User talk:JuTa/Archive 50

South Sudan (2011–2015) adm location map.svg

Moin! Könntest du die Datei bitte wieder herstellen. Es ist nicht mehr Duplikat zu South Sudan adm location map.svg. Viele Grüße, NNW 21:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 23:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. You think it's time to un-delete?

At present Category:Photographia Allemã de Alberto Henschel e Co. has 37 files in it. Cheers. DMBFFF (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 13:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

and fast! Thanks!    :D   DMBFFF (talk) 13:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Kant

• Hello JuTa, I work at the Kant Gymnasium Karlsruhe and was assigned to upload the Logo on our Wikipedia Site. I'm not sure what I need to do for you to undelete it. Could you please help me out? I'm sorry for the inconvenience... https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kant-Gymnasium_Karlsruhe

Answer in german is very welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herr Wölkchen (talk • contribs) 07:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Es getht wohl um File:Logo Kant.png. Nun da müüste ein Represetant der Schule eine Mail an das Commons-Support-Team schicken und die Veröffentlichung des Logos unter einer (genauen) freien Lizenz bestätigen. Siehe dazu Commons:OTRS/de. Ich emfehle die Lizenz {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Aber Achtung: 1) das ganze kann länger dauern (auch einige Wochen) und 2) danach kann jder weltweit das Logo zu jedem Zweck benutzen, z.B. auch auf T-shirts drucken und für teuer Geld verkaufen. Gruß --JuTa 09:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Infos und die Zeit, meine Frage zu beantworten! Das ist wirklich etwas komplizierter, als ich zunächst vermutet hatte. Dass das Logo dann CC-Lizenz hat und eben auch verwendet werden kann, ist uns bewusst. Danke wirklich für die Antwort, die Emailadresse des Support-Teams habe ich nun auch gefunden und die Freigabe bestätigt. --User:Herr Wölkchen, 09:19, 06 Mai 2020 (UTC)

Geo-Lab.info category

Hi, JuTa. You have deleted the reference category, a few hours, very few, after its creation. I am not very clear about the reason, perhaps because of a request to change the name of the included file, because there is only one file, or only one contributor. In any case, it's a project or process that starts at this point, and it will take time to include more images, which already exist, and perhaps more contributors. Finally, I would ask you to reverse this removal, to restore the category, because, as I say, it is a starting point for the development of a larger project. Best regard,--Galopax (talk) 08:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the problem was it was completly empty, which mean there was no description nor some sensefull parent caretories. I was working on some maintenance lists and tried to find a sensefull parent category without success. So I decided to delete it. Feel free to recreate it but dont forget to add at minimum one parent category. regards --JuTa 14:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Thanks JuTa. I've recreated it with parent categories. --Galopax (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Marek Mietelski family picture

Hi, JuTa. Could you please explain me why have cancelled this picture from the Wiki Commons? The picture has been taken in 1935 by my late grandfather and today I'm the only owner of both the picture (in my family album) and the film negative. In my opinion the picture finely displays the "climate" of the 1930s and the only two persons still alive (of the five pictured there) accepted including it within Wiki with great pleasure. What's wrong? Mit Gruessen ZakSpeed (talk) 11:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you are talking about File:Marek Mietelski (pianist) with family.jpg? Well, you claimed that this was your {{Own}} work, which is obviously not the case. There was no indication that this could have been made by a family member and you are the only heir. In such cases you should mention this on the description and best use the template {{Heirs-license}} for the lucense. regards --JuTa 11:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, JuTa. Understood and corrected. Author's name added as well as the statement that currently I'm the owner of the picture (and whole album). Is everything correct now? Regards ZakSpeed (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes better. I did some minor changes - see here. --JuTa 15:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank ZakSpeed (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Duplicates

Hello, thanks you for you maintenance work. Sadly museums have always duplicates in their databases, and sadly these images have differents URLs (e.g. [1] vs [2] therefore I did not find a way to avoid to upload the duplicates. I just deleted a few dozen of them, but I did not create redirects as the files were uploaded only yesterday and they were not used. IMO you can delete the duplicates without to create a redirect if it is more easy for you. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you are welcome. Its easier for me to to it with the redirects. regards --JuTa 18:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:Animals of Meghalaya: not empty anymore. (Who could, indeed, predict that subcats would be eventually created for this?!) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

You know my opinion. Fill up the subcat then I will restore it. --JuTa 08:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

• As you know mine: That while the relevant guidelines allow you to delete empty categories on sight, it indeed would be no less adherent to those guidelines to add {{Prospective category}} where it is warranted — as in the case in hand and in hundreds of other categories that keep me and many other editors coming back to this talk page to ask you for undeletion of that what should never been deleted. You keep wasting everybody else’s time and effort and misleading those who might meanwhile have used the absent category. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• Also not empty anymore: Category:Psalm 56, Category:Psalm 58, Category:Psalm 59, and Category:Psalm 88. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• And also: Category:December 2011 in Malta, Category:December 2012 in Malta, and Category:December 2013 in Malta. Idem ibidem. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Licensing issues

Hello JuTa, thank you for contacting me regarding the licensing issues for [3].

