Jim1138

Reply : Launched or delivered

Pakistan Navy Fleet Tanker launched news link: Pakistan Navy New Fleet Tanker Launched by Karachi Shipyard & Turkey's STM and Locheed Martin establishes Rotary and mission Systems news link: Lockheed Martin Establishes Rotary and Mission Systems Business Area 222.208.100.148 (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Reply : References

Most entries many contents haven't references (at least English Wikipedia), Why me must be add reference(s) ? However, I will add reference(s) when many references in same contents. 222.208.100.148 (222.208.100.148) 16:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Two years ago ...

"rv vand to last good version"
... you were recipient no. 952 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Live Aid

Any particular reason why you're continually supporting vandalism at Live Aid? Have you actually read the discussion on talk? 94.1.67.10 (talk) 08:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Krista K

Hi. I am looking at the content you restored to Krista K (diff) and trying to understand why you might think that any of it was good enough to bring back. The first part is mostly incorrect infobox parameters that don't work. Then there is some of the the most blatant puffery I have seen on Wikipedia (which is clearly either copied from a fan site or simply written by a fan) and finally a "fun facts" section which is simply not appropriate content for Wikipedia (and also reeks of being copied from a fan site). So I removed it all again. If you are convinced that there is anything legitimate in it (and I am not) please be much more selective about which parts you bring back and make sure to rewrite it neutral tone. To be honest the article still reads like fancruft and I think removing/rewriting poor content rather than adding more is the way to go here. DanielRigal (talk) 09:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

I agree with your assessment. I was focused on the "self published" in the ES, the refs didn't look self-published. I didn't look at content which I should have. Thanks for the clean-up and note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

The facts I put on Fawlty Towers--well, the source is already listed. You guys are the ones who got it all wrong. Terribly wrong. See, Andrew Sachs suffered second-degree burns to his body--not from the fire, but from the sulfuric acid that was applied to his allegedly fireproof jacket (to make it look like his Manuel character was on fire). And not on his hand. He had terrible pain and scars and the BBC paid him the royalty of seven-hundred pounds for damages. Scars which went away, but still... evidence? I believe you guys already have this, don't you? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8762883/Andrew-Sachs-suffered-burns-on-set-of-Fawlty-Towers.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.62.92.172 (talk) 04:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Siiiiiiiiilver Surffffeeeeer Intermission

"Silver Surfer Intermission" is not a name of a song. The track name is "Siiiiiiiiilver Surffffeeeeer Intermission" as it appears as metadata, on the physical album backing, and in all context of Kanye's album The Life of Pablo. 74.80.51.7 (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

EAE Business School

Hi Jimmy,

I'm changing your information because I think its a little outdate. I have references but you don't have done time to write its.

I would like to improve this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pili lau (talk • contribs) 07:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Maritime pilot

Hi Jim1138,

I edited your page to give more information to others about my profession. I am a maritime Pilot and I find that not many people are aware about the work and the responsibilities of a marine Pilot.

Have seen various websites trying to explain this job but most of them are only beating around the bush. Your page could be edited so I was trying to put in the exact nature of my job. I have been doing this work everyday for the past 20 years.

I am not going into the history of the job, neither am I talking from the legal point of view. I am only giving the practical point of view.

Rest your wish.

With regards, Capt. Rakesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.51.119.229 (talk) 09:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Change on the trinity

Hello, i gave a valid reason for why i edited the post . It simply is not-accurate i even gave bible acriptures to back it up which the post rarely does. Peaceinjesus7 (talk) 07:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@Peaceinjesus7: "Accurate content" is not a valid reason for removal. Please discuss your edit in talk:Trinity. See wp:BRD Jim1138 (talk) 07:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Shmetta (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, What is the reason for the page ISOJI not being allowed? I have structured it to be the same as an existing page with similar wording. Thanks

Isoji

@Jim1138: I recently started a page describing an apparel company. I had structured it to be in the same voice as another page started by founders of Ivory Ella. Why is it flagged for speedy deletion? Thanks.

