User talk:Flominator/Attic/01

Image:Charles Manson.jpg

You claim this photo comes from the United States Government. To me this looks like a photo from Manson's arrest by the county sheriff's office. Do you have any source for claiming this is a government photo? Thuresson 14:13, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

It was statet at en:Image:Charles Manson.jpg by the user I mentioned there. Are sheriff's pictures not PD, too? --Flominator 14:20, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Paris hilton universal photo.jpg

Hi, could you perhaps explain why you claim this is GFDL and CC? The Universal-Photo website do not seem to use those licenses, in fact they sell their photos for money. Thuresson 08:07, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Because I asked the autor, if we could use it under those licenses. Why else would we have version in a higher resolution than the UP-Website? --Flominator 09:59, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Travemünde

Hallo Flominator, nun habe ich wohl für Travemünde einen falschen Kategorienamen gewählt. Sorry. Hast Du einen Bot um die Bilder in Cat:Travemünde auf Cat:Travemünde, Germany umzubiegen? Gruß Godewind 14:59, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Ich hatte ein Verständnisproblem beim Anlegen von Category/Artikel, deshalb hieß der Cat letztlich auch Travemünde, aber durch Fehler lernt man ja. Die Category der Bilder habe ich auf Travemünde, Germany geändert, der Cat Travemünde ist jetzt leer. Was muß ich dort eintragen, damit er gelöscht wird? Godewind 16:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Ich habe {{delete}} eingetragen,das wird wohl richtig sein. Godewind 17:17, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Category:Cities in Germany

Hatte irgendwie Langeweile... und beim Stöbern durch die deutschen "Landschaften" bin ich ja auch auf das eine oder andere gestoßen, was wirklich Interessant war. Und der Hinweis, dass man nur bei dieser Art der Sortierung Bilder findet, die in keinem Artikel eingeordnet sind, stimmt. Es gab schon einige Kategorien, die zwar Bilder enthielt, allerding existierte keine Verbindung zu Cities in Germany. bemerkt hatte ich das ja erst, nachdum du meinen Artikel zu Münster einfach aus der Kategorie "Cities in germany" "rausgeschmissen" hattest. Muss man halt mit offenen augen hier stöbern. Schade, dass es in ganz vielen Fällen keine Bilder zu der Stadt gab, sondern nur Wappen, landkarten usw.  :-) --skINMATE 10:34, 4. September 2005 (UTC)

Wie stellst du das denn mit dem Übertragen am pfiffigsten an? Lädtst du die Bilder auf deinen PC runter und dann neu nach Wikipedia hoch? --skINMATE 11:44, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Geschafft, keine Artikel mehr direkt in der Catergory:Cities in Germany.... --skINMATE 19:54, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

In der kategorie sind seit gestern zwei Bilder drin, und ich bin scheinbar zu ungeschickt die an die richtige Stelle zu packen, kannst du vielleicht mal schauen? -- skINMATE 22:44, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:De la cosmographie p688 vol3.png

Why did you change the category to France? It is written in French but is about Germany... Maybe I should create a category French books though. Justinc 15:52, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

I did it because I didn't know where to put it while I was trying to keep an empty Category:Germany. What is it about? --Flominator 21:35, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Ah fair enough. Its a bit of a hybrid, its from the French translation of the first German-language encyclopaedia. The page in question is about Germany though, winemaking in Stuttgart, which is why I put it under Germany, but maybe it should just be classified as an encyclopaedia... Justinc 21:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Maybe you can write a rough summary in english and put it into Category:Stuttgart, Germany. That would be great. --Flominator 21:50, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

FlickrLickr Kategorien

Hallo Flominator!

Die Kategorien der FlickrLickr-Uploads sind oft ein 1:1-Mapping der entsprechenden "Tags" in Flickr. Siehe z.B. unter "Tags" hier für das Leihgestern-Foto. Dass diese Tags sich oft nicht als Kategorien eignen, ist schon klar. Da wir im FlickrLickr-Projekt versuchen, eine halbe Million Bilder nach brauchbaren Fotos für Commons durchzuwühlen, bleibt für eine Standard-Kategorisierung kaum die notwendige Zeit. Allerdings bin ich der Auffassung, dass Synonyme und Internationalisierbarkeit von Kategorien auf der Liste der notwendigen zukünftigen Funktionsänderungen für Commons ganz weit oben stehen müssen. Insofern glaube ich, dass "rote" Kategorien besser sind als gar keine, da man sie a) ggf. durch die richtigen austauschen, b) in Zukunft wahrscheinlich Redirect-artig mit existierenden Kategorien verknüpfen kann.--Eloquence 05:36, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Hi Eloquence, es ist kein Problem. Ich dachte nur, dass der entsprechende User es vielleicht nicht gewusst hatte, dass deutsche Ortskategorien das Suffix ", Germany" tragen. --Flominator 08:11, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Black Forrest

Hi, I'm happy to help you. Please let me know if you wich something else in the same style. Cheers, Jide 05:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Wet T-shirt

In case you weren't watching...

(copied from Talk:Bomis#Wet-T-Shirt)

Are there any Wet-T-Shirt pictures of the Bomis girls? I need one for de:T-Shirt. TIA, Flominator 08:39, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

no the only picture that can be used is in the article. --Paddy 20:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You could always ask Jimbo if he can put another one under the GFDL. But keep in mind that we can't ask him for many pictures like this - maybe we should spare that option for a more important occasion... -- Duesentrieb

There's a wet t-shirt pic of a non-Bomis girl on en: at en:Image:Wet_T-Shirt.jpg. Blackcap (talk) 07:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

(end copying)

Hope that helps. Don't know if you still need that, though. Blackcap (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I already knew that one, but it was removed from German Wikipedia :( --Flominator 08:51, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Hmmm. Well, it's now on the commons here, just so you know: Image:Wet T-Shirt.jpg. Good luck! Blackcap (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Commons-Category:Braunschweig, Germany vs. Category:Braunschweig

Hallo!
Habe gesehen, dass Du die neue [[Category:Braunschweig, Germany]] angelegt hast.
Frage: Warum?
Unter [[Category:Braunschweig]] sind bereits Dutzende von Braunschweig-Fotos vorhanden, unter [[Category:Braunschweig, Germany]] gerade mal drei – davon 2, die auch (noch) in der „alten“ Category vorhanden sind.
Was ist der Sinn zweier identischer Kategorien? Besteht die Absicht, den Inhalt der alten Kategorie in die „neue“ („ , Germany“) zu verschieben?
Prinzipiell wäre ich auch für Eindeutigkeit in der Benennung von Kategorien – insofern würde ich für +Germany plädieren, anderseits gibt es meines Wissens nur EINE Stadt dieses Namens auf der Erde, eine weitere Detaillierung zur Erzielung von Eindeutigkeit ist demnach überflüssig. Sämtliche anderen Orte, die auf Braunschweig zurückgehen heißen „Brunswick“ o.Ä.--Brunswyk 09:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Ich habe dir in Wikipedia geantwortet. --Flominator 10:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Nowitzki

[1] & [2] Hast du ne spezielle Erlaubnis für die Bilder? "Kostenlos" heißt nicht cc-by-sa...ich würde vorschlagen du schreibst ne Mail an den Autor und fragst nach einer Lizenz. Gruß Darkone 12:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Es geht mir auch nicht um das kostenlos, sondern um das rechtefrei auf der Seite! --Flominator 17:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Rechtefrei für Medien, hier soll sich aber jeder die Bilder verwenden dürfen. Also frag mal bitte per Mail nach, ob sie es unter einer hier gültigen Lizenz (PD-GNU-CC) stellen würden. Darkone 22:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Ich habe ihn ja sogar per Mail um das Portrait gebeten und ihm einen Link zum Artikel geschickt! Außerdem war man auf w:de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Bildrechte#Nowitzki mit den Bildern einverstanden. --Flominator 18:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Herr der Ringe

Hallo Flominator, folgende Bilder von dir haben sich einen LA gefangen: Image:Hdr Sam Solitaire.jpg Image:Hdr Gimli Solitaire.jpg Image:Hdr Gandalf Solitaire.jpg Wenn du eine Erlaubnis der Schöpferin dieser Figuren hast, die Fotos unter GFDL zu stellen, dann gib das doch bitte in der Bildbeschreibung an. --Fb78 20:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Fb, vielen Dank für die Info. Die Erlaubnis hatte ich und habe es daher dazugeschrieben. Gruß, --Flominator 18:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Black Eyed Peas

Du hast am 17. Januar das Bild Bild:BlackEyedPeas.jpg in der deutschen Wikipedia gelöscht [3] mit dem Hinweis NowCommons. Leider kann ich das Bild in Commons nicht finden. --217.88.28.13 07:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Das Bild findet sich hier! --Flominator 07:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:TokyoCigaretteVendingMachine.jpg

Hallo, auf der Seite von Paul Vlaar steht „Please do not use these photos without my permission.“ und „Copyright 1999-2006 Paul Vlaar, [email protected]“ - hast Du eine anderslautende Genehmigung, das Bild unter der GNU-FDL zu veröffentlichen? Wenn ja ergänze sie bitte in dem dort, ansonsten muss das Bild leider gelöscht werden. --Ratatosk ✍ 01:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Ich hatte es von der englischen WP, wo er es selbst hochgeladen hatte :) --Flominator 07:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, OK, wusste ich nich. Wäre auch schade um das Bild gewesen :) --Ratatosk ✍ 22:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Schon OK, ich hatte damals auch vergessen, den Vermerk dazu hinzuschreiben! --Flominator 12:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Britney Spears Navy.jpg

Please stop adding speedy delete to this image, original versions of cropped images are not duplicates and must not be deleted! Arniep 01:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

But why would someone need that bigger version, that doesn't show anything interesting besides her? --Flominator 07:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Zuerich Altstetten Kirchen.jpg

Da musste ich lachen! Die Kuh war übrigens sehr aggressiv und weigerte sich standhaft, an die Sonne zu stehen! Gruss und Dank --Ikiwaner 18:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Villages in Germany

Habe im Versionsverlauf festgestellt, dass du dich schon einmal mit diesem Thema beschäftigt hast. kenne mich zwar einigermaßen aus in den deutschen landen, aber wenn man so am sortieren ist, dann tue ich mich natürlich schwer, für kleine Gemeinden/Städte weit ab vom Münsterland die richtige Zurodnung (Cities in Germany oder Villages in Germany) zu treffen. Wäre es nicht sinnvoll, die beiden Kategorien zusammen zu fassen? -- skINMATE 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi Skinmate, ich schaue immer in Wikipedia nach, ob der Ort eine Stadt ist und dann passt es. Ich vermute durch eine Zusammenlegung würde die Kategorie noch unübersichtlicher werden, oder? --Flominator 17:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Klar, übersichtlich ist das nicht unbedingt. So ein klein wenig hat dieser Alphabetische "Index" ja geholfen um sich innerhalb der kategorie zu bewegen. Aber bei den deutschen Usern halte ich es schon für schwierig, zwischen Stadt und Gemeinde zu unterscheiden. ein. Wenn sich einer unser fremdsprachigen Freunde an diesen Kategorien "vergreift", für die ist die Zuordnung noch schwieriger. -- skINMATE 20:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sachalin-Lage.png

