User talk:Lomita

Bonjour, je viens de voir que vous avez signalé mon upload de la photographie de Françoise Nicolas. Je vous explique la situation, n'étant pas un contributeur régulier j'ai demandé l'autorisation à Françoise Nicolas d'uploader la photo pour elle mais je comprends que ce n'est pas très règlementaire vis a vis du droit d'auteur. J'ai donc recontacté cette dame pour lui demander de bien vouloir uploader ses photos elle même, à son nom, pour pouvoir les utiliser de manière totalement légale. Très cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadSugarrr (talk • contribs) 19:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour, c'est le photographe qui a les droits sur cette photo, c'est donc à lui de le faire et de mettre en conséquence, l'image sous licence libre CC By SA et d'abandonner ses droits --Lomita (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

vos retrais des images de Maguy et tribunal n'ont aucun sens et je prie de ce fait de bien vouloir en illustrer les pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flo Masson (talk • contribs) 22:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Page à peine créée et déjà supprimée?!

Bonjour Lomita, la page que je viens de créer sur l'actrice Philypa Phoenix qui joue dans la série Balthazar sur TF1 et d'autres séries sur Netflix, France 2 etc vient juste d'être supprimée. Je ne comprends pas. Quand on la google elle a de la presse récente. Concernant la photo j'ai bien pris soin de voir via ce lien qu'elle est utilisable car ça reste dans une ligne éditoriale et non commerciale: https://www.gettyimages.fr/unreleased-imagery Ça fait des années que je tente de lui faire sa page et encore une fois, elle est supprimée. Pourriez vous m'éclairer svp? Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragon2052 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour, la photo n'est pas sous licence libre [1] et sera bien évidemment supprimée - Vous vous trompez lorsque vous dites que celle ci est réutilisable puisque bien évidemment, toutes les images sur commons peuvent être réutilisées commercialement - --Lomita (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah d'accord, au temps pour moi, j'avais compris que tant que la bannière avec le nom du photographe était affichée cela pouvait être utilisé en éditorial. Merci de votre réponse, je rectifierai la photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragon2052 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour, meme en rectifiant la photo, elle appartient au photographe, donc n'est pas sous licence non libre - Elle sera donc supprimée Lomita (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Quand je dis rectifié c'est en changer. J'ai à présent une photo libre de droit du même événement appartenant à l'artiste donc dans ce cas pas de problème n'est-ce pas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragon2052 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Les droits d'auteurs appartiennent au photographe... Lomita (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Postcards

Hello Lomita, thanks for uploading many postcards. Maybe you are interessted in COM:WPPC. Best regards -- sk (talk) 13:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

File:L2910 - Le dépiquage au rouleau - Edouard Bernard Debat-Ponsan (1847-1913).jpg

Merci pour ce beau travail qui invite à visiter le musée de Tours. J'ai placé un tableau (Dépiquage) à l'article Battage (agriculture) -Jalbatros (talk) 14:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour - Bonjour et merci pour ce message, cela fait plaisir - Ce musée, que j'ai visité lors de mes vacances, est magnifique , il me reste encore une soixantaine de photos à téléverser.... --Lomita (talk) 14:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

File:L0398_-_Musée_d'Orsay_-_La_nature_se_dévoilant_à_la_Science_par_Luis_Ernest_Barrias.JPG

Bonjour Lomita, je vous adresse au nom de Fundacja Augusta hr. Cieszkowskiego (Fondation Comte August Cieszkowski), une majeure maison d’édition polonais. Nous aimerions demander le permis de publier cette photographie dans le livre: Pierre Hadot, "Le voile d'Isis. Essai sur l'histoire de l'idée de nature", Gallimard, Paris 2004.

Nous préparons un traduction polonais de ce livre. Nous voudrions mentionner le nom de l'auteur de cette photographie dans le copyright line. Voudriez-vous contacter-moi à mon adresse e-mail: [email protected] ?

Salutations, Jakub / Zrebie (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@Zrebie: - Bonjour et merci pour ce message - L'image étant sous licence CC-BY-SA, il n'y a aucun problème pour que vous l'utilisiez - Il conviendrait par contre d'indiquer sa provenance, c'est à dire : Lomita - CC-By-SA - Cordialement Lomita (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Witam i dziękuję za tę wiadomość - Obraz jest na licencji CC-BY-SA, nie ma problemu abyś z niego korzystał - Z drugiej strony wskazane byłoby wskazanie jego pochodzenia tj .: Lomita - CC -By-SA - serdecznie Lomita (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@Lomita: Bonjour. Merci pour votre réponse. Nous voudrions publier le copyright line avec votre nom et prénom. Serait-ce possible? Vous voudriez envoyer ces données à mon adresse e-mail: [email protected]

Cordialement Jakub / Zrebie (talk) 14:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Zrebie: Bonjour, merci, mais l'anonymat est très important pour moi, donc, Lomita - Wikimédia - CC-By-SA sera parfait - merci encore d'avoir choisi une de mes photos pour illustration d'un ouvrage - Bonne journée Lomita (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Anne Simon, chercheuse en littérature, crédit photo Agata Siecinska.jpg

Bonjour,

Je souhaiterais vous préciser que la photo suivante : Anne Simon, chercheuse en littérature, crédit photo Agata Siecinska.jpg, est bien sous Creative Commons (autorisation écrite de l'auteure).La mention a bien été ajoutée à la photo : https://animots.hypotheses.org/equipe, Merci de votre attention Bien cordialement, MDupuis — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB08:6D:6100:24C5:A4C5:60B0:4C8 (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Malek pause cafe.jpg

Bonjour,

En réponse à votre message ci-dessous, je vous informe que le site sur lequel se trouve la photo "Malek pause cafe.jpg" est mon propre site web (https://www.malek-boualem.fr) et que j'ai tous les droits sur cette photo qui avait été prise avec mon appareil photo.

Je vous remercie de ne pas supprimer cette photo de ma page (Utilisateur:Malekboualem/Brouillon) en cours de rédaction pour Wikipédia.

Cordialement Malek Boualem

Bonjour, c'est le photographe qui a les droits sur cette photo, il faut qu'il mette l'image sous licence libre CC By SA et qu'il abandonne ses droits --Lomita (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Georges Seurat

Bonjour, Cette photo a été prise par mes soins (staroad) et peut être utilisée par tous sans aucune restrictions. Cordialement 77.134.75.182 20:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Leo Gausson- rue de Moustier a Thorigny

I notice you have taken a photograph of my painting while I lent it for an exhibition at Lagny from March 13th to April 26th 2019. Did you get authorisation to shoot for copyright registration ? Brice (Private Collector) 2A01:E34:EC04:41C0:B904:6A69:821:8467 15:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour, Léo Gausson [2] étant décédé le 27 octobre 1944, ses œuvres sont dans le domaine public 70 ans après la mort de l'artiste, le 1er janvier de l'année suivante, à savoir, depuis le 1er janvier 2015 (sauf si la personne est déclarée morte pour la France, ce qui ne semble pas le cas pour Léon Gausson). Maintenant, si vous êtes un ayant-droit et que vous avez en charge les intérêts de l'artiste, il suffit de faire un courrier à [email protected] en joignant les documents, et le nécessaire serait fait pour la suppression immédiate de cette image - Bonne continuation Lomita (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

PS - A noter également que cette photo a été prise lors d'une exposition publique et qu'a aucun moment il était spécifié que les photos étaient interdites pour certains tableaux exposés.

PS @Pymouss and VIGNERON: - Bonjour, Pourriez vous si cette photo doit être supprimée car faisant partie d'une collection privée et prise pendant une exposition publique [3] - Merci de vos avis Lomita (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

L’œuvre étant dans le domaine public (sauf preuve du contraire), la protection par les droits d'auteurs patrimoniaux a échu et aucune autorisation n'est normalement nécessaire.

PS: "copyright registration" is a mostly obsolete concept since 1978 version of the Berne Convention.

PPS: rien à voir mais ce serait utile et intéressant d'indiquer l'exposition où a été prise cette photo sur le fichier.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Rien à ajouter : l'auteur de l'œuvre est suffisamment mort et, a priori, elle était exposée lors d'un événement ouvert au public, donc il n'y a pas lieu de retirer cette image. Pymouss Let’s talk - 16:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: Merci pour ta réponse rapide et tes compléments d'information - Concernant l'exposition [4] , oui se serait une bonne idée, mais comme j'ai pris en photo, environ 50 tableaux exposés, et oui, une exposition sert à cela, penses tu que je peux faire une catégorie également et comment l'appeler ? Exposition : Leo-Gausson et Maximilien Luce pionniers du néo-impressionnisme , c'est un peu long comme nom de catégorie- Lomita (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Oui, même si c'est un peu long, on met en général le titre (inutile de mettre "exposition" devant) de l'exposition comme titre de la catégorie. Voir Category:Temporary exhibitions in France pour des exemples. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

@Pymouss: - Bonjour, c'est bien ce que je pensais, merci pour ta réponse rapide Lomita (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Images page Maison Duplanteur

Bonjour Lomita,

Je vois que vous êtes en train de supprimer toutes les photos de la page Wikipédia pour violation de droits.

J'ai reçu l'accord (au téléphone) du propriétaire de la chocolaterie pour publier les photos de son site internet et les publier sur Wikipédia.

Comment puis-je faire pour prouver cela de manière écrite afin de respecter les règles de Wikipédia ?

Si pas possible, je changerai les photos pour des photos provenant de sources secondaires.

Merci pour votre réponse.

Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas Pialles (talk • contribs) 07:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour, les images ne sont pas sous licence libre, vous avez cette page qui vous explique comment le photographe peut abandonner ses droits [5], cela implique que la photo pourra être reprise par n'importe qui, qui pourrait s'en servir, y compris commercialement sans que le propriétaire (photographe) puisse prétendre à quoi que ce soit - Pour mettre des images sur commons, il y a deux solutions, ou vous prenez vous même les photos, ou les photographes abandonnent leur droit, les photos provenant de sources secondaires sont rarement sont licence libre - Bonne continuation Lomita (talk) 07:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

On the image File:Camille Gottlieb.png

Salut Lomita. J'aimerais parler de votre récente nomination du dossier concernant l'image de Camille Gottlieb et en tant qu'étranger, je ne connais pas grand-chose aux lois françaises sur le droit d'auteur, mais pour autant que je sache, la vidéo elle-même est publié sous une licence creative commons. Youtube indique s'il est publié en tant que "Licence de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée)", il peut être utilisé sous licence creative commons 3.0 unported.Veuillez regarder à nouveau mon image pour voir qu'il s'agit vraiment d'une violation du droit d'auteur.Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Waltzingmogumogupeach: - Bonjour, les droits appartiennent à Tendance TV et aucune mention sur la vidéo indique que cette dernière est sous CC-by-SA - Bonne continuation --Lomita (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Si vous allez à nouveau sur le lien de la vidéo youtube, et cliquez sur le bouton "plus", cela révèle que la vidéo est partagée sous la licence "

Licence de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée)". Si vous cliquez sur cette licence, elle renvoie vers une page qui partage la licence utilisée par youtube. Cliquez sur le lien "CCby" et elle est effectivement partagée dans "Attribution 3.0 Unported".à nouveau. Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Photo de Georges Kowal

Bonjour Lomita, Attention ! Vous semblez avoir téléchargé illégalement une photo de Georges KOWAL pour la modifier ensuite (en supprimant notre droit d'auteur, copyright dessus). Je souligne le fait qu'il s'agit de mon travail personnel était un membre de la famille KOWAL. En avez-vous conscience ? À bientôt Memoirekowal (talk) 15:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

@Memoirekowal: - Bonjour, je n'ai pas téléchargé illégalement une photo, j'ai supprimé des inscriptions sur une image qui a été téléversée sur commons et qui, comme la licence l'indique, est maintenant libre de droit voir le texte qui apparait avant de publier :

En envoyant vos modifications, vous acceptez de publier de manière irrévocable votre contribution selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Paternité-Partage des Conditions Initiales à l'Identique 3.0, et la licence de documentation libre GNU, version 1.2, 1.3, ou plus récente publiée par la Free Software Foundation ; sans sections inaltérables, sans texte de première page de couverture et sans texte de dernière page de couverture. Les réutilisateurs de contenu auront l'obligation de vous citer, au minimum, par le biais d'un lien hypertexte (adresse internet) menant vers la page où vous avez contribué, et vous déclarez être satisfait par cette méthode d'attribution. N'UTILISEZ PAS DE TRAVAUX SOUS COPYRIGHT SANS AUTORISATION EXPRESSE !

