User talk:W like wiki

Vesyolkin

I strongly disagree with your idea about filenames. If the file is named «Nikolai Petrovich Vesyolkin», the troubles appear:
1) The filename with spaces cannot be processed in windows, the operational system needs quotation marks around this filename.
2) The filename with spaces cannot be processed by any browser, the browser needs %20 instead of spaces.
3) Long filename is useless because people search by descriptions. Noone will ever search for any data about Nikolai Vesyolkin, users will search only for Николай Весёлкин in Russian. The filenames in English is a great problem for Commons, yet it cannot be solved.
4) Dots in filenames create additional mess with file operations. Having several dots in filenames, we cannot find the filename extension.
5) All my images are named within a scheme: p-surname-nn-number, where p means person, surname-nn means surname and name, number means the number of image.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PereslavlFoto, thanks for your notice.

1) 2) 4) I wrote "something like"! So Nikolai_Petrovich_Vesyolkin_(18-11-2012) or Николай_Весёлкин_(18-11-2012) is fine.
3) users will search "only" for Николай Весёлкин >> sure, everyone speaks Russian . I think there are more people speaking English. Anyway, Filenames can be in every language.
5) It's fine that you have your own system of file naming on your pc. But on commons it's better to have a system what everybody understands, not only you. Chears, --W like wiki (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for those few who speaks English

there's an English description. That's why I don't believe in file names at all, and try to make informative descriptions in native and in international languages. But who cares about some academician working in physiology... Also, I thank you for the explanation!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Eurocrisis" (unable to translate from German the name)

I saw you created the concerned file. But as I'm not sure to be able to edit it, can you modify it, making France as a red country? It's well known that the crisis was a main cause of my country political switch. --Dark Corlath (talk) 11:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dark Corlath, thx! New file name is now: Changes of government in Eurozone cause of Eurozone crisis.svg. Hopefully thats better to understand. France I will make red, when I found this information in the article as well. In the german article there are just 8 countries listed at the moment. Best regards, --W like wiki (talk) 03:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about redlinks in the VehicleModelYearC template

I just wanted to let you know about this conversation on my userpage with User:Mr.choppers regarding the redlinks on the vehicle-by-year categories that we are creating/renaming. Mr.choppers brings up a great point about some of the redlinks displayed by {{VehicleModelYearC}} being extraneous due to the establishments and disestablishments of certain makes (using Imperial as an example). While the new template certainly looks a lot better than its older counterpart(s), the functional issue posed by redlinks in some cases does need to be addressed and hopefully resolved. I would really appreciate it if you could talk to Mr.choppers about this issue and come to some workable solution. Thanks! Michael Barera (talk) 23:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've implemented the "displayredlinks=no" code into the new template, and the redlinks issue with the Imperial categories has now been resolved. We can also now implement this same simple code into any similar vehicle-by-brand category to solve similar issues of unnecessary redlinks for years before the establishment or after the disestablishment of a make. Hopefully, this simple fix has resolved the concerns of User:Mr.choppers. Sorry for any hassle I have caused. Take care! Michael Barera (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael, I m glad that you had the smart idea with the 4th parameter (redlink switch) in the template. By the way, are you agry with this edit of mine? I also posed another question regarding the template name here. Best Regards, --W like wiki (talk) 23:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We're all done with the vehicle renaming project, my friend. Thanks for getting this whole effort going. Making a clear distinction between vehicles and automobiles in the category structure really makes a big difference. Take care! Michael Barera (talk) 04:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Subglandular breast implant rightwards.jpg

Martin H. (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martin, danke für den Hinweis. Bei solch rechtlichen Fragen kenn ich mich leider nicht aus. Ich hatte die Datei damals nur aus der auf commons bereits vorhanden Version gespiegelt, damit es im Artikel Brustvergrößerung besser mit dem Bild der subfaszialen Implantation vergleichbar ist. --W like wiki (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

file:L Gewandhaus 1881-77,341.tif

Hello I discovered that you established the Commons site for the Leipziger Gewandhaus. I have added the draft by Gropius and Schmieden for the 2nd Gewandhaus in Leipzig, but I seem unable to classify it into this section. Maybe you can help?--Haendelfan (talk) 23:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Haendelfan, thx a lot for your post. I think a draft for the 2nd Gewandhaus should be in category for the 2nd Gewandhaus, not in the root category of Gewandhaus. The 2nd Gewandhaus was bild according to plans of Gropius and Schmieden. So i moved it, hope its ok for you. Best regards, --W like wiki (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tyre and Rim Technical data 01-en.svg