Du testest den Commonismus? Was soll das heißen? Warum soll die Karte gelöscht werden? Was ist los? --Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 08:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Halloo? Meldest Du Dich mal? --Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 06:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Sarazyn, sorry für die Verwirrung. Ich teste den CommonismNow-Bot und dies waren die ersten Gehversuche damit. --Flominator 17:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Ach soo. o_O --Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 08:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Noe fetters.jpg

en: These Cap/Cup Lock Shackles are lacking the cap/cup, essential in keeping the shackle shut.

de: Das sind Kapselschellen, aber ohne die Kapsel, welche die Schellen am Aufklappen hindert. Mehr Anmerkungen von mir auf der Bildseite.--Klaus with K 16:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Klaus, vielen Dank für deine Anmerkung. Ich habe sie auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite vermerkt. --Flominator 17:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi Flominator. You've been nominated for adminship at Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Flominator. Could you please indicate there whether you accept? Thanks, User:dbenbenn 04:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

You are now an administrator here on the Commons. Congratulations! User:dbenbenn 13:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Flominator 14:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I was thinking about creating the CB category, but didn't get around to it... AnonMoos 02:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Melanie Safka mch3-2b.jpg

Why do you think that this image has been released under the Creative Commons? Jkelly 01:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Because I asked the fotographer and forwarded the e-mail to [email protected]. --Flominator 11:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, I admit it: I've accidentally chosen the wrong license :) --Flominator 14:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it is all sorted out now. Jkelly 23:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wikibooks-logo-en.png

What about this one?

Why have you deleted Image:Wikibooks-logo-en.png? It is a logo, used by other projects and it is NOT REDUNDANT TO THE SVG! It is NOT the WIKIBOOKS LOGO! Now please find some correct logo, and place it BACK! I also would like to know if you are the user who did this. This probably commons user created that account because nl.wm cannot be edited without, under a false name, as non-existing, replaced the image there. I reverted, and gave a warning. He didn't respond, and re-reverted me today. Without giving a notice who he is.

People like you (and DingDong) are making sure people are fleeding from commons. Thank you for that. People like you are making the climate here impossible, as we, wikians, have to fight to an overwhelming power that DOESN't LISTEN. People like you let me loose my last part of trust in Wikimedia Commons. People like you make sure I will not upload to commons, and maybe even copy all images i use to the local wiki. People like you make sure that happens on dozens of wiki's. Just to be sure it isn't deleted under your nose. People like you make Wikimedia suck. thank you! Effeietsanders 21:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

What about Image:Wikibooks-logo.svg? --Flominator 07:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

As i tried to explain, it is NOT the same. Take a look at a wikibooks, and check the logo on the upper left. And be astonished you deleted an image that WAS correctly, in favor of an image that IS NOT, and surely not the same. You were for sure not paying attention, and that is exactly the stereotype of commons-admin that is becoming knows in the past months on nl.wikipedia. You confirm that that kind of admins exist. And I doubt for sure that if you delete such an important logo for the wikimedia-wiki's, you must have deleted other non-redundant images too. You make sure people cannot trust Wikimedia Commons. And that you now still point at that svg, i'm sorry, but then you must really have a lot of dirt in your eyes. The color is totally different of the most above book, the letters are different, etc. IT IS NOT THE SAME! Effeietsanders 08:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

If you would have taken a LOOK at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wikibooks-logo.svg , you would have seen compare:... and would have seen that it wasn't the same. I can only conclude you don't check the svg if it is indeed the same. Effeietsanders 08:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Schaengel89 asked me to delete it. Since he always used to provide solid work, I didn't doubt him. The other SVG-images where ok, so I thought that this one was too. I'm really sorry for my mistake. --Flominator 08:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

You should doubt shaengel89 more however. He is known for his png-svg pushing, and he often pushesit when it shouldn't. (Also with flags, coa's etc) He has already done a lot of damage in the past... And please always doubt people when you are deleting an image. Always check and doublecheck. You cannot take it back. Effeietsanders 08:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I've been working with him for over half a year and I didn't have any troubles with him. But on the other hand I wasn't that much into the SVG-business either. Since nobody complained I thought that it was ok. I was about to e-mail the original uploader to have him upload the file again, so thank you for uploading the older version again. --Flominator 08:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The verion i uploaded is a worse version, as it is not as exact in number of pixels etc (damn, what is that word...) I notified the original designer on wikibooks and requested him to see if he has a better verion. Could you maybe see to recover the history of the file somehow? Now i seem to be the uploader, and that is not correct of course. Further i have now uploaded a version without the text, so it is not fully correct. I just put this temporarily there, as it is been used on nl.wikimedia.org . Effeietsanders 09:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Effeietsanders, I really wonder about the reason for your anger... In fact, it couldn't really be the logo! It's right, I am the one that replaced the logo. And in fact, it's not the first one I replaced and nevertheless, it won't be the last image, as you can see on my user page when you find time between your tirades against Florian and my person. The logo has been changed on more than 20 pages of 15 different projects, but funnily enough, somebody is there and tries to let me belief, image-replacing makes people run away from wikimedia commons! apart from this unconscionable lie, you force both us to roll back my work. I say: "Nonsense", what it is, actually. What do you think, effeietsanders, will anybody revolt after looking on one simply page (http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks) because the pages uses an SVG, that doesn't look exactly like the old PNG? Will this person even realize the difference among those two images? If I wouldn't be a moralist, I'd think you are a fanactic. Regards, Schaengel89 10:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

If I read well, you admit you are the same as DingDong. And that is even worse, as making sure you cannot be talked with, hiding for critisism, is a bad thing. You don't quite understand what i say, that is clear. Or you just don't give a damn shit.

I tell you and told you before that you replace images that are correct but png by incorrect svg. That is simply falsification of data. That is vandalism. As easy as that. Especially when you do it on purpose, even more when you are told to stop it, and you just do it again without further notice on that talkpage. (http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/overleg_gebruiker:Ding_Dong) The svg was incorrect, and you just ignore that fact, You just say it's close, and i don't give a shit people want to have it correct. I'm sorry, but people are working on encyclopedeae, dictionaries etc. They should use the correct version. Or at least you should let them use the version they think is correct. Leave the choise to them.

You say I am a fanatic, I say you are. You are replacing systematicly flags, coa's, logo's by svg's. Even after people asked you several times to stop that. Often you do that anonymously, or now even under a false name. But the image is lot's of times not the same. Thát is the true problem. If it is not the same, don't ask for deletion, that is not the commons policy. Projects should be able to make the choise themselves. People like you show people that the policy of commons doesn't mention a thing. You show them, that their effords to create a correct image, or to find out which one is correct (it took people hours sometimes) are not safe here. That they risk to be deleted in favor of an incorrect svg. Effeietsanders 22:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Noe merino.jpg

Apologies my German is not good :-( I was looking at the article on merino sheep on English wikipedia and saw your photo Image:Noe merino.jpg. Are you sure all the sheep in the photo are merinos? Some of them seem to have black faces and I don't htink that is characteristic of the breed.--AYArktos 07:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi AYArktos, I'm not really into sheep :) The museum, where I recorded the pictures writes on its website that they're called Merinolandschaf, but they write that it is a hybrid race (?) from the Württemberg-region.

A google picture search supports your conlusion. Maybe only the white ones are merinos? --Flominator 10:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Kockums AB

I'll see what I can do...!

Reg. Fred Chess 09:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Copyright tags in information-template

I've answered here. Hope i helped you, bye :) --ßøuñçêY2K 22:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bali Labeled.png

Is it possible to add the names of the Islands, Nusa Penida, Nusa Lembongan and Nusa Ceningan in this picture. They are the Islands in the bottom right hand corner of the map. This graphic would be perfect for this article, Nusa Penida

What about the current one? --Flominator 09:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Perfect. Thanks

Your map is really beautiful, but is it possible to rename "Westjava" to "East Java"? 83.85.56.29 18:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC) As you can see on the map it is the eastern side of the Island. Guusb. 83.85.56.29 23:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Done! Thanks for thinking. --Flominator 08:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Commons-l subscription

Hello Flominator,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Ulan

Hallo Matthias, hast du den Panzer damals zufällig auch komplett? Das Bild, welches bisher bei ASCOD stand, musste nämlich entfernt werden. Vielen Dank im Voraus, --Flominator 14:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Ja, sind beide eingebaut MatthiasKabel 14:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Meine Benutzersperre auf Wikipedia

Hallo Flominator, Mathias Schindler hat mich gestern für den Zeitraum von einer Woche sperren lassen, den ich angesichts des angegebenen Grundes für deutlich übertrieben halte. Ich hab zwar schon versucht, mich mit ihm in Verbindung zu setzen, aber er hat mir bisher nicht geantwortet. Könntest du mal mit ihm reden? Viele Grüße von Antifaschist 666

I'm confused

As the uploader of Image:Dali on the Rocky Steps.jpg I'm surprised you didn't contact me about the permission. Maxbuten and I have corresponded about the photo and he gave his permission. In fact, if you look at the edit history, you'll see he edited the page. In any case, I forwarded his permission email to the permissions people. BTW, if {{CC-BY-SA}} isn't permission, what is? --Evrik 20:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Evrik, sorry for confusing you. Ixitixel asked me to write him, since the OTRS-people weren't really convinced of your emails. They lacked the explicit permission for commercial use and modification. Since I had some mail templates which I use in case I'm not sure if the uploader was asked, I used them. OK, I was too lazy to write something new ;) Meanwhile Max has replied and everything is alright. --Flominator 18:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Fomfr_witch_weighing_scale.jpg

URV --Historiograf 21:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Oops! --Flominator 07:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Löschvorgänge hier in den Commons

Hallo,
Ich habe im Lösch-Logbuch gesehen, dass du gerade Bilder löschst. Ich brauche dazu ein paar Infos von dir:

Wenn ich die Löschregeln richtig verstanden habe, dann wird eine schlechte Version eines Bildes mit dem Baustein "Template:Superseded" gekennzeichnet und kommt dann als normaler LA nach "Template:Deletion requests". Dort befinden sich z.Z. Löschanträge von sage und schreibe 47 Tagen und die Seite hat ca. 500 kByte. Wenn ich das Lösch-Logbuch betrachte, dann dauert es trotz einiger fleißiger Admins ;-) hochgerechnet Monate, bis meine LAs drankommen. In Category:Superseded befinden sich knapp 2000 Bilder...

