User talk:Pandakekok9/Archive8

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	I'd love to try this sometime. I see Malunggay is also called "horseradish tree" - does it have that intense sensation of horseradish? Milkfish is not something I've ever seen around here (New York). Thanks for sharing! — Rhododendrites talk |  13:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: Apparently malunggay is called "horseradish tree" because of the roots. First time I heard about it. I haven't tasted horseradish or the roots of malunggay yet, so I can't say for sure. Thanks for the barnstar! :) pandakekok9 03:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Šumava

Hi, could you look at the quality image candidates for my picture from the Šumava

This

Thanks. --Adámoz (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

@Adámoz: Looks QI to me. pandakekok9 12:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --Adámoz (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Helpdesk page replaced ! help / sorry / etc !

Hello. Maraming salamat; thank you very much for reverting and correcting my submission to the wikimedia Helpdesk page, and please accept my very sincere apologies for the disturbance !!

I am not sure what went wrong, and I am curious about this; this is what I remember doing:

• tapped [edit] on my question on Helpdesk
• prepared text (my response to response to ... etc)
• showed preview
• did something else in a different tab (unavoidable urgent task)
• a few minutes later came back to the tab with my prepared edit
• showed preview (?perhaps after a final modif)
• published

I do not understand how I could have replaced the whole page ... do you have any idea what may have gone wrong or what I did wrongly ? (apart from the fact that I was not staying concentrated on one task :) which I freely admit to) -- Jwikip (talk) 11:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

@Jwikip: That's weird. Maybe it's a bug. This is why I always check what it looks like after saving, even though I have previewed it before publishing. No need to apologize though, all of us make mistakes. :) pandakekok9 11:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

I didn't write it in the list above but I believe I did check again after the change (I usually do) ... the situation is bizarre enough for me to suspect a bug. I cannot be sure as I don't seem to have precise timings in my browser history. By the way I believe someone else was updating at about the same time. Also please note apologising is not a problem for me, as I make mistakes all the time :) !! Thank you again -- Jwikip (talk) 12:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Vrchotovy Janovice yard.jpg - QI

Hi, look for this in QI candidates, please --Adámoz (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC) -

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zyzomys pedunculatus (Central rock rat).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Would you mind transferring the coordinates from the Flickr page? —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

@Kestreltail: Done, did I do it right? pandakekok9 02:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good now! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted the rollback right to your account. I assume that you won't need it, but just in case, you can find the default rollbacker welcome message at {{Rollbackgiven}}. Thanks for helping! Ahmad^talk 00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinclodes palliatus (White-bellied cinclodes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amstrad PPC512, closed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Please link the nomination to the relevant Commons gallery, not a Wikipedia article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Linked to its own category. I linked to the English Wikipedia article because there wasn't a category of it yet (only a broad category of IBM-PC compatible Amstrad computers), so I created its own. pandakekok9 08:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. Thanks for creating the category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinclair PC200, top cover removed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File mover

Hi, I asked User: Podzemnik to make a request for me (File mover). I want to ask you if he could make this request, because Podzemnik didn´t respond to my request. I would use these rights mainly for myself, for many times I was mistaken in the title of an image and then found that the title could not be corrected, then of course I would like to use these rights in foreign images where there are various misspellings, vulgar names and so on. Thank you. --Adámoz (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

@Adámoz: Filemover is only for those who will be actively using it and have experience in file renaming. You haven't made a file rename request, which is sort of required to say you have experience. I suggest requesting a file rename request instead on those files you wish to rename. If you want to be a filemover though, you will need to read and understand COM:FR guidelines and probably make about 20 successful rename requests before requesting the filemover right. If you haven't enabled it already (or you have disabled it), I suggest turning on the RenameLink gadget on your preferences to make your job easy. Thanks, pandakekok9 10:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Migration

How can you tell me that I can't authorize migration of the license on my own photo? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Seattle_-_looking_south_on_Fifth_Avenue_from_just_north_of_the_corner_of_Pike_-_2016.jpg&diff=409164676&oldid=186026654 - Jmabel ! talk 16:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

@Jmabel: License migration is for files first uploaded to a Wikimedia project before 1 August 2009 (or if not first released under the GFDL to a Wikimedia project, it must be uploaded before 1 November 2008 to a Wikimedia project). Your photo is obviously after 2009, so it's not eligible. You can put a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license there if you want (though it already has CC-BY-SA-4.0, so it's kinda redundant). Thanks, pandakekok9 01:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Hinckley, Jr., FBI mug shot.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unpleasant but useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

VI scope modified as per your review

Hello, pandakekok9.

I've narrowed the scope of my Valued Image nomination as requested in your review. Please revisit the nomination and consider whether you can now support it. --Bobulous (talk) 18:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Changed my vote to support. Thanks, pandakekok9 01:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
M249 Paratrooper, right side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Famberhorst (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 April 2020‎ (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Destruction of the Pont National.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterygia nucea (Nut Mitre), laying eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ray Kunze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good to see that mathematicians are getting some recognition! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Derek John Scott Robinson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This is a terrible photo, but it's the best one we've got of him. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, it's too low quality unfortunately. If we get a better photo, I would happily challenge this nomination in MVR. pandakekok9 02:07, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Number of nominations

Hi, there has been an informal agreement that three/day is a sensible maximum for number of nominations at VI. Thanks. Charles (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I only made one nomination this day, so you should have told me earlier (or later if I did made more than three)... Anyway, I searched the talk page of VIC, and there were some suggestions on a daily limit of nominations. All of them didn't result in any consensus, so I'm not sure what "informal agreement" you're referring. Archaeodontosaurus did agree that there should be 3 per day limit, but it is only his choice, and I nor any VIC participant are not obliged to follow a limit. I don't feel obliged to follow any limit, I nominate whenever I find something valuable. Nominating a lot of images in a short time is not a sign that I am reckless. I make sure each image best represent their scope and have geocoding if necessary, and I look for their categories to use as the scope. Sometimes I forget, and other reviewers remind me of it, which I do as soon as I can. I prefer it be unlimited, because I believe having an an arbitrary limit might kill VI. Another reason is because there are so many valuable images that aren't VI yet, and since most of us are under quarantine, I thought it was the best time to nominate as fast as I can. I think we should have another discussion about it on the VIC talk page and establish consensus for good. If a limit would be inevitable (and it will be if VIC grows into a community like FPC), I would be fine with 10 or 7 noms per day. pandakekok9 12:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

@Pandakekok9 and Charlesjsharp: There is a VERY INFORMAL agreement among two or three people that 3/day is the maximum. I really don't mind more nominations since we're all stuck at home anyway, and the VI repository isn't nearly as complete as it should be. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

• As you say, there is no limit. Selfishness is allowed. Charles (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

• What is selfish about making more nominations? The more images that get promoted to VI, the more complete and useful the VI repository is. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Indeed. 33,096 VIs out of 60 million files is just too low. It's not even close to the 6,054,905 articles in the English Wikipedia, nor the 718,346 documented species in Wikispecies. We definitely need to promote more images, and that means more nominations. pandakekok9 03:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rubik's Cube.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support featured picture, too ilustrative of the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezarate (talk • contribs) 2020-04-05 13:57 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 12:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ronald DiPerna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franz Georg Timmesfeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Needs a crop. Charles (talk) 12:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done. pandakekok9 12:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remington Rand KMC typewriter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remington No. 1 typewriter, with keyboard covered.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Absolutely beautiful typewriter and useful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remington No. 1 typewriter, with keyboard shown.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1909 advertisement of the Remington No. 10 and 11 typewriters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Great document and useful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
North Korean visa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wind Point Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, and we have a broader view of what's useful now than they did then, although it's by custom and has never been officially changed. Changing it is probably a good thing to do, now that some of us have a lot of time on our hands... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• I don't really want to close my own nominations, but it's been 6 days since the last vote, and no one is closing, so I will just do the inevitable I guess... pandakekok9 03:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 03:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Kallumburath Thiyyar Tharawad.jpg