Hello W like wiki, will do translation shortly, will first send preliminaries for your approval, thanks — Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok perfect! --W like wiki (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin K. (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:RBL Logo 2014 44x23.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:RBL Logo 2014 44x23.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin K. (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png

File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

commonslinks berichtigen

Hallo w like wiki, du hast in den letzten tagen auf commons diverse cats verschoben, kannst du diese bitte auch in den artikeln auf de.wp anpassen. zb. bei de:St. Josef (Dresden). danke und gruß --Z ^thomas 08:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Versöhnungskirche (Dresden)

Hallo W like wiki. Bei Category:Versöhnungskirche (Dresden) erfolgte keine Verschiebung, wie bei den anderen Dresdner Kirchen. Es war von Dir copy and paste. Würdest du das bitte korrigieren. Danke --ElbHein (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo ElbHein, du hast recht, bei dieser Kirche war es keine Verschiebung, da die Seite bereits bestand. Wie hätte ich anders vorgehen sollen? Grüße --W like wiki (talk) 23:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo W like wiki, man hätte die Zielcategory vorher freimachen (löschen) sollen, sie war ja nur 1 Monat vorher als Redirekt angelegt worden, während die Category seit 8 Jahren bestand, mit 20 Bearbeitungen. Nun ist sie ja leider gelöscht (obwohl sie sich auch wieder herstellen ließe). Ersatzweise könnte man die bisherige Versionsgeschichte in die neue Cat einfügen. Grüße --ElbHein (talk) 10:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok, ich hab das mal so angeleiert. Grüße --W like wiki (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sollte so jetzt passen: Versionsgeschichte Kategorie:Versöhnungskirche (Dresden). --W like wiki (talk) 12:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Ich hatte mir das weniger kompliziert vorgestellt. Hätte die Cat nicht spätestens bei der Verschiebung am 3. September einfach überschrieben werden müssen? Also danke. --ElbHein (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Bundesautobahns"

Hey,
I know there is the discussion about the general labelling of categories in English or other languages. But calling the category "category:Bundesautobahns by number" is the worst mix of both, German and English. Could we roll it back to "category:Bundesautobahn by number", please? --Jcornelius (talk) 08:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, du sprichst ja auch Deutsch. Jedenfalls finde ich "Bundesautobahns" wirklich, wirklich furchtbar, da man an ein deutsches Eigenwort eigentlich nicht einfach ein englisches Plural-S ranpappen kann. Insofern sollte es entweder beim Singular bleiben (was noch okay wäre) oder es übersetzen (Federal Motorway). --Jcornelius (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jcornelius, hast recht, ist nicht optimal. Ausgangslage: Objekt-Kategorien sollten in der Mehrzahl benannt werden, war bisher nicht. "by number" ist Englisch, daher hatte ich die englische Mehrzahl von Autobahn gewählt, ähnlich der englischen Wikipedia-Kategorie Autobahns in Germany. Und Autobahns klingt für mich als Nicht-Engländer schon recht schräg, wenns aber stimmt. Trotzdem vielleicht andere Idee:
* Category:Bundesautobahnen by number oder
* Category:Autobahns in Germany by number

Andere Vorschläge, Meinungen? Grüße --W like wiki (talk) 08:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mediawiki websites

Category:Mediawiki_websites has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @1234qwer1234qwer4: , I answered there. Thx! --W like wiki ^{good to know} 14:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Stephen's Lutheran Church.JPG

Hi, can you please have a look at the article about Charles Haertling in the English Wikipedia? The article says, "For his St. Stephens Church in Northglenn, Colorado (1964), Haertling employed a hyperbolic paraboloid roof, evocative of similar curved concrete designs by Oscar Niemeyer." That's why I added the category "Hyperbolic paraboloid structures" to the file. However, the statement in the Wikipedia article is not cited, and I cannot find any strong references to support the statement, so I agree that the category should not be added to the Commons file, and I am sorry for reverting your edit. Please understand that I am not the editor who added the statement to the Wikipedia article. I don't know if you edit on English Wikipedia, but given your expertise, would you be willing to edit the article to correct the error? If not, please let me know and I will try to do it. Best wishes, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Jeffrey, yes ok, no problem. I just edited the article, I am quite sure thats's "scientifically" correct, but englisch is not my mother tongue so maybe you can check if it's also correct by grammer. Thanks and Best Regards, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 02:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC) And by the way: beautiful picture!![reply]

The English is perfect. Thank you for fixing the article! Best wishes, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you too! Best wishes, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 16:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --W like wiki ^{good to know} 10:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maragheh observatory Platonic solid highlighted.svg

@W like wiki: Hi,

I have reverted the last deletion that you made to category list related to this particular file. If you look at this particular image of the dome, you will see that some red lines have been added. These red lines form the icosahedron and therefore the category "Icosahedron" should refer to this image only, not to all images of the dome. (forgot to sign: Martinvl)

Hi @Martinvl: , thanks for your notice! I saw my mistake and reverted it. Now just the image and not the whole building category is in the category:Icosahedron, you agree, right? Best Regards, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 18:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, great. Martinvl (talk) 21:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Perfect! --W like wiki ^{good to know} 10:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

für deine Korrektur. Ich bin nicht völlig weg hier, nur lade ich nichts bzw. fast nichts mehr hoch, aus genannten Gründen. Unter der ISBN kann ich nichts finden, hast du einen Link zum Buch? Ich war lange nicht in Jizerka, ohne Gustav ist das wieder ein verlassenes Örtchen geworden. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Ralf Roletschek: hmm, du hast recht, scheint es online wirklich nicht zu geben. So sieht es auf jeden Fall von außen aus. Und hier steht was drüber (hinter Bezahlschranke). Ich hab es im Buchladen Buchkrone in Zittau gekauft. Aber auch bei ihnen finde ich online nur das Vorgängerbuch. Da ist das einfachste wohl, dort anzurufen.

Ich hatte über einen Freund davon erfahren, der schon das erste Buch besaß und daraufhin Kontakt mit der Herausgeberin aufnahm, und ihr seine Fotos angebot. Sie war total dankbar, da ihr v.a. von innen noch Fotos fehlten. Und so sind dann auch ein paar Fotos von ihm in dem Buch gelandet. Sie freut sich immer noch über Fotos, sagte er mir. Evtl wird's noch ein drittes Buch geben. Du hast bestimmt auch nicht nur ein Foto von Gustav und dem Misthaus gemacht, oder? Die Herausgeberin wäre Petra Laurin, Kontakt am einfachsten über das Haus der Deutsch-Tschechischen-Verständigung in Jablonec.

PS: Ja, Jizerka fehlt jetzt was ohne Gustav. Ich hätte ihn auch gern mal getroffen, zur Zeit des alten Misthauses war ich aber noch Schuljunge. Ich find v.a. das Ende tragisch mit der Brandstiftung und all den Schätzen die damit vernichtet wurden... und am Ende damit auch Gustavs Idealismus und damit sein Leben. Um so schöner, dass es solche Menschen wie Petra Laurin gibt, die die Erinnerung an ihn so am Leben halten! --W like wiki ^{good to know} 23:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Race and Ethnicity by Eric Fischer (2010 Census data)

Race and Ethnicity by Eric Fischer (2010 Census data) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

WhinyTheYounger (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maps by continent by country

Category:Maps by continent by country has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 13:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jeff G. for the notifcation, I will answer there today. These "double by" categories are a bit complicate to handle, old but important problem (see my old collection problematic category names). Regards, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 15:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rieger organs

Hallo, warum hast du Orgeln nach Österreich verschoben, die in Deutschland stehen (z.B. File:Mainzer dom marienorgel im bau.jpg, File:Paderborn - 2016-05-16 - Kirche Wewer (010).jpg, File:St. Agnes (Köln) (02) Rieger Orgel.jpg). Bringst du das in Ordnung? Magnus (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Magnus, oh, da habe ich mich wohl bei einer Mehrfach-Verschiebung mit Cat-a-lot verklickt, korrigiere ich gleich. Danke für den Hinweis! Beste Grüße --W like wiki ^{good to know} 10:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glass objects

Has there been any discussion for your potentially massive renaming of <object> <material> categories?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Objects_made_of_glass&diff=prev&oldid=727292828 Andy Dingley (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful to discuss some of this, rather than making so many more changes. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Andy Dingley: , no sorry, actually not. But there were/are around 30 categories with the name sheme "Objects made from" and that term is not quite often used, I hope you agree. I checked it also with google:

made			of	out of	from
---------------------------------------------
amber			6000+	9	1200
stone			50000+	11000	9000
limestone		9000+	4	1400
sandstone		5000+	0	5
rock			27000+	7.000	2900
rocks			15000+	8	2300 
wood			100000	195000+	16000
leather			20000+	4000	8000
bone			33000+	5500	7000
-s			11800	10	3600
Ivory			13000+	3100	3500 
basalt 			4000+	-	600 
animal horn		10+	-	6
horn			3700+	5	700
straw			5900+	1900	1100
Glass 			61000	69000+	6900
sugar			38000+	2900	1600
wax			32000+	7	1500
slate			2500+	0	2300
chocolate		4200	13000+	1200
paper			54000	99000+	6400
concrete		82000+	3600	1900
cannel coal		5+	0	3
schist			3+	0	2
rubber			11000+	2000	1200
plastic			35000+	7000	6000
-s			11000	1500	1200

Regards, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 15:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for discussing this. Although your argument seems to be "My form is the more common form", but judged after you've started renaming them. I've seen Category:Glass objects, Category:Rubber objects, Category:Plastic objects, Category:Stone objects, Category:Concrete objects go past already, just from my watchlist.