Fragen:

1. Habe ich den Text richtig verstanden, oder geht das Prozedere anders ?
2. Wann kann ich mit einer Entscheidung rechnen ?
3. Gibt oder gab es Diskussionen darüber, ob die Superseded-Bilder separat bearbeitet werden sollen?

M. f. G. Augiasstallputzer 20:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Ich muss dir gestehen, dass ich mit dem Verfahren nicht so vertraut bin. Ich weiss nur, dass Copyrightverletzungen möglichst schnell angegangen werden sollten, also per SLA statt per LA. Du kannst mithelfen, indem du die Bilder schonmal vorher in ALLEN WPs entlinkst. Mehr kann ich dazu nicht sagen, sorry. --Flominator 20:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Das habe ich mit Hilfe von "Check Usage" gemacht. Wer könnte mir hier weiterhelfen ? Augiasstallputzer 20:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Sag mir das Bild, dann haue ich es ggf. weg. --Flominator 07:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Es geht um folgende Bilder:

Image:Marheladofriedrich.jpg
Eine viel zu dunkle Darstellung. So ist z.b. Das Wrack nur noch ein schwarzer Fleck

Image:Friedrich-schip.png
Ein schlechter Scan, wohl aus einem alten Buch o.Ä. Die Farben stimmen daher auch nicht (Graustich - zu wenig Kontrast).

Image:Wreck in the Sea of Ice.jpg
Total falsche Farben und geringe Auflösung.

Die wirklichen Farben habe ich mit Google und durch Vergleich mit Darstellungen auf den Webseiten der Eigentümer geprüft.

Bei

Image:Caspar David Friedrich - Das Eismeer.jpg handelt es sich um eine exakte Kopie von Image:Caspar David Friedrich_006.jpg. Weil gemäß Check Usage alle Einbindungen auf "Image:Caspar David Friedrich_006.jpg" zugreifen und nicht auf "Image:Caspar David Friedrich - Das Eismeer.jpg" würde ich daher vorschlagen, "Image:Caspar David Friedrich - Das Eismeer.jpg" zu löschen.

Image:Gq-map.png, Image:Liechtenstein.png‎ und Image:MidwayIslands.png sind auch exakte Kopien.

Die Vergleichsbilder sind auf den Seiten angegeben. Augiasstallputzer

Hab gelöscht, was ich konnte. Beim Rest war ich mir nicht ganz sicher! Gruß, --Flominator 13:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Ich habe jetzt ganz einfach Image:MidwayIslands.png auf Image:Midway Islands-CIA WFB Map.png hochgeladen ;-). In erster Linie wegen der besseren Qualität und der systematischen Namensgebung. Jetzt sind sie 100% gleich.

Bei dem trotz Kategorien recht großen Chaos hier (unter den Bildern) wäre systematischere Benennung und konsequenteres Löschen bei Duplikaten und bei "Superseded" wichtig. Ich bin halt kein Admin, sonst würde ich da mithelfen.

Auch wäre ein Bot mit gleichzeitigem Zugriff auf die wichtigsten WPs von Vorteil, um so die Check-Usage-Einträge zu ändern. Wer könnte da weiterhelfen ?

M. f. G. Augiasstallputzer 13:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Hier ist der richtige Link zu Image:Liechtenstein.png.

Done --Flominator 17:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Why not activating subpages in the Template: namespace?

The problem here on Commons is that the subpages are not activated in the Template: namespace. -- AlNo (talk)

Why not ask them to activate it? --Flominator 16:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

I tried to provide a solution that would work independantly of this issue:

• Commons:Deletion requests (policy level)
  • Commons:Deletion requests/list (list level, with only date sections)
    • Commons:Deletion requests/items (item level, each item has the name of the object subject to deletion request)

I realize just after updating my test page that it is no use to change this: any subpage that is linked from a template is seen from the calling page as a subpage of the calling page. Example:

• page1 includes template2
• template2 links to subpage3

=> when viewing page1, you'll see subpage3 as a subpage of page1, not of template2.

Now I wonder what happens when you edit directly template2. Are the links to subpages pointing to subpages of page2 or page1? :/

=> they point to subpages of template2... :(

Best regards,

-- AlNo (talk) 08:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Gefälschte Freigabe

Hallo Flominator,
mir ist gerade aufgefallen, das bei diesem Bild Image:Ryan Smyth.jpg folgende Freigabe steht :

"Raymond Tellers" <[email protected]> 10.06.2005 12:13:41 >>> Ich bin mit den GNU-Lizenz einverstanden für den nächsten neun Bilder: - 20050417058.jpg - 20050417033.jpg - 20050506017 (Mike Modano) - 20050507018 (Ryan Smyth) - 20050507022.jpg (Martin Brodeur) - 20050510001.jpg - 20050511002.jpg - 20050512004.jpg (David Aebischer) - 20050514008.jpg MfG, Raymond

Auf meiner Userseite in der deutschen Wiki stehen meine Freigaben von Raymond :

"Raymond Tellers" <[email protected]> 10.06.2005 12:13:41 >>>Ich bin mit den GNU-Lizenz einverstanden für den nächsten neun Bilder:-20050417058.jpg -20050417033.jpg -20050506028.jpg -20050506033.jpg -20050509007.jpg -20050510001.jpg -20050511002.jpg -20050512004.jpg -20050514008.jpg Diese Bilder können bei den Artikeln von die Eishockey WM 2005, schweizer Nationamannschaft, österreichische Nationalmannschaft, deutsch Nationalmannschaft, Didi Hegen und die EVD frei benutzt werden.

Ich habe das Bild nicht in die Commons hochgeladen und für mich sieht das so aus als habe da ein User ein paar Bilder in die Email geschmuggelt, damit sie hier frei sind. Wie siehst Du das? Und was kann man da machen? Sorry, dass ich mich direkt an Dich wende, aber ich bin so gut wie nie hier in den commons und kenne mich daher auch nicht aus. Wäre auch schön wenn Du mir hier antworten könntest. Vielen Dank und viele Grüße --Vonsoeckchen 12:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Been there, done that. --Flominator 17:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Martina Nolte

Ich habe auf deletions dafür plädiert, die Nutzerin dauerhaft zu sperren. Bitte leite ein entsprechendes Verfahren ein. Ich stehe dir und selbstverständlich allen anderen deutschsprachigen Nutzern weiterhin, allerdings ausschließlich auf Commons in Bildrechtefragen zur Verfügung. Hier habe ich allerdings, wie du wiesst keinerlei Autorität. Ich wäre ebenfalls dafür, Lupo auf Commons zum Admin zu machen. Gruß --Historiograf 20:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Histo, gut zu wissen, dass du nicht ganz aus der Welt bist. Ich werde schauen, was sich in Richtung deiner Anweisungen ausrichten kann. Hast du nicht Lust, selbst als Admin zu kandidieren? --Flominator 06:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Kann ich gern machen. Ich rechne zwar auch hier angesichts der 75 %-Hürde nicht mit einer Wahl, aber ich denke, es bleibt mir die Schlammschlacht erspart, die mich auf de bei meiner Kandidatur schon ein wenig belastet hat --Historiograf 16:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Ich hatte das Gefühl, dass Wahlen hier lang nicht so persönlich genommen werden, wie auf de.wp. Lupo meinte inzwischen übrigens, dass eine Sperrung nicht angemessen sei (siehe Commons:Village Pump#Discussions for user blockades) --Flominator 16:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Admin news

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

dubios

Selbstgemachte Esoterikbilder sollten hier keinen Platz haben: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:%27Boudica%27s_Charm%27_Ornament.JPG Gruß --Historiograf 00:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Warum stellst du dann nicht einfach einen LA? --Flominator 07:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nirvana around 1992.jpg

Hi Flominator.

This image is marked as © in flickr.

I was writing you asking you if you were sure about the license but i already found in the Google cache it really was Cc-by-sa-2.0

If you uploaded more photos from that space, you should check if the license changed and notice it on the page. You may also want to show evidence to another user before the google cache expires.

Platonides 20:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Cities in Germany - Category:München, Germany | Munich | Munich

Ist ja schon eine Krux, wenn es für Deutsche Städte auch englische Namen gibt. München ist nun total gemixt. Würde da ja gerne wieder Ordnung rein bringen. Ich meine irgendwo mal was gelesen zu haben, wie das mit den Namen für Städte und Stadtkategorien laufen soll. Kannst du mir weiter helfen. Gäbe ja neben München und Köln noch weitere Beispiele. -- Rüdiger Wölk 11:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Auf Anhieb keine Ahnung, ob es da einen Konsens gibt, aber ich wäre für Munich, Germany, dann passen die Subkategorien wenigstens wieder. --Flominator 18:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Quelle inzwischen gefunden. Danke. Diskussion hier: Commons:Village_pump#Munich -- Rüdiger Wölk 02:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Spanish Revolution images

Hi,Flominator. I've noticed that you have been deleting many images that I uploaded, most of them related to the Spanish Revolution and Civil War. I have reasons to believe the photographs should be all undeleted:

• According to the present Spanish Law, the Intellectual Property Rights of the authors of simple photographs will last for 25 years starting from the 1st of January of the year after the photograph or reporduction has been taken.
  • "Simple photographs" are those which represent reality as it is without any creative or intellectual effort

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Spain

I hope you can help me with this. I don't know exactly how to make undeletion requests, and I don't mean to start a deletion/undeletion war.

Best wishes, Mr.Rocks 00:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

P.S.: Also, you deleted Image:Mlacerda.png, and this image is older than 70 years. Can you give me a reason why? Mr.Rocks 00:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mlacerda.png was deleted because the author is not known, so the picture has to be 100 years old. Image:36enfant ballester.jpg was deleted, because there was no source or year of origin given. The rest of the reasons can be found here. Regards, --Flominator 12:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mlacerda.png was published in Brazil, and hence is subject to Brazilian law, which states:

Art. 43. The term of protection of economic rights in anonymous or pseudonymous works shall be 70 years counted from the first of January of the year following that of the first publication. Mr.Rocks 01:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Dodo, who marked the picture with nld asked there: “If the copyright owner was Maria Lacerda de Moura and she died in 1945, are you sure the photo has already fallen under public domain?” --Flominator 14:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure either, but I restored it and nominated it for deletion now. Please contribute your POV at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mlacerda.png. --Flominator 14:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I've created a copyright tag for the Brazilian Copyright Law {{PD-Brazil-media}} and placed it in Image:Mlacerda.png. Flominator, could you please undelete Maria Lacerda de Moura? Cheers, Mr.Rocks 19:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure, done. --Flominator 20:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:JosephBeuys by LutzMommartz.jpg

Hallo Flominator, kannst Du bitte diese beiden Bilder (Image:Joseph Beuys by Lutz Mommar.jpg und JosephBeuys by LutzMommartz.jpg) löschen. Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob ich beim Löschantrag alles richtig gemacht habe. Ist mein erstes Mal =)! Danke und einen guten Rutsch! --Zita 09:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Die Bilder habe ich gelöscht. Ich habe auch gleich noch Commons:Löschrichtlinien erneuert, so dass du dort nun nachlesen kannst, wie du beim nächsten Mal zu verfahren hast. Guten Rutsch, --Flominator 11:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Berlinare Flickr photos by Howie Berlin

I have deleted them in good faith because:

1. The original sources have CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0 licenses, imcompactible here.
2. The extra permission limit the heights and widths.
3. You have not talked at Commons:Deletion requests/Berlinare Flickr photos by Howie Berlin and no one else argues for their retentions or replacements for long time.
4. Thanks to a developer, deleted images may now be undeleted.

