Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive711
Non Free File uploads
- Juandy004 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
I have noticed the number of non-free file's that this editor has been uploading and the number of times he has been notified and warned about them, can an administrator have a look and see if any action is or may be required. Mtking (talk) 03:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- I looked at his uploads. A small fraction are good, but he needs someone to explain the policy to him. If he dosen't get scared off by the wall of notices, explaining why his uploads are getting tagged beats blocking him. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive editing by User:Mayukh.infinity
This is only taking place in one article, which is Infinity (band). The problem is, this editor keeps replacing the original article content with this band that comes from India (see here for the diff). Whilst it was reverted once he has kept restoring his version of the content without explanation. [1] [2] and after a message was given to him (which was a request to create a separate article) he simply ignored the message and worked on his version of the article once again. [3], [4], [5], [6]. I heard that a couple of anonymous IPs are getting sick of his version of the article, and that is the reason why I'm bringing this incident here. Minima© (talk) 18:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- I suspect this is someone who doesn't understand what they are being told, so I've imposed a 48-hour edit-war block to at least stop it for now and hopefully get his attention - I'll keep the band article watched in case we get no response and he goes back to it after the block expires -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Words of dubious origin
Hi
There may be a need to remove this summary from the history [7] (right hand summary by User talk:Club Belgrano de Córdoba)
The word seems to be a little dubious [8] Chaosdruid (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've seen a lot worse in edit summaries that didn't get RevDel'd. Looks like a judgment call to me. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- We've got an essay with essentially that word in the title, so it really doesn't even come close to being a revdel candidate. —DoRD (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- We don't generally use revdel to remove profanity, even blatant profanity. Nothing compels it, we do have WP:NOTCENSORED after all. Revdel is reserved for something really horrendous or damaging (outing, defamation, etc.). -- Atama頭 22:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- We've got an essay with essentially that word in the title, so it really doesn't even come close to being a revdel candidate. —DoRD (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)