Shmetta (talk) 08:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@Shmetta: You started Isoji? It appears that user talk:Jonathan isoji started the page. You are not even listed in the page's history. Jim1138 (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Asian Institute of Medical Sciences

Hi Jim, Can you please help me in adding this content. I have made some editions and I beg pardon if I have not followed any regulations. Kindly help me out in the same. Thanks 122.180.15.58 (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Using Wikipedia sa reference

I read an article guideline here on Wikipedia stating that we could use Wikipedia as reference for the citations is this true or not?Merkabaraphael21 (talk) 09:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@Merkabaraphael21: Per WP:CIRCULAR Do not use articles from Wikipedia (whether this English Wikipedia or Wikipedias in other languages) as sources. You can copy the references from the article into your article. Best to mention that you are doing so in the edit summary. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

unrepentant IP

Thank you, Jim1138, for reporting 174.105.181.77 at AIV. I've also started the second thread about that account this month at ANI [1]. I think all their edits need to be reviewed; alas, the list was appreciably shorter when I reported over a week ago. Cheers, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

editing

My editing is true bro sanjay 08:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjayshivalak (talk • contribs)

Mods & RockersColFergStod (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jim Excuse me if what I'm requesting is easy for some, but for me at 72 I'm struggling! I added an article to the page Mods & Rockers, and you have removed it temporarily, until I enter a reference/citation. I have attempted to find how to enter the details of my book on to Footnote, but I keep going round in circles. This is what I want to write, is this correct? Footnote: Stoddart, Colin (June 2016) 'Mods to Rockers' ISBN: 9781783019267 CHAP: 1,2 & 3 A) Is it OK to use CHAP: 1,2 & 3? b) If all OK and I copy, where or do I paste the details on the Mods & Rockers page, in the Footnote scetion? Thanks for you help. Regards Colin (Stoddart)

Fan Popo

Jim, the film-maker's name is Fan Popo, not Fan Pop. Please see the following sources:

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/sep/24/mama-rainbow-film-maker-sues-chinese-censors-over-ban-on-gay-themed-movie http://www.queercomrades.com/en/about/fan-popo/ http://www.cityweekend.com.cn/beijing/article/focus-filmmaker-fan-popo http://www.advocate.com/40-under-40-emerging-voices/2014/08/19/40-under-40-filmmaker-fan-popo-screens-hope-lgbts-china

A five-second search on your part would have confirmed this. I meant to make this change a long time ago, but I kept forgetting to do it.

Please reverse your reversal of my one-letter edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.63.148.184 (talk) 03:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

LiDAR

Thank you Jim. I agree. But my first task is to rewrite the article. It is a worthwhile article, but was a mess. We can decide later how much of it is how-to. Describing how LiDAR may be providing erroneous readings is not necessarily how-to, but I defer to those with greater experience.

Foucault (talk) 06:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I think I have completed the main rewrite. Still needs a lot more citations. I think the bit about Waze could be deleted. Let me know which other parts you think should come out.

Foucault (talk) 10:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Jim, I have left some comments on the LiDAR talk page. Please feel free to respond. Foucault (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Everton

Hi, having noticed your reverts of the previous edits to this article by User:2a02:c7d:dc08:8400:e172:2a32:158:a3f4, and examined his edits, all he is trying to do is update the kits in the infobox to the correct, current kits. May I suggest that rather than reverting due to lack of a source, perhaps either assist him in this change or direct him to his sandbox until he has perfected the change. A quick look at various other premier league club pages show that references are generally not required alongside the kits in infoboxes, however the everton fc website will confirm they are correct and needed changes, and is clearly a reliable source. I would assist myself, however due to work and other commitments, as well as inexperience in using colours on wiki, I would more than likely just screw it up completely. Thanks douts (talk) 14:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I definitely agree. I often help, but not nearly enough. I am primarily an WP:RCP and rather overwhelmed. I find the templating system wholly inadequate, often hostile, and repulsive to new editors who make minor errors. The system needs a major overhaul. Thanks for the message. Jim1138 (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Raffles College of Design and Commerce