I just found that alternate photos are available at [4], but no one else placed the photos here. I can undelete the photos with thier page history in one condition, i.e. the photos have to be reuploaded with CC-BY-SA 2.0 to replace those with CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0. Instead of further deletions, I will try to replace these photos and restore local images. If you want to undelete, please replace the licensing information as well.--Jusjih 13:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Replied at your talk page. --Flominator 14:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

In addition to a reply at my talk page, the deletion discussion has arguments that extra permissions were meant for Wikipedia only, but still not good enough. I am undeleting deleted images with their descriptions to have nww uploads. If I cannot find free-use replacements, I may want to undelete them but have them tagged pending free-use replacement.--Jusjih 14:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

More admins are voting to delete Berlinare Flickr photos by Howie Berlin. If you disagree their deletions, you should go to Commons:Deletion requests/Berlinare Flickr photos by Howie Berlin to speak out as soon as you can as I will not make further deletions myself after meeting you. Wheel wars involving admin vs admin are considered destructive.--Jusjih 16:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much for telling me. I didn't want to start a wheel war. I didn't even know about the DR when I restored the pictures. I just thought that you weren't able to find the license on flickr and deleted them without reading the commentary. Meanwhile I changed my mind - you did the right thing. The only one who really made a mistake was the person who requested the deletion without putting DRs into the pictures. --Flominator 18:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Flickr regexes

Oops, almost forgot about that one :)

Here they are:

flickrs = (\
    re.compile(r'.*?(?:http\:\/\/www\.)?flickr\.com\/photos\/([0-9]*?\@[^ \n\t\|\=\&\/]*?)\/\/?([0-9][0-9]*).*', re.S + re.I),
    re.compile(r'.*?(?:http\:\/\/www\.)?flickr\.com\/photos\/([^ \n\t\|\=\&\/]*?)\/\/?([0-9][0-9]*).*', re.S + re.I),
    re.compile(r'.*?(?:http\:\/\/www\.)?flickr\.com\/photo_zoom\.gne\?id\=()([0-9][0-9]*).*', re.S + re.I),
    re.compile(r'.*\{\{Flickr.*?()photo_id.??\=.??([0-9]*).*?', re.S + re.I),
)

The regexes have two groups, author and photo_id. Author is only there if it is available in this kind link. I also am quite sure that I have a fifth regex somewhere on my harddrive, but I can't find it. I will look for it. The regexes use Python's regex syntax. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

re.compile(r'.*?http\:\/\/.*?()\.static\.flickr\.com\/.*?/([0-9]*).*?\.jpg.*', re.I + re.S) -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. Unfortunately I don't have the time currently to make such a script :( -- Bryan (talk to me) 09:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:André Boisclair.jpg

Hi. Could you review the above image. Thanks in advance. FellowWikipedian 21:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I was too late. But I will ask the author of the picture, if he wants to change the license. --Flominator 09:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sorrow.jpg

Is there any problem with this image?? It seems to me the image is taken from website? But license is confusing. Do you think it should be deleted?--NAHID 21:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The license could not be clearly understood. Either the creator forwards an email to [email protected] or we delete it. The source website seems to have copied its stuff from all over the web, as well. Since I found no email address there, I didn't email them. --Flominator 06:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Charles Manson.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Charles Manson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 21:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Image:Hans_von_Ohain_age_25.jpg

You were involved in this... Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 00:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thx --Flominator 08:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Johann Christoph Dreyhaupt.jpg

Hello,

This is not a copyright violation. Regards, Yann 21:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

I know - it was just useless. --Flominator 22:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Your page

Special:Mypage, Special:Mytalk. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. --Flominator 18:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Noe steam tractor.jpg

Just for your information, this is not a "steam tractor", but a portable engine. It has to be towed, it has no way of moving itself, so it should really be in the Steam machinery section.--John of Paris 18:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I know that it isn't capable of moving but the interwiki at de:Lokomobil suggested en:Steam tractor as translation. Is that wrong? --Flominator 19:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Well a tractor is something that pulls something isn't it? Portables were towed on site by oxen, horses or later a tractor to do temporary stationary work, such as threshing in the Summer and working circular wood saws at other times (They were usually hired by contractors.), so you may as well put your pic it in the Steam machinery section where there is already another portable waiting for a mate. I'll keep a lookout for any other strays. Best wishes, --John of Paris 08:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Picture request

Thank you for letting me know about the pisture request being done and being the first person to leave me a message on my talk page. Ksbrown^talk 20:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipediatroll

Ich habe ja nichts dagegen dass man Bilder löscht die nicht in Ordnung sind. Jedoch solltest du bitte nicht Wikipediart löschen. Dies dann auch noch ohne Vorwarnung. Es gab für den Wikipediatroll keinen Löschgrund der akzeptabel gewesen wäre. Unterlasse also bitte in Zukunft, kreative Projekte zu gefährden. Sondern beschränke dich auf sachliche Kompetenz.

Es mag sein das der Troll auf der Seite ähnlich aussieht. Jedoch ist dies nicht das gleiche Bild. Schau mal ob er Hörner hat, schau mal ob er ein WP Ball in der Hand hält, schau mal ober eine Keule in der Hand hat, schau mal ob die Augenfarbe die gleiche ist. Nein ist alles nicht gegeben. Ebenfalls steht er völlig anderst. Es handelt sich also um ein völlig anderes Bild. Es kann sein, dass bei der Bildschöpfung dieses Bild als Vorlage gedient hat, damit sind aber in keiner Weise irgentwelche rechtlichen Fragen berührt. Da es sich bei dem Wikipediatroll um ein eigenständiges Bild, mit eigenständiger Aussage handelt.

Man kann Copy and Paste strafen, aber keine exaktere Spezifizierung. Damit ist das Bild rechtlich völlig einmandfrei. Bedenke auch das Fotomontagen einen Uhrheberrechtsschutz haben, weil sie der künstlerichen Freiheit unterliegen. Sobald ein Bild mehr als 60 Prozent eigenes enthält, sind sie frei. Bedenke das beim Wikipediatroll völlig die Hintergrundlanschaft gefehlt hat. Macht schon mal 50 % und dann war da noch das eigenständige Gesicht auch 15 %. etc.. Also war beim WP Troll rechtlich alles in Ordnung. mfg Torsten Schleese 05:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Da du ihn ja nun wieder unter Image:Wikipediatroll.jpg hochgeladen hast, stelle ich eben einen LA, damit die Community entscheiden kann, was URV ist und was nicht! Mir was das nur in diesem Fall zu riskant, da es schon eine ziemlich freche URV war. Wenn du dir rechtlich so sicher bist, warum hast du dann keine Quelle angegeben? --Flominator 12:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Diesmal bin ich nicht schuld: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Wikipediatroll.jpg --Flominator 18:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Terroristenbilder

Du hattest unlängst Image:Andreas_baader.jpg gelöscht. Vom selben Uploader gibt es noch ein paar genauso problematische Bilder, dich ich mal mit Template:Nsd getaggt habe. Vielleicht hast du auch noch nen Auge drauf, da ich hier kein Benutzerkonto habe. --84.137.7.49 16:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

mittlerweile klappt das mit nld recht gut, vermute ich. Danke fürs Markieren. --Flominator 18:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:CNG

Hallo Flominator, Du hast hier die Vorlagen GFDL und cc-by-sa-2.5 reingesetzt, aber noch immer den Satz dringelassen „Please check that the conditions given above are compliant to the Commons licensing policy. Most importantly, derivative work and commercial use must be allowed.“ Gehört dieser Satz nicht jetzt raus? (ich wollte es nicht selbst tun, da ich nicht weiß, was wirklich im OTRS drinsteht) Herzliche Grüße, --UV 14:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Du hast wohl Recht! Im OTRS steht, dass die Bilder unter GFDL und CC-BY-SA stehen. --Flominator 15:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Using_sextant.gif

Here is the sextant animation without captions. Thank you for your compliment. Alvesgaspar 10:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

That was fast! Thank you very much. --Flominator 10:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Oklahoma City bombing.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oklahoma City bombing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Pharos 00:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vienna austriae detail.jpg

Hallo Flominator, hast du die Vienna Austriae-Ansichten von nach 1548 - danke für den Upload! - eigentlich zurechtgeschnitten oder waren die schon so? Bei der Nordansicht ist nämlich ein Bilddetail am linken Rand, das mich interessieren würde, grade nicht mehr zu sehen. Würde mich deshalb auch über nähere Angaben zu deiner Quelle freuen. lg --Contributor 13:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Contributor, die habe ich leider genau so von der UB Wien bekommen, die sie extra für mich eingescannt hat. --Flominator 18:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Ach so (tolles Service übrigens!). Die UB darum zu bitten, das Bild vielleicht weniger beschnitten nochmal zu schicken, wäre wohl etwas vermessen... Hm, aber wenn du den Scan in Auftrag gegeben hast, muss doch - wenn schon nicht der Urheber - zumindest die Quelle / Vorlage bekannt sein, oder? --Contributor 22:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Mail mir mal, dann geb ich dir die Kontaktadresse bei der UB. --Flominator 09:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Götterbilder

Hallo Flominator, vielleicht kannst du mal nachschauen: Unter category:Hindu deities gibt es einige Bilder, deren Lizenzen mir zweifelhaft vorkommen. Ich kenne alle Motive als weit verbreitete Götterbilder (Andachtsbilder), normalerweise wird aber kein Künstler und kein Alter angegeben. Sind die jetzt für wp frei? Es betrifft die Bilder, Image:LordShiva.jpg , Image:Shiva parvati01.jpg, Image:Shiva-parvati2.jpg, (expired, woher will der Autor das wissen, der Stil lässt eher auf ein junges Werk schließen) Image:Shiva Ganesh Parvati.jpg (abfotographiertes Bild), Image:Ganesha.jpg, Image:Ganesh.jpg, Image:Lord Ram.jpg (Author: Not known?), Image:Brahma-vishnu--ja-Shiva.jpg, Image:Vishnu.jpg (expired?? woher will der Autor das wissen??), Image:Vishnu07.jpg . --Durga 02:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi Durga, das hat nun ein wenig gedauert, aber in solchen Fällen bist du mit {{subst:nld}} meistens auf der sicheren Seite. Gruß, --Flominator 09:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

außer Rama sind die jetzt noch blau geschriebenen Bilder o.k., sie wurden inzwischen ersetzt.--Durga 23:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Das kommt mir zweifelhaft vor (GPL!)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Self_Portrait_with_a_Flower.jpg Bitte vote auch für #3 --Historiograf 19:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Welche #3? --Flominator 19:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:CampinoFernsehturm7.6.97.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:CampinoFernsehturm7.6.97.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 15:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks but I only uploaded a cropped version. I contacted the author Saginet55 on de.wp in order to make him license it. --Flominator 16:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Asian_woman_shoulder.jpg

I updated the page and changed the license to {{Copyrighted free use}}, but please feel free to change it to multilicensed, because I'm pretty sure that's what the photographer agreed to. Thanks for getting permission to use it! Cheers, riana_dzasta 01:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi dzasta, thanks for your message. I've changed the license now. --Flominator 07:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Güstrower Wappenentwürfe

Hallo, kannst Du bitte hier darlegen, warum die Wappenversuche nicht zu entsorgen sind? Man könnte sie auch unheraldischen Murx nennen, soweit wollte ich aber nicht gehen :-) Sie werden auf keinen Fall Eingang in einen Artikel finden und gehören zu den vielen Kellerleichen der Grafikwerkstatt - dort hat sich u.a. zu diesem Thema inzwischen N3MO geäußert, der zu denen gehört, die mit Heraldik, Tingierung und Blasonierung etwas anfangen können. gruss Geograv 18:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg

Hi. I was doing some admin work at en Wikipedia and ran across en:Image:Nightwish Juhannus.jpg. It was listed for deletion as a copy of Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg. Now I notice a few problems:

• en:Image:Nightwish Juhannus.jpg is definitely not the same as Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg. en:Image:Nightwish Juhannus.jpg is a much larger resolution but is also more blurry.
• en:Image:Nightwish Juhannus.jpg is listed as coming from http://www.flickr.com/photos/johanna__/51983270/ which appears to be accurate (the resolution of the largest size is the same as the en image).
• Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg is listed as coming from http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=344669302&size=l and you approved it. But when I click on that link, it goes to a different image on Flickr from a different Flickr contributor (peetfeet instead of johanna). It looks like the same band but it's a different picture and I couldn't find the commons picture in peetfeet's other Flickr contributions.

So, I don't know where Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg actually came from or why it is less blurry than en:Image:Nightwish Juhannus.jpg. I also don't know what happened to the Flickr picture that you approved. With an inaccurate source for the less blurry image here, it seems like it should be deleted, right? Thanks for your attention. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Wknight94, thank you for telling this.

• It seems that the link at Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg was the one for Image:NightwishFeb2005.jpg.
• I fixed the description of Image:NightwishJune2005.jpg. I think it is less blurry because it is smaller and flicker or codeispoetry have the better resizing algorithm than the one on en.wp.
• I copied the en-version to the one on commons. --Flominator

Bildbeschreibung Image:ANNA Chakvetadze.jpg

Vielen Dank, dass du Image:ANNA Chakvetadze.jpg hochgeladen hast. Du hast eine Quelle für das Bild angegeben, leider fehlt aber eine Bestätigung, dass der Autor oder Bildrechteinhaber des Bildes der Nutzung unter der angegebenen Lizenz zustimmt. Bitte gib den Link zu der Webadresse an, die die entsprechenden Lizenzinformationen enthält. Solltest du über eine schriftliche Genehmigung zur Nutzung des Bildes verfügen, sende bitte eine Kopie davon an OTRS.

Bitte beachte das das Bild ohne die Bestätigung nach einer Woche schnellgelöscht werden kann. Vielen Dank. Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 09:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

It says on Ralf Reinecke's website that: "Sämtliche Vervielfältigungen, Verbreitung oder sonstige Benutzung des Inhalts der einzelnen Webseiten oder der gesamten Website sind nur nach vorheriger Absprache gestattet. Bei Verlinkung dieser Website von anderen Sites aus wird um kurze Mitteilung gebeten an >>[email protected]. Alle auf dieser Website erwähnten Handelsmarken sind das Eigentum ihrer jeweiligen Besitzer.". From what I'm able to gather from this, the photos are not free to use. And the text on de-user Pascalre's page doesn't seem to be any kind of permission, it's just a link to his webpage with a comment on when the photos were taken. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 14:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello again. I reverted your changes to the image page to reflect that there still isn't a permission that can be verified. If de:Benutzer:Pascalre is the author of these images like he claims to be, you can ask him permission by email and then send it to [email protected]. On page email templates (auf Deutsch: Emailvorlagen) you can see various ready-made emails to be used when requesting permission. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 14:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Mail ist unterwegs. --Flominator 06:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

The {{OTRS pending}} template should only be added on a page when the reply email has been received from the author and sent to the OTRS. Has he replied? If he has, has he authorized the use of this picture only or the whole bunch of pics on his website? regards, --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 20:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Panoramen

Wenn die Einzelbilder so gut sind wie deine, ist es einfach Fleißarbeit. Mit Autostitch zusammenpappen. Paßt es unter Optionen die besten Parameter einstellen und fertig ist das Bild. --Marku1988 18:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Wow! Vielen Dank für diesen sehr guten Tipp! Dürfen wir denn die Bilder in Commons nutzen, die mit dieser Version erstellt wurden? --Flominator 10:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Vorlage:Panoramafreiheit

Hi, could you please clarify what is this page? It's on the gallery namespace. Thanks :) PatríciaR ^msg 21:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry. It was the wrong language. Should have been Template:Panoramafreiheit. Thanks for looking. --Flominator 07:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:HollyMonument.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:HollyMonument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko 15:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Output of the Flinfo tool: two proposals

Hi, and thanks for making your flinfo tool available. I'd like to propose two formatting changes in the output:

1) I suggest changing the placement of the licencing tags from this format:

...
==Licensing==
 {{cc-by-2.0}}
 {{flickrreview}}
...

to this one:

{{Information
...
|Permission={{cc-by-2.0}}{{flickrreview}}
...

In my opinion, making the licencing tags part of the description box gives a less cluttered layout.

2) I suggest stripping the image title from the source link, like this:

...
|Source=http://www.flickr.com/photos/13091127@N00/1314053915
...

instead of the current output:

...
|Source=[http://www.flickr.com/photos/13091127@N00/1314053915 My Cool Image Title]
...

Because many Flickr images do not carry a very useful title, and we provide a new one on upload in any case, just seeing the (still-clickable) URL is more informative, IMHO. Among other things, it allows the identification of the image on printouts of the description page.

For an example of the proposed format, see Image:Yangtze at First Bridge.jpg. Thanks, Sandstein 10:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Sandstein, thanks for your message and sorry for not replying earlier. (1) I used to put license tags in template:information as well, but I was told not to do it. (2) The name on the Flickr page shows how the creator labeled the file. I think that this is good to know, even some may be rubbish. --Flominator 10:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:en

Hallo, Flominator, ich hab' gesehen, dass Du hier was ausprobieren willst. Nur zur Info: Template:Translation table funktioniert seither nich mehr richtig. Viele Grüße Orchi 21:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Bitte auch Template talk:En gucken. Gruß --BLueFiSH.as 08:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry! Ich wollte eigentlich nur erreichen, dass man Templates ohne Text erkennen kann :( --Flominator 08:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:S10.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:S10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--GeorgHH 18:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I deleted it by myself --Flominator 18:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Lollipop chicken photo

Hi, I just used the new tool to upload a photo of lollipop chicken, but the photo didn't show up. How will I know when it appears, so I can put the photo on the en:WP page for this food? Badagnani 19:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, I suppose, you mean this one? Just visit http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php?id=529670337 , download it on your harddisk and upload it to commons. If you don't want to do this, you might wanna use the Flickr upload bot. Best regards, --Flominator 08:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Creator:Andrew Butko

See User talk:Butko#Creator:Andrew Butko --Butko 09:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Lizenz Flickr

Mission erfüllt!

Hallo, mal eine etwas ungewöhnliche Frage, aber vielleicht kannst du helfen. Erstmal danke für Flinfo, ist wirklich nützlich! Da du höchstwahrscheinlich selbst bei Flickr angemeldet bist, wende ich mich an dich. Es geht um dieses Bild, es ist unter keiner freien Lizenz veröffentlicht. Kannst du als angemeldeter Nutzer den Autor kontaktieren und mal fragen, ob er es unter eine freie Lizenz stellen würde? Ich wäre sehr interessiert an diesem Bild für Wikipedia. Wäre sehr nett, ich möchte mich nicht deswegen extra bei Flickr anmelden. Danke schonmal. Gruß --тнояsтеn ⇔ 18:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Ich habe nicht nur ein Account bei Flickr, sondern auch eine Textvorlage für solche Fälle. Ist erledigt. --Flominator 19:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Sehr schön, vielen Dank! --тнояsтеn ⇔ 19:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Das ging aber flott! Nochmals danke. Gruß --тнояsтеn ⇔ 15:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

geocoding?

moved to User talk:Flominator/Flinfo --Flominator 09:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gabor Talmacsi-Aprilla-1.jpg

How did you think the speedy deletion?!!! Don't you read the permission? I have got the author permission!!!!!!!!!!!! Undid the deletion immadetly! If needed I can justify with the the Wikimedia OTRS system (as other my uploaded pic Image:Military of Hungary-welcome.jpg --Beyond silence 08:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Beyond silence, the problem is, that I was not able to find someone with access to OTRS that understands Hungarian. I will restore it with the copyvio, but I can't guaranty, that it won't be deleted again. The easiest the thing would be, if the author changed the license within flickr. Here is how to do it. Regards, --Flominator 12:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

You are not right. You didn't read the discussion page yet, I see: [5] My mailing with the author was English, because he is English too. But I will ask him to write the ost system's letter sample or change the flickr license. Give us somemany time! Thanks --Beyond silence 13:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Universal replace

I'm sorry, but I won't implement such a function. I think that we should not replace images on local wikis that are not on Commons. It's a potential source of conflicts between Commons and the local communities and I don't want to risk that. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

getFirstUploader

Wichtig: Erst nach pageload aufrufen (am Besten aus addOnloadHook).

function getFirstUploader () {
  if ( wgNamespaceNumber != 6 ) return '' ; // Not an image
  if ( wgAction != 'view' ) return '' ; // Not viewing
  var fh = getElementsByClassName(document,'table','filehistory') ;
  if ( fh.length != 1 ) return '' ; // Not found
  fh = fh[0] ;
  var as = fh.getElementsByTagName('a');
  var ret = '' ;
  for ( i = 0 ; i < as.length ; i++ ) {
    var t = as[i].title ;
    if ( t.substr(0,5) != 'User:' ) continue ;
    ret = t.substr(5);
  }
  return ret ;
}

Na denn...

function getFirstUploaderAPI () {
  if ( wgNamespaceNumber != 6 ) return '' ; // Not an image
  var title = wgPageName ;
  var request = window.XMLHttpRequest ? new XMLHttpRequest() : new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.XMLHTTP.3.0");
  var url = "http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&format=xml&prop=imageinfo&iihistory&iiprop=timestamp|user|url&titles="+title ;
  request.open("GET", url, false);
  request.send(null);
  var xml = request.responseXML ;
  var iis = xml.getElementsByTagName('ii') ;
  var ret = '' ;
  for ( i = 0 ; i < iis.length ; i++ ) {
    ret = iis[i].getAttribute('user');
  }
  return ret ;
}

Image:BigMamou.ogg

Das Stück ist PD, das es ein altes Volkslied ist. Volslieder sind im Allgemeinen immer Public Domain, da es keinen Autor gibt, somit ist auch kein Urheberrecht oder ähnliches existent. Damit sollte der Fall wohl erledigt sein, ich werde den Baustein wieder rausnehmen. Gruß, Waylon 19:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Melodie und Text mögen PD sein, der Gesang und die Aufnahme jedoch nicht. --Flominator 19:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Nach den Informationen, die ich habe, schon, dass Lied ist Public Domain Work. Man kann ein PD-Bild ja auch nicht wieder unter Urheberrecht stellen, wenn ich mich nicht irre. Waylon 19:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Meines Wissens hat Gesang Schöpfungshöhe. Bitte klär das auf de:WP:UF. --Flominator 19:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, mach ich. Waylon 19:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, dort hat man mir gesagt, dass der Titel wieder Schöpfungshöhe erreicht, wenn die Neu-Inszenierung sich deutlich von der eigentlichen Version unterscheidet. Ich versuch mal rauszufinden, in wie weit sich nun Jennings' Version abhebt. Waylon 19:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Downtown Chicago Illinois Nov05 img 2648.jpg was speedy deleted without giving me a chance to respond. Please participate in the discussion there since you initiated it. Dori - Talk 18:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator 20:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Snail Request

Hi! I was wondering if you could post a picture of a Physa snail, like, the one that's in your photo of Lymnaea stagnalis?--Mr Fink 19:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Which one do you mean? --Flominator 20:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The smaller snail in this picture [6] is Physa.--Mr Fink 16:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I only organized the permission from Dr. Lars Peters. In September 2006 I asked him about higher resolution and he said, that he didn't want a higher resolution version on Wikipedia, but would send me one for private use. Maybe you can work something out with him. Best regards, --Flominator 20:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Berlin-Baby-Wall-1968.jpg

warum haben Sie ohne Rückfrage gelöscht mit "copyright violation"

Das Bild habe ich selbst Fotografiert 1968 und später vom Fotopaipier abfotografiert. Tamas Szabo 11:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I only marked it as copyvio, because it was the same picture like http://www.flickr.com/photos/dbforum/130137150/. Zirland deleted it afterwards. I just checked http://www.flickr.com/people/dbforum/ and found out, that this seems to be you, too. I'm sorry, picture has been restored. --Flominator 20:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Danke schön für die gute Klärung! Übrigens Deine Flickr Fotos sind sehr gut! Tamas Szabo 15:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hanau gruendungsplan sommer 1597.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Hanau gruendungsplan sommer 1597.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Something went amiss with the uploading of this image, and is unusable in its current state.--KTo288 20:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Diskriminierung von Administrator

"User:Polarlys" tut mir meine Seite hier ständig löschen, obwohl ich da einen Text von mir da Hereingeschrieben hab. Dann habe ich eine Liste mit Links eingefügt und der kommt mir Kopiergeschützte Werke an, um mit dieser Seite Unfug anzustellen. Der hat die geschützt, obwohl ich da 'reingeschrieben habe, dass ich selber jeder hier editieren darf. Dann habe ich den aufgefrordert das rückgängig zu machen und der hat es nicht gemacht. Das ist Vandalismus! Ich habe gegen keine Regel verstoßen. Nun hat der mich gauf meiner eigenen Benutzerseite gesperrt, obwohl ich nur meinen eigenen Text da hereingeschrieben habe!!!--The User 09:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Der Nutzer, der hier in der Vergangenheit übrigens hunderte Urheberrechtsverletzungen reingestellt hat, aufgrund von „hate speech“, persönlichen Angriffen und ideologisch verbrämter Arbeitsweise auf en.wikipedia.org und de.wikipedia.org wiederholt gesperrt wurde (mit einer ganzen Armada von Sockenpuppen), der TU und SLUB Dresden mehrere Abuse-Meldungen eingebracht hat, hat Texte von ard.de kopiert und war zudem mal wieder in seiner „In-der-BRD-wird-gedopt-während-unsere-heldenhaften-DDR-Athleten-inklusive-die-Schwimmerinnen-mit-den-Bärten-ihre-Medaillien-ohne Doping-gewonnen-haben“-Mission unterwegs. Das steht in krassem Widerspruch zu COM:SCOPE. --Polarlys 11:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Telex.jpg

Hallo Flominator,
hast du das Telex in Image:Telex.jpg zufällig im Fernmeldemuseum in Aachen aufgenommen? Falls ja, es gibt seit gestern die Category:Fernmeldemuseum Aachen. -- Túrelio 13:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Nein, das Telex stand in einem ehemaligen Gebäude der Telekom, das inzwischen verkauft wurde. Leider wurde beim Umzug das Gerät verschrottet :( --Flominator 20:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rihanna Tallinn.jpg

Hello.

I have seen you have tagged that picture as {{No permission since}}. I have found that the source is this one, and the license I believe is this one. Untill I find someone who understand estonian, the few word I have been able to translate, make sense to be a cc-by-sa. --Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^commons _es 22:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Kõik õigused autorile means all rights reserved.Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^commons _es 10:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kõik õigused autorile.

All rights belong to the Author

Sa ei luba teistel oma tööd mitte mingitel tingimustel ilma sinu nõusolekuta kasutada,

You don't allow for others, your own work, in no circumstances without your permission

kopeerida, muuta ega avaldada.

to copy, to change and not to publish.

Kehtib tavaline autoriõiguse seadus.

Regular authors rights are applied.

sry for poor translation if here are some mistakes. Suwatest 06:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I think, we can delete the image now ... --Flominator 11:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token b8888a461f3cf721b00d814632155e3d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This is great news. Thank you, I've changed it. --Flominator 18:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

User:CommonismNow

Can I set user:CommonismNow to upload a category of files from en.wiki? Evrik

I don't think so: When we found out about CommonsHelper we stopped development. --Flominator 19:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

• "c'est la vie. Evrik 19:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Flickr-no known copyright restrictions

Image deletion warning

Template:Flickr-no known copyright restrictions has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lokal_Profil 13:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Es war einmal, vor langer Zeit...

...da meintest du ich solle den Rotatebot so umrüsten dass er auch schneiden kann :) Cropbot macht das jetzt. Benötigt zwar eine Anmeldung, ist danach aber (hoffentlich) fast so einfach zu bedienen wie Rotatebot :) Grüsse, --Luxo (talk) 12:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Du bist ein Tier. Vielen vielen Dank!!! --Flominator (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

in die "werkzeuge" einbauen sollte mit diesem Script funktionieren :)--Luxo (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

function addcroplink()
{
   if(wgNamespaceNumber == 6)
   {
      if(wgTitle.match(/(.*)\.(jpg|jpeg)/gi))
      {
          var croplink = "http://toolserver.org/~luxo/cropbot/cropbot.php?img="+wgTitle;
          addPortletLink("p-tb", croplink, "Crop", "p-crop", "Crop this image", "o", false);
      }
   }
}

addOnloadHook(addcroplink);

PS: Danke :)--Luxo (talk) 20:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Danke auch dafür. Bitte, gern geschehen :) --Flominator (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Zwei Bildlein

...haben ihre Mama verloren, nämlich diese beiden Bearbeitungen. Das Original auf de.wp wurde vor einem halben Jahr gelöscht. Ich vermute mal, dass meine beiden Crops dann auch in den Mülleimer gehören. (Um diese beiden von Virtuosität völlig unbelasteten Bildbearbeitungsfrühwerke wär's noch nicht mal schade.) Wie siehst du das? Grüßle, --Wildfeuer (talk) 22:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Wildfeuer, da hast du wohl Recht. Danke für den Hinweis. --Flominator (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Danke fürs Müll wegbringen, :o) --Wildfeuer (talk) 15:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

hi

Was kann deine Commons Monobook alles? Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 00:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Include sie und probiere es aus: Zeug für {Information} einfügen ist die Kernfunktion. --Flominator (talk) 10:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Jede Menge Fragen

Hallo lieber Flo, hab diese drei Bilder hier

• Image:Heart Blossoms.jpg
• Image:Dicentra spectabilis Traenendes Herz Bluetentrieb.jpg
• Image:Dicentra spectabilis Traenendes Herz Drei Blueten.jpg‎

gerade vollends überall durch die unter korrekten Namen hochgeladenen ersetzt, soweit der bot das nicht hingekriegt hat. Die könnten jetzt also auch weg. Wärst du so lieb...?

Die Bilder vom Uracher Wasserfall und der Burg Hohenurach sowie der Y-Burg hätte ich eigentlich auch gerne ersetzt, aber der commonist spinnt bei mir leider total. Abgesehen davon ist er lizenzangebotsmäßig nicht auf dem neuesten Stand (kein CC-BY-SA-3.0). Funktioniert der denn nur unter Linux vernünftig? Wir haben das gerade von meinem Rechner geschmissen, um mehr Platz für meine Bilder zu kriegen... Einen funktionierenden commonist brauch ich aber, um meine etwa 18000 Bilder in das inzwischen bei mir installierte Mediawiki zu schaufeln. War übrigens ein echt guter Tipp von dir, es mal mit dem Mediawiki zu versuchen; das erleichtert die Artikelarbeit ganz erheblich! Und in meinen vorhandenen Textdateien schafft es langsam Ordnung und Nutzbarkeit, ge-ni-aaal! Da kommt das MoinMoinWiki echt nicht dran. Aber wie krieg ich es dazu, einen Kategorienbaum zu erstellen/zeigen? Und wie übernehme ich Vorlagen aus de.wp; beispielsweise die Taxoboxen oder Wladys Vorlagen für ein Seitenlayout wie das von de:Wikipedia:Süddeutschland. Und..... ach nö, nicht alles auf einmal. Lieben Gruß, --Wildfeuer (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Wildfeuer, wegen Klausuren die Kurzform:

1. Commonist ist Java, sollte unter Linux tun (habs nicht ausprobiert). Am besten fragst du zu den Problemen mal bei Commons:Tools/Commonist bzw. der Diskussionsseite dazu nach.
2. Kategorienbaum? Da brauchst du eine Erweiterung für, siehe mw:Extension Matrix
3. Vorlagen sind normale Artikel, die "Vorlage:Infobox Gedöhns" o.ä. heißen. Die musst du auch bei dir anlegen.

Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 10:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Compostela

With the map of Compostela pilgrims ways Stjacquescompostelle.png

Very important : it is necessary to mark the position of Cluny

Cluny is a real departure from Burgundy way to Le Puy-en-Velay.

If you can edit the map, thank you. Crestian (talk) 11:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Crestian, I just extracted the map from a pdf file. Maybe you want to contact the author of it. --Flominator (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Ups...

...hab gerade diese Rumspielerei entdeckt, die versehentlich in den Commons-Hochladeordner statt in den Papierkorb gewandert ist. Täztu diesen enzyklopädieuntauglichen Schrott bittschön entsorgen; inzwischen hab ich auch weitaus bessere Aufnahmen dieses Motivs. Grietinx, --Wildfeuer (talk) 08:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Erledigt. --Flominator (talk) 07:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Herzinniglichsten Dank!--Wildfeuer (talk) 08:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Verehrter Feuerwehrmann, könntest du auch das noch löschen; happich schneller getippt als geguckt, hätt einglich dieses werden sollen. Btw, den commonist haben wir jetzt mit einem Scheibchen Linux auf Zeit (sprich Knoppix-CD) zum Funktionieren gekriegt. Hast du eine Ahnung, was ich mit diesen Uploadunfällen hier anfangen soll? Nochmals hochladen? Grüßle, --Wildfeuer (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Gelöscht und gemailt. --Flominator (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Notice of namespace-rename "Image" -> "File"

Dear user, the MediaWiki developers recently announced that the "Image:" namespace is going to be renamed to "File:". "Image:" will remain an alias. The canonical namespace name wgCanonicalNamespace will change from "Image" to "File".

I noticed that you use wgCanonicalNamespace in either your monobook.js page or a JavaScript file in your userspace (check this list).

Please check and replace all occurrences of

wgCanonicalNamespace == "Image"

with

wgNamespaceNumber == 6

to ensure that your scripts keep working. Thanks! --Dschwen (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Tztztz....

da und da wäre 270 besser gewesen als 90°... :-P Lg--Luxo 18:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Da hat aber jemand sehr sehr schlampig gearbeitet - oops. Danke! --Flominator (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Fundstück

Hallo Flo, dieses Pflanzen-Bild wurde durch ein völlig anderes geupdated, dessen angegebene Quelle (ein Tierlexikon!) meiner Überprüfung erwartungsgemäß nicht standhielt. Upload erfolgte durch CommonismNow. Wasnda schief gegangen? --Wildfeuer (talk) 16:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Wildfeuer, da fragst du am besten mal User:Ixitixel, der das verbrochen hat :) --Flominator (talk) 08:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Hab ihn angesprochen. Schönes Wochenende noch! Lieben Gruß, Wildfeuer (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Abuse in deletion

Hello, I would like to know why one of my creations has been deleted COA of Kingdom of Morocco. No one has reported or commented anything wrong or ask for amendement and therefore, this is really surprising and upsetting as far as this creations take a long time to dessin. Regards, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 21:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I asked him to delete it because I had problems doing it myself. The image is still available, but the name was corrected after the request of several users. You can find it now under Image:Coat of arms of Morocco.svg. Next time please name your uploads in a proper way. And please refrain from unfounded accusations as long as you don't know anything about something. Oh, and don't tell shit. You knew exactly that there was a problem, you even removed one of the warnings from the image. -- Cecil (talk) 21:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Although I have to admit, that my delete reason was a little imprecise. --Flominator (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, if you have clicked on the "Delete"-link in the duplicate-template, then it would have created a new deletion reason which tells where the image can be found now. But I replaced the image in all projects before I asked you so nobody should need that information anymore. -- Cecil (talk) 22:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

... except the uploader who wasn't involved in this process ;) --Flominator (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Flominator, thank you for your explanation, but still I don't see a convincent reason to did that. However, I see that nothing can be change back so let's go forward. Concerning some of Cecil commentaries, some are clearly impolite and I will repport this abuse.--SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview

Hallo Flominator, ich habe versehentlich zwei Bilder dieser Sorte, die anscheinend nur für die Vorschau gedacht sind, gespeichert. Ich hoffe, dass diese Vorschaufunktionen wieder gelöscht werden können, ohne dass auch die Bilder gelöscht werden. --Konrad Lackerbeck (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Konrad, ist kein Problem. Ich lösche die Seite eben mal. --Flominator (talk) 15:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Technical problem with Image:Noe_biergarnitur_alt.jpg

Hi. There seems to be something odd going on with Image:Noe_biergarnitur_alt.jpg: specifically, the file size and image dimensions recorded in the Commons database don't seem to match the actual file. This might be because someone — possibly you — uploaded a new version of it at some point, but due to a software bug the upload wasn't properly recorded as a new version, and ended up silently overwriting the original file instead. I'd appreciate it if you could check the image and reupload either the current version (to simply correct the database record) or whatever version you think should be there. Thanks in advance, and sorry to bother you with this. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I will search for the original file and upload it again. --Flominator (talk) 12:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Flinfo instructions

Hello. About http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php

Could you change the name of the "About" link to "Instructions"?

Also, can you add a link to "Flinfo live help"? Maybe to Commons:Help desk

[[Commons:Help desk|Flinfo live help]]

Flinfo live help

This may solve most how-to problems I mentioned previously: MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext/fromflickr#Flinfo. --Timeshifter (talk) 12:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

What about putting the live help link on the Flinfo page? I will try to change the button (and all translations). --Flominator (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Changed it to "manual", I hope that's ok? --Flominator (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I see that you are not a native English speaker. "Manual" means a book. It does not necessarily mean "instructions" to everybody. We don't want to scare people away by making it sound like they need to read a book. :) Maybe "Short instructions" would work. Maybe the live help link can go on the instructions page. I think it would be good to put the link on both pages. --Timeshifter (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

What about "Help" instead of "instructions"? --Flominator (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

That would work. --Timeshifter (talk) 13:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! --Timeshifter (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Zoologischer Garten Berlin - Marmorsaal im Zoo.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Danke!

Hi Flominator, danke fürs Anlegen der Herder-Bildkategorie! Weißt Du irgendwo ein Tutorial, wie man das macht? (Dann muss ich in Zukunft nicht jemanden fragen.) Grüßle --Spiritcreateslife (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Bitteschön. Die Gallery ist unter w:de:Hilfe:Bilder erklärt, die Zusammenfassung erzeuge ich mit SumItUp. Ich würde übrigens gerne dein Foto mit den Büchern löschen, da das urheberrechtlich nicht ganz sauber ist, die ganzen Covers unter einer freien Lizenz zu verbauen. <subtil>Übrigens: Übernächsten Montag ist wieder Stammtisch.</subtil> Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Verzeih, am Montag lag ich heuschnupfentot im Bett. Hoffe, Ihr hattet Euren Spaß. :-) Ich hab, als die Fotos gemacht hab, gefragt, ob ich darf. Aber wenn Du das eine Bild zur Sicherheit löschen magst, dann tu's gern, bevor es Probleme gibt. --Spiritcreateslife (talk) 09:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Muss dich leider enttäuschen. Es ist erst diesen Montag :)) Das Bild hau ich bei Gelegenheit dann mal weg. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Es brennt...

Lieber Flo, könntest du hier bittschön einen Löscheinsatz machen? Ich weiß nicht, auf was für Ideen dieser bot sonst noch kommt... Grüßle, --Wildfeuer (talk) 08:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Da war jemand schneller! --Flominator (talk) 19:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

translation

Szybka Kolej Miejska w Trójmieście Zdjęcia przystanków leżących w województwie i jakby ktoś miał jakieś historczne

Fast City Train in Trójmiasto (Gdynia, Gdańsk, Sopot). Photos of train-stops in voivodeship and some historical if anyone has.

Fast City Train is probably something similar like S-bahn in Germany (but 100% on ground).

--WarX (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menschenrettung mit der Steckleiter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Rotate, so the edge of the building (seen on the right on the picture) is directly vertical and then crop it out, because it is very white. --Jolly Janner 19:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the improvement advices ;-) check it out again ;) --Stefan-Xp 15:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)  Support Good now! --Jolly Janner 16:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Benutzername ändern ?

Ist es kurz nach der Anmeldung bei wikimedia commons noch möglich, meinen Benutzernamen von Peter.nobis in Peter.Nobis umzubenennen ? --Peter.nobis (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Schau dir mal Commons:Changing username an, dort sollte alles erklärt sein. --Flominator (talk) 12:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

my bad

I accidentally hit the save button on the preview page at User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview. If you can could you delete it if you happen to be an admin or if you know anyone who is? I thought I was on a different page for some reason.--Wrestlinglover (talk) 04:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator (talk) 04:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Sorry about that. Hey, would you happen to know how to rename an image? I'm new on here. I mainly just stay on english pedia. I uploaded an image that has the same title as another on english pedia. I usually just let the bot move it onto english pedia instead of me, but seeing as there is one with the same name, I was wondering how to move the image File:Delirious.jpg to :File:Delirious1.jpg.--WillC 06:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I think inserting Template:Rename should help. --Flominator (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks.--WillC 17:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Problems with Flinfo

Hi Flominator. Recently the Official White House photostream on Flickr changed its license from CC-by to United States Government Work. When using Flinfo it marks the uploads as {{copyvio|Flickr, licensed as "United States Government Work" which is not a free license --~~~~}}, instead of {{PD-USGov}} or {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Could you change the behaviour of Flinfo, please? Lobo (howl?) 17:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC) P.D:Sorry for my English

Thanks for the message. It is done. --Flominator (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 203 308-2 in Titisee 5499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:AEJ_Collins.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AEJ_Collins.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:AEJ_Collins.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jay32183 (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Flinfo request

Could you change ==Licensing== to == {{int:license}} ==? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Multichill (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Flominator, at Commons:Batch uploading/WLANL a suggestion came up: When the description is not set could Flinfo fallback to the title?

