User talk:ZLEA

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ZLEA!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft 3-views

[edit]

I notice that you have been adding many categories to aircraft images, without apparently considering the category hierarchy principles in our policy article COM:CAT. That article goes into considerable detail about the hierarchical category tree, and why we should avoid adding categories that are direct parents or children of categories already containing the same image. For example, an image can be in Category:Aircraft 3-views or Category:SVG aircraft 3-views, but not both. Similarly, Category:Aircraft 3-views is a sub-category (ie child) of Category:Line drawings of aircraft, so an image should not be a member of both. Also, Category:CAC-15 is a sub-cat of Category:CAC aircraft, so Category:CAC aircraft is redundant for the same image. I hope you will attempt to understand better the hierarchy principle, and that you will correct the many errors you have already created, thank you in anticipation, PeterWD (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. - ZLEA (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear ZLEA,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

2D objects Vs. 3D objects

[edit]

Hello 👋🏻, I saw that you uploaded a number of images of coins from the United States of America to Wikimedia Commons from an external website, are those images listed as free there? Because when someone makes a scan of a 3D object (like coins) new copyright © is created and we would need OTRS permission to use them here. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For example File:1951 Booker T. Washington half dollar obverse.jpg was made by the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation, so while the government of the United States of America created it (making it a public domain design) the fact that the coin is 3D means that the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation has separate copyrights over the scanned image. You can also e-mail the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation and ask them to verify a free license for usage on Wikimedia Commons if you haven't already. Or maybe this has already happened and you forgot to use the template. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trung From my understanding, the US Mint holds the copyrights for all coins it produces. While outside individuals and organizations design the coins, the copyrights are handed over to the mint if the design is accepted.
Coin designs, while stamped into a 3D object, are in fact considered 2D. Therefore as long as the coin is pictured head on, it should be okay. - ZLEA T\C 15:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ZLEA: , well, yes the designs are "{{PD-USGov}}" and simple sketches of them are considered to be 2D derivative works that can't be copyrighted, but scans are a different story, please see "Commons:Currency#Important points". While I would like simple scans of coins to be acceptable a new copyright © is created. Please see this user talk page (Mobile 📱) for a case where a user (recently) assumed the same. You could upload these images locally to the English Wikipedia under fair use but here there exist 2 (two) separate sets of copyrights for coins and while one is in the public domain the photographer (read: Scanner) owns the copyrights of the scans (banknotes are considered to be purely 2D works, but coins aren't). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Trung Thanks for letting me know. For technical reasons I cannot contact PCGS or NGC for copyright permission. If you or someone else is able to do that, that would be great. If not, go ahead and delete them. - ZLEA T\C 14:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to contact both of these parties sometime in the future, you could also nominate those pages yourself if you want, but if an OTRS ticket is fetched then they will be undeleted. Also you could upload them to the English language Wikipedia before nominating them as Wikipedia does allow them. Basically anything not accepted here can be locally uploaded to some Wikipedia's, but it's best to upload them here if they have a free license because then they could be used at any Wikimedia website and re-users are certain that they're free. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Trung Will the each file's corresponding Wikipedia pages (such as en:File:1925 Medal Norse Silver commemorative (obverse).jpg) be deleted if the images are deleted on Commons? - ZLEA T\C 15:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately yes, which is why they would need new names first. You could first copy the file and names manually and then delete the files here for deletion, though I would advise you to keep a list (such as "User:ZLEA/PCGS" or something) of them for when I will request permission. I really don't like breaking bad news to people. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Trung I've created the lists of images from the PCGS and NGC at User:ZLEA/PCGS and User:ZLEA/NGC respectively. - ZLEA T\C 23:11, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I will try to contact both companies soon. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Trung According to the following template, Template:PD-USGov-money, all of the images are in fact on the public domain despite being taken from PCGS and NGC. - ZLEA T\C 13:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NGC permission

[edit]

I received permission from the NGC, however the letter I received by Janell Armstrong also included the note "you should check before using images from our World Coin Price Guide, Ancients articles or NGC Registry as these are not our images." So I would like to ask you if the images you uploaded fall within these before I will direct them to the OTRS team. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trung The images came from [1]. - ZLEA T\C 18:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

[edit]

Reminding myself to check back on Commons:Village pump/Copyright#File falsely identified as a US coin. - ZLEA T\C 13:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23

[edit]

After he blocked me on Wikipedia, Bbb23 reverted many of my constructive edits. Could you in particular restore my edits to American Veterans Disabled for Life silver dollar? I had already turned it from a simple stub into an article with references and an infobox. Thanks. --Anastasia D.Rossi (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anastasia D.Rossi No problem. I hope to see you in a few years after you take the standard offer. - ZLEA T\C 22:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Washington nickel update

[edit]

Just uploaded some new pictures of the Washington nickel. There were actually several varieties of the 1909 Washington nickel, with different placings of "Liberty" as well as two patterns that year with Washington facing left. I already have an update for the gallery, but because I am blocked on Wikipedia, can you do me a favor and copy and paste the source below?

