Content deleted Content added
Kaciemonster (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 61:
:::Using "Quinnspiracy" immediately places '''the victim of false accusations and harassment''' on the back foot, strongly implying that there is a "conspiracy" involving Quinn, when in reality, if anything there has been a conspiracy '''against''' Quinn. That wording is right out and unacceptable.
:::The fact that Gamergate supporters object to describing '''false accusations as false''' cannot, per [[WP:BLP]], result in us describing the accusations as anything but false. There is no valid reason to remove the word from the section, other than that Gamergate supporters don't like us accurately describing the fact that their accusations are false. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 19:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
::I chose the title "Quinnspiracy" for that section because I was trying to separate it from the events of Gamergate, since it happened before Gamergate actually existed. I don't think that it's "made-up bullshit as a 'conspiracy' in a section title" when that's what the early events were referred to as. I believe I only have that sourced to Reason right now, but I have a few other articles that I think can be used that referred to it as Quinnspiracy (I remember that I meant to add a Boston Globe article where it was mentioned, but I think I forgot to add it.)
::As for the TFYC quotes, I have an Erik Kain article where it's mentioned, and also a Vice article that mentions the "sabotaging" that can be added to the sources for it. That said, I chose to include TFYC's accusations to elaborate on the reasons for their feud with Quinn. I'm willing to remove the details about the feud, but at that point it would probably be reasonable to ask if they deserve more than a passing mention. [[User:Kaciemonster|Kaciemonster]] ([[User talk:Kaciemonster#top|talk]]) 19:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
| |||