User talk:Oliver-Bonjoch
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
--SieBot 10:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 11:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by ABFbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (abf /talk to me/ (using a bot)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 09:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions, but License of the file is unknown. If it's a non-free or no-license content, It will be deleted. Thank you.--Kwj2772 09:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Manca d'informació amb el fitxer Image:Memòria_Històrica_entre_la_ideologia_i_la_justícia.jpg
[edit]
Gràcies per carregar Image:Memòria_Històrica_entre_la_ideologia_i_la_justícia.jpg. M'he adonat que la pàgina de descripció del fitxer ara per ara no especifica qui ha creat el contingut, per tant l'estatus de dret d'autor no queda clar. Si no ho heu creat vós mateix, aleshores cal que expliqueu els motius pels quals es pot fer servir a Wikimèdia Commons (vegeu l'enllaç d'etiquetes de drets d'autor més avall). Així mateix, també heu d'especificar on ho heu trobat, en la majoria dels casos, amb un enllaç que porti cap a la web on ho heu agafat i les condicions d'ús del contingut d'eixa web. Si es tracta d'una obra derivada, hauríeu de proporcionar també el nom i la llicència de l'original.
Si la imatge no té un senyal de dret d'autor també l'hauríeu d'afegir. Si en sou el creador aleshores podeu afegir {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} per a posar-ho sota una multillicència lliure o {{PD-self}} per a posar-ho sota domini públic. Podeu llegir Etiquetes de drets d'autor per a trobar la llista completa d'etiquetes que es poden utilitzar.
Adoneu-vos que qualsevol imatge sense font d'origen o sense etiqueta de llicència d'ús s'esborrarà una setmana després de l'avís, segons la guia de supressió ràpida. Si heu carregat altres imatges, si us plau, comproveu que heu especificat també la seua font d'origen i l'etiqueta de drets d'autor. Podeu trobar tots els fitxers que heu carregat fent servir l'eina de la Galeria. Gràcies. Chech Explorer 17:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Els drets d'aquesta portada i de les altres imatges emmagatzemades a la Categoria INEHCA pertanyen a l'Institut d'Estudis Humanístics Miquel Coll i Alentorn (INEHCA), que m'ha autoritzat a descarregar-les a Wikipedia Commons, tal com he especificat en un mail enviat a Wikipedia Commons.--Oliver-Bonjoch 17:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Panorama template
[edit]Hi!
Thanks for adding File:Napoli da Castel Sant Elmo.jpg, it's a lovely image! I just wanted to point you to en:Template:Panorama for images like that---it's a good idea to use that template, at least on those Wikipedias where it's available... Thanks! Morn the Gorn (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Greetings from Barcelona ;-) --Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 13:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The front side of the sporran, is it fur? If yes, what kind of fur? Calf? Thank you! --Kürschner (talk) 11:04, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- This concerns images of art by Slavko Pengov. They're beautiful photographs, and I'm sorry to have to bring them up for review. I'm just afraid that there are underlying copyright concerns that must be evaluated given the date and placement of the art. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
| Category discussion notification | Category:Pengov_Paintings_in_the_Parliament_House has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
84.61.144.211 08:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Slavko Pengov
[edit]I do not understand why you have eliminated my photos of Pengov's paintings in Bled, in Žale and in the Parliament House of Slovenia. I have made these photos myself and I have dedicated a lot of my time to recover the work of this slovenian artist. I am very dissapointed with this violation of my work. --Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 22:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm sorry for your disappointment; I wish we had another option, but I'm afraid that legally we cannot keep them. As explained at Commons:Deletion requests/Art by Slavko Pengov, Pengov's work is still under copyright, which means that legally we cannot make copies of them and publish them without permission from Pengov's estate. The country where they are hanging Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 23:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)does not have an exception for publicly displayed artworks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- There are a lot of photos of contemporary artists in Wikipedia. So all this photos have permission? Pengov's paintings in the Parliament House belong to the people of Slovenia, and the painting in Žale is outside, in a public place. Who owns the rights of Pengov's work? There are no books of Pengov's paintings anywhere. So I am the only one doing the work of getting to know Pengov's genius around the world. --Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. They are beautiful pictures, and the articles that had them are the worse for losing them. But this is a legal reality, and there is nothing we can do about it. We are required to abide by the coypright policies of the Wikimedia Foundation and the various projects it hosts. There are some exceptions permitted for "fair use" images on Wikipedia, but images hosted on Commons must be licensed for reuse or free of copyright. To see Wikipedia's "fair use" policies, please visit Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Non-free content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Jo ho sento molt més encara. No has contestat cap de les meves preguntes i m'adreces a una normativa que no em dona cap resposta concreta.
Sento que no has respectat la meva feina. Has esborrat un munt de fitxers meus sense cap consideració vers les hores que he regalat inútilment a Wikipedia. No estic gens d'acord amb la teva actuació lamentable. Segons els teus criteris, haurien de desaparèixer gairebé totes les fotografies relatives al segle XX. No has contestat les meves preguntes, perqué no ha hagut cap reclamació externa a Wikipedia sobre el meu treball. Si hi ha hereus de Pengov, crec que aquests estarien satisfets de la tasca que he fet per a recuperar la memòria d'aquest artista, i que tu has destruït sense escrúpols. Tanmateix, entre tants artistes, no entenc perquè t'has fixat precisament en Pengov i has esborrat la documentació visual sobre la seva obra que he anat recollint en els darrers anys. Lamento profundament el dia que vaig començar a col·laborar amb Wikipedia.--Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't delete any of your work; I brought the copyright problems for review. I notified you when I did so. After a due period of time, they were deleted by a Commons administrator because they do not meet Commons policies. I'm sorry that this is such a disappointment to you, but, again, this is a legal matter; we cannot change the copyright laws. It is not Commons' policy to wait for complaint from copyright owners; copyrighted content that is not properly licensed is removed when it is discovered. See Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain. I realize that this must be quite a blow; you obviously believed that the pictures were free for you to photograph and publish. I'm sorry that this doesn't seem to be the case. Some countries do permit photographers to take pictures of paintings in museums, but not all do. You may be able to use some of the images on individual Wikipedia policies; as I pointed out, English language Wikipedia does permit limited unfree pictures under some circumstances. Other language Wikipedias also have these "exemption doctrines". Commons does not; it is not permitted to by the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs these websites. See WMF:Resolution:Licensing policy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
No tens raó i ho saps. He llegit aquests documents sobre la "doctrina" de Wikipedia i no trobo cap motiu objectiu per a eliminar les meves fotografies. Cap de les fotografies que m'has esborrat era d'un museu. Les de les pintures murals del Parlament d'Eslovènia van ser realitzades durant una visita, autoritzat pel funcionari que em va acompanyar i que no em va advertir que no podia publicar-les. A més, la pintura del Cementiri de Žale està a l'exterior, en la façana d'un edifici. És evident que el 99% de les fotografies d'obres d'art i edificis del segle XX publicades a Wikipedia no tenen una autorització dels autors o dels dipositaris dels drets de reproducció. De fet, amb aquests criteris dels quals parles, haurien de desaparèixer quasi totes les imatges de Wikipedia. Crec, doncs, que l'esborrament de les meves imatges ha estat un acte execrable de vandalisme i exigeixo una rectificació. Malauradament, no és la primera vegada que ensopego amb una persona que abusa d'una posició d'autoritat per a menysprear la feina d'altres. En els anys que porto col•laborant a Wikipedia, he pogut comprovar que diversos administradors desfan arbitràriament el treball gratuït dels voluntaris sense cap mena de consideració ni escrúpol. Així mateix, tot veient que no puc apel•lar a cap "autoritat superior", crec que no em queda altre recurs que suspendre indefinidament la meva col·laboració amb Wikipedia. Estic profundament disgustat i decebut de Wikipedia. Em sento com un idiota perdent més temps discutint amb éssers virtuals que s'amagen darrere un nick. Tal com van les coses, no desitjo, doncs, perdre més temps en regalar hores de feina que poden ser destruïdes amb tanta arbitrarietat i facilitat, i així ho faré saber en el meu perfil d'usuari. Ja n'hi ha prou!--Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 07:33, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you feel that way. Copyright law is what it is, and I have linked you to the relevant policies and practices on Commons created to keep the project within that law. Just to further clarify, the Terms of Use linked above the "edit summary" each time you edit a page includes the following:
- Non-text media on Wikimedia Foundation projects are available under a variety of different licenses that support the general goal of allowing unrestricted re-use and re-distribution. The requirements for such licenses are given in the Wikimedia Foundation Licensing Policy. Individual communities may elaborate upon and refine these requirements.
- That licensing policy says (emphasis added)
- All projects are expected to host only content which is under a Free Content License, or which is otherwise free as recognized by the 'Definition of Free Cultural Works' as referenced above.
- In addition, with the exception of Wikimedia Commons, each project community may develop and adopt an EDP. Non-free content used under an EDP must be identified in a machine-readable format so that it can be easily identified by users of the site as well as re-users.
- Wikimedia Commons is only permitted to host freely licensed or public domain content. It is not able to host copies of copyrighted artworks unless they are taken in an area that has an exception for publicly displayed artworks.
- In terms of appealing to a higher authority, I see that User:Vriullop has explained your options. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Consulta a la pàgina principal
[edit]Et contesto aquí a la consulta que has fet a la pàgina principal. Tens raó en que poques obres d'art del segle XX es poden utilitzar lliurement. Pots veure Commons:Abast del projecte#Ha d'estar sota una llicència lliure o en el domini públic. Mentre no sigui de domini públic, és a dir mentre no hagin caducat els drets de l'autor, cal una autorització seva o dels seus hereus que tenen protegit per llei els seus interessos comercials, entre d'altres. Una altra qüestió és la llibertat de panorama. A Espanya, per exemple, es pot fotografiar lliurement (és a dir, no només per a ús personal sinó per a qualsevol propòsit inclòs comercial) qualsevol obra que estigui permanentment a la vista des d'una via pública. En altres legislacions, entre elles Eslovènia, això no és així. Si vols apel·lar la resolució de Commons:Deletion requests/Art by Slavko Pengov ho pots fer a la pàgina Commons:Undeletion requests on serà revisat per un altre administrador, però sincerament no veig que tingui opcions. Si vols més explicacions ho puc intentar jo mateix o pots demanar-les a Commons:Disputes noticeboard. --V.Riullop (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Moltes gràcies pel teu interès, però, segueixo pensant que el meu treball ha estat víctima d'una actuació arbitrària. Si s'apliquen aquests criteris, amb rigor no es podria publicar cap foto d'Eslovènia.
- Tu saps perfectament les hores de feina que pot haver darrere de qualsevol mena de col·laboració a Wikipedia, i, sincerament, no disposo de més temps per a perdre'm en el laberint institucional d'aquesta organització. Ja ho vaig intentar anys enrere per culpa d'una altra actuació arbitraria d'un administrador xilè de la Wikipedia espanyola que m'esborrava constantment un article sobre la revista Diàlegs, perquè desconfiava de la rellevància d'aquesta publicació cultural catalana. Després vaig descobrir que ell mateix es dedicava a redactar entrades sobre revistes de "safareig" del seu propi país. En fi, tot plegat d'una "coherència" espatarrant.
- Els qui em coneixen personalment saben que sóc una persona pacient, pacífica i dialogant, però la meva paciència també té límits, com la meva ingenuïtat. Em consta que a internet -i Wikipedia no és una excepció- hi ha un munt de gent que no tenen cap vida fora de la pantalla i que hi aboquen les seves frustracions personals com a hackers o com a censors de fòrums o d'altres projectes comunitaris. Jo estic força ocupat en el món real i he de "robar" una part important del meu temps lliure per a col·laborar a Wikipedia. Ja n'estic tip d'ensopegar amb personatges d'aquesta mena. No renuncio a penjar la documentació gràfica que he anat reunint sobre Slavko Pengov, però, quan tingui vacances, quan pugui, crec que ho faré a través d'un blog i de facebook.
Tanmateix, moltes gràcies pel teu missatge.--Oliver-Bonjoch (talk) 08:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
No ets l'únic
[edit]Noi, jo en soc un altre d'escaldat. Tens tota la raó quan parles de la feina i les hores mortes que hem fet i que un "simpàtic" amb un càrrec es carrega sense més ni més. A mi m'han esborrat com uns deu articles. Alguns d'ells d'una llargada de més de quinze pàgines després d'haver llegit 1000 fulls d'un llibre d'en Paul Preston, una autèntica eminència sobre el franquisme. La raó? Sospita de copyvio. També s'han carregat fotos, etc. Encara ara, després de uns quatre mesos de no fer res (em van blocar per dir les veritats) encara rebo notificacions de pàgines preparades per a ser esborrades. Mira si són rucs que em van esborrar un article per copyvio d'un altre que estava en una web meva!!! Només calia anar al codi font de la web i veure els Meta Tags on deia clarament: Author= Josep Xicota. El cas és que estic col·laborant en una altra wiqui, Epistemowikia, que no té el relleu de la WP però que editar-hi és pau i glòria. Em van rebre amb els braços oberts, m'han permès escriure en català (el servidor és de la Universitat d'Extremadura), en fi, no sé si t'arribarà aquest missatge, però si vols seguir treballant sense ensurts i amb una gent molt maca m'ho dius, d'acord? Per cert, està ple de ex-wiquipedistes que, o bé han marxat fastiguejats o els han expulssat. És una llastima que els millors redactors que han passat per la WP hagin acabat aixi. Rep una salutació cordial! --Josep Xicota (talk) 05:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ara he vist que no em reconeix la signatura, et deixo directament el correu electrònic, no crec que sigui cap pecat: [email protected]. Salut!
|
|
File:Parliament_of_Slovenia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.170.156 08:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 17:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 12:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Srce Jezusovo. Stained glass window.jpg
[edit]
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Srce Jezusovo. Stained glass window.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eleassar (t/p) 13:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Sv Martina Bled. window 1.JPG
[edit]
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sv Martina Bled. window 1.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:Sv Martina Bled. window 2.JPG
- File:Sv Martina Bled. window 3.JPG
- File:Sv Martina Bled. window 4 detail.JPG
- File:Sv Martina Bled. window 4.JPG
- File:Sv Martina Bled. window facade.JPG
Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 10.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 11.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 12.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 13.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 14.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 2.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 3.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 4.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 5.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 6.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 7.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 8.JPG
- File:Sv. Marija Rakovnik Window 9.JPG Eleassar (t/p) 13:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Emonec.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 |
File:France Kralj. Ljubljana v zimi.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eleassar (t/p) 08:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:St Mary Monument Ljubljana.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
|
File:France Kralj. Ljubljana v zimi.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eleassar (t/p) 10:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Durham_Cathedral._Interior
[edit]Dear Oliver-Bonjoch, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_Cathedral#/media/File:Durham_Cathedral._Interior.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan [email protected] --hippofish 14:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Foto Anton Cañellas.JPG
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Foto Anton Cañellas.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foto Anton Cañellas.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Discasto talk 21:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
|
File:M.A.Cassanyes surrealista.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Discasto talk 21:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
|
File:M.A.Cassanyes per Marques-Puig.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Discasto talk 21:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
|
File:M.A.Cassanyes per J. Olive.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Discasto talk 21:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jesus Oliver i Salas.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jesus Oliver i Salas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jesus Oliver i Salas.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Discasto talk 21:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fra Valentí Serra.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fra Valentí Serra.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fra Valentí Serra.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Discasto talk 21:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
