|
Ciao Justass,
spero che tu sia la persona giusta a cui mi possa rivolgere per risolvere un grande problema. Mi sono collegato a common oggi dopo molti giorni che mancavo e ho notato che qualcuno ha cancellato molte delle immagini che per anni ho caricato in common. Sono tutte immagini con regolare licenza a cui avevo lavorato per molto tempo per arricchire wikipedia e che erano presenti in wikipedia italia fino a poco tempo fa. Non so cosa sia successo ne chi sia stato e non so che fare anche perchè non ne ho di copie conservate per poterle ricaricare. Spero che tu possa aiutarmi. Fammi sapere presto.--Chicco2 (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, images you uploaded to Commons with "Own work" claims comes from different websites like climate4you.com, tucsoncitizen.com, geonet.org.nz and so on. If you have permission to upload and license any of deleted images please follow Commons:OTRS/it procedure. Thank you --Justass (talk) 21:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hola. Por favor desbloque mi otra cuenta de usuario Usuario:Halvis, esta cuenta no es un títere de aquella, esta cuenta fue creada hace mucho tiempo ya que no sabía como emigrar las cuentas en wikipedia, posteriormente emigré la cuenta halvis y desde entonces la uso en commons, y sobre la ultima publicación en HalvisC es porque ocurrió un error en el acceso de cuentas cuando esyaba revisando en commons y vi todas las advertencias.
Por otro lado, las imagenes Archivo: Barrio_maico.PNG, Archivo: Inundación_Riohacha.PNG, Archivo: Indundacion_Villanueva.PNG todas son mías, debido a que trabajo con periodistas y tengo las fotos a mi nombre, no las pegué de blogs y de otras páginas donde aparecen, igualmente File:Inundación Maicao.PNG y Cerro Palúa.PNG. No tengo culpa de que otros colegas periodistas la suban en internet. File:Ordonez colombia.PNG y File:Inundación colombia.PNG sí son copiadas.
Saludos--HalvisC (talk) 22:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, so called "your images" were collected from all across the web, including File:Cerro Palúa.PNG copied from [1]. User:HalvisC was created on 15'th of July and Halvis 11 days later. There is more than enough to have one account and please concentrate on uploading "Own work" works, not copy/pasting from elsewhere --Justass (talk) 22:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yo creé HalvisC porque no sabía que las cuentas en wikipedia podrían emigrar. Como yo señalé, las imágenes que yo te especifiqué las coloqué sin necesidad de copiarlas de internet. yo tengo una foto propia de File:Cerro Palúa.PNG y que coloqué en Commons, yo no tuve necesidad de copiarme de inicarco, mira por ejemplo: imagen de mezquita de maico [2] [3] [4], yo también tengo una foto de esa mezquita exactamente igual, si coloco la que yo poseo, también es una violación al copyright?
- Nunca utilicé HalvisC como títere, observa mis contribuciones desde que creé Halvis y la anterior. Saludos, y por favor desbloqueame y restaura mis archivos, yo soy periodista y nosotros facilitamos las fotos y muchas aparecen en Internet y en medios de prensa, son material libre, y por eso coloqué las que poseo en mis manos como Cerro_Palua.PNG. --HalvisC (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If yuo are the author of File:Cerro Palúa.PNG, please upload full resolution (resolusion lleno) image as a proof. Thank you --Justass (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No me permite subir imágenes, además no me están solucionando el bloqueo y yo necesito las imágenes borradas y el desbloqueo porque yo edito mucho en wikipedia y necesito ilustrar los artículos. Saludos--HalvisC (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You can upload File:Cerro Palúa.PNG image with User:HalvisC, please do so as a proof of your words. Thank you --Justass (talk) 09:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No me deja subirlo--HalvisC (talk) 11:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, justass--
I uploaded a photo of Jorge Cruise to American authors on Sept. 29. It was flagged by you for not having proof of the photographer's permission. I've since gotten an e-mail from the photographer which I've forwarded to permissions-commons, but the flag has not been lifted. This is my first submission, so any idea what's still wrong?
Thanks a lot for all of your help,
Sad squirrel (talk) 04:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, queue at COM:OTRS is quite long, and it may take up to few weeks for OTRS volunteer to get to your email. To reflect current status of image I have added {{OTRS pending}} to File:Jorge Cruise.jpg. --Justass (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for deleting my page jerk. Everything on that was ttrue and now I have to go and create another
- You are welcome, but before creating another wikipedia style article bother to read Commons:Galleries --Justass (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, you just deleted the gallery page I created for Bent Jædig. I guess I did something wrong. Would you please help (guide) me doing it write? Thank you. Fusion is the future (talk) 19:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, gallery was deleted because it was empty and didn't had any images. Sorry, if this was too fast and you were about to fill it with pictures. Please feel free to recreate it if this is the case --Justass (talk) 19:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I just want to know why it is copyright violation, because all the photos are my own, and what I need to do to save them in wikipedia. NICKy1038 (talk) 17:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, I have answered shortly to your question at File talk:All Hallow's EP.JPG --Justass (talk) 18:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Beyond My Ken and AnonMoos brought this to discussion, and it was not found to be the case. It was made clear that the CC license granted moral rights, and that the statement did refer to moral rights. Some editors had issue with the wording, but there was no decision stating that I was acting outside my rights per the CC. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 19:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Your moral rights are not covered by CC. Your "honor or reputation" can be reasonably exercised to the fullest extent permitted by the applicable national law, but only after derivative diminish it, not with prior restriction and only in the way national law cover it. 4(d) So both of your statement about moral right and "negative" content has nothing to do with CC-BY-SA --Justass (talk) 19:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, yeah they are. How about you read the CC? That link says copyright laws "grant creators 'moral rights' which may provide some redress if a derivative work represents a 'derogatory treatment' of the licensor's work" and the [CC license] states towards the bottom of the page that my moral rights are not affected by the license. You are baseless with your claims otherwise. The discussion upheld my moral rights, the license upholds my moral rights, and whatever your opinion is on the matter does not matter because they are my rights and your opinion can not change that. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 19:38, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Again please read license text, moral rights are not covered by the license but may be (or may not) by your national law --Justass (talk) 19:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- They are not mentioned there, but they are here. It states there that my moral rights are not affected by the license. Therefore I have every right to declare them. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 19:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Again - Other Rights are nor affected by the license, (that you already released upon). They can or cant be affected by your national law, that can be "reasonably exercised" after your rights are diminished but not otherwise--Justass (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The license does not affect my other rights, such as my moral rights. Therefore I can exert and have every right to claim my moral rights. Also, it is inappropriate to edit the permission section of images when you do not own the copyright, and also inappropriate to block someone to win an edit dispute. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 23:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You can not claim any rights that are in contradiction with The License you already released your images. I see no other means to stop you from edit-waring over and over again, when this issue was already talked and there is clear consensus about "inappropriately" of your additional restrictions --Justass (talk) 23:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My moral rights are not in contradiction to the CC. The CC does not affect my moral rights, and even you have stated that. So, I have every right to claim and assert them. You have issue with how something appears, something that is not for you or Commons to review, because they are my rights. Yet, you take it upon yourself to tell me what I can and can not say in regard to my rights that the CC has no say over.
Also, there was no clear consensus. If it was clear, everyone would have the same answer. The editors didn't. This isn't some editorial dispute, this is about my rights as copyright holder, and a general disapproval about how the first half of a statement reads (ignorein the latter half which affects how the first half reads, mind you) is hardly a clear decision. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 08:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So that's why you re-reverted Justass' edits, after he blocked you for doing it the first time? Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You are creepy, stop following me, stop housing me. What I do is none of your business and stop trying to start arguments. I didn't revert his edits, so just go away already. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 23:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, Justass
What is wrong with a picture which I have loaded "27osn_Cvetkov.jpg"?
It is my personal work. I haven't broken the right of other persons. The person represented on a picture I knew personally.
It is very necessary for me given images - for use in my article (Кузбасс (спецподразделение))
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кузбасс_(спецподразделение)#.D0.98.D1.81.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.8F
My article isn't checked up yet, besides article subject - isn't displayed in the searcher.
Please help me with the decision of these problems if you know as...
Thanks
- Hello, image you uploaded was created by combining pictures of Mr. Цветков that was taken from mvd.ru, or warheroes.ru, or from any of those websites. Non of those websites allows redistribution of content, or mark images as "freely" licensed. You cant claim "own work" (Личная работа) that apparently were created not by you. If there are some circumstances I am not aware of, please use Commons:OTRS/ru to verufy your authorship. Thank you --Justass (talk) 08:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, Justass. I received your notice [[5]] and I beg you pardon for my mistake. Thank you for your help. --Antonella (talk) 09:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- P. S. Please, I would like to ask someone to control my edits (I am Italian). May you tell me who can I contact? Many thanks. --Antonella (talk) 09:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, if you are comfortable in communicating in English please feel free to ask me any question you may have. If you prefer Italian, administrator Trixt may help, also there is Commons:Bar italiano --Justass (talk) 09:46, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Justass,
All the uploades of User:Breana P are Promotional content of Bella Brand: MOR Cosmetics. Geagea (talk) 00:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, listed all images on Deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/All images by User:Breana P--Justass (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Xnaderliptak has resumed editwarring to keep the changes in the upload license that he's been told by numerous editors he cannot do. Can something be done? Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you create another page for me. Like a professional page. i need something to boost my career. my email is [email protected] and i will give you all the details. PLEASE
- Commons is not CV hosting and self-promoting website --Justass (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justuss! Wir haben uns am Ost Bahnhof in Berlin am 12 August gesehen .Vielleicht kannst Du Dich an mich errinnern.Vielen Dank fürs Foto.Wie Gehts Dir? Was machste gerade? Thanks for your Photo.Your Picture is very nice it´s Beautiful.My name is Julie.I was twenty-eight years old.I comes to hameln.Can you the Story of the rattenfänger from Hameln? Dear Julie
|
File:B1ARAPatagonia01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| — Jeff G. ツ 18:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am new user and I don't know all rules yet. I recognize an error. The user MaxBioHazard has helped me to correct the situation.
File:27osn_Parad.jpg ,File:27osn_Marsh.JPG - its my own work, I have simply incorrectly entered the data.
I have informed on it to the user Martin H., but he hasn't answered me.
Klok27 (talk) 05:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Justass,
I can't figure out how to fix the licensing for the image on this page..trying to keep it from being deleted. I understand no fair use claims are accepted, but none of the other options make sense to me. Tried to ask question at licensing page, but can't figure that out either. If the image is a publicity still, available on the movie website for download, what should it's licensing be, if not fair use?
Thanks~
|
|
File:Scenederue-1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justass,
As posted in the Village pump I've created a tool enabling us to mark uploads as patrolled systematically with ability to cut out timeframes with From: and Until: stamps, and ability to Hide already patrolled uploads. I noticed you were previously active or interested in this and invite you to install the userscript and continue this way. See also COM:RUP. If not already request patroller right and confirm your Wikimedia account with the Toolserver as this is required. Feel free to contact me with any questions or feedback on my talk page, in the Village pump post or report bugs on the Tools feedback page –Krinkletalk 16:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Mongol_Empire_History.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Masur (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is the first experience I've had uploading anything to Wikipedia Commons. I hardly know what I'm doing and obviously doing it wrong. If you want to delete what was uploaded, please go ahead, but please be nicer. This lousy t-shirt (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, image you uploaded File:New Years Orange Drop Intercontinental Miami.jpg comes from the website where all content is copyrighted (© Copyright 2001-2010 Official Portal of Downtown Miami). Common serves as freely licensed image repository and all images must be released under acceptable license by the authors or copyright holders. In the cases when image comes from copyrighted source , uploaded must provide written evidences of permission and message left on image and your talk pages was about it.
- Same image could be found on dozen of other websites like [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] and it's hard to determine who is the original author and under what license this image is licensed. Please feel free to ask any other questions you may have. --Justass (talk) 08:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| --Tomchen1989 (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, haven't seen you on here much lately. Hope all is well. You were a great deal of help with other images I uploaded from a Maine website. I would like to upload this image, and then expand it as you did with other such images.[13] I wonder if you might have time to help me with that? (This home belonged to the assistant keeper of the West Quoddy Head Lighthouse in the easternmost town in the contiguous United States.) Many thanks. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, sorry for delay. I have uploaded full resolution image as File:West Quoddy Head Lighthouse homestead, Lubec 1897.png--Justass (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. No worries about the delay. Hope all is well with you. Thank you for helping with this, and thanks again for your help in the past. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, just noticed that the image is now nominated for deletion? I can't imagine how a photograph from 1897 is still under copyright, no matter what the website says. Thank you again for uploading it, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to contribute to the discussion. Thank you. MarmadukePercy (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:West_Quoddy_Head_Lighthouse_homestead,_Lubec_1897.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How do I uplaod pic which are not copyrighted. I tried doing that but you have deleted it too.
- Hello, all pictures are copyrighted unless author(s) release them under any "free" license or to public domain. The fact you copy/pasted images from the Internet to your Flickr account doesn't make you an author nor revokes any copyrights. Please read Commons:First steps --Justass (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How is File:WKSUlogo.png not a blatant copyright violation? The WKSU website clearly says "all rights reserved" by WKSU Public Media. Levdr1 (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, WKSU logo consist only from standard letters and does not meet the threshold of originality. In other words person/organization cant write a word and claim copyrights over it as it is not a creativity work -Justass (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Se que posiblemente no entiendas lo que te digo, pero es tan sencillo como copiar y pegar en el traductor. Mi problema es que, has borrado un par de fotos que no eran de internet, Asi que me gustaria agradecerte muchisimo el gran trabajo que has echo. A y como no, agradecerte tambien, el previo aviso que has echo del borrado de las imagenes. Una vez más muchas gracias por compartir tu simpatia con el resto del mundo. Linea14 (talk) 23:56, 4 Marzo 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, I do not speak Spanish and I a not sure I understand you correctly. Please do not upload images from all over the Internet without written permission from the authors. A lot of useful information can be found at Commons:Primeros pasos --Justass (talk) 10:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justass, I need a specialist for a license question. I found some old pictures on http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/3315570. These are watermarked and gettyimages is selling the pictures. Off course they did not made the pictures, but somehow these images are there. The license of the images (I would expect) is PD-Old (image made in February 1911). So now my question: Can I use parts of the images for Wikimedia commons (for instance only the head to avoid the watermarks)? Best, --Florentyna (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Floe_Kuehnert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| 91.19.124.201 08:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justass -
Received a message alerting me to the fact that the photo I uploaded on Commons was not allowed b/c it's fair use. However, you do say I can upload it locally to the English Wikipage I've edited. I tried clicking the link for instructions, but it says I'm not able to access b/c I'm not an administrator. Can you give me a little help? I'm new to Wikipedia and still trying to figure everything out.
Thanks,
MIA47
- Hello, you can upload copyrighted images locally to English Wikipedia under fair use rationale. Please follow this link. Please keep in mind that you need to be registered for four days and have made at least 10 edits on en wiki. --Justass (talk) 13:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
The two images Le Lion des Bantous and Rleo are creative common share.... Please check... If anything, I am modifying that right away.
Thanks
Hi,
I just don't understand your actions cause all two images are Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike licenses on flickr... But why?
Thank you
previous message: Lumumba11
- Hello, the fact you uploaded Herleo Muntu's covers to your Flickr account doesn't make you nor author nor copyright holder. You already admitted you didn't got permission from artist stuff to distribute or freely license images. Please refer to the Commons:OTRS procedure, ask Mr. Herleo Muntu's stuff to fill the email template and send it to permissions-commons
 wikimedia.org Thank yuo --Justass (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
that is my blog with Pantilimon's photo
- You already proven that all images you upload are stolen from all around the web. --Justass (talk) 15:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Google_Chrome_def.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| —Fitoschido // Leave me a shout! 10:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Coats_of_arms_of_the_United_Arab_Emirates.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 05:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non riesco a inserire la mia foto sulla mia pagina (Stefano Munafò). In pratica non capisco come fare il dowload dal mio pc alla pagina wiky.
Ho provato diverse volte ma senza successo. Mi potete aiutare ?
Stafano Munafò
Hi! Please note for my request about Main Page/lt. Thanks in advance! --Kaganer (talk) 10:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justass, just FYI: Temporali (talk · contribs) has faked a positive Flickreview by you. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Affected:
As the permission is probably insufficient. Yours sincerely Jean-Fred (talk) 10:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Sintel movie 720x306.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Colin (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason to remove the link. I have permission to Tross Nipanki The Roij which is custodian of the work of Matrige to use ... Also this photo is public domain.
La imagen que he subido, no es ninguna violación, al contrario. Yo soy propietario de la foto, yo trabajo en la empresa CRONICA S.A. en Paraguay. --Marceeaax (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, please follow Commons:OTRS procedure to verify that you are indeed owner of uploaded photos. Thank you --Justass (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Justass, Why did you mark File:Annenhof palace in Moscow (map, 1739).png for removal? There are two maps there, one is from 1739 (sic!), one is from Wikipmapia (which is CC-BY-SA). What was the problem? Wikidim2 (talk) 16:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, part of the map was taken from the Google map service (wikimapia just incorporate them into own webpage) and Google's terms of service doesn't allow derivatives or commercial usage of it's maps. For futher reference please see Commons:Image_casebook. As an alternative you can use maps from http://www.openstreetmap.org/.-Justass (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
|
|
| This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Oph1622.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. | JuTa 22:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Affected:
-- Gazebo (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 16:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Justass. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Kutubijos mečetė.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Didym (talk) 03:44, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Osterstein Castle from the air, 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| 92.208.143.61 15:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Justass,
unfortunally I dont understand the copyright of your picture "chufa.jpg". Could you please explain to me how it is supposed to use ? There is something said about a watermark, but I cant find one. It would be very nice because its a nice picture.
Greetings from Germany
- Hello, I am not the author of this photo. The only alteration I made was to remove watermark at the bottom from the original image. You can see previous version of the same plant here. About licensing please see just below the picture where it says "the authors grant permission to copy and use the image with the sole restriction of giving a mention to the photographer (in this case, dr. Stanley Kays)". Generally you can use image for what ever purpose you like including commercial one or alter image in any way as long as dr. Stanley Kays is attributed. --Justass (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Maria Callas (La Traviata) 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| — Racconish ☎ 20:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Maria Callas (La Traviata).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| — Racconish ☎ 20:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Affected:
Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Justass.
Your map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_City_of_Danzig#/media/File:Gdansk_Bay_Borderlines_1939_English.svg shows the territory of Weimar Germany or the Weimar Republic as German Empire in the mainland and East Prussia. This is inaccurate. While the Weimar Republic was known in German as Deutsches Reich, this translates as 'German Realm' not German Empire. The usual German word for empire is Kaisertum. The German Empire (1871-1918) that was abolished at the end of World War 1 was known, in German, as Deutsches Kaiserreich. The most accurate name for interwar Germany is simply 'Germany'. Could you rename the German Empire citations on the map as Germany? You could technically also rename the citations as German Realm - which is accurate but less common. Many thanks. --IACOBVS (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:ObservatoryKa-Dar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Túrelio (talk) 11:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Justass. I see you are not active very much any more, but I hope you read this soon. I have nominated Wikipedia:Germanwings Flight 9525 for FA at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Germanwings Flight 9525/archive1 and they are asking we provide the data source for this derivative work. I need your help. Prhartcom (talk) 13:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, I just made vector image out of linked jpg original without ever looking at the data or it's source, sorry.
- Very quick search points to Flight Anomaly Tracking for Improved Situational Awareness. Case Study of Germanwings Flight 9525 with the quite similar vertical path. Hope it helps --Justass
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
|
![8 deleted picture "File:27osn_Cvetkov.jpg"](#deleted_picture_"File:27osn_Cvetkov.jpg"){kind=link}
![15 Dont recreate|File:27osn Сvetkov.jpg"](#Dont_recreate|File:27osn_Сvetkov.jpg"){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
