User talk:Olivier

• User talk:Olivier/Archives 2006-2010

TUSC token f63c37cdc4bff63ef16d5a537be1396c

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Altars in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur

Bonjour,

La Category:Altars in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur est une bonne idée. mon "petit" souci : j'en ai pris une bonne quantité, essentiellement sur le Vaucluse, mais également dans les Alpes de Hautes Provence, et les Bouches du Rhône. Des sous catégories, par département ne seraient elles pas les bienvenues ? qu'en penses tu ? Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 09:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

même question pour la Category:Pulpits in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour. J'ai cree la categorie Category:Altars in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur parce qu'elle n'existait pas encore, alors que d'autres regions en ont deja une. Evidemment, s'il y a beaucoup d'images dans plusieurs departements, une sous-categorisation me parait tout a fait adequate, comme c'est par exemple deja le cas dans Category:Altars in Aquitaine. Meme chose evidemment pour Category:Pulpits in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur. Je vais creer les sous-categories pour "altars" et "pulpits" pour chaque departement de la region PACA. Vous pourrez ensuite y ajouter vos photos comme vous le souhaitez. J'espere que cela repond a votre question. Par ailleurs, merci et felicitations pour vos nombreuses et excellentes photos du sud de la France. Il m'est arrive a plusieurs reprises de changer les categories de vos photos. N'hesitez pas a me demander si certaines de ces categorisations vous paraissent surprenantes. Bonne continuation ! Olivier2 (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour les créations. Je finis quelques mise en lignes de photos bien ensoleillées, pour illustrer la commune de Visan (nord Vaucluse), et je ferais un peu le tour des autels vauclusiens. Pour vos catégorisations sur mes photos, pas de soucis, elles amènent souvent des précisions que je n'avais pas pris le temps de mettre. Merci pour votre travail, qui est également fort utile. Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Gap

Category discussion notification

Category:Gap has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fr.Latreille (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Update: the initial content was disambiguated into Category:Gap (Hautes-Alpes). Olivier2 (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Question

Bonjour,

Je n'ai pas compris pourquoi plusieurs photos du "Village des bories" à Gordes avaient été sorties de la catégorie "Gordes" alors que cet endroit est sur la commune de Gordes. Je ne suis pas spécialiste de la catégorisation mais s'il y a quelque chose qui m'a échappé, je souhaite apprendre.

Cordialement, --Erussal (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

(desole je n'ai pas d'accents sur mon clavier)

Le principe de la categorisation est comparable aux poupees russes. Il suit une arborescence du general vers le specifique.

Un exemple devrait etre le plus simple pour illustrer: Les images de la mairie du 3eme arrondissement de Paris sont groupees dans Category:Town hall- 3e arrondissement, Paris, categorie qui se trouve a l'interieur de Category:Paris IIIe arrondissement, elle-meme a l'interieur de Category:Arrondissements of Paris, elle-meme dans Category:Paris, qui est dans Category:Île-de-France, etc.

Il ne convient donc pas de mettre une photo de la mairie du 3eme dans la categorie "Paris". L'aborescence doit etre suivie, sinon la categorie "Paris" contiendrait des milliers de photos, et serait par consequent en pratique inutilisable.

Ainsi, les images du village des bories sont groupees dans Category:Villages des Bories. Le village etant lui-meme sur le territoire de la commune de Gordes, Category:Villages des Bories est une sous-categorie de Category:Gordes.

La photo d'une borie du village des bories se trouve donc logiquement dans Category:Villages des Bories, lui-meme dans Category:Gordes. La photo de la borie n'a donc pas a etre elle-meme a titre individuel dans la categorie "Gordes", puisqu'elle appartient a une categorie qui est en integralite incluse dans cette categorie.

Vous pouvez vous referer a COM:SURCAT (en francais) et COM:OVERCAT (en anglais) pour plus d'informations.

J'espere que cela n'est pas trop confus. N'hesitez pas a me demander si vous avez d'autres questions. Cordialement. Olivier2 (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Merci d'avoir pris sur votre temps pour me fournir ces explications tout à fait lumineuses. Cela m'évitera à l'avenir de faire des erreurs.

J'interviens dans Commons principalement en ce qui concerne les cabanes en pierre sèche et leurs appellations régionales ou savantes. Je suis confronté au problème suivant : il y a deux catégories principales équivalentes, l'une en français "Cabane en pierre sèche" (singulier), l'autre en anglais "Dry stone cabins" (pluriel). Est-il possible de les fondre en une seule catégorie, qui serait "Cabane en pierre sèche" ? S'il faut garder "Dry stone cabins", peut-on le reformuler en "dry stone hut" (singulier), "hut" étant d'un emploi plus courant que "cabin" ?

Cordialement, --Erussal (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Je suis ravi si j'ai pu vous eclairer. Je viens de relire ma propre page de discussion et m'apercois qu'une bonne partie des discussions tournent autour du theme de la classification et des categories. Aujourd'hui les choses sont assez claires et codifiees, et il est interessant de voir que certaines regles importantes n'etaient pas encore finalisees en 2006, ce qui generait d'autant plus de discussions.

En ce qui concerne votre question relative aux cabanes en pierre seches. Je ne suis pas un expert du sujet, ni une autorite dans les Commons. J'y ai surtout classe beaucoup d'images, en generant relativement peu de controverse. Donc ce qui suit n'est que ma suggestion.

Anglais ou francais : les categories Commons etant identiques pour tout le monde, le choix est generalement fait de les nommer en anglais afin de maximiser la comprehension par des lecteurs potentiellement de toutes origines. On note des exceptions pour des sujets tres locaux, et qui probablement pour cette raison ne generent que peu de controverse. Ainsi, les noms des eglises sont generalement conserves dans la langue d'origine. Voir par exemple les sous-categories de Category:Churches in Vaucluse, Category:Churches in Rione IX - Pigna et Category:Churches in Stuttgart. Je suppose que le nom de la categorie Category:Cabane en pierre sèche n'a pas genere de commentaire negatif jusqu'a present car elle contient presque uniquement des cabanes se trouvant en France.

Singulier ou pluriel : dans ce cas, la regle est assez claire : une categorie contenant des sous-categories homogenes est toujours au pluriel. Nous avons donc par exemple "Category:Churches in Vaucluse" et non pas "Category:Church in Vaucluse". La logique est que la categorie contient des eglises, et non pas une seule. Ainsi, si l'on garde un nom francais, la categorie Category:Cabane en pierre sèche devrait se nommer Category:Cabanes en pierre sèche, meme si le nom de l'article Wikipedia francais est au singulier.

Donc : pour repondre a votre question, si vous souhaitez fusionner les 2 categories, le plus adequat a mon sens serait de tout regrouper dans Category:Dry stone huts, et de creer une sous-categorie Category:Dry stone huts in France qui contiendrait toutes les images de cabanes en pierres seches de France. Dans ce cas, la categorie Category:Cadoles serait une sous-categorie de Category:Dry stone huts in France. Les cabanes des autres pays pourraient soit etre classees dans d'autres sous-categories comme Category:Dry stone huts in Spain, soit rester provisoirement dans la categorie mere Category:Dry stone huts.

Par experience, la categorisation que je viens de decrire ne devrait pas generer de controverse, dans la mesure ou elle suit les usages habituels des Commons. Donc si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez creer les nouvelles categories et faire les modifications vous-meme. Je peux egalement contribuer si vous le souhaitez. Cordialement, Olivier2 (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Je vous remercie d'avoir fort aimablement prêté toute votre attention aux problèmes auxquels je suis confronté et de m'avoir indiqué, de façon claire et didactique, les solutions à mettre en œuvre. Je serais enchanté si vous acceptiez de me prêter main forte, en particulier pour ce qui est des étapes de la création de nouvelles catégories et de la suppression (ou redirection ?) d'anciennes qui seraient périmées (je n'y suis pas très à l'aise). Pour ce qui est de la ventilation des photos dans les diverses catégories, je puis me charger de l'essentiel de cette tâche répétitive.

Voilà comment je vois les choses : une catégorie générale Dry stone huts (en remplacement de Dry stone cabins), qui regrouperait par ex. Dry stone huts in England, Dry stone huts in Italy, etc., mais Cabanes en pierre sèche en France (car Cabane sous sa forme française ou sous ses formes dialectales dans certaines régions était le terme le plus répandu et se trouve être celui employé actuellement par les spécialistes du sujet). On y mettrait les sous-catégories Caselle, Chibotte, Borie, Cadole, Gariotte, Cabane d'orri, Cabanon pointu, Capitelle, etc. Qu'en pensez-vous ?

J'envisage aussi de faire par la suite, si elle n'existe pas déjà, une catégorie Dry stone walls avec ses sous-catégories.

