User talk:Pro2

English: Welcome to the Commons, Pro2!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 20:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Taken with Nikon D300, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.  -Kanonkas_(talk) 12:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Carla Bruni-Sarkozy (3).jpg

Hi,

Thk's to had choose my photo. Would you like I upload a bigger size of this photo. The original size is 2592*3888 (4,9 Mo). Witch size do you want? Have a goo day. CaptainHaddock (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, would be good. If you want, you can upload the original Size..maybe a litte bit lower. Thank you. -- Pro2 (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured Picture promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Carla Bruni-Sarkozy (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carla Bruni-Sarkozy (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset dorum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks a bit oversharpened to me, composition is great --Mbdortmund 15:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC) Now better? -- Pro2 14:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC) good --Mbdortmund 00:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Featured Picture promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sunset dorum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunset dorum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Karel (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra Allwetterzoo Münster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Request Not identified. Lycaon 22:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Better now? Pro2 13:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC) Almost ;-). Just the scientific name and the category and I'll promote. Lycaon 13:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC) Fixed. Lycaon 16:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

GFDL-1.2 auf de

Hallo. Was heisst denn Dein Editsummary so it's ok beim wiederherstellen des EB Statuses des GFDL-1.2 only Schmetterlings? --Dschwen (talk) 03:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Hm, ich habs ja nicht direkt wiederhergestellt. Ich habs ja auf de=2 gesetzt, also dass es mal ein exzellentes Bild war. (was ja auch stimmt, war ja mal als exzellentes Bild eingetragen) Fand ich besser, als den Hinweis ganz zu entfernen. Aber prinzipiell soll es mir egal sein, also wenns dir nicht gefällt, kannst du es auch wieder rausnehmen. :-) -- Pro2 (talk) 13:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gazania rigens var. rigens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 01:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset lüdenscheid germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domestic Goose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 02:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gazania rigens var. rigens.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gazania rigens var. rigens.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robert De Niro KVIFF portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done, good quality --Richard Bartz 22:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goura scheepmakeri sclaterii 1 Luc Viatour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Definitely a QI. Love the pastel background. --Siipikarja 10:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Robert De Niro KVIFF portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Robert De Niro KVIFF portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Splash 2 color.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technical good, the edge of the pot isn't really fancy and the crop on the right side is a bit tight . but .... let's go QI. --Richard Bartz 15:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Splash 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments certainly QI-material --Mbdortmund 20:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MarienkircheHalle Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Outstanding quality. --kallerna 13:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC) FP quality indeed. (but please add author if you nominate someone else's work). Lycaon 17:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MarienkircheHalle Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good, shouldn't the person be removed? --Mbdortmund 23:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC) Das Entfernen von Personen ist verboten ;-) --Berthold Werner 06:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)  Comment This is already a FP, what's the point of nominating it here? Yann 21:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)  Comment AFAIK there is no rule, that FPs cannot be nominated as QIs --Berthold Werner 06:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC) And it's featured on German Wiki, not on Commons. Btw: There is a version without the person here -- Pro2 12:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)  Support OK then good. Yann 10:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC) FP and QI are not mutually exclusive, this is not a hierarchical system and the same goes for VI: An image can be any or each of them. Lycaon 22:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Actitis hypoleucos.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Actitis hypoleucos.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 18:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church Mylau - side 2009 (aka).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly garden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The bytterfly looks very good to me, but to me the image might benefit of some of the blurry flowers in the foreground being cropped off. But Im no expert. --Korall 21:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Torn over this one: love the butterfly, hate the distracting and unbalancing background flower --Vladanr 09:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)  Support Agree about the background/foreground, but the excellent quality of the butterfly lets me forget about this; after all, this is QI and not FP. -- H005 17:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

You forgot to sign

here. Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

thank you. -- Pro2 (talk) 23:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KTM Quad 990 neutral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:KTM Quad 990 neutral.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KTM Quad 990 neutral.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Rename

Hello. Regarding your rename request, i want to inform you about something. Wiki guideline tells us that "If a filename in a local project conflicts with a filename at Commons, the file in the local project should be renamed. Renaming it at Commons instead would mean changing it in 500+ projects instead of just 1." Therefor, your request has been denied. All best. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 18:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Pro2!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Butterfly unnamed.JPG was uncategorized on 3 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Terassengarten-gottorf 100 1227 copy.jpg was uncategorized on 17 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly unnamed.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama herscheid stottmert germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice sunset. --King of Hearts 07:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herscheid stottmert germany sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very beautiful. --Saffron Blaze 16:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi, I just saw you tweeked my Cardualis tristis picture. What a great result! I thought it was good enough but it didn't pass QI, but now, I'm sure it will work! Thank you again and I look foward to a new collaboration! Letartean (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

My pleasure ;-) -- pro2 15:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Danke!

Danke für deine Bearbeitung meines Fotos (Weißes_Dinner), hab erst jetzt mitbekommen, dass noch ein Vorschlag in der Fotowerkstatt gemacht wurde. Gefällt mir wirklich besser so! --Berita (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Gerne doch :-) -- pro2 05:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:FED3-18.jpg

Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Mariposa monarca (Danaus plexippus), Jardín Botánico de Múnich, Alemania, 2013-01-27, DD 01.JPG

I doubt whether the file description and category are wrong here. JKadavoor Jee 15:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry; I posted in a wrong place. :( JKadavoor Jee 04:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Never mind! -- pro2 15:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caligo eurilochus bananenfalter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lambertikirche Innenraum Münster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Salzburg Dezember 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a lot of interesting details. --Milseburg 19:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolf Alpenzoo Innsbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add a category which location it was taken on, and consider doing it for each of your uploads. --A.Savin 18:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Done. --Pro2 17:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC) --A.Savin 20:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus München 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fukuoka Tower Before Sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Jesuitenkirche Luzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Balloon over Luxor - Egypt denoised.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Championship celebration Borussia Dortmund 2011.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Championship celebration Borussia Dortmund 2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Chianti (talk) 17:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Championship celebration Borussia Dortmund 2011.jpg

File:Championship celebration Borussia Dortmund 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MB-one (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)