User talk:Jacek79

Image:Hamburg_Hbf_Signale.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 19:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

File:612 550 Marsberg.jpg

Hi Jacek79! Die Koordinaten der Kameraposition stimmt anscheinend nicht. Sie liegen direkt im Bahnhof. Da ist aber kein Bahnübergang mit Ampel. Außerdem könntest du noch die Blickrichtung eingeben (|heading:Blickrichtung). Die Abkürzungen gibt es hier--Druffeler (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

• Die Koordinaten geben per conventionem den Standort der Kamera an...und ich stand nun mal auf dem Bahnsteig und fotografierte mit einem leichten Tele. Blickrichtung war ziemlich genau Südwesten.Jacek79 (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Ich schaue mir das morgen mal in GoogleEarth an!--Druffeler (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Passt das ungefähr?--Druffeler (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Jå, das schaut ganz in Ordnung aus. :-) Jacek79 (talk) 15:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - August-September - Holidays

I've removed some of your entries. The theme is on the act of going or being on holiday/vacation, not pictures of sites and scenery. If you disagree with the edit, please discuss on the Photo Challenge talk page. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

I disagree with your removal. The view I posted stands for the gorgeous views you get when hiking in the mountains. And: Next time please request a discussion before removing anything. Thank ye. --Jacek79 (talk) 14:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museumstram Wien P2 462 mit k5 1501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 422 027-3 S2 Dortmund-Westerfilde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen Hauptbahnhof mit Tw 701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The main motiv is the wagon, so it's QI. The building is leaning in a little bit. --XRay 09:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Photo Challenge Bad weather

Hello Jacek79
you're correct, I didn't catch the sentence in the checklist when we decided to try to put new images on top this month - I'll change that now to avoid further confusions.
About the time restriction - I did notice that as well, but as it affects the majority of the pictures submitted so far, I asked for discussion at the Photo challenge talk page.
Best wishes and thanks for your comment! --Anna reg (talk) 22:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flexity-Berlin nr 9001 M2 Prenzlauer Berg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 14:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 218-433 1 luebeck hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viadukt Niederntudorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! E 10 1239 ocean blue Altenbeken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2143 070-7 Ernstbrunn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GKB 63.08 Wies-Eibiswald.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Basel BVB Nr. 482 Mittlere Rheinbrücke.JPG

Hallo, Jacek,

bei deinem Foto vom BVB-Tram schreibst du, der Wagen 1473 hätte eine Sänfte. Eine Sänfte ist aber ein Wagenkasten, der keine eigenen Räder hat, sondern sich auf die benachbarten Wagenkästen stützt; sie ist also nur bei mehrteiligen Einheiten möglich, zum Beispiel bei der Variobahn.

Der Standardwagen besteht aber nur aus einem einzigen Wagenkasten. Wahrscheinlich handelt es sich um eine Niederflursektion innerhalb des Wagenkastens, das heißt ja wohl auch das polnische niskopodłogową.

Was meinst Du?

Grüße, -- Aisano (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Grüezi! Ehrlich gesagt, habe ich die Sache mit der Sänfte (der Ausdruck ist außerhalb der Schweiz eher ungebräuchlich) irgendwo unkritisch übernommen. Aber danke für den Tipp. Ich werde in dieser Sache nachrecherchieren. --Jacek79_✇✇ 16:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, schau Dir mal das an: VBZ Be 4/6 (Tram 2000) Das Nfl-Mittelteil ruht hier auf Jakobsdrehgestellen, das es sich mit den Nachbarsektionen teilt. Es ist also keine eingehängte Sektion. --Jacek79_✇✇ 18:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Danke. Hier in München verbindet man nach meinem Eindruck den Ausdruck "Sänfte" mit den Teilen der Variobahn, die auf den benachbarten Sektionen ruhen (zweite und vierte Sektion von fünf). Wenn das Nfl-Mittelteil des Standardwagens keine eigenen Räder/Achsen hat, passt das ja gut zusammen. Ich habe das nicht erkannt. -- Aisano (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, auf [1] steht's expressis verbis: Das Nfl-Mittelteil nennt sich Sänfte. --Jacek79_✇✇ 20:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesenbrücke geöffnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, even when it´s not very sharp. --Hubertl 10:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vordersdorf Höhenstraße.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koplopers 4091+4057 Haren.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now --Hubertl 22:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:IC 2434 IC2 + 146 555-8 Oldenburg Tweelbäker Weg.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:IC 2434 IC2 + 146 555-8 Oldenburg Tweelbäker Weg.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh well, the license information must have gone lost somehow as the form I'm using has the license selector box marked NOT NULL. As it's my own work, there is no copyright issue and no reason to delete it. --Jacek79 (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nederlandse Spoorwegen class ICM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This picture is special. I suggests to change the scope: A train composed of two three-section "koplopers" [[:Category:ICM|ICM]] --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Then the scope would be very, very narrow. --Jacek79 (talk) 14:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree with Archaeodontosaurus that this is a good picture and I also agree with him that "ICM" is inappropriate as a scope - visit ICM to see alternative meanings of "ICM". May I suggest "Nederlandse Spoorwegen Intercity Materieel (Dutch Railways Intercity Material) class electric multiple unit" as an appropriate scope? Also, please fill; in the date that the photo was taken. Martinvl (talk) 07:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Good counter-suggestion, Martin! Here it's in fact the Commons cat which is named very unluckily :-( --Jacek79 (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

 Support I am happy to support this nomination. Martinvl (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wien Hauptbahnhof, Wiedner Gürtel entrance ----

Scope changed from Wien Hauptbahnhof to Wien Hauptbahnhof, Wiedner Gürtel entrance --Jacek79 (talk) 19:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image. It is strongly recommended to give the sense of sight. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment The images of Wien Hauptbahnhof are sorted in sub-categories covering particular years (maybe because it was opened a couple of years ago). Such a by-year cat would make a very narrow scope, or what do you think? --Jacek79 (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I misspoke. For category requires that clicking on the scope is directly in the category that contains the image. For the sense is the geographical exposure of sight, south or north-east etc ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Does it mean I've gotta link to the primary cat I put the pic into, but the scope shall be something like "Wien Hauptbahnhof, Wiedner Gürtel entrance"? --Jacek79 (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes it is acceptable --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment OK, updated. --Jacek79 (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAB Lok 57 Altenbeken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Below 2 MP --Poco a poco 18:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment I caught the small version by accident, sorry! Retry, please. --Jacek79 20:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Good quality Poco a poco 18:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen in Deutsch
• übersetzen in Polnisch

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: mittel.

Please help us to translate the speedy deletion policy in many language so that non-english speaker can read it as well.

Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank,

die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist Church (Sint-Jans-Molenbeek).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The shadowing and coloration appear poignant. -- Cirt (talk) 15:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wismarer Schienenbus DHE T1 Boekelo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 643 044 RB51 Glanerbrug.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen in Deutsch
• übersetzen in Polnisch

Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank,

die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Picture of the Year/2015

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen in Deutsch
• übersetzen in Polnisch

Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank,

die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Jacek79,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen in Deutsch
• übersetzen in Polnisch

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: mittel.

Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank,

die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Blanc depuis l'Aiguille du Midi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:15, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Jacek79!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aiguille du Goûter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful view with no pixel spared, but lots of posterized snow --Daniel Case 02:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC) *  Comment Do you mean the large patch of snow in the lower left corner? It's quite dirty as the snow fell last winter. --Jacek79 18:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC) No, the one at top center. Daniel Case 05:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) * OK, I've just adjusted the over-illuminated snow fields a bit. Please look. --Jacek79 19:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC) OK, still not perfect but good enough for QI now. --Daniel Case 16:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aiguille Verte et Aiguille du Midi depuis le Col des Rognes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aiguille du Goûter, north face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Info See the location field in the metadata. It also contains the orientation. --Jacek79 (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope must include the orientation of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Aiguille du Goûter to Aiguille du Goûter, north face --Jacek79 (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

,

•  Comment Why haven't you told me you mean the scope? I've just changed it. Please try again. --Jacek79 (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Ok perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Glosowanie na Photo_challenge

Panie Jacku, zagłosowałeś dwa razy na pierwsze miejsce w konkursie: tutaj. Proszę popraw. --Jarekt (talk) 02:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Setra S 415 NF of BahnBus Hochstift.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 20:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo Jacek79,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jacek79,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt Farmer pulling sledge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford 3000 closed-cab.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wollepark viewed from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Please explain why this is a sufficiently notable scope. There's just a stub article on German Wikipedia about this housing development. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Info - You're right about the WP article (which is really a lousy stub), but the Wollepark has been in the media up here (including NDR and Bild-Zeitung) for quite a while. Once I've got the time for a rewrite of the article, I'll do this. --Jacek79 (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
• Thanks for establishing the notability of the scope.  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Jacek79: I'd prefer a direction (cardinal point) here: "southwest view" or the like --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 17:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Info You'll find that information in the image metadata. But I'm not very fond of narrowing the scope of this submission even more. --Jacek79 (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Jacek79: kaʁstn's suggestion seems fair to me.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment not every building needs a cardinal point, but this is a huge complex with several building and it's visible from every side. Maybe, there's another very relevant view from another direction. For this case, the scope should be extended IMHO. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 07:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
    •  Info Better now?! --Jacek79 (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Wollepark to Wollepark viewed from the southwest --Jacek79 (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Best in Scope, all criteria met. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 18:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Of course I'm fine with this, but why is the direction truly needed in the scope, with but two Commons photos of this complex and this one obviously best in the original scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - June - Clocks/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Nordwolle Delmenhorst Haupttor Uhr.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Clocks, in June 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1939 Pontiac Deluxe Six 4-Door Sedan Type 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit strong sharpening but QI for me -- Spurzem 15:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Refuge du Nid d'Aigle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baraque Forestière des Rognes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good image and obviously useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railroad telegraphy pole in Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. F8 or F11 would probably have been better.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sturmtief Herwart Jadebusen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the photo, but I see 2 dust or water spots on the upper left and 3 more on the upper part a bit to the left of the right margin. Please fix those and check for any others I may have missed. -- Ikan Kekek 02:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)  CommentSpeckles have been removed now. --Jacek79 15:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC) I'm not sure what you did, but I still see at least 5 dust spots, where I previously said they were, and I've cleared my cache. -- Ikan Kekek 00:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC) I removed some speckles, but apparently those you didn't see, and I didn't see those you meant in the first place. Please look again. --Jacek79 19:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)  Support - Thanks, you got most of them. I've tried to mark the location of another very dark one, but I'll go ahead and promote the file. -- Ikan Kekek 20:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)  CommentOK, after your clue, I've even deleted this last (hardly visible) speckle. --Jacek79 20:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Destroyed crane at Niedersachsenbrücke in Wilhelmshaven.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A2.3 7203 Neuperlach Süd U5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough, image is sharp enough and the verticals are well done --Michielverbeek 19:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peat cokery in Elisabethfehn, Barßel municipality, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Nice building, seems like it could be useful. Possible QI, too; worth trying a QIC nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Josefs-Hospital in Delmenhorst, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus A380 prototype F-WWOW - Hamburg Airport 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo Jacek79,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Privateways Quest Kodiak 100 D-FBHI JadeWeserAirport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sénéchal Vintage Race Days Rastede.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:56, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

This month the UNESCO Wiki Loves Earth photo contest takes place. For this photo contest we need an small update in the file marker template. Thank you!

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank,

die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 09:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VT 81 Weser-Ems-Eisenbahn Ankum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - June - On the move/Voting

Hi Jacek. Could you fix your voting on this challenge. You voted 3, 3, 1, 1. You can only give points to three photos and one each of 3, 2, 1 points. Can you remove or fix some of your votes. Otherwise I will need to remove the votes as ineligible. -- Colin (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Fixed. Is it OK now? --Jacek79 (talk) 20:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercedes-Benz O 317 half-double-decker bus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, correctly described and categorized. Ready to be used on Wikipedia projects ! -- Skimel (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elano 1 Go Oldenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroën B10 Cabriolet Bruchhausen-Vilsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NE 81 of Weser-Ems-Eisenbahn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support easily best in scope. --MB-one (talk) 10:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Moving files to Commons

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Moving files to Commons ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: niedrig.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank,

die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 09:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tenement Troststraße 64–66 in Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baarle-Hertog Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Chromatic noise in the sky and on the chimneys, some CAs and the cut mid in the steeple is a bit unfortunate. Could you please fix at least the noise and the CAs? -- PtrQs 01:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)  Comment Done. --Jacek79 15:06, 31 March 2019 (UTC) Errors corrected. Fine picture. --Ruthven 15:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aiguille Verte depuis l'Aiguille du Midi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great view, there is some CA --Poco a poco 18:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC) @Poco a poco: CA removed. OK now? --Jacek79 21:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Sorry, no improvement, now the clouds for example are looking very unnatural. --Milseburg 15:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC) @Milseburg: Clouds repaired (I didn't know they had CA, too). It's OK now, isn't it? --Jacek79 22:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC) No, it isn't, the clouds on the left look awkward --Poco a poco 17:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC) Remastered from scratch. Now it must be OK. --Jacek79 22:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Ok --Poco a poco 16:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krupp O 10 F4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Hot Chicken Flavor Ramen.jpg

File:Hot Chicken Flavor Ramen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merlin Plus Two.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jacek79,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jacek79,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bentheimer Eisenbahn VT 112 RB56 Neuenhaus Birkenstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Bentheimer Eisenbahn VI image

Bentheimer Eisenbahn VT 112 RB56 Neuenhaus Birkenstraße

Hello @Jacek79:

Noticed your Bentheimer Eisenbahn image nominated for VI and to me it meets all the VI requirements. My only suggestion is to consider tighter cropping (suggestions in notes) to provide better focus on the engine.

Best, --GRDN711 (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alstom LHB Coradia LINT 41 of the Bentheimer Eisenbahn AG.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jacek79,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Please remain calm and collegial

---

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

A.Savin 22:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Das solltest zu aller Erst mal Du selber beherzigen. Ich habe Deinen Konflikt mit Steindy gelesen. Gute Nacht! --Jacek79 (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

You're wrong, I didn't insult anyone as troll or something. --A.Savin 22:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MAN Lion's City (12 m) CNG (2nd generation).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Beware of your nominations this one did not appear in the competition. I corrected. You have to give the right category where we can see the picture this is not the case yet. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

 Info Sorry, when uploading the pic, I didn't even know of the existence of the 12 m category. :( --Jacek79 (talk) 13:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• Ok but you have to modify either the scope or the category of the image, so that it is consistent. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
• Jacek79, note that "Category:" shouldn't be visible in the scope. Look at any other nomination's scope in edit mode to see how they do it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
• Thank you for the notice, but this is a mere formal mistake. Corrected. --Jacek79 (talk) 20:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

• You're welcome, I think. :-P I'm still not seeing this photo in the linked gallery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

• Look again, please. --Jacek79 (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - I see it now and will take your word for it that it's the only photo in scope. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 06:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020

Hallo Jacek79,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2019
• 
  Hessigheimer Felsengärten
• 
  Silberteich im Harz
• 
  Nationalpark Jasmund

Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 08:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MAN Lion's City G CNG (2nd generation) in Oldenburg, Lower Saxony..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen Airport Terminal 1 Check-In during Covid-19 Crisis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CAs on the pillars --MB-one 22:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Are these CAs bad? --Jacek79 20:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC) Bad for QI, yes. But that should be fixable. --MB-one 07:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC) CAs removed. Manually, of course. --Jacek79 20:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC) I still see fringes on many edges --MB-one 12:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC) The CAs were on many more places than on the pillars. Corrected now automatically. OK now? --Jacek79 20:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good now --MB-one 09:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Mercedes-Benz 300 d Pullman

Hallo Jacek79, thank you for your vote. But would you please add „supported“? Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 21:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremer Pferdebahn 23 beim Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nordwest-Zeitung headquarters (2020).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful. I don't remember whether geocoordinates are required for a VI of a building, but could you possibly add some? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
  • They are already there. ^^ --Jacek79 (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I'm not sure why I didn't notice them before. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A29 Huntebrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I can see color noise and CAs, could you fix it? --Tesla Delacroix 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Reduced the magenty and cyan channels slightly. Better now? --Jacek79 20:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Hevy destortion due to the projektion --Milseburg 20:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC) I can still detect CAs and strong color noise at the steel structures --Tesla Delacroix 11:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Reworked. It must be OK now. --Jacek79 21:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC) I am very sorry! The image itself is definitely very sharp and will be a QI, but there is still strong color noise in the sky and at the concrete etc. Do you use Lightroom? There is an easy way to remove this with Lightroom. --Tesla Delacroix 23:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC) added an image note --Tesla Delacroix 08:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)  DoneI removed the reddish noise in the central part of the bridge. Should be sufficient now. --Jacek79 19:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. I can see some noise at full-resolution but it's not apparent at full height on a 4K monitor. Note that it's better to do (profiled) denoising before exporting (with higher bit depth) to hugin. --Trougnouf 09:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Tempelberg Sandkrug im Gegenlicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Thank you :) I'm still not fully convinced with the way the leaves separate from the overexposed part but the main artifacts are gone so it's probably good enough. --Trougnouf 23:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC)  Support good one ! --PetarM 07:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward Hansa 1800 station wagon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The only in scope and useful. We have a Hansa 1500 station car in the commons but not a 1800. -- Spurzem (talk) 22:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SLT-2 Mammut.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Problem with the scope: it must refer to the category that contains the image, not to an article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment ----

Scope changed from de:Schwerlasttransporter_der_Bundeswehr#Schwerlasttransporter SLT 2 „Mammut/Elefant“ to category:SLT-2 Mammut --Jacek79 (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vordersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo Jacek79,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Landschaft
• 
  Halde Jägersfreude
• 
  Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderhänge bei Wallersberg
• 
  Landschaftsschutzgebiet Heseler Wald und Umgebung

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Detail
• 
  Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge im FFH-Gebiet Regnitz, Stocksee und Sandgebiete von Neuses bis Hallstadt
• 
  Blüten des Gamander-Ehrenpreis im Naturpark Taunus
• 
  Striegeliger Schichtpilz im Bruderwald in Bamberg

Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1953 Chevrolet Handyman 210.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 12 July 2022
•  Support. Good image of a rare car -- Spurzem (talk) 07:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

(UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1953 Chevrolet Handyman 210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the CA --Ermell 20:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)  CommentCA reduction turned on. Why is there always so much CA in almost every pic I shoot? --Jacek79 20:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. The (cheap) lens is often the cause. This is also common at the edges of the shadows when backlit. --Ermell 21:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volkswagen Polo II convertible.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022 ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: mittel.

Winners just announced

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 09:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1937 Bentley 4¼ Litre Roadster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Volvo bus

Hi. Please renominate the photo and I'll support it. I'm sorry the nomination was closed already. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - November - Unfinished things/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Aspern Seestadt Panorama Sonnenallee von Osten (2013).jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Unfinished things, in November 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2023

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Wiki Loves Folklore starts on 1st of February and we need your help in translation of the main page in your local language.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 05:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Deletion policy

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Deletion policy ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

This is an important policy page, please assist to translate it into your language.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 14:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:De minimis

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:De minimis ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

This is an important policy page, please assist to translate it into your language.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 14:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Fair use

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Fair use ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

This is an important policy page, please assist to translate it into your language.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 14:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Derivative works

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Derivative works ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

This is an important guideline page, please assist to translate it into your language.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 14:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Velomobile in Emmerke.jpg

Copyright status: File:Velomobile in Emmerke.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Velomobile in Emmerke.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2024

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: mittel. Frist zur Übersetzung der Seite: 2024-01-25.

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 starts Feb 1! We need your translation skills! Can you help make the page accessible in Your Language. Thanks a bunch!

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Wenn du dich abmelden oder deine Benachrichtigungseinstellungen für Übersetzungen ändern möchtest, rufe bitte Special:TranslatorSignup auf.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 07:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Copyright tags/General public domain

Hallo Jacek79,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Polnisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.

Die Seite Commons:Copyright tags/General public domain ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:

• übersetzen (Deutsch)
• übersetzen (Polnisch)

Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Wenn du dich abmelden oder deine Benachrichtigungseinstellungen für Übersetzungen ändern möchtest, rufe bitte Special:TranslatorSignup auf.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons‎, 04:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgericht Oldenburg von der Alten Hunte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 22:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vertical grille on a BMW 501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amtsgericht Nordenham.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipziger Gullydeckel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holder A55 tractor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meet all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)