Dear Jim

I wanted to let you know that I've undone the changes you made to the Raffles College of Design and Commerce page. This company has not lost their registration or accreditation and this can be easily verified on the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency website. The sentences you inserted into the page are therefore false and misleading, and breach the Terms of Use of Wikipedia. If you want to discuss further, please feel free to write to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.29.107 (talk) 01:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

The Quint - Objection to deletion

@Jim1138:

Hi Jim,

I created the page for quint but I didn't delete any content form The Quint wiki page.Also I mentioned many reference link for The Quint wiki page. Can you please tell me how can I improve this page to overcome the deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.23.114 (talk • contribs) 05:28 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Uploading and referencing

Hi Jim

I am a bit stuck.I uploaded an NHTSA manual to WikiCommons. It was on the NHTSA web site and seems to be a document the NHTSA want to make public, I am not sure if it was correct to upload to Commons or even Wikipedia. I have the Commons URL for the document. I now want to add it to the Lidar article references, but for the life of me I cannot get it to look half decent. Can you give me a hint. I am using Visual Editor and a Mac desktop.

Foucault (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

By the way I replied to your message on my talk page, but overlooked pinging you.

Foucault (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh. And it would be good to get those manuals you mentioned. Thank you for sourcing them.

Foucault (talk) 15:42, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

One of the things that seems to be a big deal in radar and lidar is cosine error. I have mentioned in the lidar article. The best way to reference it is to write a WP article on cosine error and link to it. So when I have polished off the lidar article (or someone else does, but I don't see anyone putting up their hand), I think I should write a new article on cosine error. To do that I am going to need to draw a bunch of diagrams, so learning that from the WP help articles is going to be a big treat!

Foucault (talk) 17:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

If it turns out to be OK to upload the NHTSA document, I have given some thought to the categorisation, in ascending order

device specifications -> lidar devices -> technology -> speed limit enforcement -> law enforcement -> US regulatory bodies -> society

What do you think?

Foucault (talk) 05:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I could avoid all of these problems by linking to the external source site. In most cases I have no choice as the source documents are copyright, my experience is that a lot of WP external links are broken, this is inevitable with the passage of time.

Foucault (talk) 06:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

OK. I am onto it now. I searched for "Referencing using Visual Editor" and finally came up with a decent help article. Foucault (talk) 04:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@PatrickFoucault: Sorry for not responding. I've been rather overwhelmed and overly tired. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I hope it is nothing serious and you soon feel better. When you get a chance have a look at the Lidar article. Although I have further work to do I have taken the liberty of removing all tags, please put them back if you feel removal was unwarranted. Foucault (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Larry Craig

Appreciate the humor. Well played. 107.77.230.37 (talk) 04:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138

No, I do not think it is a mistake, it was just the relevant information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.9.146 (talk) 09:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jim

Firstly, I wrote unnecessary information and my computer changed it due to chrome auto-fill. Secondly, I would appreciate it, if we can end this conversation.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.9.146 (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jim1138,

For the last time I will stop editing when you stop reverting the Irrelevant and Unnecessary Information, also I do not see what is wrong with my edit, I did not remove any Relevant Information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.9.146 (talk) 09:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Marvin Kaplan

The location of his death, Tarzana, CA, was posted on the Home Page of www.MarvinKaplan.com

Sree Sree Thakur Anukulchandra

The Sources provided for the data on the page is untrustable, and much from works of devotees and used as an advertisement, which violates secularity and nutrality of wikipedia, please do not change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek453 (talk • contribs) 07:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@Abhishek453: Nonsense. You deleted numerous book references as well. Jim1138 (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Sree Sree Thakur Anukulchandra This article Sree Sree Thakur Anukulchandra in Wikipedia is spreading superstition and working as an advertisement of a religious godman, who has nothing connection of social reformation or philanthropy. He is just a religious leader, nothing more than that.The references provided for meeting with famous people are totally false. The name of the books are articles written by him are published by his devotees and don't have global recognization like ISBN. The devotees are spreading wrong message through this article, as you can clearly see the neutrality disputed message in the wiki wall. Even they hide the fact of 6 marriages of the person when polygamy was banned in India at that time.Source Please correct this Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek453 (talk • contribs) 07:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@Abhishek453: I would agree that it seems rather poorly written. However, if you and/or I remove that content, it will simply be restored by one of his cronies. I would suggest you ask at the wp:teahouse or wp:help desk about what to do. Make your request clear by indicating what and why the sources are poor. It will likely take an administrator to keep it clean. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Edits on King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck

Hello, Thank you for your message. The removed portions do not have sources, and are most probably erroneous, as I have not seen similar information in any official materials. Hairwire (talk) 07:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

My edit.