Cordialement, --Erussal (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Je m'y attele, en esperant ne pas commettre d'impair. Je reviendrai indiquer mes commentaires une fois le travail suffisamment avance. Olivier2 (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Note: Les categories Category:Dry stone walls et Category:Dry stone walls in France existent deja. Olivier2 (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour. Comme vous l'avez certainement constate, j'ai fait de nombreux changements. J'ai cree des categories, fait des redirections, categorise des images, etc. Pour comprendre l'arborescence, le plus simple est de demarrer a Category:Dry stone. Vous verrez que les categorisations sont essentiellent de 2 ordres : par type de construction et par geographie. Par consequent, il existe souvent au moins 2 chemins pour parvenir a une sous-categorie. Ainsi, Category:Cadoles peut etre atteinte par 2 chemins :

Chemin 1: Category:Dry stone > Category:Dry stone huts > Category:Dry stone huts in France > Category:Cadoles

Chemin 2: Category:Dry stone > Category:Dry stone in France > Category:Dry stone huts in France > Category:Cadoles

J'ai change quelques textes d'introduction de place, sans en modifier le contenu. J'ai attribue des categories a un bon nombre d'images, mais la suite sera beaucoup mieux faite par un expert. J'ai certainement commis des erreurs et fait des racourcis qui doivent etre expliques. N'hesitez pas a me demander des precisions. Enfin, tout ce que j'ai fait peut etre ramene a son etat initial, aucune information ni image n'a ete perdue. A vous de voir ce qui est adequat. Cordialement. Olivier2 (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Template:St Maximim - Hugin

Bonjour,
J'aimerai savoir pourquoi tu as retiré le dit template {{St Maximim - Hugin}} sur les images qui y sont associées.
Merci par avance.
Esby (talk) 19:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

(je n'ai pas d'accents sur mon clavier)

Je n'ai absolument rien contre ce template. Il avait seulement des consequences inadequates qui peuvent certainement etre resolues. Lorsque ce template etait applique aux fichiers que j'ai modifies, des categories etaient automatiquement attribuees aux fichiers, sans etre modifiables. Par exemple: File:Basilique St Maximim La Sainte Baume - colored version equirectangular.jpg avait comme categories Category:Church interiors in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur et Category:Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Saint-Maximin-la-Sainte-Baume. Je voulais remplacer la premiere par une categorie plus precise : Category:Naves in Var. Or en faisant un edit, la categorie a modifier n'apparaissait pas. Vous pouvez consulter l'historique du fichier pour vous rendre compte de ce que je decris. J'en ai conclu qu'elle devait provenir d'un template. En retirant le template {{St Maximim - Hugin}}, les 2 categories "automatiques" ont ete supprimees. Je suis pret a remettre moi-meme ce template, mais a condition qu'il ne cree pas d'effets secondaires comme celui que j'ai decrit. Outre les fichiers eux memes, les consequences etaient le surpeuplement des categories concernees. Olivier2 (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Je pense avoir compris : le template {{St Maximim - Hugin}} contient effectivement les 2 categories Category:Church interiors in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur et Category:Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Saint-Maximin-la-Sainte-Baume. Serait-il possible d'oter ces 2 categories du template, afin de pouvoir attribuer des categories aux images de facon individuelle ? Olivier2 (talk) 20:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

J'ai enlevé la catégorisation effectuée par le template. Esby (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Merci. Souhaitez vous que je re-insere les templates que j'ai enleves ? Olivier2 (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Comme vous voulez, je les remettrai en temps voulu sinon. Je n'ai pas trop le temps de m'en occuper pour l'instant. Esby (talk) 23:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Je viens de les remettre. Ce n'est pas que j'ai beaucoup de temps non plus, mais je pouvais y passer la minute que cela m'a pris, puisque je l'avais propose. Olivier2 (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Merci. Esby (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Registan DP.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 12:57, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Maybe an error by Commonshelper, or some misplaced labels. I have transfered this image from en:Wikipedia (original here), using Commonshelper. The license seems fine on en:Wikipedia. I do not understand why it became deprecated in the process. I will just leave it as it is. Olivier2 (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Sam Wo Public School off Lin Ma Hang Road,TSUNG CHAI LING, Muk Wu Village 045.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Temple in Muk Wu 049.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Muk Wu door 047.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Maybe errors by Commonshelper, or some misplaced labels. I have transferred these images from en:Wikipedia, using Commonshelper. The licenses seem fine on en:Wikipedia. I do not understand why it became deprecated in the process. I will just leave it as it is. Olivier2 (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Frémin ou Flamen ?

Bonjour, Vous avez ajouté la catégorie Anselme Flamen à une photo prise le 18 février 2006 au Louvre (cour Marly) concernat une statue de Diane File:GD-FR-Paris-Louvre-Sculptures008.JPG. D'après la Web Gallery of Art ([1]) cette statue serait de René Frémin. Pouvez vous vérifier si votre attribution est exacte ? Merci. Robert Valette (talk) 08:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Le site du Louvre a un article relativement détaillé sur cette sculpture, qu'il attribue à Anselme Flamen ([2]). Dans le doute, j'aurais tendance à me fier à cette référence. J'ai également ajouté le lien sur la page de la photo. Cordialement. Olivier2 (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour, le site du Louvre est une référence indiscutable ; donc pas de problème. Cordialement. Robert Valette (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Grape_varieties

Grape varieties has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

bandeau mérimée

Cher Olivier

n'enlève pas le bandeau concernant la base mérimée en ce moment ! SVP ! il s'agit de photo chargé pour le concours wikiloves monuments. ne fait rien de ce coté là avant la mi décembre Merci Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

OK, bien compris. Bonne continuation ! Olivier2 (talk) 10:44, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Eastern and Western Pagodas

Category:Eastern and Western Pagodas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Deor (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Monument_to_Genghis_Khan_(Sükhbaatar_Square)

Monument to Genghis Khan (Sükhbaatar Square) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

84.61.139.62 20:06, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:European_Parliament,_Strasbourg

European Parliament, Strasbourg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Langhamhotelmelbourne.jpg

File:Langhamhotelmelbourne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Hkairport sars.JPG

File:Hkairport sars.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Paris Trocadero 111.jpg

Yours sincerely, Myrabella (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

France_water_tower.jpg

Le château d'eau.

Bonjour Olivier, j'ai ajouté une géolocalisation à cette image, pensant avoir identifié le château d'eau de la photo. Cependant, comme c'est vous qui l'aviez catégorisé en "Buildings in Tonnay-Charente", je voudrais savoir si vous pouviez confirmer, histoire que je ne géolocalise pas au mauvais endroit. Merci et bonne soirée ! KiwiNeko14 (talk) 20:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Bravo pour le géolocalisation ! En regardant l'historique du fichier, je comprends que je l'avais catégorisé en "Buildings in Tonnay-Charente" parce qu'il contenait déjà la mention "A water Tower in Tonnay-Charente France". Ceci dit, je dois avouer ne pas connaître l’endroit, mais si l'on combine la mention d'origine et le fait que ce que nous montre Google Street View ressemble bigrement à la photo, il y a peu de risque que ce ne soit pas la bonne candidate (bien que je ne retrouve pas les arbres de la photo sur Google Street View).. Olivier (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonsoir et merci : j'aime bien ajouter des géolocalisations aux images qui en manquent. En ce qui concerne les arbres hauts que l'on voit sur la photo, il existe, d'après la capture de Google Street View, de tels arbres dans la rue du Bouton d'Or qui est proche du château d'eau. Sur la photo, cependant, deux ou trois détails n'apparaissent pas : la ligne téléphonique qui longe la rangée d'arbres, les arbres d'allure différente mais de hauteur équivalente situés sur la berge opposée de la rue, et la ligne ÉDF qui passe à côté du château d'eau. Alors, certes, puisque la photo date de 2004 et que la capture de Google Street View date de 2013, il est possible que le paysage ait changé entre-temps. Si j'écoutais mon côté perfectionniste, je sens que je pourrais demander confirmation au téléverseur de la photo. :) Bonne soirée ! KiwiNeko14 (talk) 17:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Registan DP.jpg

File:Registan DP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Olivier2. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Olivier2~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Capitals in Crypte de la cathédrale Saint-Bénigne de Dijon

Bonjour, merci pour votre travail dans cette catégorie (renommage, transfert des fichiers et catégorisation). Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 07:49, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Merci pour votre message. Cela me fait plaisir si ma categorisation a été utile. Olivier (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Category: Statues of the baptism of Jesus Christ France

Bonjour,

Il ne manquerait pas le "in" devant France ?

Cordialement, Ralph Hammann (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Oui, bien vu ! Je viens de le corriger. Merci pour la remarque. Olivier (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Portrait_of_a_Family_Playing_Music

Portrait of a Family Playing Music has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Capitelles

Capitelles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Achim (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:L'Origine_du_monde

L'Origine du monde has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

123.108.244.184 08:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Karena Lam

Category:Karena Lam is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

B dash (talk) 08:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Saintes

Saintes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Nice

Nice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 02:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Vajont disaster

Please, if there isn't copyright, can you upload here the photographies from these Italian sites about the most important protagonist about that disaster: 1, 2, 3, 4. Thank you very much. --87.14.24.94 12:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Tours

Tours has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Grotte_Chauvet

Grotte Chauvet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Japonisme

Japonisme has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 13:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tarascon Karl Gröber 1934.jpg

Copyright status: File:Tarascon Karl Gröber 1934.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tarascon Karl Gröber 1934.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Fixed. Added PD-old tag. Olivier (talk) 17:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)