Myrto Aloumpi
I am interested in the study of Athenian democracy, politics, public speaking, popular morality, and social values as well the interaction between citizens and foreigners and population mobility in the ancient world.
I am a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow in Classics, at the University of Crete, Faculty of Philology. My research project is entitled “Civic obligation and socio-political (im)mobility: Foreigners and the Shaping of Athenian citizenship” and is part of my broader project “Athenian Citizenship: Networks of Citizens and Foreigners in Democratic Athens”.
In 2021-2022, I held a Teaching Fellowship in Classical Philology at the University of Crete, Faculty of Philology.
In 2020 - 2021, I was affiliated to the Department of Communication & Media (Liverpool) as Research Assistant for the project "COVID-19: Being alone together: developing fake news immunity". I contributed to this research project with my expertise in Ancient Greek rhetoric and oratory in examining how COVID-19 related misinformation and disinformation develop and spread. The main goal of the project was to provide citizens with the means to act as fact checkers in order to face the current infodemic.
In 2018 - 2019, I held a Stipendiary Lectureship in Classics at Somerville College (Oxford) and in 2019-2020, I was Lecturer in Classical Studies at the Department of Archaeology, Classics, and Egyptology (Liverpool).
I completed my DPhil thesis on 'The civic virtue of philotimia: rhetoric, ideology, and politics in democratic Athens' at Wolfson College (Oxford) under the supervision of Rosalind Thomas and Tim Rood.
I am a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow in Classics, at the University of Crete, Faculty of Philology. My research project is entitled “Civic obligation and socio-political (im)mobility: Foreigners and the Shaping of Athenian citizenship” and is part of my broader project “Athenian Citizenship: Networks of Citizens and Foreigners in Democratic Athens”.
In 2021-2022, I held a Teaching Fellowship in Classical Philology at the University of Crete, Faculty of Philology.
In 2020 - 2021, I was affiliated to the Department of Communication & Media (Liverpool) as Research Assistant for the project "COVID-19: Being alone together: developing fake news immunity". I contributed to this research project with my expertise in Ancient Greek rhetoric and oratory in examining how COVID-19 related misinformation and disinformation develop and spread. The main goal of the project was to provide citizens with the means to act as fact checkers in order to face the current infodemic.
In 2018 - 2019, I held a Stipendiary Lectureship in Classics at Somerville College (Oxford) and in 2019-2020, I was Lecturer in Classical Studies at the Department of Archaeology, Classics, and Egyptology (Liverpool).
I completed my DPhil thesis on 'The civic virtue of philotimia: rhetoric, ideology, and politics in democratic Athens' at Wolfson College (Oxford) under the supervision of Rosalind Thomas and Tim Rood.
less
InterestsView All (24)
Uploads
Papers by Myrto Aloumpi
Talks by Myrto Aloumpi
In his sturdy book, A Rhetoric of Motives, Kenneth Burke argues that a fundamental purpose of rhetoric is identification: a speaker gives signs to the audience, mainly through language, indicating that his “properties” are the same or similar to those of the audience, thereby affirming a community with the audience and forging proximity. This is what Burke calls “consubstantiality” – the sharing of substance between two individuals – a process that ends in persuasion. Rhetoric also has the capacity to generate division or prolong hostility, persuading the audience by setting up people, matters or ideas as antithetical to the listeners. Rhetoric, in other words, creates a community: a conscious, psychological attachment to a group and the belief that this group has shared interests that are, in turn, at odds with those of other groups that may be constructed or implied by the speaker. Psychological and social studies indicate that the activation of group attitudes and identities and inter-group relations – in-group solidarity and out-group hostility – have a huge effect on the behaviours and attitudes in target audiences (e.g. Miller et al. 1981; Conover 1984; Lau 1989; Huddy 2003).
The techniques of unity and division in respect to rhetoric have been widely studied in classical scholarship, but only in a fragmentary way: there is no single, systematic and comprehensive study of these techniques. This gives scope for further research since there are several open questions: what forms does the rhetoric of identification take in Greek and Roman prose and poetry? What do these forms tell us about the speaker’s purpose, and how does he exploit them to the best rhetorical effect? What sources do we have about the reaction of the audience? How much difference does the nature of the speeches – forensic, deliberative and epideictic – make in the exploitation of the rhetoric of community and division?
Topics may include, but are not limited to considerations of:
a. language;
b. emotions;
c. performance;
d. memory;
e. humour theory;
f. gender-based approaches;
g. religion;
h. narrative, argumentation, ēthopoiia and other techniques that reinforce affiliation/ disaffiliation to groups.
Book Reviews by Myrto Aloumpi
In his sturdy book, A Rhetoric of Motives, Kenneth Burke argues that a fundamental purpose of rhetoric is identification: a speaker gives signs to the audience, mainly through language, indicating that his “properties” are the same or similar to those of the audience, thereby affirming a community with the audience and forging proximity. This is what Burke calls “consubstantiality” – the sharing of substance between two individuals – a process that ends in persuasion. Rhetoric also has the capacity to generate division or prolong hostility, persuading the audience by setting up people, matters or ideas as antithetical to the listeners. Rhetoric, in other words, creates a community: a conscious, psychological attachment to a group and the belief that this group has shared interests that are, in turn, at odds with those of other groups that may be constructed or implied by the speaker. Psychological and social studies indicate that the activation of group attitudes and identities and inter-group relations – in-group solidarity and out-group hostility – have a huge effect on the behaviours and attitudes in target audiences (e.g. Miller et al. 1981; Conover 1984; Lau 1989; Huddy 2003).
The techniques of unity and division in respect to rhetoric have been widely studied in classical scholarship, but only in a fragmentary way: there is no single, systematic and comprehensive study of these techniques. This gives scope for further research since there are several open questions: what forms does the rhetoric of identification take in Greek and Roman prose and poetry? What do these forms tell us about the speaker’s purpose, and how does he exploit them to the best rhetorical effect? What sources do we have about the reaction of the audience? How much difference does the nature of the speeches – forensic, deliberative and epideictic – make in the exploitation of the rhetoric of community and division?
Topics may include, but are not limited to considerations of:
a. language;
b. emotions;
c. performance;
d. memory;
e. humour theory;
f. gender-based approaches;
g. religion;
h. narrative, argumentation, ēthopoiia and other techniques that reinforce affiliation/ disaffiliation to groups.