121.98.24.90 (talk) 07:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Just asking, how was that source not notable?

@Jim1138:

Regarding to the article John Naisbitt University

Dear Jim,

Thank You very much for you suggestions.

I did not know for the summary page. I will take this into account.

I removed the text from the article because it references unrealibale sources. In Serbia, there is a great confilict between the remainins of Serbian Democracy Party and the current Serbian Progressive Party. The reference from the newspaper was created by Serbian Democracy Party and it has false information. This ruins the reputation of John Naisbitt University. We already took legal measures against this...

Warmest regards and thank you once again, Nebojsa Bacanin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nebojsabacanin (talk • contribs) 08:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

But, this article harms the University reputation. This article is full of lies and misuses. What kind of policy is that? You accept unrealiable references and sources. This is definitely for legal actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nebojsabacanin (talk • contribs) 08:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@Nebojsabacanin: Clear it up with Aljazeera. They are the ones reporting on the problem with Megatrend University. The Wikipedia article is just summarizing Aljazeera. [2]. It would not appear to be as you said: "is not valid.... and completely false" It sounds like Megatrend has some very serious issues. Jim1138 (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Have you seen Mića Jovanović? And there are more sources for the scandal that led to Mića Jovanović resigning. Doug Weller talk 14:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Alt-right

How are my alt-right edits original? Kashifv (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@Kashifv: This edit The source does not state "neoliberal" Jim1138 (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

I'll run all my edits past you can I use original alt-right sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kashifv (talk • contribs) 18:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Replying on Kashifv's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 20:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Qigang Chen

Hi Jim, Yes, we are working on a new website of Mr. Qigang CHEN which will be put online in September 2016. All my updates are based on this new website. Do you suggest me to do the content updates of Wikipedia after the release of the new site? Thanks for your guidance in advance. Best regards, GL — Preceding unsigned comment added by LLFCN (talk • contribs) 09:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Replied on LLFCN's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

about changes the Vietnamese Women's Content

The page I removed is not true about the museum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Le Cam Nhung (talk • contribs) 02:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

References CHEN Qigang

Hi Jim, I just cancelled a subject which was empty of content: the fact is there was nothing under "References" for CHEN Qigang. What's the value to keep it? I'm glad that you gave green light for my editing. Will continue the updates in the coming days. But frankly speaking, I'm not familiar with your reduction requirement. Will appreciate if you could give me some guidance or an example to get inspirations. Best regards, GL — Preceding unsigned comment added by LLFCN (talk • contribs) 10:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Error on YOUR part

I corrected the decorations because previous authors had placed multiple award stars in incorrect order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.167.113.116 (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

I've also corrected the placment and order of repeat service star awards.

I AM A U S NAVY VETERAN. WHOEVER PLACED THOSE AWARDS FOR MCPON GIORDANO DID SO INCORRECTLY. YOUR REVERSION FROM CORRECT ORDER AND PLACEMENT WAS JUST AS MUCH IN ERROR AS THE ORIGINAL POSTER. UNLESS YOU ARE A VETERAN, DO NOT CHANGE THE ORDER. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptSquid (talk • contribs) 23:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@CaptSquid: Actually, I am an Air Force veteran. However, I have no idea what the correct order is, nor do I care what the correct order is. In fact, I have no interest at all in boob candy. So, I am apparently qualified to set the order?

If you note the edit summary, I didn't undo the edit because it was "wrong". I undid it because the editor didn't bother to explain their actions with an wp:edit summary. Did you happen to note the Unexplained removal of content? Ever read the rules and procedures of Wikipedia, or are you just doing it Navy style?