Anastasia D.Rossi I will take that into consideration, but you are a banned user. But please keep in mind that I could get in trouble for making edits at your request. See en:WP:PROXYING. - ZLEA T\C 16:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ZLEA: Yes, I understand the sentiment, which is why I would like to stop there with that final edit. However, there is still much work to be done, especially on Cancelled denominations and some commemoratives. --Anastasia D.Rossi (talk) 16:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Anastasia D.Rossi Like I said, you still have a chance to come back legitimately. Stop your sockpuppetry and make all your accounts known, and in a few years request to have your ban appealed. Until then, you might want to contribute to a non-Wikimedia numismatics wiki such as like CoinFacts Wiki or Currency Wikia. - ZLEA T\C 16:36, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obverse designs

[edit]

Thanks, --Anastasia D.Rossi (talk) 16:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-P 50th anniversary Kennedy half dollar high relief obverse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1884 ring nickel (obverse).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-P 50th anniversary Kennedy half dollar high relief reverse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

[edit]

Reminding myself to check on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Klt808755010 obv.gif at a later time. - ZLEA T\C 13:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Future historians will be grateful

[edit]
Numismatics Barnstar
Thank you so much for both creating and organising the 2019 US Banknote Contest on Wikimedia Commons. Future historians will thank you for bringing so much of US monetary history in one place. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 05:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Trung Thank you. - ZLEA T\C 12:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

[edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

100 peso American Period Philippine banknotes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rots61 (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:2_peso_American_Period_Philippine_banknotes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rots61 (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echinospartum horridum 2015-06-04 01 (cropped).jpg ?

[edit]

Hi, thanks for changing the file name upon my request File:Echinospartum horridum 2015-06-04 01 (cropped).jpg - but I don't understand why you've added "(cropped)". There is another similar photo File:Echinospartum horridum 2015-06-04 01.jpg, but these are two different photos taken in a series, the time of the first is 12:05:44, and the second is 12:05:48. You can also check the original sizes of both of them. I kindly request changing the file name to "Echinospartum horridum 2015-06-04 02.jpg", as I originally requested. Cheers, Nova (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Sorry about that. I didn't see that you requested both files to be renamed. - ZLEA T\C 17:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done - ZLEA T\C 17:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your prompt response! Best, Nova (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  10:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  14:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  03:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  19:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  21:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,  Mysterymanblue  03:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,  Mysterymanblue  05:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 Apollo 11 50th Anniversary 5oz Dollar Reverse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  20:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,  Mysterymanblue  00:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,  Mysterymanblue  01:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  03:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:America the Beautiful quarter obverse (West Point).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The metadata of this photograph indicate that it was taken by Burwell and Burwell Photography, a private contractor used by the mint to take some of its coin photographs. These files are protected by copyright and are non-free as established by Commons:Deletion requests/Burwell and Burwell photographs of U.S. coins.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

 Mysterymanblue  06:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2014 Kennedy Half Dollar 50th Anniversary Gold Obverse.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

April 2023

[edit]

I originally wanted to take the standard offer in mid-2022 but with the fake Devo in my timeline releasing two separate albums that year, I decided to put it off until late 2023/early 2024. If I return as a constructive editor, I was wondering if A) I could have one of my locked accounts (of my personal preference) unblocked and unlocked, and B) some of the pages that were deleted could (namely United States two thousand-dollar bill and Learn to Be Still) could be restored. --190.10.8.6 04:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one you should be asking. You must contact an admin via one of these methods. - ZLEA T\C 15:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:P03 modified P-51 Mustang Miss Ashley II with contra-props.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Wdwd (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wdwd The VRT took a little longer than usual to confirm the permission, but it's been resolved now. - ZLEA T\C 18:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ZLEA, perfect. Was an overlap.--Wdwd (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Bigger, Brighter, Bluer (aircraft) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jmabel ! talk 00:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 09:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]