User talk:Rilegator

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rilegator!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Category:Chartreuse de Fayard

Bonjour Rilegator. Je viens pour la deuxième fois de supprimer la Category:Carthusian monasteries in France attachée à la Category:Chartreuse de Fayard. Dans le Sud-Ouest de la France, une chartreuse est souvent le nom donné à un bâtiment noble, qu'on pourrait parfois appeler manoir. Des religieux n'ont jamais habité dans ces demeures. En voici un autre exemple et encore un autre. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Igor. Je comprends. Pardon! Et merci pour cette note. Cordialement. Rilegator (talk)

TUSC token 87b67e0c9cc08d962f6f2504377886e4

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:James Joyce in Ljubljana.JPG

File:James Joyce in Ljubljana.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Hystrix (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Category: 1. Land developed and cultivated by man in Germany versus 2. Cultural landscapes of Germany?

Hallo Rilegator, die von mir (1.) gewählte Bezeichnung habe ich nach der Konsultation meines Langenscheidts und reiflicher Überlegung gewählt, weil es nämlich nicht die in den Welterbe-Listen aufgeführten Landschaften oder Bauwerke definiert, sondern die durch menschliche Einflüsse geformten Landschaften. Es betrifft also die durch Ackerbau, Aufforstung, Weinbau oder sonstige landschaftsveränderten bzw. gartenbauveränderten menschlichen Umgestaltung geprägten Landschaften, während die Welterbe-Listen entweder besonders schützenswerte architektonische oder natürliche Besonderheiten aufführen und würdigen. Ich halte daher die von mir gewählte Bezeichnung für besser geeignet und genauer für derartige Objekte. --dontworry (talk) 08:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Dontworry. Kulturlandschaften (Cultural landscapes) sind Landschaften, die im Gegensatz zu Naturlandschaften, ihre Eigenart menschlichem Einfluss verdanken. Mit Welterbe-Listen hat der Begriff also nichts zu tun. Der Begriff "Kulturlandschaft" ist älter als die UNESCO und stammt aus dem 19. Jahrhundert. Eine Kulturlandschaft ist und bleibt eine Kulturlandschaft, auch wenn sie nicht zum Welterbe zählt und sie wird dadurch nicht zum "Land entwickelt und kultiviert von Menschen" (Land developed and cultivated by man). Gruß, --Rilegator (talk) 13:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Rilegator, das ist aber jetzt ein Widerspruch in einem Satz: Zuerst Kultur durch menschlichen Einfluss (also: developed and cultivated by man) und danach sie wird dadurch nicht zum "Land entwickelt und kultiviert von Menschen" - also, was denn nun - ja oder ja? ;-D Selbstverständlich wurden Naturlandschaften erst durch die Kultur (Entwicklung und Kultivierung, nicht umsonst reden die Agrarökonomen beim Fruchtanbau von Kulturen!) der Menschen zur Kulturlandschaft. Aber der Begriff ist vermutlich an sich so vielfältig und unscharf (sowohl Deutsch als auch Englisch), dass es dabei je nach Schwerpunkt und eigener Perspektive immer verschiedene Ansichten dazu geben wird. Der von mir gewählte Begriff ist dabei nur etwas schärfer als das allgemein gebräuchliche kulturell. --dontworry (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Leo

Aloha! FYI: Bin grade ueber diesen Link gestolpert: [1]. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 15:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Ich weiß, der Link stammt aus der englisch übersetzten Seite dieser russischen Quelle: [2]. --Rilegator (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Okidoki. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 16:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BraunschweigerDom 20170121 Vierung B ohneDecke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very impressive --Llez 14:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Blackheads

Hello! What is your source for categorizing two Swedish kings as belonging to the Brotherhood of Blackheads? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:55, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

They were members of the Brotherhood of Blackheads according to: Friedrich Amelung, Geschichte der Revaler Schwarzenhäupter von ihrem Ursprung an bis auf die Gegenwart nach den urkundenmäßigen Quellen des Revaler Schwarzenhäupter-Archivs 1. Die erste Blütezeit von 1399–1557. Reval: Wassermann, 1885. --Rilegator (talk) 09:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

?? One of them was only 26 and the other was newborn when that book was published. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Events in

Hallo Rilegator, hast du das Bild File:Olympiade samstag bfkuu denkmayr 0126 (35146022743).jpg‎ genau angeschaut. Es handelt sich um ein Event in Villach - das ist aber nicht Zagreb ;-) es waren Teilnehmer aus Zagreb. Also people of Zagreb würde passen. Aber Event in Zagreb net wirklcih. --gruß K@rl (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Karl, Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur.--Rilegator (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Braunschweig FW Culemann Waisenhaus Alexiushaus 1798.jpg

Copyright status: File:Braunschweig FW Culemann Waisenhaus Alexiushaus 1798.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Braunschweig FW Culemann Waisenhaus Alexiushaus 1798.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Maximilian Stark

Category:Maximilian Stark is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion): https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Maximilian_Stark&diff=715991614&oldid=715975417 If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 11:35, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Tobias categories

Hello, Rilegator. Just so you know, my plan was to check all those files that I changed to make sure there weren't any category issues like the ones you reverted. I'm still going to check.

By the way, one of the ones you reverted was for a file in Category:Tobias and the Angel (Titian). That painting wasn't in any Tobias category until I added it a little while ago. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello Auntof6, thanks for your explanation. I was afraid there was a mistake. Thanks for checking. Rilegator (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:Perspective_views_by_subject

Perspective views by subject has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)