This user has autopatrolled rights on Wikimedia Commons

User talk:JJMC89

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89.

This is the user talk page of JJMC89, where you can send messages and comments to JJMC89.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Namaste,

I hope this message finds you well.

So, I wanted to enhance the page Vinitha on Wikipedia by adding a picture of her. My approach was to reach out to the author, requesting permission to feature a photograph with proper accreditation, inspired by a similar practice observed on File:Anita-nair-portrait-wikipedia.jpg. However, to my dismay, it appears this method may not align with best practices. (Please refer to File:Vinitha.jpg for context.). To address this, I've taken the initiative to request that the author instruct their photographer to send formal consent via email, which he has sent already. Hopefully, this will rectify the situation satisfactorily.

On a related note, I seek guidance regarding the usage of photographs from external sources, such as news websites or blogs, for Wikipedia. For instance, would it be acceptable to utilize an image sourced from a website like http://www.saffrontree.org/2015/11/in-land-of-stick-figures.html, even in the absence of explicit Creative Commons licensing?

Your insights on these matters would be immensely valuable. Thank you for your time and consideration. Theshubhz (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The outstanding issue is that licensing the file only under the GFDL is not permitted per Commons:Licensing#GNU Free Documentation License. As such, I've listed the file for deletion. For any image published online, you must have the copyright holder send in a permission statement unless the place it is published in explicitly specifies an acceptable license (example: https://flickr.com/photos/34523388@N06/53167761891 specifies CC BY 2.0). — JJMC89 22:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on Wikitech

[edit]

Hello, could you check your Wikitech talk page? I need help with moving a template there due to something happening on Commons. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 03:43, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]