File:Kallumburath Thiyyar Tharawad.jpg , you have tagged this for speedy deletion , but i request you that this file is posted in those article under creative common license and anbody can use that .please check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Othayoth shankaran (talk • contribs) 14:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cessna 620.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convair Model 103.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convair Model 111, right front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Only in Scope Not geocoded, but I doubt that information about the precise location is easy to find for such an old photo, so I believe the omission is acceptable here. --Bobulous (talk) 12:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose needs some indication of location. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I emailed the museum asking an approximate location of where this photo was taken. Please give me at least 3 days before closing. Thanks, pandakekok9 02:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• Nicely written email. I'm sure the museum people will be flattered. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. No need to wait for 3 days, @Charlesjsharp: I got a response. It's taken at Lindbergh Field, now known as the San Diego International Airport (though thinking about it, it seems it should have been obvious that it's taken at that airport, but nothing's wrong with making sure right). I've updated the file description page with geocoding. pandakekok9 12:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:38, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convair Model 116, right front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This image is tiny, but at review size I'd say that right now this image is best in the suggested scope, and also in the more generic scope "Convair Model 116". Should the scope be made more generic in this case? Also, is there any chance of geocoding this image after all these years? --Bobulous (talk) 19:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Idk, but if I made it more generic, it would conflict with this one I think. pandakekok9 05:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I'd say that this image is clearer than the other image, so I'd personally be happy for this image to be best in the generic scope, and that other image to try for the more specific scope. But maybe VI veterans ought to comment on that. --Bobulous (talk) 11:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose needs some indication of location. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I emailed the museum asking an approximate location of where this photo was taken. Please give me at least 3 days before closing. Thanks, pandakekok9 02:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

No need to wait for 3 days, @Charlesjsharp: I got a response. It's taken at Lindbergh Field, now known as the San Diego International Airport (though thinking about it, it seems it should have been obvious that it's taken at that airport, but nothing's wrong with making sure right). I've updated the file description page with geocoding. pandakekok9 12:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Pinging Charlesjsharp just in case the ping failed pandakekok9 12:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cessna Model 407 concept.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 20:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1918 Sovnarkom decree adopting the Gregorian calendar for the Russian Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Please link to a relevant Commons category, rather than a Wikipedia article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done. pandakekok9 11:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Thank you. Very interesting document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alkaline battery leakage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and seems best in scope overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your kindness

Thanks for your kindness and appreciation of my photos, and to be sure, the beauty of Luzon, Philippines, its treasures only found in the farthers sitios and villages of Barangays, very sincerely and good luck also Judgefloro (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plexippus petersi (jumping spider).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

how can i delete my own picture

Hi, how can i delete my own picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisagasparri1 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

@Elisagasparri1: You can't, only admins can do that. And seeing that the file is still being used in the Italian Wikipedia, it's unlikely it will be deleted. pandakekok9 13:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
March for Jesus in France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Previous reviews (2012 and 2013) pandakekok9 06:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Info Scope is changed from March for Jesus to March for Jesus in France. pandakekok9 06:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - Although it's a little blurry even as a thumbnail, I think File:MPJB.png is best in scope because it shows a bigger crowd and the "Marche pour Jesus" sign is in bigger letters. I'd welcome an argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

It looks like they are posing for a photo instead of marching. pandakekok9 09:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

They don't look like they're walking to you? I mean, how would we know? But some of them are not looking forward. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

There are people on top of the photo, so at first look I would assume that they are posing for a photo. But after looking closely, seems like they are walking on a bridge. I'm still not convinced though that File:MPJB.png beats this photo though. This nomination clearly shows that the people are walking, and the text is clearly visible (thanks to the higher resolution, also it has translations in annotations). On the other photo, only the "March for Jesus" text in French is readable. pandakekok9 10:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

You make good points. As documentation, in that sense, the nominated photo is more useful. I'm not sure what to think about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - I've decided to accept your argument. I think the labeling of the signs makes the difference, though it also helps that this photo is sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotchkiss Mle 1914 machine gun.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question This is the cleanest image in the category, but it shows this weapon with something hanging under the barrel which is not seen in any of the other 42 photos of this weapon (except perhaps this photo). What is that hanging under the barrel at the muzzle end, and does it make this depiction too unusual to be most useful within this scope? --Bobulous (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

To be honest: I don't know as well. I will ask Rama about that. pandakekok9 05:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

@Bobulous: So according to Rama, it's an early flash suppressor used in World War I. I think it's not unusual, in fact it's probably usual to add that to the Hotchkiss while in combat, so this adds to the value. :) You can see how the suppressor works here. pandakekok9 08:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

 Comment That's very interesting, and the image description should really be enhanced by adding a mention of this unusual flash suppressor. With that addition, I'd support this as being the most valuable image in scope. --Bobulous (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Done. Rama also added an image annotation over the flash suppressor. pandakekok9 01:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

