User talk:Korall

Old talk

Myskand

Hej, din nya bild av myskanden ser ut som en vild individ, då borde den ligga i Category:Cairina moschata. Vänliga hälsningar, --Nordelch (talk) 21:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Tack för tipset!

Jag kategoriserade den som en okänd fågel när jag lade upp den, så jag fick hjälp med kategorieringen. I efterhand har jag gjort lite efterforskningar. Även om fjäderdräkten liknar den vilda varianten så tror jag att de vilda änderna har svart skinn i ansiktet.

Dels står det så i en bok om fåglar i Florida som jag har, och dels är den det på enda bilden jag kan hitta på commons på den vilda varianten. Dessutom är de vilda exemplaren sällsynta i Florida. Men om du vet säkert är du välkommen att kategorisera om den.

Vänligen

--Korall (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Nja, jag är inte heller någon expert och ställde därför en fråga hos tyska Wikipedia. Den förste som svarade tycker också att det är en vildand och hänvisar till denna bild. Kanske kan bilden föras i bägge kategorier, det förekommer även hos några andra foton som visar myskanden. Vänliga hälsningar, --Nordelch (talk) 18:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Jag måste säga att jag är alldeles för okunnig för att kunna skilja en vildand från en förvildad tamand. Eftersom båda släppts ut i området finns båda möjligheterna. Beteendemässigt var den skygg jämfört med andra jag sett av samma art (vissa springer rentav rakt emot en), men en väldigt trolig förklaring till det är att den hade ungar. Bilden som hänvisades till är också kategoriserad som muscowy duck. För att byta kategori på en fil som någon annan kategoriserat känner jag att jag vill ha mer på fötterna än så. Men en dubbelkategoriserng tills vidare kan vara bra. Förhoppningsvis är sidan bevakad av den som kategoriserade fåglarna. --Korall (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

{{VN/title}} & {{Synonyms/title}}

Hej min svenske ven!

Der mangler svenske oversættelser af de engelske begreber "Vernacular name" og "Synonyms" i de to ovenstående skabeloner. Kunne du ikke - som biologikyndig og svensktalende tilføje dem?

Når du har gjort det, kan du så ikke samtidig finde en biologikyndig bruger som taler et sprog der ikke er dækket i skabelonerne og bede denne bruger gøre det samme?

med venlig dansk hilsen

--Slaunger (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello Korall,

Any idea on this point ? In fact I was the requester for that point and Slaunger helped me find you ;-)

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serani.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good portrait --George Chernilevsky 20:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sterna maxima with fishing gear.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruddy daggerwing in Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Grand Hôtel, Stockholm

• 
  Good quality DSLR by Korall, October 2008
• 
  Crappy, overexposed compact camera version by Slaunger, July 2008

Had I only noticed before uploading that you already had a better quality photo taken from the same place and with the same crop... I wish I've had my DSLR back then as the light was very good and so were the dramatic dark shower clouds in the background. Only I blew it . --Slaunger (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Frogs

Hello Korall, all of your frog pics with "Rana arvalis" in the description to me look more like Rana temporaria. Note especially the snout, which is rather blunt-edged (obtuse-angled) in all your frogs. -- Greetings, Fice (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Matchbox Ingrid and Frederik Wedding 1935.JPG

And also:

• File:Rädda Barnen matchbox.JPG
• File:Wedding or engagement Matchbox.JPG

Yours sincerely Sreejith K (talk) 11:57, 9 October 2012 (UTC)