I have corrected the licensing tag into a more appropriate tag, since this file is published by a governed Indonesian council, it has the same legal status with common laws and thus are in public domain.

Shall the tags or something else need to be corrected, let me know. Ksuc (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

OK, I removed the problem tag now. --JuTa 12:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi JuTa, Thanks for deleting my redundant SVG_Translate_tool_test_Corsica-geographic_map-en.svg etc files. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 23:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

You are welcome. --JuTa 06:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Ciara Beauty Marks Tour Promo Poster

Hi I received a message on my talk page from you about a copyright regarding the promotional poster for Ciaras Beauty Marks Tour. I have no clue who the owner of the promo poster is. Is there any way for you to fix it? If possible. Pillowdelight (talk) 03:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Then the only possible fix is to delete the file on commons. Please read Commons:Licensing. --JuTa 03:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

I tried deleting it not sure if it did, can you check? If it didn’t is there any way for you to delete it? Pillowdelight (talk) 03:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

You cannot delete images, only admins can. But I did this now. --JuTa 06:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

GBCT Logo

Hi JuTa,

I have updated the GBCT logo with what I understand to be the correct licence. Logos were supplied by the organisation and are available under "attribution"

Regrading the GTC logo, the organisation are registering it as they did not have that done and once that is through I will attempt to updates the licene on Wiki.

Is that the correct course of action please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HMCLSPLYL2020 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, but you added just *no* license to the image (but a warning template that there is no license). Please see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. --JuTa 12:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Duplicates in Category:Orchids

@JuTa:
Hallo JuTa,
in der Vergangenheit habe ich gesehen, dass Du bei Duplikaten Bereinigungen vorgenommen hast.
Hast Du ein spezielles Werkzeug zum Erkennen und Löschen von Duplikaten?
Heute hat "User.Tm" 148 Orchideenbilder von Flickr in die Kategorie Category:Orchids eingestellt,
die bereits in den entsprechenden Kategorien und Artikeln der verschiedenen Arten vorhanden sind.
Ich habe User:Tm informiert.
Hast Du die Möglichkeit, die Dateien zu prüfen und zu löschen?
Mit Dank für Deine Mühe verbleibe ich mit Grüßen. Orchi (talk) 16:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Ich finde sie über Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. Diese Seite wird alle 3 Tage aktualisiert, das nächste mal am 10.05. Gruß --JuTa 17:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

PS: Du kannst Sie aber gerne auch vorher schon mit {{Duplicate}} markieren. Dann kümmert sich wohl ein anderer Admin darum. --JuTa 17:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

...vielen Dank für Deine Auskunft. Kommen diese als Duplikate erkannten Dateien automatisch in Special:ListDuplicatedFiles? Orchi (talk) 18:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Sofern sie wirklich binär identisch sind, ja. --JuTa 18:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

....danke für die Bereinigung der Duplikate. Die letzten 30 Bilder habe ich von Hand mit "dupe" versehen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)♀

Pharyngeal fricatives audio

Hi, could you restore the versions of File:Voiceless pharyngeal fricative.ogg and File:Voiced pharyngeal fricative.ogg? Pharyngeal fricatives and epiglottal fricatives (also known as pharyngeal trills) are definitely different sounds, so if the files are identical then they are inaccurate. I would like to consult Wikipedia editors on which versions are accurate, but now that you've deleted them I can't do so. (COM:OVERWRITE is violated in these phonetic demonstrations left and right, which is another issue.) Thanks! Nardog (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nardog, they are back. I will reprocess them in a week or so if nothing happens. regards --JuTa 06:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Now that I've looked closer, it seems it is rather Voiceless epiglottal fricative.ogg and Voiced epiglottal fricative.ogg that should should be deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Voiceless epiglottal plosive.ogg. (I can't put the entire blame on those who spuriously overwrote the files, however, as Wikipedia used to rely simply on filenames to determine which files to show.) Nardog (talk) 12:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File MP3

Guten Abend. Ich bin Administrator in vec.wiki (Venetien) und wollte MP3-Dateien erstellen, in denen Sie die Aussprache der Wörter hören können, damit Sie sie in die Stimmen einfügen können. Ich erhielt eine Benachrichtigung, in der ich gebeten wurde, einen Administrator zu kontaktieren, um dies zu tun. An dieser Stelle wollte ich um Informationen bitten und verstehen, ob es ein Verfahren gibt. Vielen Dank im Voraus für Ihre Antwort und viel Glück! --Fierodelveneto (talk) 18:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, wo wurdest Du gebeten? Normalerweise kann Du Dateien ganz normal hochladen, solltest aber z.B. Commons:Licensing beachten. Gruß --JuTa 18:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File JPG