 Support With that I'm happy to support this as best in scope. The image does not yet have geocoding, and while I'm not certain it needs it others may disagree. So if the camera coordinates at the time of taking this photo can be added, I recommend you do so. --Bobulous (talk) 11:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

The current version looks like a "studio shot", so geocoding is unnecessary I think. I added the GPS location of the Musée de l'Armée anyway just to be sure. pandakekok9 12:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Question File description says Mle 14, not Mle 1914. Which is right? Charles (talk) 20:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Mle 1914, Mle 14, and M1914 are all the same. They are synonyms. pandakekok9 03:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Demonstration against Haftar at the Berlin conference of the Libyan peace process, from the side of the protesters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Demonstration against Haftar at the Berlin conference of the Libyan peace process, facing the protesters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I agree that this one is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remington Rand version of the M1911A1 pistol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --T.Bednarz (talk) 11:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dan Wesson M1911 DW Panther (K03-B).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1940 United States Census poster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, wonderful document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Car of the Convair Model 118.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, weird curiosity. I added info about the dates of this prototype's flights to the "date" tab of the file description, because that would help people estimate the date of this photo to around 1947-48. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convair Model 118 in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Weird, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing Model 50 in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment @Pandakekok9: What is the difference between this image and the jpg one? —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

This PNG is cropped from the original TIFF scan, and since both of them are lossless, the cropping didn't result in a loss of quality. I did use however the PNG to create the JPG version, but that's for Wikimedia projects using it, and not all of us have a decent internet. In my opinion, quality should always be preserved for historical photos, and quality in historical photos = value. pandakekok9 01:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Okay. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose needs some indication of location. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't think it's possible here. The photo only shows water in the background, and the description says "a nonstop flight to Hawaii", so we can't exactly say where this photo was taken. Was it taken on the coast waters of California? Coast waters of Hawaii? Somewhere in the Pacific Ocean? Geocoding can't be done here unfortunately, and I think it can be exempted as "unknown location" in VI criterion 5. I hope you reconsider your oppose vote. Thanks, pandakekok9 02:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Charlesjsharp: See this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kestreltail (talk • contribs) 02:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Pinging just in case Kestrel's ping failed pandakekok9 03:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. Location information for a moving vehicle is irrelevant to the scope of the vehicle itself. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing Model 50 on water.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

---

Scope changed from Boeing Model 50 sailing to Boeing Model 50 on water --pandakekok9 12:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support - Useful, and I don't think the locations of vehicles need to be included for VI. It's immaterial for this scope to know which body of water the plane is on. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:20, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Qasem Soleimani (2019).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Impossible to choose one image as VI. Charles (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Anyway, the picture is not in that category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Uh, I beg your pardon? Where in the criteria does it state that the image must be exactly in the specified category linked in the scope? This photo is categorized to the subject's "in 2019" category, which is a subcat of the "by year" cat, which is a subcat of the category I linked. This one is an example of a VI that is best in scope that is not in the category linked in the scope. Sure, the cat of the file was changed after it was promoted, but do we have to cat this nomination into Category:Qasem Soleimani so that it is "in that category" and then decat it after promotion? That's a waste of time. pandakekok9 07:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

 Support Scope fixed. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia (1970).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Wrong category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@Palauenc05: Sorry, I don't understand. What category should this be in? pandakekok9 07:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• It's not in the category that is linked to your scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Scope fixed. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dan Wesson M1911 DW Pointman Minor (PM3-P).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 20:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dan Wesson M1911 DW Patriot (PT E 45).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 20:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Game Boy Camera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and I see no need for geocoding in a product shot like this. --Bobulous (talk) 21:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 20:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cecilia Roth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 20:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello pandakekok9

I can I dismiss my bot request Tbiw (talk) 09:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Closed the request for you. pandakekok9 09:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

See have just learnt about bot not the only way now I requesting for template editor Tbiw (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Commons Barnstar
		thanks man you help me get away from the bot request drama I just wanna appreciate that is why I gat to give you this keep it high please just contest for bureaucractship. Tbiw (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu

I think you strike for Copywrite Violation of the poster of Mukkadarpur ka Majnu, My dear brother, that poster belongs to the film and I am the producer of the film, How can I violate the Copywrite It is our property...

I request you to resolve this issue So that we can use the poster of the Wikipedia page of the said film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

@Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu: Please send an email to the OTRS team and provide evidence there proving that you own the copyright of the poster. Thanks, pandakekok9 09:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juan DeBiedma, aka Hungrybox.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Athletics Logo

Hello! I have been trying to update the logo of the university I work at, but it has been flagged twice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lander_Bearcats. I'm wanting to update with the correct logo so people will stop using the old one. Please let me know what I need to do to make this happen. Thanks! Rixonlane (talk) 04:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

@Rixonlane: There's two options here: either ask whoever is in charge of your university's copyright to send an email to the OTRS and confirm there that they are releasing their logo under a free license, or overwrite the local version at the English Wikipedia (en:File:LanderBearcats.png). For the latter though, it should be in a lower resolution, due to Wikipedia's Non-free/fair use media policy. pandakekok9 04:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convair Model 111, right back view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support unique in scope Ezarateesteban 20:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convair Model 116, left back view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support unique in scope Ezarateesteban 21:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dan Panosian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This one's IMO better as the subject is looking to the camera. --T.Bednarz (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 Support Subject is better-engaged with the viewer. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 02.jpg 0
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 03.jpg +2 <--
=>
1. File:Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 02.jpg : Declined.
2. File:Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 03.jpg : Promoted. <--

--pandakekok9 03:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing XP-15, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Closed nominations with no votes

I'm sorry about that. I didn't realize voting would close already with no votes. If you renominate them 3 at a time, I'll do my best to look at the other photos in scope (if any) and vote, since no-one else is doing it. Photos of these pieces of technology are surely useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:NikolayChkheidze-5.png

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikolay Chkheidze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Extracted from File:NikolayChkheidze-5.pdf, which was nominated before. This somehow got a higher resolution when I extracted it using Atril Document Viewer. I don't know whether it's the real resolution of the photo or I accidentally upscaled it without adding more details. Whatever, it's in a raster format now, so hopefully this can pass. pandakekok9 02:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your RfA

I am sorry to learn that your RfA has now been closed as "Unsuccessful". Should you wish to apply again in the future, I'd be happy to support you again. In the meantime, please stay safe. T Cells^Talk 18:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued image candidates/SARS-CoV-2 without background.png scope change

Please reconfirm your vote on Commons:Valued image candidates/SARS-CoV-2 without background.png after scope change. Piotr Bart (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Already done, thanks. pandakekok9 14:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Dhawal-Shah-2Stallions-425x425-profile.jpg is my own image

Hi pandakekok9,

The image Dhawal-Shah-2Stallions-425x425-profile.jpg belongs to me, as in, it is my photo. I gave permission to ashvindas.com to use my image. You can check that it is also on my LinkedIn profile here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dhawaljshah/

Please reverse the Copyright violation and change it to a filename change. Or let me know how else I can convince you that it is my photo to share and not a violation.

Dhawalshah2s (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Dhawalshah2s Dhawalshah2s (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

@Dhawalshah2s: First, it is the photographer who owns the copyright of that photo. So you would need permission from them. They should send an email to the OTRS team and confirm that they are releasing their photo under the free license specified on the file description page. If it's a work for hire (you hold the copyright), we still need a verification from the photographer themselves. Thanks, pandakekok9 08:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Thierry Bontridder

Hi, Please remove the banner because license authorization is accepted by Commons for all photos of the article! Thank you,--KtyMBA (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@KtyMBA: Hi, I have closed the deletion request now. Thanks, pandakekok9 02:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi Kushiiey O'cute (talk) 13:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Baidyanath Prasad Mahto

I am not aware of Wikipedia policy i am new here ......I don't know how to revert uploads I did.....help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor wikip6 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, first thank you so much for your Helps , it seems there are no severe objections in my candidancy. Could you kindly please leave you openion for determination of that right by admins. I really appreciate your time and guidance.. kind regards.--Déjà vu • ✉ 03:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isometric Pixel Art by Peterson Freitas (enlarged).gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Hello Pandakekok9,

Many thanks for reverted the file Guan Yin of the South Sea of Sanya.JPG few minutes after my request this morning.Contributeur2019 (talk) 09:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)