Caltraser55

Joined 8 September 2018

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nick-D (talk | contribs) at 08:39, 17 September 2019 (→‎September 2019: cmt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nick-D in topic September 2019

Welcome

Hello, Caltraser55, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Caltraser55, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 07:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

  Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jordan Belfort, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply


August 2019

  Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Brisbane, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Indeed, let's take it to Talk Kerry (talk) 00:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Second Cold War. Nick-D (talk) 07:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I note also the discussion at Talk:Second Cold War#Sino-Australian tension where concerns had been raised about your editing and this extraordinary talk page post where you accused someone of being " nothing more than a CCP censor agent" who was attempting to "silence" Australia and Hong Kong. As your BLP violations appear to be motivated by your personal political beliefs, I seriously considered setting the duration as indefinite due to a lack of confidence that they will not be repeated when the time expires. Nick-D (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
What can I say I am unapologetically pro-democracy, and yes George-Ho asked me to retract those statements to which I did, so that isn't an argument for blocking me. Nowhere did I post defamatory remarks about Gladys Liu on here.--Caltraser55 (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps you are right then User:Nick-D, I honestly had no intention to defame, I was just adding content I thought was of interest to that section. You have my sincere apologies.--Caltraser55 (talk) 08:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
No answer Nick-D?
As you retained the unblock request below where you're arguing that your reinsertion of this material was justified, I'm not sure what to make of this to be honest. I note that the block has now expired, and wish you the best in editing in accordance with WP:BLP in the future. Nick-D (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Caltraser55 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unfairly blocked by User:Nick-D over what he believes were defamatory comments I made about Gladys Liu, when pressed on what comments he was referring to User:Nick-D ignored and continued removing valid content without prior discussion. I believe I was civil, as per his talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nick-D#Second_Cold_War:_Sino-Australian_tension and I repeatedly told him I was open to constructive discussion and he was free to edit and add anything that he felt were "biased", however I did not feel removing the entire content was a warranted action, so I stand by my commitment as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Cold_War&action=history to revert what I believed was unnecessary deletion of contentCaltraser55 (talk) 07:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Unfairly blocked by User:Nick-D over what he believes were defamatory comments I made about [[Gladys Liu]], when pressed on what comments he was referring to User:Nick-D ignored and continued removing valid content without prior discussion. I believe I was civil, as per his talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nick-D#Second_Cold_War:_Sino-Australian_tension and I repeatedly told him I was open to constructive discussion and he was free to edit and add anything that he felt were "biased", however I did not feel removing the entire content was a warranted action, so I stand by my commitment as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Cold_War&action=history to revert what I believed was unnecessary deletion of content[[User:Caltraser55|Caltraser55]] ([[User talk:Caltraser55#top|talk]]) 07:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Unfairly blocked by User:Nick-D over what he believes were defamatory comments I made about [[Gladys Liu]], when pressed on what comments he was referring to User:Nick-D ignored and continued removing valid content without prior discussion. I believe I was civil, as per his talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nick-D#Second_Cold_War:_Sino-Australian_tension and I repeatedly told him I was open to constructive discussion and he was free to edit and add anything that he felt were "biased", however I did not feel removing the entire content was a warranted action, so I stand by my commitment as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Cold_War&action=history to revert what I believed was unnecessary deletion of content[[User:Caltraser55|Caltraser55]] ([[User talk:Caltraser55#top|talk]]) 07:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Unfairly blocked by User:Nick-D over what he believes were defamatory comments I made about [[Gladys Liu]], when pressed on what comments he was referring to User:Nick-D ignored and continued removing valid content without prior discussion. I believe I was civil, as per his talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nick-D#Second_Cold_War:_Sino-Australian_tension and I repeatedly told him I was open to constructive discussion and he was free to edit and add anything that he felt were "biased", however I did not feel removing the entire content was a warranted action, so I stand by my commitment as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Cold_War&action=history to revert what I believed was unnecessary deletion of content[[User:Caltraser55|Caltraser55]] ([[User talk:Caltraser55#top|talk]]) 07:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}