| Submission declined on 4 November 2024 by Pokelego999 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 25 December 2022 by JML1148 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by JML1148 22 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 May 2022 by Kaleeb18 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kaleeb18 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 4 May 2022 by Kaleeb18 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kaleeb18 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 April 2022 by Snowycats (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Snowycats 2 years ago. | |
Comment: There's some good sources in here (Such as the Variety one) but there are some uncited statements, sourcing to random Twitter accounts, a citation to Sportskeeda (An unreliable source) and many primary citations. There is additionally no Reception for the film, and what exists in most sections of the article hinges primarily on Variety. I feel with a few more similarly strong sources this has legs to stand on, but right now this needs work. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Although it is in a better state than earlier, it still fails NFILM because most sources are either unreliable or a failure of SIGCOV. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 21:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
| In Space with Markiplier | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Mark Fischbach |
| Written by | Mark Fischbach |
| Produced by | Amy Nelson (creative) Will Hyde (executive) Ben Curtis (executive) Ryan P. Hall (executive) Jordan Levin (executive) Marla Quintana Jeff Guerrero Evan Bilda (associate) |
| Starring |
|
| Cinematography | Jordan Bradley |
| Edited by | Kody Gibson Ryan Gould |
Production company | |
| Distributed by | YouTube Originals |
Release dates |
|
Running time | 120-180 minutes[a] |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
In Space with Markiplier is a 2022 two-part interactive comedy-science-fiction film written and directed by Mark Fischbach, better known by his online pseudonym Markiplier. The film stars Fischbach, as well as Steve Taylor, Mick Lauer, Lio Tipton, Linda Bradshaw and Pamela Horton in major roles, with several other content creators having cameo roles.
The film is a spiritual successor to Fischbach's 2019 film A Heist with Markiplier, and follows Mark, the head engineer, handing over the command of Invincible II to the Captain (the audience's lens), but catastrophe soon strikes.[1] Like Heist, it is split into several short videos, where each video has multiple end cards that will direct viewers to different timelines. Unlike his previous films, which branched into a variety of endings, both parts of In Space with Markiplier have fixed narrative endings as well as scenes the viewer is guaranteed to see, allowing for a cohesive narrative that spans across all possible paths.
Cast
edit- Mark Fischbach as Mark
- Jordan Bradley as Captain
- Lio Tipton as Lady
- Steve Taylor as Computer
- Rosanna Pansino as Scientist
- Morgan Simone as the Bandit
- Arin Hanson as Narrator / Dr. Cecil H.H. Mills
- Mick Lauer as Gunther B. Gunnerson / Detective
- Pamela Horton as Celcionna F. Kelvina
- Bob Muyskens as Burt
- Wade Barnes as Wug / Wubba
- Matthew Patrick as Mack / Theory Crew / Himself
- Holt Boggs as Shuttle Pilot
- Linda Bradshaw as Dorene L. Whitacre
- Ethan Nestor as Agent Crank / Wormhole
- Tyler Scheid as Agent Smiles
- Brian Wecht as Ninja Crew
- Dan Avidan as Sexy Crew
- Robert Rexx as Diner Staff
- Baldermort as Invincible Tower
- Michael, Andrew, and Evan Gregory as Bam Bam, Sparkles McGhee, and Cue Tip
- Mo Alfy as Joe / Murder Victim
- Sara Burke as Widow / Window Guard
- Carlos Pena, Roderick Loving, Jason Campbell, Judy Lee, Sophia Tinsley, Reggie Lussier, Kai Woodley, Gabriel Leite, Amani Alexander, Adam Weightman as Crew Members
Production
editDevelopment
editFischbach teased the idea of a sequel to A Heist with Markiplier in a December 2019 interview. He said, "If I do it again, and I might, I would wanna do it in an even better way than I did this time. And I have no idea what that means, and I have no idea how to say that, but, you know, if I did it again I would wanna surpass what I've already made."[2] Development began on a potential continuation. In June 2020, YouTube Originals announced their ordering of a second interactive special to be written by Fischbach and produced by Rooster Teeth.[3]
In January 2021, it was announced that YouTube Originals would be reducing its slate of upcoming content. As In Space with Markiplier was already contracted and ordered, its production was not affected.[4]
Filming
editSimilar to Heist, the film was produced by Rooster Teeth in Austin, Texas.[3] Burning Tractor provided visual effects, with owner Wes Meyers working as visual effects supervisor. "TBD Post" provided post-production. Both companies were involved in these same roles in Heist.
Marketing
editOn September 3, 2021, the first animated teaser was uploaded to Mark's YouTube channel, revealing the film's official title. On December 11, 2021, a second teaser was unveiled at the 11th Streamy Awards.[5] On March 4, 2022, the official trailer was released, announcing the release date of April 4, 2022, set to coincide with the 10 year anniversary of Fischbach's first YouTube video.[6] Prior to the initial release, much of the nature of the series was not revealed, including its two-part structure. In addition to online promotional material, the film was advertised by billboards in several locations in the United States,[7][8][9] some of which mirrored promotional materials for prior YouTube Originals.[10]
Reception
editAn estimated five hours after launch on October 30, 2019[11], Part One had 1.4 million views.[12] As of April 30th, 2023 Part One sits around 20 million views[13] while Part Two has 7.1 million.[14]
The series also received coverage from Variety, who noted the film's popularity in contrast to YouTube shifting its focus away from original programming.[15]. It was nominated in the 1st Children's and Family Emmy Awards for Outstanding Interactive Media.[16]
Awards and nominations
edit| Award | Category | Recipients | Result | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streamy Awards | Show of the Year | Mark Fischbach | Nominated | [17] |
| Scripted Series | Won | |||
| Children's and Family Emmy Awards | Outstanding Interactive Media | Mark Fischbach | Nominated | [18] |
References
edit- ^ Spangler, Todd (2022-04-05). "Markiplier Launches Interactive Sci-Fi Adventure 'In Space,' Part of YouTube's Scaled-Back Originals Slate". Variety. Retrieved 2023-05-01.
- ^ "Markiplier Reacts to 'Heist' Success and Teases a Potential Season 2 (Exclusive)". Entertainment Tonight. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
- ^ a b Spangler, Todd; Spangler, Todd (2020-06-25). "YouTube Orders New Demi Lovato Docuseries, Renews Shows With Markiplier, MrBeast and James Charles". Variety. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
- ^ "YouTube officially shuts down original content group". NBC News. 18 January 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
- ^ Markiplier's Sneak Peek of "In Space with Markiplier" | 2021 YouTube Streamy Awards, 11 December 2021, retrieved 2022-05-28
- ^ Beef, Kobi (4 April 2022). ""Happy 10 years": Valkyrae, Jacksepticeye and more react to Markiplier's 10th anniversary on YouTube". www.sportskeeda.com. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
- ^ "@joe07alvarado". Twitter. April 5, 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
- ^ "@inspacewmark". Twitter. April 5, 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
- ^ "@lyssini". Twitter. April 12, 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
- ^ "PewDiePie can't believe Markiplier "ripped off" his YouTube show billboard". Dexerto. 2022-05-19. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
- ^ "YouTube's first interactive special stars Markiplier and has 31 possible endings | The Star". thestar.com.my. Archived from the original on 2019-10-25. Retrieved 2020-10-08.
- ^ Spangler, Todd (2022-04-05). "Markiplier Launches Interactive Sci-Fi Adventure 'In Space,' Part of YouTube's Scaled-Back Originals Slate". Variety. Retrieved 2023-05-01.
- ^ Fischbach, Mark (2022-04-04). "In Space with Markiplier: Part 1". YouTube. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
- ^ Fischbach, Mark (2022-05-02). "In Space with Markiplier: Part 2". YouTube. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
- ^ Variety, Apr 4, 2022
- ^ Dresden, Hilton (2022-11-01). "Children's & Family Emmys: Netflix Leads Nominations for First Awards Ceremony". The Hollywood Reporter.
- ^ "12th Annual Streamy Nominees". The Streamy Awards. Archived from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2022-12-10.
- ^ "2022 CAFE Nominees (ALL) – The Emmys". theemmys.tv. November 2022. Archived from the original on 2023-02-10. Retrieved 2022-12-10.
- ^ A full playthrough of all options results in a runtime just short of 3 hours. A narrative playthrough of the main story (not including options) takes about one hour for each of the two parts
External links
editCategory:Interactive films Category:Films directed by Markiplier Category:Rooster Teeth