Jezebel1349

Joined 30 November 2013

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jezebel1349 (talk | contribs) at 17:14, 6 December 2013 (→‎Attacks on editors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 10 years ago by Jezebel1349 in topic Attacks on editors

Jezebel1349, you are invited to the Teahouse

 

Hi Jezebel1349! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

 

Your recent editing history at Madai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

3rr warning on Madai

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Madai. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Your next revert, you will be reported for blocking. Blanking properly referenced info repeatedly just because you disagree with it is not considered acceptable here. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You distrupt the article with irrelevant informations and fringe theories. Jezebel1349 (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Attacks on editors

I strongly suggest you familiarize yourself with our basic policies such as not mounting attacks on other editors, other editors' contribs lists etc. or I predict it is you who will find yourself banned in short order. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Z10

Get out here looser! You are looser because you spend your all of times here. I do not care Kachins or etc. Because its not my all world looser. I am so sorry for you. And also I agree that you are a non-European WOG. Jezebel1349 (talk) 17:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ugly disgusting pig. I said that because if you had a normal life and had a gf or smth you would not live here looser. Jezebel1349 (talk) 17:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ahah! The looser is still complaining me just like a kid. Now you are so happy and relaxed, eh? Poor idiot. Do you think that I care Kachin monkeys or Madai? Moron.Jezebel1349 (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply