User talk:Tournasol7/Archive31

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de la Minyona in Cardona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardener river in Suria (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vincent church in Cardona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Cardona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cardona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Francis church in Manresa (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palau Llobera in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)  Support good quality -- --Matutinho 06:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Sant Roc in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)  Support good quality -- --Matutinho 06:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal del Pont in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)  Support idem -- --Matutinho 06:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episcopal Palace in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)  Support idem -- --Matutinho 06:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Font de la placa del Palau Episcopal in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placa de Sant Isidre in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Travessia de Sant Josep de Calassanc in Solsona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Font de la placa de Sant Joan in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral & Font de la placa del Palau Episcopal in Solsona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal del Castell in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Remei del Castellvell in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)  Support good quality ----Matutinho 13:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal de Llobera in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)  Support good quality ----Matutinho 13:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital chapel in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)  Support good quality ----Matutinho 13:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Mercy church in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)  Support good quality ----Matutinho 13:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castellvell in Solsona (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Organya (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Seu d'Urgell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sala Sant Domenec in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serra del Cadi (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us!

Hello Tournasol7/Archive31,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

• 1st prize: 500 USD
• 2nd prize: 400 USD
• 3rd prize: 300 USD
• Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
• Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
• Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
• Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
• Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in La Seu d'Urgell (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urgellensis Ecclesiae Archivia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episcopal Palace in La Seu d'Urgell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrer de Sant Agusti in La Seu d'Urgell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segre river in La Seu d'Urgell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Immaculate Conception church in La Seu d'Urgell (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrer Major 30 in La Seu d'Urgell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cal Mossen Andreu in La Seu d'Urgell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulstrasse 2 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulstrasse 6 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 60 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 65 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 63 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 40 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs at the chimney. Please try to remove it. --XRay 05:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 7 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelical rectory in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberger Strasse 2 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 6 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 24 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 23 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 19 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 11 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well at Kirchenstrasse in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guentherschem Waisenhaus in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 5 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 8 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brauergasse 2 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 18 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neugasse 1 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neugasse 5 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 25 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cronbergergasse in Ladenburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metzgergasse in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faerbergasse in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faerbergasse 17 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faerbergasse 15 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faerbergasse 11 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheingaustrasse 6 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 37 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 38 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinheimer Strasse 46 in Viernheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celje National Hall (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Celje (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celje Cathedral (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Ptuj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town tower in Ptuj (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Island & Bled Castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celje National Hall (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Celje (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celje Cathedral (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Ptuj (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesuitengasse 1 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martinian church in St-Martinien (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lamaids (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pardulphus church in Frontenat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Treignat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Pardulphus church in Mesples (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Salvere church in Saint-Sauvier (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St Palais Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chamberat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Viplaix (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 place Louise Therese de Montaignac in Montlucon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dionysius church in Chazemais (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Desiderius church in St-Eloy-d'Allier (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Courcais (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Nassigny (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Marinus church in Nassigny (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Sebastian church in Estivareilles (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius church in Audes (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cher river near Vaux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Victor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint George church in Desertines (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-en-Murat (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Michael & Blaise church in St Angel (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Deneuille-les-Mines (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martial church in Deneuille-les-M (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Sornin Allier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Montserrat Abbey (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montserrat Abbey (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Fiacre church in Monetay-sur-Allier (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julien church in Cressanges (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Rocles (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Noyant-d'Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Treban (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montord (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee de la Vigne in Saint-Pourcain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Fourilles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cesset (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Marien church in Target (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Hyds (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Blomard (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Beaune-d'Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Malicorne Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ronnet (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Genesius church in St-Genest (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Thomas church in La Petite-Marche (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julian church in St-Fargeol (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Marcellus church in St-Marcel-en-Marcillat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Terjat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Villebret (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Durdat-Larequille (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Durdat (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Larequille (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Neris-les-Bains (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Stephen church in St-Etienne-de-Vicq (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Germain church in Crechy (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montoldre (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bouce Allier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Felix Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Gervasius & Julian church in Barrais-Bussolles (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Roch church in Billezois (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Perigny Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Lapalisse (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Liernolles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Ottmarsheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Monetay-sur-Loire (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Coulanges Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravane TdF 2022 in Rodez (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-Premier Tech TdF 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in Montcel (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Tresserre (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Le Boulou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Jozerand (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fallen leaf of Platanus x hispanica (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bonitus church in St-Bonnet-pres-Riom (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Translation of St Nicholas church in Gimeaux (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Teilhede (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Prompsat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Yssac-la-Tourette (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Gall church in Beauregard-Vendon (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Davayat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menhir de Montotoute (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Davayat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Aubiat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Varennes-sur-Morge (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pessat-Villeneuve (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Pause Castle in Pessat-Villeneuve (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Clerlande (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Martres-sur-Morge (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Grimardias in Maringues (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Surat (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Andre-le-Coq (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Ignat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Translation of St Martin church in St-Ignat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavoir de l'Ayrolle in Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Chappes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in St-Laure (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Entraigues Puy-de-Dome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redemptoristines convent in Riom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 rue de l'Hôtel de Ville in Riom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Agricola & Vitalis church in Bulhon (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Joze (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Les Martres-d'Artiere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Culhat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady priory in Noalhat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Hilarius church in Limons (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Translation of St Martin church in Crevant-Laveine (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Luzillat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Puy-Guillaume (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Alexandre Dumas in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Dorat (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue du Marche in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 35 rue Conchette in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle ND-de-la-Route de Pont-de-Dore (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Domninus, Dionysius & Our Lady church in Seychalles (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Saint George chapel in Lezoux (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross in Peschadoires (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Caprasius church St-Jean-d'Heurs (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lempty (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Espirat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Vassel (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of St John the Baptist church in Moissat-Haut (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bouzel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chas (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cournon-d'Auvergne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bonitus church in St-Bonnet-les-Allier (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mur-sur-Allier (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Perignat-sur-Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Perignat-sur-Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Busseol (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Symphorian church in La Roche-Noire (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mirefleurs (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Mirefleurs (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Laps (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Calmont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Le Piboul (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Palais in Vic-le-Comte (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at place de la Republique in Vic-le-Comte (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maurice church in St-Maurice PdD (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pignols (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Coudes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sanctuary in Meritxell (1).jpg

And also:

• File:Sanctuary in Meritxell (2).jpg
• File:Sanctuary in Meritxell (3).jpg
• File:Sanctuary in Meritxell (4).jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 11:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viaur river in Moulin d'Ayres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Tayac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pas de la Casa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic de Tossal Mercader (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic d'Auriol from Pas de la Casa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julitta church in Milhac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trou de Bozouls (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Calmont Aveyron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ND-des-Carnesses chapel in Montaillou (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Vincent church in Ax-les-Thermes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino in Ax-les-Thermes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Prades (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis in Ariege (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Coudons (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cosmas and Damian church in Belcaire (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Roquefeuil (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Espezel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Principale in Ginoles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Rennes-le-Chateau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand-Rue Vaysse Barthelemy in Quillan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de l'Eglise in Quillan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Quillan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Couiza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Arques (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Coustaussa (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Serres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Serres Aude (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Albieres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Termes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mouthoumet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Quiricus and Julietta church in Laroque-de-Fa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Termes Aude (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Tineries in Lagrasse (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee du Piano in Limoux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du Presbytere in Limoux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Calviere in Alet-les-Bains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Alzonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Kingston DIMM 16 GB DDR4-3200Jaritz 04:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees from Pezens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Pennautier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Ventenac-Cabardes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Julian & Basilissa church in Ventenac-Cabardes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Alzonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey church in St-Polycarpe (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pezens (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Belcastel-et-Buc (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Buc (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Consulat in Lagrasse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. oh yeah, pretty good photo! --Modern primat 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Monze (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Rieux-en-Val (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mark church in Taurize (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Languedoc in Servies-en-Val (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Pradelles-en-Val (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phone booth bookcase in Villar-en-Val (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Villetritouls (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Villetritouls (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauquet river in Clermont-sur-Lauquet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Labastide-en-Val (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 rue Calviere in Alet-les-Bains (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 place du Marche aux Vins in Selestat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 place du Marche aux Vins in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 rue des Franciscains in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humanist Library in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 rue des Chevaliers in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Marcellus church in Fonties-d'Aude (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of Fine Arts in Carcassonne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! School group Jean-Jaures in Carcassonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican chapel in Carcassonne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Rolland in Carcassonne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Faith school in Selestat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 place du Marche Vert in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue de la Grande Boucherie in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue du Babil in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 rue du Babil in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9 rue de la Grande Boucherie in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18 place du Marche aux Choux in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Billex in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 place du Marche aux Choux in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19 rue des Bateliers in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 rue des Oies in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9 rue des Chevaliers in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge des Allies in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 rue des Precheurs in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel d'Andlau in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 place d'Armes in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 place d'Armes in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 rue des Franciscains in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adelphus church in Kingersheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burned area in Massif de la Clape (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Gruissan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de l'Universite in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Tronsson Ducoudray in Reims (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cours Anatole-France in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Vesle in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 25 rue Carnot in Reims (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montlucon (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St Louis chapel in Montlucon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passage du Doyenne in Montlucon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Grande in Montlucon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of the Dukes of Bourbon in Montlucon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius church in Audes (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dionysius church in Chazemais (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Nassigny (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont-canal de Chantemerle in Vaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Sebastian church in Estivareilles (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Vaux (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post office in Vaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eligius church in Vaux (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Victor (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Marinus church in Nassigny (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some tilt --Poco a poco 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)  Done. --Tournasol7 13:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martial church in Deneuille-les-M (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint George church in Desertines (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Michael & Blaise church in St Angel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Priest-en-Murat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-en-Murat (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Treban (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Treban (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Fiacre church in Monetay-sur-Allier (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julien church in Cressanges (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Rocles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Saturnin & James church in St-Sornin (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Rocles Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Noyant-d'Allier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sioule river in St Pourcain sur Sioule (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge over the Sioule river in St Pourcain (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Marien church in Target (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Pourcain-sur-Sioule (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in St-Pourcain-sur-Sioule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 pl. du Marechal Foch in St-Pourcain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Fourilles (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Fourilles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Hyds (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Malicorne Allier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in Malicorne (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Beaune-d'Allier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Blomard (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cesset (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Montord (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Aignan church in Beaune-d'Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dionysius church in Sittensen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Danckelmann in Lingen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Wittenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Wittenburg (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Wittenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Markt 12 in Wittenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittenburger Gluecksfaenger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former town hall in Lingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Markt 16 in Lingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Ursula church in Hasseluenne (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in Zeven (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruene Strasse 13 in Ottersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ottersberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 05:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lingen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformed church in Lingen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Cloppenburg (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Wildeshausen (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former town hall in Wildeshausen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Alexander church in Bawinkel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vincent church in Haseluenne (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in Loeningen (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Loeningen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Lastrup (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 13 in Wildeshausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courthouse in Cloppenburg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former town hall in Wildeshausen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Strasse 18 in Wildeshausen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Oyten (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Alexander church in Wildeshausen (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ottersberg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Oyten (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Alexander church in Wildeshausen (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remter in Wildeshausen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hunte river in Wildeshausen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Wittenburg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Wittenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dionysius church in Sittensen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courthouse in Zeven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in Zeven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fallen leaf of Platanus x hispanica (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fallen leaf of Platanus x hispanica (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Strasse 18 in Wildeshausen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Wildeshausen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Danckelmann in Lingen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lingen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Cesset (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former town hall in Wildeshausen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Haseluenne (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice light, good composition, good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vincent church in Haseluenne (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Ursula church in Hasseluenne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Alexander church in Bawinkel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Loeningen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Haseluenne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Cloppenburg (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in Zeven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ottersberg (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Lastrup (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the St Vitus church in Loeningen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in Loeningen (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Wildeshausen (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courthouse in Cloppenburg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Wittenburg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Oyten (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)These images are all taken in the finishing area after the end of the run aren't they? --Charlesjsharp 10:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marco Odermatt Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marco Schwarz Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marco Schwarz Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marco Schwarz Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marco Schwarz Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zan Kranjec Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manuel Feller Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filippo Della Vite Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikaela Shiffrin Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 04:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filippo Della Vite Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Steen Olsen Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Steen Olsen Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vincent Kriechmayr Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra Vlhova Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra Vlhova Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra Vlhova Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wendy Holdener Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leona Popovic Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanna Aronsson Elfman Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ana Bucik Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sara Hector Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katharina Truppe Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelle Gisin Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anna Swenn-Larsson Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 05:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anna Swenn-Larsson Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paula Moltzan Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ana Bucik Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katharina Liensberger Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ana Bucik Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katharina Truppe Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laurence St-Germain Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ali Nullmeyer Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ana Bucik Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laurence St-Germain Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelle Gisin Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ali Nullmeyer Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camille Rast Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jessica Hilzinger Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filippo Della Vite Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jessica Hilzinger Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filippo Della Vite Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luca De Aliprandini Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ana Bucik Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camille Rast Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patrick Feurstein Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filippo Della Vite Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stefan Brennsteiner Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luca De Aliprandini Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)