Hallo JuTa , Sie hatten mir für diese Datei eien Mail geschrieben wg. Unklarheit bei der Lizenz: "RS111_Peter-Henry-von-Koss.jpg". Ich habe das Bild persönlich von der norwegischen Rettungsgesellschaft Redningsselskapet erhalten, weil ich danach gefragt hatte. (Zitat der Mail: "Hi, Andreas, Use this picture instead. This is from 2017, with our new logo. Credit: Redninsselskapet. -Enjoy RS-Eigil Andersen". Wenn ich ein Bild quasi geschenkt bekomme, kann ich dies als mein Bild hochladen mit Bezug zum Quellauthor? P.S. ich hatte die Gesellschaft schon angeschrieben mit der Bitte, die Lizenzvorlage auszufüllen und an COMMONS zu senden. Bisher sehe ich das nicht und vielleicht sieht sich Herr Andersen nicht dazu in der Lage. Wie soll ich in einem solchen Fall verfahren? Ich möchte ungern gegen die Lizenzbestimmungen verstoßen. Ansonsten werde ich wohl auf das Bild verzichten müssen - Schade. --Awistreich (talk) 11:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Awistreich, ich sehe {{OTRS pending}} ist bereits auf der Dateibeschreibunsgseite, aber leider keine Lizenz. Die müssten also eine ihnen genehme Lizenz wählen - z.B. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} - und an das Commons-Support-Team per mail schiken - siehe Commons:OTRS. Ohne Lizenz wird die Datei nach einer Woche gelöscht, was bald der Fall ist. Du kannst auch dort schonmal nachfragen, ob {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} für sie OK ist und das dann nachtragen. Falls die Datei glöscht werden sollte, und sich hinterher die Freigabe als valide herausstellt, kann und wird sie in der Regel aber wieder hergestellt. Gruß --JuTa 12:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

heisst dies, wenn ich bei der RS nachfrage, ob sie mit der {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} einverstanden sind und sie antworten mit ja, dann reicht dies? Und ich kann dann diese Lizenz nachtragen?. --Awistreich (talk) 04:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Jein, sie müssten das dann auch an das OTRS-Team schicken, sonst wird die Freigabe wohl nicht anerkannt. --JuTa 05:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Photographs of flags of France by canton

Can you delete this on behalf of Fr.Latreille? Thanks. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 02:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I have a question, can I request cleanup for a category? SpinnerLaserz (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean with cleanup? --JuTa 03:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Requesting Autopatrol rights

Hello @JuTa: , I hope you are safe and doing good. I think I was eligible for the autopatrol rights before, some of my upload were turned out to possible copyright violation. I accept that I did mistake. I'm aware that Wikimedia commons adhere to the policy and are strict against copyright. But I consider that I wouldn't misuse the right if granted, and won't violate policy. Thanks and regards. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 02:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Please request this on Commons:Requests for rights, as this is the official way. --JuTa 02:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah @JuTa: I already did. I guess it would take a quiet time their for admin attention. So I ping you personally. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 02:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

The please just wait until your request get processed. --JuTa 02:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Please restore two deleted files

Hi JuTa,

you have deleted

File:Helena Bohle-Szacki 2008.jpg

File:Helena Bohle-Szacki 1938.jpg

Can you please restore both files, and then ping me? We have received OTRS permission from the rights holder.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC) (German OTRS team)

Hi Mussklprozz,  Done.--JuTa 06:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Danke! :-) --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Félicien Kabuga

Hi, JuTa you deleted the Category:Félicien Kabuga because of empty. There is now at least 1 file. Can you restore the category? Thanks. :-) Lotje (talk) 08:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 13:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop deleting my creative commons contributions

Please stop deleting my creative commons contributions. You have deleted several of my original contributions to creative commons. This is destructive, unwarranted, and denies me your assumption of good faith. Furthermore, you have deleted these works without any notification to my, denying me any right to due process before the deletion.

In most, if not all, cases you have deleted images I have created using PowerPoint. These images use the PowerPoint drawing tools, and occasionally include clip art from creative-commons collections assembled by PowerPoint. I take care to only include clip-art images already released under creative commons. As a consequence, the resulting (newly created composite) image is released into the creative commons when I release rights to my creative contributions to the work.