Also the issue is less about files, more about categories. We have to produce a category tree that is useful and comprehensible. Just looking at Category:Glass objects, we have the following subcategories (just that one material). Are you going to replace these and their children too? Or make things less consistent rather than more?:

Massive changes like this have always been trouble. Just diving in single-handed with no discussion beforehand has not been a good way to move forwards, from past experience. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Andy Dingley: yes, you are right, those were massive changes, but there are massive problems and thers is a massive amount to do, just look into categories like Media needing categories or Translation possible.

And yes, you are right with your concept of working together and in my world it would be exactly like this. But my past experiences the last years shows something different: more and more no one cares, even in such fundamental cases like WikiProject Heraldry, Template:TemplateBox or Categories for discussion.

And then I saw this category Objects by material: half of the subcategories are named "objects made from <matrial>" which is precise but poor English and the other half is named like "<matrial> objects" which is not so precide in every case e.g. with categories like Amber objects which can mean "amber colered objects" or "objects made of amber". Since one year this problematic mixture exists but no one cares nor an discussion exists. This is the real scandal! Now it is differnt, you cares and we both love consistency and we met us in the tree, you came down from the branches like Category:Glass objects I climbed up the trunk via Objects by material. There is order in your branch Category:Glass objects but near the trunc there is inconsistency. So what you think? Regards --W like wiki ^{good to know} 18:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that we should be starting a discussion on this somewhere a lot more public than one user's talk page and trying to get a consensus.
W like wiki, I haven't really looked at how many edits you made. I became first aware of this through about half a dozen changes to categories for my own photos. Would it be at all possible to roll back what you have done, so that we can start from the status quo ante? - Jmabel ! talk 21:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: ok, I understand. So this way please. I hope that is what you was asking for. Regards --W like wiki ^{good to know} 23:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Andy Dingley (talk) 15:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

W like wiki, Please stop this, at least for now, until there is a chance to discuss. And please comment in the discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User_problems#Big undiscussed_categorization changes%2C editor won't engage or discuss. I, for one, think (for example) the longstanding Category:Glass objects is a much better name than Category:Objects made of glass and I'm absolutely certain that no one should be doing a change this massive without prior discussion to try to get some sort of consensus.

Consider this an administrative warning to stop making these changes, and to engage in the discussion at COM:AN/U, or you will be given at least a short-term block. - Jmabel ! talk 16:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image generation/doc

Danke für deine Verbesserungen – vielleicht wird dieses Beschreibungsmonster dadurch besser lesbar? Du bist wohl einer der ganz wenigen, die nicht sofort erschreckt die Seite verlassen, wenn sie der ausbordenden Komplexität von Vorlage und Beschreibung gewahr werden.

Du erscheinst (ebenso wie ich) um Verbesserungen, Klar- und Richtigstellungen, Aufräumen der Kategorien und die Anwendung von sinnvollen Ordnungskriterien bemüht. Eine wahre Sisyphosarbeit ! Jeden Tag und jede Stunde werden neue Ungereimtheiten in die Wp gestellt, so dass da unmöglich nachzukommen ist; aber Aufgeben ist auch keine Option.

Ein wenig wundert mich, dass du ausgerechnet auf Image generation gekommen bist – denn du selbst wendest diese Vorlage nicht an. Aber ich muss ja keineswegs alles verstehen ! Weiterhin frohes Schaffen -- sarang♥사랑 10:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber @Sarang: entschuldige bitte meine späte Rückmeldung! Zuerst mal Danke für dein Danke!! und auch die Worte: "Du erscheinst (ebenso wie ich) um Verbesserungen, Klar- und Richtigstellungen, Aufräumen der Kategorien und die Anwendung von sinnvollen Ordnungskriterien bemüht" - ganz genau, da geht es mir wie dir! Und diese ganzen "Ungereimtheiten",... aber da lässt mich deine Wortwahl dann schon fast wieder drüber schmunzeln, "Ungereimtheiten" ist wirklich gut! – Einige Mitmenschen gehen irgendwie sehr robust durch die Welt, kopfschüttel. Dazu hab ich vor kurzem einen schönen Spruch geschickt bekommen: "Schwache Menschen rächen sich. Starke Menschen vergeben. Schlaue Menschen ignorieren." (soll von Einstein sein) Aber genau das letzte der drei fällt mir schwer, dir vielleicht auch!?

Und kaum einer in meinem realen Umfeld kann nachvollziehen, in was für Welten wir hier unterwegs sind. Und was wir hier die ganzen Stunden und letzten Jahre alles aufgebaut, verbessert, strukturiert haben. Und auch mit welcher Reichweite! Daher habe ich mich sehr über deine Meldung und Wertschätzung gefreut! Weil es mir eben wieder zeigt, dass da noch andere Krieger unterwegs sind, die nach Verbesserung und Qualität streben und diese dann eben auch woanders erkennen und wertschätzen können.

Und damit hier auch ein DANKE für deinen Ausbau, die Pflege und Wartung, der ganzen One-Letter-Vorlagen!! Wie dumm irgenwie, dass sich die deutsche Wikipedia dagegen entschieden hat! Sowas ist für mich immer das größte Problem: wenn es irgendwie nicht mehr um die Sache geht, sondern irgendwelche Egos mitspielen, oder Sturheit! Ein Kumpel hatte die mal gut auf den Punkt gebracht:

Haben wir noch nie so gemacht!
Machen wir schon immer so!
Wo kommen wir denn da hin!
Wenn das alle machen würden!

Ach so, gekommen bin ich auf Image generation/doc über meine Arbeit bei den Wikipedia Logos. Dabei war ich auf Category:Wikimedia icons gestoßen (Layoutvorschlag ok?) und von dort dann über die Verlinkung bei igen/doc gelandet war. Und da ich mich vor kurzem einige Zeit mit TemplateBox/doc beschäftigt hatte, waren mir dann eben sofort ein paar Dinge bei igen/doc aufgefallen. So mein Weg, den ich nicht immer kontrollieren kann :) LG --W like wiki ^{good to know} 22:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dein layout in Wikimedia icons ist so ausgezeichnet und übersichtlich, dass ich den link in Image generation noch deutlicher darauf verweisen lasse. Nur für den Fall, dass irgendjemand dorthin gerät und es liest. Danke für deine Arbeit!

Zwar lobst du die One-letter templates aber du scheinst sie zu meiden – zumindest hier. Natürlich ist es nicht einfach, alle Vorlagen so gut zu kennen dass man immer die optimale an der Hand hat.

In der de:Wp mache ich kaum mehr was, nach einigen Anfeindungen (2011). Manchmal erscheint das ein Verein von Oberlehrern zu sein, die immer recht haben. Klar dass auch in den commons viel Kritik an meiner Tätigkeit erfolgt, aber hier fühle ich mich viel heimischer als bei den Deutschen. Obwohl ich bei ignoranten usern, die offensichtlich Beschreibungen missverstehen, Hassgefühle erweckt habe – wenn dir mal sehr langweilig ist, kannst du den diversen links folgen um zu sehen wie da die Emotionen hochgekocht sind.

Nach dieser kurzen Abschweifung: egal wer da bellt, wir ziehen weiter mit unseren Bemühungen die Wp ein klein wenig besser zu machen. So gut es jeder vermag -- sarang♥사랑 14:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Planche des belles filles statue.JPG

File:Planche des belles filles statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:---sort order demo/SubcategoryNote

Hallo @Achim55: ich habe gesehen, dass du Category:---sort order demo/SubcategoryNote zweimal gelöscht hast. Der Kommentar deiner ersten Löschung war "content was: "nabaz azeez maran archaeologist nabaz azeez maran", and the only contributor was "N.8a8m88". Das wundert mich. Eigentlich hatte die Seite einmal einen Hinweis enthalten, der auf den einzelnen leeren Unterkategorien von Category:---sort order demo eingeblendet wurde, um deren Funktion zu erklären. Das steht allerdings im Widerspruch zu dem, was du vorgefunden haben musst, als du die Seite das erste Mal gelöscht hast. Könntest du der Sache bitte einmal nachgehen und evtl. eine Version der Seite reaktivieren, bevor sie von User:N.8a8m88 oder einem anderen davor geändert/entstellt wurde. Vielen Dank! MfG --W like wiki ^{good to know} 18:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, habe alles wiederhergestellt und dann auf deine letzte Version revertiert. Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55:

Great! --W like wiki ^{good to know} 19:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Versteckte und nicht-versteckte Kategorien

Hallo! Ich habe gesehen, dass du bei einigen Meta-Kategorien das {{Hiddencat}} herausgenommen hast, mit dem Hinweis "IMPORTANT: Flat categories are hidden, these not!" Kannst du mir einen Hinweis geben, wo das so festgelegt ist? Ich habe nichts gefunden. Liebe Grüße -- Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grüß Dich @Reinhard Müller: Danke für deine Nachricht und entschuldige meinen etwas zu knappen Bearbeitungskommentar! Bei später Bearbeitungen war ich dann etwas ausführlicher. Da ist dann Commons:Categories#Categories marked with "HIDDENCAT" verlinkt. (Der Link steht auch auf der Doc page von Template:Hiddencat;) Der Hauptgrund ist also, dass diese Kategorien inhaltsbezogen sind, nur eben im Namen mit "Categories..." beginnen. (Hiddencat ist eher für alles, was technischer Natur ist und weniger für den Leser gedacht ist, also Categorien für Wartungsarbeiten oder Angaben zu Lizenzen, File-Format etc.) Aber das ist eben leider noch nicht konsequent durchgezogen. LG --W like wiki ^{good to know} 14:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte eigentlich Kategorien wie Categories of Austria by district immer als Wartungskategorie und nie als Inhaltskategorie angesehen. Eine solche Kategorie wird wohl kaum zur Inhaltssuche verwendet werden, sondern eher zur Wartung des Kategoriensystems. Und aus Sicht eines Anwenders finde ich die Anzeige solcher Kategorien eher verwirrend. Beispielsweise Categories by size sammelt ja Kategorien, die inhaltlich überhaupt nichts miteinander zu tun haben. Liebe Grüße --Reinhard Müller (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reinhard Müller: Ja, Categories by size ist vielleicht auch ein extremes Beispiel, obwohl ich auch als Leser in ihr einen Sinn erkenne. Ansonsten, wenn ich sehe, was sonst üblicherweies hidden Wartungs-/User-/Lizenzkategorien sind (etwa CC-BY-SA-3.0-AT • Items with VRTS permission confirmed • Files by User:wzhkevin • GFDL-1.2 • CC-BY-SA-3.0 • Supported by a Wikimedia chapter • Categories for discussion), dann ist doch Categories of Austria by district durchaus inhaltsbezogen.

Ich denke das Problem steckt tiefer, du hast das hier ja auch schon mal teilweise angedacht. Meta-Kategorien und Flat-Kategorien sind noch sehr stiefmüttelich und ich finde auch nicht klar behandelt. Beste Grüße --W like wiki ^{good to know} 16:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Categories of Austria by district war halt hidden, weil der ganze Kategorie-Ast ab Categories of countries von hidden cats durchdrungen ist und man beim Anlegen neuer Seiten sich immer am Bestand orientiert hat. Die Kategorie ist ja auch Teil von Districts of Austria und innerhalb des Topics-Baumes sollten keine hidden cats sein, oder!? --W like wiki ^{good to know} 16:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zum Nachtrag: Categories of Austria by district hatte ich in einem eigenen Edit explizit auf hidden gesetzt - weil ich das eben für richtig hielt/halte und mich die Sichtbarkeit gestört hat.

Dass Categories of Austria by district unterhalb von Districts of Austria eingeordnet ist sehe ich vergleichbar mit Templates related to Austria, das (indirekt) unterhalb von Austria liegt: technisch zwar im Topics-Baum, logisch aber nicht. Darum bevorzuge ich für solche Einordnungen auch das "~"-Präfix. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Von mir auch noch ein Nachtrag :-) - ich sehe den wesentlichen Unterschied darin, dass sich z.B. Flora of Austria, History of Austria oder Mountains of Austria auf den Inhalt der darunter gesammelten Medien beziehen - eben Flora, Geschichte oder Berge. Categories of Austria dagegen bezieht sich auf das Wiki-Konstrukt "Kategorie". Blumen, Geschichte und Berge gibt es in der richtigen Welt. Kategorien gibt's nur hier. Darum ist das für mich eine interne Kategorie, die logisch nicht in den Topics-Baum zu rechnen ist, und konsequenterweise ist ja auch die Categories-Wurzel neben Topics und nicht darunter. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reinhard Müller: Na da bin ich mit Categories of Austria by district so richtig in ein Fettnäpfchen getreten, nun ja:)... wir reden ja drüber. Also was du sagst, kann ich nachvollziehen, Kategorien gibt es nur hier. Aber sie sind v.a. auch zum Navigieren für Leser gedacht, die etwas suchen! Und da gibt es so viele verschiedene Anfragemöglichkeiten, dass ich da die Verbindung zwischen zwei Kategorien nicht verstecken würde, wenn sie helfen könnte das zu finden, was man sucht. Bsp.: Ich suche nach Bussen in Österreich, sortiert nach Farben (Buses in Austria by color), und dann such ich für eine Fotomontage noch nach irgendwas anderem passenden dazu aus Österreich, was auch schon nach Farben sortiert ist. Dafür gibt's dann eben Categories of Austria by color. Die Bezeichnung “category” gibts natürlich nur hier, aber der Leser ist ja gerade auch in Commons und sucht hier nach etwas. Man könnte sie auch "Aspekte" von Österreich sortiert nach Farben oder anders nennen. Eigentlich hatte sich das ja auch schon soweit durchgesetzt, dass die Kategorien nicht versteckt sind, nur eben im Bereich "by country" sind viele noch versteckt. Und weil nach meinem Empfinden Categories of Austria by color auch nicht neben sowas wie Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item versteckt werden sollte.

Und es geht ja auch um Einheitlichkeit, was bedeuten würde, dass man alle Kategorien aus Categories verstecken müsste. Wärst du dafür?

Die Templates sind natürlich grenzwertig, für den normalen Leser uninteressant. Aber irgendwie macht es ja auch doch Sinn, Templates hier mit einzusortieren. Jeder Leser könnte ja auch Autor sein, oder zu einem werden. Viele Templates haben als Sortierschlüssel übrigens auch τ (das Griechischen Tau) was noch hinter "~" am Ende einsortiert wird, siehe dazu Commons:Categories#Sorting categories: The special sortkey τ (lowercase Greek letter Tau) is used to sort templates at the end of the related Commons-category, see for example Category:Transport templates sorted in Category:Transport. (Sorting in Commons is not case sensitive so only uppercase Τ (Tau) is shown.) Grüße --W like wiki ^{good to know} 19:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ganz überzeugt mich das Argument mit der Fotomontage mit den Farben nicht. Wenn ich zum roten Bus etwas anderes passend rotes dazu suchen würde, würde ich das über die Red objects in Austria machen und nicht über die Meta-Kategorie.

Zu deiner Frage, ja ich wäre eigentlich dafür, alle Kategorien aus Categories zu verstecken - sehe aber gleichzeitig auch ein, dass das suboptimal ist, wenn diese untereinander eine Hierarchie bilden. Ich habe selbst noch keine abschließende feste Meinung, was hier die beste Lösung wäre. Und eigentlich würde ich hoffen, dass diese Entscheidung nicht wir beide in dieser Diskussion hier treffen (oder du alleine), sondern dass das etwas breiter diskutiert wird, sodass andere Meinungen und Gedanken auch noch mit einbezogen werden können.

Und ja, das mit dem Tau habe ich gerade jetzt zum ersten Mal gelesen, da kann ich gleich einige von meinen Vorlagen neu einsortieren :-)

Liebe Grüße --Reinhard Müller (talk) 21:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reinhard Müller: Naja, wenn ich danach gehe, was wir bereits haben, dann stehen wir/ich nicht ganz so alleine da. Unter Commons:Categories#Categories marked with "HIDDENCAT" steht es ja eigentlich: Versteckt werden sollen:

non-topical categories
categories used for template-based categories, such as license tag based categories

Und Categories of Austria steht unter der topic Austria!

Eigentlich halten sich auch die meisten topics daran, an das wenige was wir an "Regeln" dazu haben, nur eben nicht die Länder-Kategorien, was dummerweise ein riesiger Ast ist. Ich weiß im Moment auch nicht weiter. Gute Nacht erstmal --W like wiki ^{good to know} 22:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hecker entwurfe 2010-01-08 1 -090-1.1600x900.webp

Hallo. Siehe bitte: COM:VRT. --Krd 08:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grüß Dich @Krd: danke für deine Nachricht hier. Kannst du mir das bitte noch etwas konkreter erklären. Die Bilder wurden doch von seinem Enkel mit dessen Erlaubnis hochgeladen!? --W like wiki ^{good to know} 18:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round bales

Please note that round bales even in the English wiki are actually referred to as "round". Hjart (talk) 12:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes ok @Hjart: now I think we found a good solution there! Thx for your message here and Best Regards! --W like wiki ^{good to know} 19:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --W like wiki ^{good to know} 19:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:No documentation/doc

Dear colleague! By this edit you: 1) replaced the link to the existing Category:Templates without documentation by a link to Category:Template documentation pages without documentation which just redirects to it, 2) added a red link to non-existing template Improve documentation, 3) replaced the link to the existing page Commons:Template documentation by an interproject link to Wikipedia:Template documentation which is deleted long ago. Why? Gamliel Fishkin 21:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Gamliel Fishkin: thank you for your message! Ouuh, quite chaotic

, I also tried some time to understand it afterwards, but also my comment "user namespace" don't helpes a lot:). Sometimes I have to many browser windows open. I repaired it. Now it has the state from before. Only I deleted Category:Message templates which is for user namespace - aaah,... now I undestand what was my intension. Sry for the confussion!!! Best Regards --W like wiki ^{good to know} 02:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you undone your edit completely, but is was not completely wrong. Gamliel Fishkin 06:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gamliel Fishkin: No no, I really clicked something wrong, edited an old version or something else. I really only wanted to remove Category:Message templates because they are for user namespace. That's what I did. The rest I think is fine or do you have something? Your three points also fit now again. Regards --W like wiki ^{good to know} 08:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IgenCoa

Hello W like wiki,
I'm Kontributor 2K, working on heradry.
What I mean exactly is : Do you intend to go on working on Sarang's heraldry modules ?
Actually, some minor fixes are required, and other updates might be too
Thank you,
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ola @Kontributor 2K: Thank you for asking! No actually I have no template editor rights. But funny coincidence: 10 days ago I was granting for them :). How did you find me regarding heraldry and sarang♥? Because of my creation of Category:Pages using Template:COAInformation with incorrect parameters yesterday? Or because January last year I was creating some categories in heraldry? I appreciated the work of sarang♥. some chapters above I hade a short personal talk with him, finally I was to busy to answer him again and now,

... So we will see, at the moment I am focused on some structure in Commons maintenance Thats why I found the maintence categories of {{COAInformation}}. Best regards -- W like wiki ^{Please ping me! • Postive1 • Postive2} 00:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK,

See you later then, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template editor given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted template editor right to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to work with templates. Please consider enabling two-factor authentication for your account. Furthermore, please look at Category:Commons protected edit requests (template protected) occasionally and try to help your fellow Commoners with responding to their edit requests. Thank you.

Gruß + Dank, Achim55 (talk) 18:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update request

Hello.

Can you add the border of South Sudan in:

File:Major endorheic basins.png
File:Ocean drainage-HE.png
File:Ocean drainage.png
File:Idrografia Africa IT.png
File:Valle del Nilo.jpg
File:Congo-Nile Divide.svg
File:Congo-Nile Divide2.png
File:CongoLualaba watershed topo political.png
File:Top50stedenAfrika1.PNG
File:Top50stedenAfrika2.PNG
File:Top50stedenAfrika3.PNG
File:GreaterMiddleEastbg.png (South Sudan is not part of the Greater Middle East)
File:GreaterMiddleEast2.png (South Sudan is not part of the Greater Middle East)
File:Map of the Arab-Israeli conflict-tag.svg (South Sudan is not part of the Arab World and nor involved in that conflict)
File:UDEAC and CEMAC in ECCAS.png
File:UMA.PNG
File:Igad2.png
File:Östafrika.png

Yours sincerely, Oirattas (talk) 19:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:W like wiki

Contents

Vesyolkin

"Eurocrisis" (unable to translate from German the name)

Concerns about redlinks in the VehicleModelYearC template

Notification about possible deletion

file:L Gewandhaus 1881-77,341.tif

File:Tyre and Rim Technical data 01-en.svg

Copyright status: File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png

Copyright status: File:RBL Logo 2014 44x23.png

File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png

commonslinks berichtigen

Category:Versöhnungskirche (Dresden)

"Bundesautobahns"

Category:Mediawiki websites

St. Stephen's Lutheran Church.JPG

Maragheh observatory Platonic solid highlighted.svg

Danke

Category:Race and Ethnicity by Eric Fischer (2010 Census data)

Category:Maps by continent by country

Rieger organs

Glass objects

COM:AN/U

Image generation/doc

File:Planche des belles filles statue.JPG

Category:---sort order demo/SubcategoryNote

Versteckte und nicht-versteckte Kategorien

File:Hecker entwurfe 2010-01-08 1 -090-1.1600x900.webp

Round bales

Template:No documentation/doc

IgenCoa

Template editor given

Update request

Navigation menu

User talk:W like wiki

"Eurocrisis" (unable to translate from German the name)

Concerns about redlinks in the VehicleModelYearC template

Notification about possible deletion

Copyright status: File:1.fc koeln logo 22x25.png

Copyright status: File:RBL Logo 2014 44x23.png

commonslinks berichtigen

Category:Versöhnungskirche (Dresden)

"Bundesautobahns"

Danke

Rieger organs

Glass objects

COM:AN/U

Category:---sort order demo/SubcategoryNote

Versteckte und nicht-versteckte Kategorien

Round bales

IgenCoa

Template editor given

Update request

Navigation menu

Search