User talk:Petr Kinšt
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Plaviste 2009-08-23.jpg was uncategorized on 24 August 2009.
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Petr Kinšt, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vitčice - socha svatého Jana Nepomuckého.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
WLM Barnstar
[edit]
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Petr Kinšt, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Petr Kinšt, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Fakt krásná fotka! Díky! V březnu ji použiju jako vzor pro účastníky školení. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Díky --Petr Kinšt (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Dobrý den, domnívám se, že šablona kulturní památky k této fotce nepatří. Sochy byly do zámku umístěné dlouho po vyhlášení zámku KP. Podle mně dostupných informací (nepopírám, že můžete mít přesnější informace) jsou tyto sochy v zámku pouze vystavené, ale nejsou jeho součástí. --Xth-Floor (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Přesnější informace nemám, vycházel jsem pouze z popisku a samotné fotky, která kromě vlastních soch zachycuje také klenutý prostor zámku, který památkově chráněný je. --Petr Kinšt (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Domnívám se, že pokud je ústředním motivem snímku, podle kterého je i pojmenovaný, zcela jiný objekt a z předmětu ochrany je patrný jen zanedbatelný zlomek, pak šablona ke snímku nepatří. Působí totiž dojmem, že ústřední motiv snímku je předmětem ochrany, což není pravda. --Xth-Floor (talk) 13:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Jasně, já nad tou šablonou ve skutečnosti docela váhal. Jestli jste přesvědčen o tom, že tam být nemá, klidně ji odstraňte, nicméně myslím, že by bylo lepší ji tam nechat a podrobnosti vysvětlit v popisku. Už jen podle klenby bude ta místnost/chodba patřit k významnějším místům zámku. --Petr Kinšt (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Domnívám se, že pokud je ústředním motivem snímku, podle kterého je i pojmenovaný, zcela jiný objekt a z předmětu ochrany je patrný jen zanedbatelný zlomek, pak šablona ke snímku nepatří. Působí totiž dojmem, že ústřední motiv snímku je předmětem ochrany, což není pravda. --Xth-Floor (talk) 13:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!
[edit]Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,
každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.
Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.
Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
[email protected] -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Abandoned_cities_and_villages_in_the_Doupov_Mountains has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above and below: omitting the subpage, transclusion, year, month, and day. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)