User talk:Fritzober
Alles, was dann doch noch irgendwann geklappt hat, wird entfernt! Stehen bleiben nur die offenen Wunden! Als Auftrag!
File:Cover der Amerikanischen Ausgabe Daughters of Africa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
·×ald·es 05:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, XalD! I have the permission for publishing in WP from penguinrandomhouse!
All the best --Fritzober (talk) 06:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
File:British Cover Daughters of Africa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 08:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Ies! I have the permission for publishing in WP from penguinrandomhouse!
see here ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
All the best --Fritzober (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Margaret-Busby, photographer Horace Ové.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 08:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Hi, Ies again! I have the permission for publishing in WP from penguinrandomhouse!
All the best again --Fritzober (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Hans-Ulrich Gack (2017).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 23:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Ama Ata Aidoo (2014) - Ausschnitt.jpg
[edit]
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo Patrick Rogel!
- auf der Quell-Flickr-Seite [1] sind genau die angemahnten Eigenschaften verzeichnet. Die zugeordnete Lizenz ist "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)". Es wäre nett, wenn du mir erklären könntest, was da noch fehlt und wie das ggfs. zu heilen ist! Danke im Voraus --Fritzober (talk) 13:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- PS: wie oben sichtlich, habe ich mir schon einige blaue Nasen geholt, aber ich habe nicht vor aufzugeben, vielleicht kannst du mir helfen! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fritzober (talk • contribs)
- Hallo, ich antworte mal für Rogel: Auf Wikimedia Commons sind nur freie Lizenzen erlaubt (Siehe Commons:Lizenzen). Das heißt, dass keine Bedingungen einer Lizenz darf irgendeine Verbreitung oder Abänderung einschränken. Dies wird aber hier durch die Beschränkung der kommerziellen Verbreitung und der Abänderung allgemein getan. Habitator terrae 🌍 14:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Für Genehmigungen kannst du COM:OTRS/de benutzen. Habitator terrae 🌍 14:52, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo Habitator terrae! Nett, dass du mich ein Paar Wendungen weiter durch das Labyrinth führst! Ich werde also versuchen, die Fotografen weichzukochen, mir eine Passe-partout-Lizenz zu erteilen. Gibt es irgendwo eine Aufstellung der verschiedenen CC-Lizenzen? Die Unterschiede zw. CC BY/NC/ND etc. würde ich mir gerne mal übersichtlich dargestellt anschauen.
- Danke für das Beispringen! Gruß --Fritzober (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hier finden sich eine schöne Zusammenfassung, aber natürlich sind auch andere Lizenzen (wie z. B. {{WTFPL}}) zulässig, sofern sie frei sind. Habitator terrae 🌍 19:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Mariama Bâ Plakat (2014).jpg
[edit]
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo Patrick Rogel!
- auf der Quell-Flickr-Seite [2] sind genau die angemahnten Eigenschaften verzeichnet. Die zugeordnete Lizenz ist "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)". Es wäre nett, wenn du mir erklären könntest, was da noch fehlt und wie das ggfs. zu heilen ist! Danke im Voraus --Fritzober (talk) 13:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Ama Ata Aidoo (2014).jpg
[edit]
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo Patrick Rogel!
- siehe bitte oben: "An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Ama Ata Aidoo (2014) - Ausschnitt.jpg", Gruß --Fritzober (talk) 13:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Aseem Shrivastava bei einem Vortrag über R. Tagore 2016.jpg
[edit]
Ronhjones (Talk) 00:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Ricken Patel, Commonwealth Lecture, 2013.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 12:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Suad Amiry (16206771201) Ausschnitt.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Suad Amiry (16206771201) Ausschnitt.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Suad Amiry (16206771201) Ausschnitt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Logo Ushahidi.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Logo Ushahidi.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Ushahidi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Logo des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Lady Howe and Franklin, 1774 (NYPL b12349156-ps prn cd3 43) (Ausschnitt).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Logo Armut und Gesundheit in Deutschland a+G.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Logo Ushahidi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
File:UNRISD Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
大诺史 (talk) 04:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Simonetta Di Pippo (2015).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Überkategorisierung
[edit]Hallo Fritzober, danke für Deine Beiträge, doch bitte vermeide Überkategorisierung. Gruß --Andreas Schwarzkopf (talk) 06:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sophie Scholl, Aufnahme Hans Scholl (Blumberg 1942).png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Sophie Scholl, Aufnahme Hans Scholl (Blumberg 1942).png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sophie Scholl, Aufnahme Hans Scholl (Blumberg 1942).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Löschantrag auf Originaldatei
[edit]Hallo Fritzober, ich habe heute einen Löschantrag auf eine Datei gestellt, von der du einen Ausschnitt als neues Bild File:Fallon Sherrock (2020).jpg hochgeladen hast. Der Löschantrag Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fallon Sherrock - Backstage.jpg betrifft somit auch deine Datei. Mirer (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Raphaela Vogel (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Elisabeth Pate-Cornell (2021).jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Elisabeth Pate-Cornell (2021).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Lutheraner (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo Lutheraner! Die Datei "Elisabeth Pate-Cornell (2021).jpg" stellt einen Ausschnitt der Datei "Elisabeth Pate-Cornell 01.jpg" dar. Für diese hat der Autor die Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 international“ festgelegt, welche aus meiner Sicht somit auch für die abgeleitete Datei gilt.
- Ich habe die Datei aus meiner Sicht ordnungsgemäß mit dem Upload-Assistenten hochgeladen. Warum dabei die Lizenzangabe nicht übernommen wurde, kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Ich habe jetzt wie oben empfohlen die Lizenz mit dem Freigabe-Assistenten bestätigt (Vorgangs-Nummer: 4879-aab9cf23c24db829) und hoffe, dass zumindest dieser Fall damit korrekt abgeschlossen werden kann.
- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Fritzober (talk) 09:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Virginia Gamba cropped (2019).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Virginia Gamba cropped (2019).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Virginia Gamba cropped (2019).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Lutheraner (talk) 00:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hochgeschätzter @Lutheraner!
- Ich habe auf die Lizenz der Ausgangsdatei des Bildausschnittes verwiesen. Diese ist unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung 3.0 Polen“ lizenziert. Es erfolgte die Namensnennung: (nämlich) Gov.pl. Nach dieser Lizenz darf die Ausgangsdatei durch mich "verbreitet werden – vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden – neu zusammengestellt werden – abgewandelt und bearbeitet werden" zu den folgenden Bedingungen: "Namensnennung – Du musst angemessene Urheber- und Rechteangaben machen, einen Link zur Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Diese Angaben dürfen in jeder angemessenen Art und Weise gemacht werden, allerdings nicht so, dass der Eindruck entsteht, der Lizenzgeber unterstütze gerade dich oder deine Nutzung besonders."
- Ich kann den Fehler nicht erkennen und bitte um Hilfe! Ein etwas konsternierter Fritzober (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Die Situation ist nicht ganz eindeutig . Ich nehme an, du hast die Hinweise zur Rechtslagenänderung der polnischen Regierungsfotos gelesen. Wenn nicht, solltest du das umgehend nachholen. Das ursprüngliche Foto ist vor dem Stichtag hochgeladen worden und wäre somit in Ordnung. Dein Ausschnitt wurde jedoch nach dem Stichtag hochgeladen und untersteht meines Erachtens der neuen Rechtslage. Letztlich wird dies hier ein Admin entscheiden müssen. Freundliche Grüße Lutheraner (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Danke für deine Erklärung! Wenn deine Rechtsauslegung hier zum Tragen kommen sollte, muss ich halt auf den prägnanteren Bildausschnitt verzichten - wenn der Admin zu anderen Einsichten kommen sollte, würde ich mich natürlich freuen. Danke nochmal für deine Mühe und gute Nacht! Fritzober (talk) 01:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Die Situation ist nicht ganz eindeutig . Ich nehme an, du hast die Hinweise zur Rechtslagenänderung der polnischen Regierungsfotos gelesen. Wenn nicht, solltest du das umgehend nachholen. Das ursprüngliche Foto ist vor dem Stichtag hochgeladen worden und wäre somit in Ordnung. Dein Ausschnitt wurde jedoch nach dem Stichtag hochgeladen und untersteht meines Erachtens der neuen Rechtslage. Letztlich wird dies hier ein Admin entscheiden müssen. Freundliche Grüße Lutheraner (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sophia Adenot (2022).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Sophia Adenot (2022).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Adenot (2022).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sehr geehrter AntiCompositeBot! Ich habe den File:ESA astronaut announcement Class of 2022 (52519418671).jpg zurechtgeschnitten und unter dem Namen File:Sophia Adenot (2022).jpg wieder hochgeladen. Ich habe für die neue Datei exakt die gleichen Lizenzangaben gemacht, die für das Orginal angegeben waren. Ich würde gerne verstehen, was deinen Algorithmus dabei stört, bzw. wie ich es machen kann, damit du garnicht in Aktion treten musst! Einen guten Rutsch ins Neue Jahr wünscht Fritzober (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Logo UN Special Envoy Disability Accessibility.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Logo UN Office on Genocide prevention and Responsibility to Protect.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Mark G. Lawrence (2019).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
186.172.153.238 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Reem Alsalem (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 21:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Anaïs Marin (2023).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Anaïs Marin (2023).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anaïs Marin (2023).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
DCB (talk) 17:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Fabián-Salvioli-UNLP (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Tomoya Obokata.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Tomoya Obokata.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tomoya Obokata.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Maria-Lena Weiss im Deutschen Bundestag (cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— doclys (❀) 15:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Natalie Holzner (2023) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lutheraner (talk) 16:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:السيدة الجليلة عهد (cropped).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:السيدة الجليلة عهد (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:السيدة الجليلة عهد (cropped).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Quick-ease2020 (talk) 21:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo Quick-ease2020, ich fürchte, dass es zur Löschung kommen wird, ich habe die Datei durch Anwendung des Crop-Tools auf eine unter CC-Lizenz veröffentlichte Datei erstellt, wenn deren Lizenz nicht mehr besteht, gilt das für mein Derivat wohl auch! Schade! Grüße Fritzober (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Logo ECOSOC Forests.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
IDCM (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Gloria Diaz (2023).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |