User talk:Sp5uhe
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Please see Commons:Deletion guidelines. Some of the images you have tagged for speedy deletion may or may not be out of scope, and if you think they are inappropriate you may list them for deletion. However speedy deletion is only used in certain more narrow cases; see the guidelines at the link for more details. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 14:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Also, for my own photos, note that the photos of me I uploaded as they illustrate certain topics relevent to Commons, and are used in categories or pages in such manner. -- Infrogmation 14:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your trust
[edit]Thank you for exhibiting trust in me in my recent request. I will do my best to continue to act in a way that will benefit the commons and the commons community. -- Avi 01:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Nowe Ateny KOŃ - str 475, 476.jpg is uncategorized since 12 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Nowe Ateny s475.jpg is uncategorized since 12 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Nowe Ateny s476.jpg is uncategorized since 12 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Dariusz-Zawiślak.jpg is uncategorized since 27 March 2009.
- Image:PL Świąteczna przygoda a very chrismas story Dariusz Zawislak.jpg is uncategorized since 11 April 2009.
- Image:Katarzyna Surmiak-Domańska.jpg was uncategorized on 7 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 00:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Szczepan Jankowski 1.jpg was uncategorized on 1 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Szczepan Jankowski 2.jpg was uncategorized on 1 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Please could you see with Demonides who questions the deletion request. See User talk:Yann#File:Gen. bryg. Stanis.C5.82aw BUTLAK.JPG. Also you didn't copy the warning to his talk page. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Witam serdecznie. Owszem, zdjęcie File:Gen. bryg. Stanisław BUTLAK.JPG, które umieściłem w haśle Stanisław Butlak było zrobione przez profesjonalnego fotografa celem włożenia do Teczki Akt Personalnych. Zgodę na publikację tego zdjęcia otrzymałem, więc opublikowałem je na oficjalnej stronie 23 Śląskiej Brygady. Dlaczego jako Admin strony 23SBA nie mogę tego samego zdjęcia umieścić w Wiki? Zakład fotograficzny, w którym zostało zrobione powyższe zdjęcie nie istnieje już od kilku ładnych lat. Demonides (talk) 11:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Encyklopedja staropolska ilustrowana
[edit]Witaj, tak patrzę na OZ i zauważyłem twój upload. Może lepiej użyć szablon {{Book}}? Ewentualnie mogę później przejechać całą staropolską botem i zmienić tabelkę. Yarl ✉ 16:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Prośba
[edit]Szczerze mowiac to sporo roboty by bylo, ale bot by to zrobil w kilkanascie minut. Trzeba by bylo napisac w jakichs tutejszych zadaniach dla botow, ale nie wiem gdzie takie sa. Moze user:jarekt bedzie wiedzial, bo on jest bardziej spolecznosciowo oblatany. Herr Kriss (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Niby mozna, ale recznie to strasznie dlugo by zajelo. Herr Kriss (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Serio, lepiej to botem robic, ja nie mam zbytnio czasu spedzac dwie godziny non stop przenoszac. Herr Kriss (talk) 02:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Glosujac przeciwko nie powiedzialem, ze bede robil wszystkie prace, ktore mi zlecisz, szczegolnie takie, ktore znaczaco obciazaja, mimo braku czasu. Skoro sa boty z uprawnieniami admina, to zglos sie do takiego operatora, albo zglos sie do innego admina, ktory ma ochote przenosic kilkaset plikow. Herr Kriss (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Aha, mozesz skorzystac z {{Rename}}. Herr Kriss (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Glosujac przeciwko nie powiedzialem, ze bede robil wszystkie prace, ktore mi zlecisz, szczegolnie takie, ktore znaczaco obciazaja, mimo braku czasu. Skoro sa boty z uprawnieniami admina, to zglos sie do takiego operatora, albo zglos sie do innego admina, ktory ma ochote przenosic kilkaset plikow. Herr Kriss (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Serio, lepiej to botem robic, ja nie mam zbytnio czasu spedzac dwie godziny non stop przenoszac. Herr Kriss (talk) 02:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
OTRS
[edit]Cześć! Widziałem, że przyszła zgoda na OTRS na to zdjęcie, jednak spodziewałem się, że zgoda obejmie również i tę grafikę. Jeśli nie ma zgody, to proszę od razu oznacz do usunięcia. Jeśli jestem w błędzie, to dziękuję za sprostowanie. Pozdrawiam, Patrol110 talk 19:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tomasz_Reich_2008-04-20.jpg
[edit]- spoko - po prostu widzialem na OTRS ten mejl odnosnie czegos w tym hasle, wiedzialem ze sie tym zajmiesz, stad pomyslalem, ze cie o grafice przy okazji zawiadomie. Masur (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 08:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:GDJ_2010_Jabłonna_022.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GDJ_2010_Jabłonna_022.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
4028mdk09 (talk) 13:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sp5uhe,
don't you think that File:PL Sabat 2010 023.JPG is somewhat embarrassing for the depicted user? As we have enough other shots of her, this one could be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 11:05, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Polish speaking OTRS agent requested
[edit]See this thread. I'm not sure how urgent it really is.--Chaser (talk) 01:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Tak - ale tak czy owak - wyszło z niego, że nie ma potwierdzenia na zgodę na CC-BY-SA i GNU FDL na pliki, które załadował Pkuczynski - a na maile i wpisy w dyskusji (w Wikipedii) - nie reaguje. Trzeba więc tą sprawę rozwiązać - zwłaszcza, że to dotyczy fotek zawodowego fotografa. Ciągnąłeś tą sprawę w 2009 i wtedy ona nie została załatwiona do końca. [1] i pewnie dlatego nie wstawiłeś wtedy szablonów OTRS do tych zdjęć. Plus jest taki problem, że w tym szablonie jest ewidentna reklama tego zawodowca, co też nie jest zgodne z zasadami Commons. Drugi taki przypadek to fotki Łukasza Łukasika User:Pkuczynski/Lukasz Lukasik - [2] - tu nie ma żadnego w ogóle potwierdzenia zgody. Polimerek (talk) 10:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Hej,
obsłużyłeś ten ticket w grudniu 2010, ale nie dodałeś na stronę pliku żadnej informacji o tym, że zgoda została otrzymana, w związku z czym wczoraj plik został usunięty. Przed chwilą go przywróciłem, na przyszłość jednak proszę, żebyś dodawał informacje o otrzymaniu zgody na strony opisu plików. Pozdrowienia, odder (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Bażantarnia in Pszczyna - 1920 postcard.jpg.tif
[edit]Jakiś wydawca? Albo chociaż konkretny link do strony na której jest osadzona? Teraz to nawet nie wynika, że to widokówka jest. Równie dobrze można by podać "google.com". Masur 19:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Tak samo to - File:Bażantarnia in Pszczyna - map 2.jpg - autor wcale nie jest anonimowy, bo jest podpisany na mapie (niestety z powodu jakości nie idzie rozczytać); także data bardzo dokładnie jest podana. No ale tak się wpisuje, jak się nawet oryginału albo dobrej kopii w ręku nie miało, prawda? I pięknie weryfikowalne (nie mówię o licencji, bo to że to pd-old to dośc logiczne, ale zwykłej weryfikowalności/źródłach) grafiki trafiają do haseł. Masur 19:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Wiesz, może mój komenatrz był nieco ostry (za co przepraszam, jeśli odebrałeś go zbyt osobiście), ale chodzi mi głównie o to, że mamy teraz super nastawienie w kierunku źródeł w hasłach, podczas gdy pliki nikogo w tej kwestii nie interesują. A przecież fałszywe informacje mogą być tak samo w pliku, jak i w haśle, stąd powinny nas obowiązywać podobne standardy. I wcale nie chodzi o licencje. Masur 08:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Jeśli coś jest PD, to źródło jest przydatne, ale nie jest formalnie konieczne. - formalnie jest konieczne, bo jak zweryfikować PD? Szczeólnie, jak dochodzi do przypisania sobie autorstwa i źródła. Powoduje to, że zamiast być PD, plik może być fałszywie przypisany do danej osoby. Masur 12:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Pytanie
[edit]Czy wg Ciebie rzecznikiem powinna być osoba, która wymyśla sobie nieprawdziwy powód pewnej sytuacji ("której nie chce się odpisywać")? Jakbyś się zapytał normalnie to bym Ci odpowiedział czemu nie odpisuję. Jednak w takiej sytuacji nie będę się przed Tobą tłumaczył. Co do poprzedniego pytania - zajmuję się wyłapywaniem copyvio. O sprawach językowych proszę pisać do osoby, która się zna na tym - nie da się ukryć, że mój język jest słaby. Na bugzillę każdy może zgłaszać błędy. Linki w protectedpagetext kierują do dyskusji artykułu, więc jest ok. Z mojej strony sprawa zakończona, nie będę więcej odpowiadał na Twoje zaczepki. Jeśli masz sprawę do adminów to zapraszam na COM:VP. Jest też polski stolik. Herr Kriss (talk) 01:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ale ja poważnie mówię, że nie jestem kompetentny w sprawach językowych, więc wolę nie tłumaczyć komunikatów systemowych, jeśli nie jest to jakis banalny błąd, który dla mnie jest oczywisty. Z tego co widzę, to najlepiej napisać do Julo, Maire. Pewnie z kilku innych też, ale nie chcę wprowadzać w błąd - co do tych dwóch userów jestem na 100% pewien. Herr Kriss (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Na jakiej podstawie twierdzisz, że ten tekst jest udostępniony na licencji cc-by-sa-3.0 (czytaj: kto udzielił takiej licencji)? Jeśli nie jesteś autorem tekstu, to powinieneś wskazać stronę, na której taka licencja została udzielona, lub przesłać kopię podpisanej przez autora zgody na udzielenie licencji do OTRS.
Ale raczej podejrzewam niewłaściwy szablon licencji... Ankry (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Encyklopedia Muzyczna PWM 1.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Encyklopedia Muzyczna PWM 1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Encyklopedia Muzyczna PWM 1.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Logan Talk Contributions 06:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Encyklopedia Muzyczna PWM 2.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Encyklopedia Muzyczna PWM 2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Encyklopedia Muzyczna PWM 2.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Logan Talk Contributions 06:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Jmabel ! talk 03:03, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Your admin status
[edit]Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.
You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on plwikibooks, where you are an administrator. Since plwikibooks does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.
If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.
We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.
Best regards, Rschen7754 17:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
dzięki za zdjęcia
[edit]dzięki za zdjęcia. Anwar2