Please stop deleting my creative commons contributions. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Lbeaumont, you are using "third party" photos and similar to create your content without naming them and likely without their consent which makes them copyright violations. Please stop uploading such images in future. --JuTa 14:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

PS: You were notified for a lot of images on your talk page by the nominators for deletion. --JuTa 14:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Request

Hello. Could you check this file please? The user who upload the photo extracted the copyvio label... Best regards. chansey^MesajYaz 01:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

I converted it to a regular deletion request. --JuTa 01:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

File:草生正恒.jpg

File:草生正恒.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely! Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by User:CptViraj. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Suppression photo de la Chancellerie Polonaise

Bonjour JuTa, je ne comprend pas vos suppressions de photos de la Chancellerie de Pologne, pour lesquels je suis intervenu dans les propositions de suppression (par exemple ici Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Franciscus with Zoran Zaev in 2018) pour lesquelles dans une première proposition l'administrateur @King of Hearts: avait statué sur un maintien du fait de la notoriété de l'auteur (une chancellerie). Depuis de nombreux contributeurs viennent supprimer les bandeaux en masse, en faisant croire que la licence n'existe pas. Merci de votre réponse. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi the flickr public domain mark is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Flickr files. Soneone else marked the as havin no (accepted) license and I procssed that.--JuTa 12:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

J'ai procédé a des remplacements de bandeau qui ont eux-mêmes été supprimés par d'autres sans intervenir sur la page de discussion, c'est pas correct comme procédé. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

You can try a Commons:Undeletion request. I will not restore the file(s). --JuTa 17:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Flag of Tirol and Upper Austria.svg

Hallo JuTa, das verstehe ich nicht ganz? Warum werden gleich aussehende Flaggen jetzt unter einer Datei zusammengefasst? Müssten dann nicht auch die Flaggen von Franken, Hessen, Indonesien und Monaco zusammengefasst werden? Unter Horizontal bicolor white and red flags oder Horizontal bicolor red and white flags gibt es bestimmt noch mehr Beispiele. Die historisch identischen Flaggen von Haiti und Liechtenstein könnten auch zu einer Datei zusammengefasst werden. Groete. --  SpesBona 21:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Die waren binär identisch. Ich arbeite regelmäßig Special:ListDuplicatedFiles ab. Bei den anderen Flaggen gibt es dann wohl winzige Unterschiede. Ich sehe jedenfalls keinen Sinn darin, zwei (oder mehr) absolut identische Dateien zu haben, wenn es auch anders geht. Gruß --JuTa 21:48, 28 May 2020 (UTMcDonaldsC)

File:Fröhliche Angestellte bei McDonalds.JPG

Hi JuTa, könntest du mir bitte helfen? Ich habe nicht herausgefunden, wo auf der Bildseite genau ich die Nachlizensierung self GFDL....c-by-sa-all eintragen soll. (Ich denke übrigens,dass der Fehler bei commons liegt, weil auch andere Dateien an dem Tag denselben Fehler aufwiesen) Mit fröhlichem Pfingsgruß MoSchle (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it looks OK now. I kept it. --JuTa 18:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

thanks MoSchle (talk) 05:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Rhcplive

Hello. Can you please explain me why the file Rhcplive has been cancelled? It had all the permissions required Prugna (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, which file you are talking about? --JuTa 00:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Löschung von "Category:Pleated trousers"

Hallo JuTa, ich wollte die Kategorie Pleated trousers neu erstellen da ich mir sicher bin das da mal was kommen wird. Ich wollte da nur einen Einteiler (drei Bilder) mit diesem Hosentyp als Unterkategorie einfügen. Nur habe ich die Info bekommen das diese Kategorie bereits existierte und von dir gelöscht wurde weil es nur eine Person gab die Beiträge lieferte. Ähm... soll das bedeuten das keine Hosen aus Plissee (Stoff) gibt? Oder hattest du einfach einen schlechten Tag? Sorry, Ich verstehe es nicht und würde die Bilder, die wohl in der Kategorie gewesen sein müssen, gerne sehen.--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, hie Kategorie war komplett leer und wurde deshalb gelöscht. Wenn Du Inhalt dafür hast erstell sie gerne wieder. Gruß --JuTa 15:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Download Aadhar Card by Name and Date of Birth for Adhaar.png

File:Download Aadhar Card by Name and Date of Birth for Adhaar.png has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely! Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by CptViraj. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Chakwal

Hi. Category:Chakwal District has many "nature" images. I think instead of deleting the Category:Nature of Chakwal you could have placed a couple of pictures in there. It's a pity... --E4024 (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to do it yourself. --JuTa 15:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Category

Hi, Could you please undelete Category:Davey2010 temp 15 as it's part of a maintenance category (i think), Once the virus has ended I'll sort through everything but truth to be told right now I'm not in the frame of mind to worry about my carts etc, Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 23:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Please recreate it as soon as you need it. --JuTa 01:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Do not delete my categories again as the next time you do you'll be at AN!, It's courtesy and respectful to restore peoples things that YOU have deleted when people ask you to restore them,

If you cannot be bothered to restore things then don't fucking delete them!.