Interesting that Hyman G. Rickover does not have images of his ribbons or awards. George Marshall has smaller award images. I see that John M. Richardson's medals are 80 pixels while William F. Moran's medals are 106 pixels. Since they have the same rank, shouldn't their medals be the same size? And since Steven S. Giordano is a lowly petty officer, shouldn't his medals be smaller then the admirals? Interesting that someone I nor many have never heard of have about the same number of medals as Rickover and Marshall?

BTW: is there something with your cap-key, or does the Navy always type in ALL-CAPS, aka "SHOUTING"?

Kelly Johnson of the Skunk Works "Never do business with the Navy". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Last Exit on Brooklyn change

It seems you have removed an addition to the Last Exit on Brooklyn site where I included the Espresso Float. As the manager of the Last Exit at the time it was moved and a long term patron I did not and do not think I need to cite myself as the source.

I have noticed significant changes to the page over time and the wholesale removal of information. If you were to look at the oldest pages (which I could not find in the "View History" section you will see my name, David Johnson, as the manager during the move.

My question to you, however, is - What gives? What makes you the arbitor of what is added to this page? Tell me what you know of the place? How do you verify the source information that others have provided? Is wikipedia no longer the open sourced place for information?

I am deeply offended that a place where I lived for over 26 years and where I worked for over 8 of them is no longer available to me for editing. I noticed that many of my past edits were removed.

We shall see how fast you respond to this as you had removed my post within about 1 minute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.149.161 (talk) 07:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Replied on user's talk page User talk:174.21.149.161. Jim1138 (talk) 18:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Never Contribute Jim1138

Jim1138, I do not like you so I am not going to talk to you because you are bad and disrespectful and rude and not polite at all. Wikipedia is a dangerous website for me due to you being a villain. Wikipedia is a bad website.

Says the block-evading sockpuppet. Sro23 (talk) 16:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Christchurch Harbour

Jim

Thanks for your message, just introducing some more facts regarding rights of use. The public right of navigation is not established and feel that any one equiring should have the facts available to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Portleypig (talk • contribs) 10:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit Warring

How long do I have to wait before a consensus is considered reached? The guy with a problem with the edit stopped contributing to the talk discussion.

Also, you wrote that, "The content was originally not there, so it needs to be left out until wp:consensus is reached. See wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle" however I would like to point out that the content was indeed there since February of this year, until it was removed by a vandal a few weeks ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:58C:C400:9DE0:ADEA:A945:784C:2D7D

Thus, all I tried to do was restore the removed content but the other guy keeps reverting it, without giving any reasons at all.

Thanks Marquis de Faux (talk) 03:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

greetings

thank you the welcome. Rigo cardiel (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

MONKEY KING

(Dear Jimmy, it was done by mistake from my child. but you can't compare Hanuman with monkey king. for hindu people hanuman is limit of strength, knowledge, speed, loyalty in simple word is Idle of perfect human living. he is not like monkey king,in most of movie i saw that monkey king is evil, who fight ageist god. hence i request you to delete reference of hanuman ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.248.14.26 (talk) 10:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

More updates for List of Cute High Earth Defense Club Love! episodes

Hey Jim I trying updating Season 2 episode list but for some reason the previews will not show. Can you update the episode list page again thanks.

Newest episodes for that page are:

Episode 08 - Love is Like the Snow Original Air Date = September 1, 2016 Episode 09 - The Chemical Substance of Love Episode 10 - September 15, 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pastellecandy10 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

@Pastellecandy10: The unfilled episodes are "commented out" with the use of "<!--" as the start of the commenting out, and "-->" (I added nowiki stuff so it would show here). To add a new episode, move the comment start <!-- down to the next unused episode block. Make sure that the table is closed with the |} and you should be set to update. Please use the "Show preview" button to check that the edit works. If you mess up the table format, you may see some of the stuff normally below the table included inside the table. If you can't figure it out, use your browser's go back button once or twice to restart. See help:table for more info. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)