En conséquence, j'ai bien conscience que je n'ai fait que respecter les règles et recommandations, en supprimant un texte qui n'avait rien à faire sur une image - Bonne continuation --Lomita (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Ouf j'ai eu peur ! Tout est bien qui finit bien. Memoirekowal (talk) 15:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Marie-Noelle Marineau.jpg

La photo File:Marie-Noelle Marineau.jpg respecte les droits d'auteur, je ne comprends pas d'ailleurs pourquoi celle-ci est soumise à la suppression. Elle a été prise dans le cadre d'un tapis rouge organisé par Rhizome pour prendre des photos libres de droits d'auteurs québécois. Chaque auteur pris en photo a rempli un formulaire de consentement du droit à l'image qui explique que les photos prises dans le cadre de cette activité sont en licence libre CC-BY-SA 4.0. Tout le monde peut donc reprendre cette photo comme bon leur semble, y compris des sites web ou des médias. Rhizome a été financé par des fonds publics et ce projet a été mené en partenariat avec Wikimedia Canada. FrederiqueDube (talk) 19:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Bonjour à vous aussi - Avez vous vu que j'ai enlevé immédiatement le bandeau [6] puisque cette photo est sous cc by sa ? et justifié mon revert par ( erreur) --Lomita (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

La bataille d'Alger

Bonjour,

L'affiche du film "La Bataille d'Alger" est dans le domaine public car elle date d'avant 1989 et 1973.

Cordialement

Riad Salih (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Présentation de Jésus au Temple (Fondation Querini Stampalia, Venise) (15162548088).jpg

File:Présentation de Jésus au Temple (Fondation Querini Stampalia, Venise) (15162548088).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MenkinAlRire (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Bonjour Lomita, merci de votre aide pour le renommage de la photo de Hermentaire TRUC (chirurgien). Je viens vers vous, pour la photo de Yves Dejean, également chirurgien, c'est enrevseluj qui m'a aidé à créer sa page sur wikipédia, pourriez vous me dire si je dois faire autre chose ou juste attendre que l'envoie de mon email à ORTS soit traité ? Très bonne journée à vous, Bien cordialement Kadimalou (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:L'intérieur de la Berlinische Galerie (Berlin) (9640921394).jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Ballens vue du ciel.jpg

File:Ballens vue du ciel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Cologny (GE).jpg

File:Cologny (GE).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Collonge-Bellerive (GE).jpg

File:Collonge-Bellerive (GE).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Bernex (GE).jpg

File:Bernex (GE).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Versoix vue du ciel 2.jpg

File:Versoix vue du ciel 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Genthod Vue du ciel.jpg

File:Genthod Vue du ciel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Arnex-sur-Nyon vue du ciel.jpg

File:Arnex-sur-Nyon vue du ciel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Nyon vue du ciel 2.jpg

File:Nyon vue du ciel 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Marchissy vue du ciel.jpg

File:Marchissy vue du ciel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Yverdon-les-Bains vue du ciel.jpg

File:Yverdon-les-Bains vue du ciel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Gaillard (France).jpg

File:Gaillard (France).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Annemasse (France).jpg

File:Annemasse (France).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Fully (VS).jpg

File:Fully (VS).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Chamoson (VS).jpg

File:Chamoson (VS).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Collonge-Bellerive (GE).jpg

File:Collonge-Bellerive (GE).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File:LancelotRoyle.JPG

File:LancelotRoyle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:01-101-0010 перенесен на ул. Студенческая 12.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 15:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Le Monolithe (Lyon Confluence) (10749309636).jpg

File:Le Monolithe (Lyon Confluence) (10749309636).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Romainbehar (talk) 14:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)