Again do not under any circumstance touch any of my categories - If you have a problem with them let me know!. –Davey2010^Talk 18:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Catherine (given name)

Hallo JuTa, Catherine hat [Category:Unisex names] und in wikidata dann männlicher Vorname. Gibt es einen Mann, der so heißt? Die Frage ist ernsthaft, gibt ja auch Männer die Maria heißen, deshalb frage ich lieber. Ich dachte es ist 100 % weiblich. ??? Adelfrank (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Es gibt zumindest Category:Catherine-Dominique de Pérignon. Gruß --JuTa 22:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Der Mensch wird alt wie eine Kuh und lernt immer noch was dazu. (gilt auch für Deine Verlinkung hier) Danke. Adelfrank (talk) 10:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Sq3d-Feuille lenticulaire.jpg

Hi. I see you deleted File:Sq3d-Feuille lenticulaire.jpg. I don't understand the basis for this decision, and I think you may be mistaken. As already noted in the deletion log, this image was published first on Wikipedia, and has been used elsewhere. Did you perhaps think it was a copyright violation because the image is used elsewhere?--Srleffler (talk) 17:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

See previous discussion at User talk:Sreejithk2000/Archive 8#File:Sq3d-Feuille lenticulaire.jpg--Srleffler (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I restored the image and raised a regular DR now. --JuTa 05:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Jan Grefe

Hi JuTa I was wondering if you could take a close look at this category. Your comments would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 09:59, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Oops! Lotje (talk) 09:59, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it looks at has been fixed - see here and here. regards --JuTa 15:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Photos supprimées

Vous venez de supprimer tous ces fichiers, SANS TENIR AUCUN COMPTE des sources que j'ai indiquées et complétées le 28/05/2020, ni des explications que j'ai fournies pour chacune de ces images, après le message d'avertissement qui avait été posé par User:Ellin Beltz (qui n'a pas pris la peine non plus de répondre!).

Vous agissez comme un vulgaire apparatchik, sans aucun discernement ni volonté de dialogue.

En plus, vos suppressions qui laissent morts les liens et insertions utilisant ces images cassent les articles qui les incluent. C'est quasiment du vandalisme !

Je ne vous souhaite pas mes bons sentiments. Nevatovol (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, neither the source page(s) nor the desription pages tells us anything about the author or the age of the images. They can be recent paintings still protected by copyright. regards --JuTa 15:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, It's impossible to license images if == {{int:filedesc}} =={{Information|date =|source =xxx|author =x}}== {{int:license-header}} =={{PD-old-100}} is all you provide. We need date of image, source of picture, author/creator of image, to determine the license. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Vous pinaillez. Il existe en droit un principe général selon lequel il faut qu'une personne estime qu'elle subit un préjudice pour demander le retrait d'une publication. Tant qu'aucun préjudice n'est allégué, le droit à l'information prime. Dans les cas présents, la victime éventuelle d'un préjudice pourrait en "apporter la preuve par tout moyen" et alors un retrait s'imposerait. Votre interprétation tatillonne conduit à opérer une auto-censure généralisée, y compris concernant des personnages qui ont plusieurs siècles.

Cela est d'autant plus incohérent que sont permises, par exemple, des images de sportifs, de chanteurs ou de top-models qui sont certes des images "dûment autorisées" par ces personnes, mais qui sont surtout de pures images de communication et à caractère totalement promotionnel. Où est l'esprit encyclopédique et honnêtement informatif dans ce traitement inégal ? Nevatovol (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:JeanNicolet vestara1634.jpg, File:Jean Nicolet atcom GreenBay.jpg

Allez ça continue, je ne sais pas si vous gagnez des primes statistiques à la fin de chaque mois, mais si vous créiez autant d'articles encyclopédiques que vous dégommez d'images, vous seriez sûremetn l'égal d'un d'Alembert, Diderot ou Chambers... :(

Sur ces deux images précisément, j'avais indiqué, je me cite, que "l'administrateur du site-source de cette image est incubator:User:Axel xadolik. Il pourrait valider explicitement l'autorisation d'utilisation, mais malheureusement il est pour l'instant dans l'impossibilité physique d'intervenir (voir sa page utilisateur)". Le mot "humanité" doit pourtant pouvoir se comprendre dans toutes les langues. Que puis-je vous souhaiter ? La même chose ? Non, je pense trop à l'image de File:Mohamed Bouazizi.jpg que vous avez supprimée sans état d'âme il y a quelque temps. Que feriez-vous de la video de George Floyd ? Nevatovol (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

I cannot find any declaration of a free license on any source link you provided to those images. That makes them simply copyright violations. You may read Commons:Licensing and if you have contect to the copyright holders Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 15:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Deleted images

You deleted images with reason Source of derivative work not specified since 31 May 2020, but sources are specified there:

• File:Галя Тимофеева некролог 1919.jpg is from «Кіевский Коммунист» newspaper, February 6, 1919
• File:Галя Тимофеева сообщение о предстоящих похоронах 1919.jpg is from «Известия Киевского Совета Рабочих Депутатов» newspaper, February 15, 1919
• File:Галя Тимофеева сообщение о похоронах 1919.jpg is from «Вісті виконавчого комітету Київської Ради Робітничих Депутатів», February 18, 1919.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Yep, I missed that. The source in the desciption in a language I dont speak. I restored them. --JuTa 00:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kreuz Vorne HJS G.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Reclamation about files recently deleted

Appreciated JuTa:

Recently, you deleted the following images:

• File:Powers of the past.png
• File:Knock Knock.png
• File:Quarantine zone - the World.png
• File:How nations get along with each other.png
• File:Fake continental unity.png
• File:Europe is left alone.png
• File:Bad choice of words.png
• File:Christians can into sensitivity.png
• File:Europe cannot into superpower.png
• File:Polandball map of the Cold War.png
• File:Colombia, then and now.png
• File:Boyacá 1819.png
• File:A giant leap for mankind.png
• File:Círculo Polandball.png
• File:Hermosabeachpier.jpg

And you did that because these images have "no permission".

I need to know what permission are you talking about, because this deletion is unfair and, as far as I know, no permission is required when the image is own creation. I say the latter because the following archives (among the group of deleted ones) were entirely created by me:

• Quarantine zone - the World.png
• Polandball map of the Cold War.png
• Colombia, then and now.png
• Boyacá 1819.png
• A giant leap for mankind.png

I hope at least an explanation for what you've done.

Thanks in advance,

--Universalis (talk) 13:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

By this type of artwork its allways better to confirm your authorship through Commons:OTRS. Otherwise its normaly highly doubtfull that the creator and/or copyright holder is identical to the uploader. PS: If they are realy your own work they might have a problem with Commons:Scope. regards --JuTa 18:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

The archives I said I created entirely, I really created them. And in regards with the scope, it's not a problem in regards to Polandball-style images because there are a lot of Polandball-related images in Commons. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see a reason to not to rehabilitate the said images. --Universalis (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

@Universalis: Yes they are a lot of Polandball-related images just because you upload them here under your other account Babelia (talk · contribs)... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, again: the best would be to confirm your authorship through Commons:OTRS. But I ping User:Patrick Rogel to ask for his reasons to mark these images as "no permission". and to get a second opinion. regards --JuTa 04:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@JuTa: The images comes from Imgur and Imgur accounts are anonym and images are not free to use, especially commercially. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Universalis: in this case a verification through Commons:OTRS is required. --JuTa 06:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@JuTa: As far as I see an OTRS permission has already been sent regarding the remaining files File:The mashup.png and File:Russian influence.png. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Santa Vittoria di Serri original site plan Taramelli 1931.jpg

Dear JUTA,

you are a Wikipedia Administrator and Bureaucrat, I am a poor content provider for Wiki both in IT and EN. So please help me! Before publishing an article or making any changes I study and collect plenty of documentation. I am very attentive to copyrights for images and texts. Most of the images I upload on Wikimedia are my own photos, sometimes I upload images produced by other persons and I am very attentive to their intellectual property any copyrights.

The general rule is that when the author died more than 70 (seventy) years ago there are no more rights to be empowered by the authors and the image is free for everyone.

This is exactly what happens for the image I published which you deleted and delinked. The author is an Italian archaeologist named Antonio Taramelli, he excavated the site of Santa Vittoria and published its complete map in 1931. Taramelli died in 1939: 81 years ago. I believe there is no copyright on this image!!

If I have been wrong please let me know what was wrong and this will allow me to learn more form Wiki.

But if I was right I would like my picture to be re-published and re-linked on Wikimedia.

Thank you very much for your help.

Aga Khan (IT) (talk) 19:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you missed to add a license template to the omage description page. I now restored the file and fixed that. regards. --JuTa 23:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Please undelete

Category:Christmas in Australia in the 1940s -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Lisbon tram 334 -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Regarding restoring File:HouseholdGods-BandPic1.jpg

Hello @JuTa:

We have just received an Email at Permissions-Commons releasing this picture, can you restore this image: File:HouseholdGods-BandPic1.jpg? Thank you.

--Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Is it confirmed by OTRS? Are yo an OTRS volounteer? --JuTa 08:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@JuTa: Yes, I am an OTRS volunteer. I will add the info to the page, once it's restored. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. PS: Please add {{User OTRS}} to your user page. --JuTa 09:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Please remove the tag of deletion.

I added the details that you asked from me. Please remove the tag of deletion. File:18-11-51-img-20200525-wa0035.jpg Mangalam Agrawal (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done, but marked as no permission now. --JuTa 05:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Uitgebreide Boshoff gesin van Orania (Extended Boshoff family of Orania) (Wynand Boshoff).jpg

You deleted an image because it was not used. I beg to differ, it was removed from a page on Fellows of the South African Academy of Sciences. Please ammend. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 07:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

No, the flickr source is PDM - see https://www.flickr.com/photos/152506033@N06/44769081742/ - which is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Flickr files. --JuTa 14:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

About: Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ficha scrum.png

Sorry, I didn't indicate any information about image rights. These are the ones: https://www.safecreative.org/work/2006154426206-las-reglas-de-scrum. The copyright of both the original work and this derivative work is mine, and the publishing rights are held by scrummanager.com. Both are released under a cc by license. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan.palacio (talk • contribs) 10:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Then you should add this to the file decscription page and correct the license. If you need help, please tell me. --JuTa 10:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Missing image text.svg

