as people who have experienced homelessness,[8] or people who have experienced incarceration.[9]

Lived experience leadership is often confused or conflated with other participatory approaches, including patient and public involvement, co-production, or co-design.[2] A key distinction between lived experience leadership and other approaches in which other health professionals (i.e., those not working from lived experience perspectives) control health systems and initiatives relates to the extent to which decision-making power and resources are shared. Approaches controlled by other health professionals, in which people with lived experience are kept out of decision-making and agenda-setting roles or processes, have been criticised for such tokenism.[10]

Characterising Lived Experience Leadership

edit

Seminal research into establishing definitions of lived experience leadership has identified key characteristics of it relating to roles, requirements, purpose, and process.[1]

Roles

edit

Lived experience leadership can be enacted through a variety of roles, but it is not role-dependant.[1] While obvious examples of roles in which lived experience leadership may be practiced are senior health positions requiring lived experience,[11] [12] it could also take place in representative roles, or in the absence of formal roles.

Requirements

edit

The requirements for lived experience leadership appear to be lived experience and leadership capacity.[1] To be considered lived experience leadership, the application of lived experiential expertise should take into not only one's own experiences, but also the synthesis of collective lived experiences.[13]

Purpose

edit

The purpose of lived experience leadership is to effect change to improve the circumstances of other service users. [1] Some identified changes brought about by lived experience leadership include contributions to human rights agendas, bridging between services and service users for more meaningful service provision, and less restrictive practices in healthcare.[14]

Process

edit

Lived experience leadership is performed through a variety of processes, namely through collaboration, direct or indirect influence over decision-making, application of lived experience, and development of inclusive cultures.[1] Health systems and organisations usually exclude people with lived experience from decision-making structures. However, evidence suggests that recognising the expertise of people with lived experience, and providing resources or opportunities for them to be able to drive health system agendas is a step towards supporting their leadership.[15]

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d e f Stewart, Stephanie; Scholz, Brett; Gordon, Sarah; Happell, Brenda (February 2019). "'It depends what you mean by leadership': An analysis of stakeholder perspectives on consumer leadership". International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 28 (1): 339–350. doi:10.1111/inm.12542. PMID 30281898.
  2. ^ a b Scholz, Brett; Stewart, Stephanie; Pamoso, Aron; Gordon, Sarah; Happell, Brenda; Utomo, Bagus (February 2024). "The importance of going beyond consumer or patient involvement to lived experience leadership". International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 33 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1111/inm.13282. PMID 38131453.
  3. ^ a b Scholz, Brett; Gordon, Sarah; Happell, Brenda (February 2017). "Consumers in mental health service leadership: A systematic review". International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 26 (1): 20–31. doi:10.1111/inm.12266. PMID 28093883.
  4. ^ Scholz, Brett (May 5, 2022). "We have to set the bar higher: towards consumer leadership, beyond engagement or involvement". Australian Health Review. 46 (4): 509–512. doi:10.1071/AH22022. PMID 35508415.
  5. ^ Gordon, Sarah (December 2005). "The Role of the Consumer in the Leadership and Management of Mental Health Services". Australasian Psychiatry. 13 (4): 362–365. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1665.2005.02215.x. PMID 16403131.
  6. ^ Scholz, Brett; Bevan, Alan; Georgousopoulou, Ekavi; Collier, Aileen; Mitchell, Imogen (September 2019). "Consumer and carer leadership in palliative care academia and practice: A systematic review with narrative synthesis". Palliative Medicine. 33 (8): 959–968. doi:10.1177/0269216319854012. PMID 31199194.
  7. ^ Edwards, R., Parham, J., Wells, L. (2022). The Australian conusmer leadership experience. Consumers Health Forum of Australia. https://chf.org.au/publications/australian-consumer-leadership-experience
  8. ^ Andrews, Cal; Heerde, Jessica A (2021). "A role for lived experience leadership in Australian homelessness research". Parity. 34 (6): 22–23.
  9. ^ Buck, Gillian; Ryan, Kemi; Ryan, Natasha (March 17, 2023). "Practicing Lived Experience Leadership with Love: Photovoice Reflections of a Community-Led Crime Prevention Project". The British Journal of Social Work. 53 (2): 1117–1141. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcac174.
  10. ^ Ocloo, Josephine; Garfield, Sara; Franklin, Bryony Dean; Dawson, Shoba (December 2021). "Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews". Health Research Policy and Systems. 19 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3. PMC 7816359. PMID 33472647.
  11. ^ "Job Advert".
  12. ^ "Mary O'Hagan as the Victorian Government's first Executive Director of Lived Experience". November 11, 2021.
  13. ^ Stewart, S., Warner, T., Griffiths, S., Edan, V., Makuvachuma, D., Scholz, B., Roper, C., & Kennedy, H. (2023). Power of Self as the Resource and the North Star: A Discursive Analysis of Lived Experience Leaders’ Constructions of Lived Experience Leadership. International Mad Studies Journal, 1(1).
  14. ^ Byrne, Louise; Stratford, Anthony; Davidson, Larry (March 2018). "The global need for lived experience leadership". Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 41 (1): 76–79. doi:10.1037/prj0000289. PMID 29494198.
  15. ^ Scholz, Brett; Bocking, Julia; Happell, Brenda (February 2018). "Improving exchange with consumers within mental health organizations: Recognizing mental ill health experience as a 'sneaky, special degree'". International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 27 (1): 227–235. doi:10.1111/inm.12312. PMID 28145617.