You made a mistake of deleting File:Missing image text.svg. File:Sameboat temp cc0.svg is intended to be my temporary testing ground of SVG file. You should restore Missing image text.svg. It should no longer gives an exact duplicate file alert as I have reverted my temp file to an older version. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 10:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 10:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Also please revert all the works by CommonsDelinker bot on all Wiki projects of File:Missing image text.svg. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 10:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

I started to do so, but need a break now. YOu might like to help on https://tools.wmflabs.org/commons-delinquent/index.php?image=Missing_image_text.svg; I started from bottom to top. --JuTa 10:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Smits_Pieterszoon_(surname)

Category:Smits_Pieterszoon_(surname) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Gouwenaar (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Adding OTRS permission

Hope you aware that Special:AbuseFilter/69 tagging changes "Adding OTRS permission by non-OTRS member", as it`s also tag filter log for you. I`d like to suggest you to request OTRS permission on Meta, if you can spend time to contribute there. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 15:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

No, thanks I cant or better dont want to. --JuTa 15:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Don't mind, when I was check changes on abuse filters I've noticed that. It was just a suggestion. This and this (many more) which was tagged by that abuse filter. I thought you are bureaucrat and sysop here, so you could have it. Also I'd like to suggest you to remove "confirmed" uaer rights from your account because you are already in autoconfirmed group. Thank you for your understanding. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 17:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PV Groscavallo 018.JPG

Copyright status: File:PV Groscavallo 018.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PV Groscavallo 018.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by Stefan2. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Hero shakib calebHero shakib calebHero shakib caleb.jpg

File:Hero shakib calebHero shakib calebHero shakib caleb.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : COM:CSD#G2 G2: Broken redirect ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely! Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by CptViraj. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Do not populate Category:Historical images

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20200616064030&target=JuTa&namespace=all&tagfilter=Cat-a-lot&start=&end=2020-06-16

You moved a lot of photos to Category:Historical images of Taiwan. PLEASE DO NOT do that when you dont understand what the photos represent. They are UNRELATED to Taiwan!

On the other hand, plz dont populate Category:Historical images, because it will be scrapped: Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Historical images.--RZuo (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Maršálek (surname) --> Marsalek

Hi, JuTa I am afraid you will have to take a closer look to Maršálek (Q55810001) and Marsalek (Q37213174). I created Category:Maršálek (surname) but imo it would have been better to create Category:Marsalek (surname). Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi as he is names Maršálek on WD, I would recommend to rename the commons cat, add Maršálek (Q55810001) to his WD item and add minimum an english description to Maršálek (Q55810001). regards --JuTa 15:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thierry Bontridder - droits accordés sur photos !

Bonjour,

Vous avez retiré par erreur la photo "Mouvement 3, Th. Bontridder, 2013. Sculpture en acier inox peint. Dimensions : 2 x 4,2 x 2 m. 2012."

Mouvement 3 : Auteur photo = KtyMBA – Sujet photo = oeuvre d’art public de Th. Bontridder – KtyMBA a offert gratuitement la photo à Th. Bontridder - KtyMBA a autorisé la publication sur le site bontridder.eu - Th. Bontridder autorise la publication sur Wikipédia à KtyMBA et à Commons via courriel « Republication ».

D'avance merci de bien vouloir vous renseigner auprès de "Republication" et de remettre cette photo avec licence.

--KtyMBA (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case. There was no confirmation by an OTRS volounteer since April. --JuTa 16:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Thierry Bontridder - droits accordés (CC BY-SA 3.0)! Stop aux suppressions d'images !

Bonjour,

La permission de distribuer ce travail sous la licence Creative Commons paternité partage à l'identique 3.0 ('CC BY-SA 3.0'Texte en gras) a été reçue sur OTRS, via le ticket no 2020042010006705. Merci, --KtyMBA (d) 16:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Nathaniel TANG a répondu aux courriels de "Republication" dans son e-mail du 30 avril 2020 à "Thierry Bontridder" que l'autorisation est accordée et apposée sur la page.

J'ai replacer l'image sous licence. Merci de respecter mon travail de bénévole.

--KtyMBA (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Again: Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for those cases. I am not a member of the OTRS team and cannot see the tickets. OTRS pending images atomaticly go into some "delete me" categories normaly after 37 days without confirmation. --JuTa 14:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Hazal Kaya

Hallo. Was this cat re-invented? I mean was it previously deleted? Can you please revive the original one if it exists? (I open hundreds of cats but I never thought of adding my name as cat creator, is this a volunteer work or propaganda site? Whatever...) Is there a way of "automatically" going to the original (deleted) cat when it is re-opened? Would be very useful. Me and one other user would knock your door less often... :) --E4024 (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I restored the old vesions of it. See also here. --JuTa 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Can you also kindly bring back Category:Hazal (given name)? (You guys, admins, are like JC: Levántate joven y camina... :) --E4024 (talk) 20:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done --JuTa 20:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Hazal Kaya

Hello @JuTa: @E4024: I'm not getting what kind of propaganda I'm playing or trying to.. if I'm uploading images of Turkish blp and to manage those files and category if I'm adding Files/Category created by C1K98V. What's wrong in it?. Please guide me. Thanks and regards. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 02:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Well, as I restored some old versions of this cat, you are now not anymore the first creator of this cat. So the minimum the naming of "your" cat is wrong in this case. regards --JuTa 02:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

hello thanks, but I have a concern because the @E4024: doesn't interact and just revert. He/She should explain. This create an confusion, no courtesy between editor. I don't have issue with any of my fellow editor. Only few of clash has occurred due to E4024. Thanks and I'm sorry. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 02:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

LOVE YOUR WORK

Suborno Sabbir (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Civilizaton image

Hello. Thank you for your warning about image which have I upload to Wikimedia Commons. I am pretty new to Wikimedia Commons, honestly i've just try to take a image from Google graphics to add to my edit of article (i couldn't do it anyway, probadly because image wasn't verified yet). I had think that Google graphic publishing the images and photos that can be used freely (for example in the presentations) so I hadn't think about copyrights. Can you tell me about that where such information is? Sorry for the problem. (Euraczek (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC))

When nothing else is meantioned all context in the internet is per default "all rights reserved", which is the case here. This makes it imcompatible with commons. The image will be deleted. sorry. --JuTa 13:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:20150725_Cologne_Amphi_Festival_DAF_0004_crop.png

Hallo JuTa, mir ist ehrlich gesagt nicht klar, warum das Bild zur Löschung getaggt wurde. Alle Informationen sind m.E. vorhanden. Bitte hier antworten, danke: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:20150725_Cologne_Amphi_Festival_DAF_0004_crop.png -- H005 16:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Dort geantwortet. --JuTa 18:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:⋈

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Removal of Yazz Ahmed picture

Hi, I don't understand why you deleted the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yazz_Ahmed_Quartet,_19_april_2019.jpg

when it's not under any copyright whatsoever, being in public domain:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/146907430@N03/32703637827/in/photolist-2ecpHir-2ecpKyt-24YGRHg-RPUG9B-Ts2ebw (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/)

What am I missing?

Thank you for your answer, have a nice day.

Laurent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZukunftsBaum (talk • contribs) 15:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, public domain mark from flickr is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Flickr files. regards --JuTa 15:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Birger Carlstedt flagged

Hi JuTa,

We have uploaded the artwork of Birger Carlstedt on behalf of Amos Rex and Konstsamfundet, who own both the commercial rights and copyright according to the artists will. It is only 45 years since the artist passed, but the owners wish to share the art with the public. They have sent an OTRS-consent, but that has not yet been processed and now the art was flagged. Is there anything we can do to speed up the process? As far as we are concerned it is the first time a museum has agreed to share art in this way, so it would be a shame if the art was deleted before the OTRS-process has been completed. Lina Fredrika (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but which image(s) excactly you are talking about? I cannot find any deleted contribution of yours. --JuTa 06:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for answering so quickly! I am refering to this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Skr%C3%A4ck_birger_Carlstedt.tif , it has not been deleted yet but has been flagged. It was uploaded by the account User: Foto-Fredrika which is part of the same project as I am. We uploaded 40 pictures, and the letter of consent was sent by the museum to [email protected] but I think it has not been processed yet.

Lina Fredrika (talk) 08:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Well, you may ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case. Please note that there is no {{OTRS pending}} nor a {{OTRS received}} template on its description page. You should try to fix this. --JuTa 09:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, We noticed now that the new file uploaded a few days ago redirects to an old file that doesn't have the appropriate OTRS etc. This seems to be the problem, we will try to fix it. This means that that https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Skr%C3%A4ck_birger_Carlstedt.tif can be deleted. So sorry for the confusion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lina Fredrika (talk • contribs) 12:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I now copied the OTRS pending template over from the deleted duplicate. Sorry, I must have missed that while processing the duplicates. --JuTa 15:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your help! :) The version we uploaded on June 13th included data like measurements, technique, Wikidata etc (please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harlekin_591-BC_-_Birger_Carlstedt.tif for reference) but this information was somehow lost because this other version of the painting excisted. Do you know if it is possible to overwrite the original so the relevant data will be available? Lina Fredrika (talk) 07:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done --JuTa 07:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Wonderful, thank you! Lina Fredrika (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi. It seems this issue is settled, as there is a {{PermissionOTRS|2020061610003516}} tag. Yet the file still carries a "delete" tag. No other file regarding this group file permission seems to carry this delete tag. Could this be corrected? All the best.--Paracel63 (talk) 11:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

I kept it now. --JuTa 16:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)