See for example this flickr image and the Flinfo result. Multichill (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Sounds doable. I'll see when I can do it. --Flominator (talk) 18:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok, great! Don't want to rush you, but when do you think you can make it? Multichill (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

You are, but nevermind. It's done :) --Flominator (talk) 08:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Woohoo, thank you! Now I can fire up the batch upload :-) Multichill (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Erm, another (simple) one. Could you use {{subst:Unc}} instead of {{Uncat}} (example)? Multichill (talk) 13:16, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Flominator (talk) 13:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Commonist licenses

Dear Flominator,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 8000 files (started with about 1,8M files) . Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, Multichill (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Multichill, file was changed. Yes, you can fix my images. Sorry for causing you work. --Flominator (talk) 12:00, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done All files are changed. Commonist should have be fixed ages ago. I contacted the author, but haven't received a response yet. If he doesn't respond within a couple of days I think I'll just fork it. Multichill (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure, if he hasn't already. I'm using an older version. --Flominator (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

I checked the sources at the website. Still outdated. Multichill (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Teamgeist_Ball_World_Cup_2006.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Teamgeist_Ball_World_Cup_2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Herr Kriss (talk) 19:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Flinfo Info

I'm wondering how you determine which Cats exist from your site? Do you have a downloaded cached copy of the database or do you do a remote search with php and if so can you share the code for that with me? I'm writing a similar program for mushroomobserver.org and working on one for antweb.org (link). Any assistance in this regard would be very highly appreciated. Raeky (talk) 06:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

You've got mail. --Flominator (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Missing description page for File:Emmendingen Schlosserhaus 8628.jpg

Hi, Flominator. It looks like the file File:Emmendingen Schlosserhaus 8628.jpg, which you uploaded last month, is missing it description page, including licensing information and categories. This is probably because of a known bug in the MediaWiki software which can sometimes cause the description page not to be created for newly uploaded files. Could you please try to recreate the missing description page? Thanks in advance. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Ps. It seems you also uploaded the very similar image File:Emmendingen Schlosserhaus 8630.jpg around the same time. If you in fact intended to upload both with the same description and licensing, you could just copy the description page from that image. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Done. Thanks. --Flominator (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Mens_combined_ceremony.jpg

Hallo Flominator. Du hast vor längerer Zeit dieses Bild von Flickr auf Commons hochgeladen und dabei in der Dateibeschreibung angegeben, dass es sich um die Siegerehrung der Kombination der Männer bei den Olympischen Winterspielen 2006 handelt. Bist du dir sicher, dass das stimmt? Bei Flickr gibt's dazu ja keine Beschreibung, ausser dem von dir hinzu gefügten Kommentar. Als ich mir heute dieses Bild ansah (nicht zum ersten Mal, aber offenbar erstmals genauer), fiel mir auf, dass der Herr am dritten Platz Rainer Schönfelder so gar nicht ähnlich sieht. Also habe ich nach weiteren Bildern dieser Siegerehrung gesucht, und bin hier bei Getty Images fündig geworden. Das Outfit des Zweit- und Drittplatzierten passt eindeutig nicht mit jenem im fraglichen Bild zusammen. Also habe ich mir weitere Siegerehrungen angesehen, und bin hier auf den 2x500 m Eisschnelllaufbewerb der Männer gestoßen. Das passt doch eindeutig zusammen.

Also lange Rede kurzer Sinn: Meines Erachtens zeigt das Bild eindeutig nicht die Siegerehrung der Alpinen Kombination, sondern jene des 2x500 m Eisschnelllaufbewerbes der Männer. Was meinst du dazu? --Tschaensky (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Tschaensky, das nenne ich doch mal aufmerksam. Die Beschreibung stammte von User:Marcus Cyron, der sich vermutlich dann vertan hat. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt die Dateibeschreibung korrigiert und das Bild aus allen Artikeln entfernt. Könntest du bitte das Bild umbenennen (z.B. in "2006 Winter Olympics Medal Ceremony Speed Skating 500 metres Men.jpg" oder ähnlich)? Anschließend kann ich es wieder in passende Artikel einfügen. --Tschaensky (talk) 07:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Erledigt: File:2006 Winter Olympics Medal Ceremony Speed Skating 500 metres Men.jpg --Flominator (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Besten Dank! --Tschaensky (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Drawers

We have a discussion about another category Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2009/10/Category:Drawers_or_draughtsmen_or_draftsmen#Category:Drawers_or_draughtsmen_or_draftsmen
I noticed you created the (furniture) category Category:Drawers, now it would be useful to use the Drawers category for the Drawers Artists.
Do you got any opinion or objection to renaming the actual Category:Drawers to Category:Drawers (furniture) or something similar?
Esby (talk) 10:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

OTRS-Freigaben

Hallo Flominator, kannst Du bei den vier von Dir hochgeladenen Fotos File:Bildstein Panorama.jpg, File:Spießhorn Panorama2.jpg, File:Herzogenhorn uebers Leisungszentrum auf den Feldberg.jpg und File:Herzogenhorn in Richtung Bernau.jpg nochmal bzgl. der OTRS-Freigabe nachhaken? Da war etwas mit OTRS pending schief gegangen und es wäre doch schade, wenn die Bilder gelöscht würden. --:bdk: 19:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Moin, ich habe Eingangsbestätigungen vom OTRS bekommen, aber die Mails sind wohl verschollen. Raymond wollte mal nachschauen, wo sie sind. Zur Not kann ich die Mails aber auch nochmal schicken lassen. --Flominator (talk) 09:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Bunny in box.jpg

File:Bunny in box.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Comment: Nicht von mir nominiert. --The Evil IP address (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Flominator/Attic!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Rieseneck Jagdanlage Tafel.jpg was uncategorized on 5 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Cospeda.jpg was uncategorized on 5 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Dürnstein-Loiben.jpg was uncategorized on 5 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Rieseneck Jagdanlage.jpg was uncategorized on 5 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Grab von Franz Ferdinand.jpg was uncategorized on 6 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Moosburg.png was uncategorized on 8 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030800.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030467.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030675.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030450.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030703.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030625.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030487.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030452.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030462.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030488.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030731.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030699.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030405.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030770.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030757.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030386.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030389.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030601.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030524.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030725.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030704.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030787.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030795.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030537.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030490.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030415.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030742.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030651.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030516.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030792.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030689.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030455.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030599.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030597.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030598.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030624.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030765.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030410.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030376.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030559.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Schauinsland Archivbehälter 1040383.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030639.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030564.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030390.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030553.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030665.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030491.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030511.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030617.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030796.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030544.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030500.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030788.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030786.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030760.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030782.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030626.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030780.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030674.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030683.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030378.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030402.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030542.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030417.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030701.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030630.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030401.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030377.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Schauinsland Archivbehälter 1040384.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030443.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030466.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030514.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030784.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030779.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030568.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030393.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030719.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030752.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030696.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030618.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030536.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030527.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Glockenguss Ewattingen 1030777.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:L. Sigwarth - Spinnstube.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Otto-Ernst von Nostitz und Ehefrau Rosemarie 2954.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Flinfo tool

Some queries on its talk subpage please ;-) . . . it isn't working properly - thanks! MPF (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing me to it. --Flominator (talk) 17:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I fear another bug has sprung up . . . it strips all the carriage returns out now, leaving this:

{{Information|Description=''[[Juniperus scopulorum]]'' foliage and cone, Fort Collins, Colorado|Source=[http://www.flickr.com/photos/23729084@N03/3534851713/ Conifer, juniper...?]|Date=2009-05-14 02:04|Author=[http://www.flickr.com/people/23729084@N03 Chet Thomas] from Fort Collins, CO|Permission=|other_versions=Brightened from original}}{{Location dec|40.563503|-105.067062|}}=={{int:license}}=={{cc-by-2.0}}{{flickrreview|MPF|2010-02-25}}[[Category:Juniperus scopulorum]]

Of course it means that the license and other headers don't show properly until the cr's are put back. MPF (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Is it better now? --Flominator (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

'Fraid not, it is still stripping out carriage returns (i.e., no line spacing). Sorry for the slow reply, computer been down for the last few days - MPF (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Where exactly? --Flominator (talk) 07:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

At the second stage, when I click on [Open upload form]. The line spacing is present before than, but gone in the new window that this opens. Just done a bit of checking - it seems to happen if I do any editing at all in the first stage (e.g. adding any text or a link or a category, or deleting an unwanted flickr-generated category). Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 09:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Better now? --Flominator (talk) 18:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, working fine now, thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Was ist denn los mit dieser Seite? (Sunrise)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview

Ich merke daß diese Seite (url oben) in die Kategorie Posters eingestuft ist. Ich kenne mich nicht so gut aus hier, aber könnte es sich um einen Fehler handlen? Hätte eher das Bild eigentlich sollen aufgeladen werden anstatt einer Seite?Kenmayer (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Die Seite ist die Vorschau von User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview und muss ab und zu mal gelöscht werden. --Flominator (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Ticket regarding CNG coin images

Could you comment at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Request clarification on use of Ticket# 2006092710009217? Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 03:13, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Stadtpanorama-Stuehlingen.jpg

Hi Flo, ich bin beim Nachsichten auf o. g. Bild gestoßen. Sie ist 3,74 MB groß - ist das der Grund, warum es keine Vorschau gibt und es im Artikel (de:Stühlingen nicht angezeigt wird? Ein purge hat nicht geholfen. Danke & Gruß --dealerofsalvation 06:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Dealer, einmal anders gespeichert und schon wuppt es. Wie sieht es bei dir mit de:WP:T/SÜD aus? Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 07:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Supper Sache, danke. [7] :) Gruß --dealerofsalvation 16:04, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Löschen von Bildern

Hoi Floh Wenn du schon Bilder löscht, („File:HofkleidungMeersburg1.jpg“ gelöscht (the dolls are artists works and therefore copyrighted) dann informiere wenigstens den Benutzer der sie hochgeladen hat. Ich würde dies als Höflichkeit ansehen, nachdem meine Arbeit hier nicht unerheblich ist. Danke --Böhringer (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Ich versteh es auch nicht. Das sind stinknormale Schaufensterpuppen, und auch die Kleidung ist Handwerk, höchstens Kunsthandwerk. Gab es da irgendwelche Beschwerden, oder wie kommst Du plötzlich auf die Löschung? So etwas ist doch normalerweise völlig unkontrovers. Ich würde die vier Dateien ehrlich gesagt gerne wiederherstellen. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Es freut mich sehr, dass die hiesigen Kontrollmechanismen funktionieren (dies ist kein Sarkasmus). Den Benutzer hatte ich per E-Mail informiert. Ich meine mich an einige Fälle in de.wp zu erinnern, wo solchen Puppen eine gewisse Schöpfungshöhe zugesprochen wurde - und sei es nur wegen der Schminke. Sollte sich das inzwischen geändert oder ich überreagiert haben, könnt ihr sie natürlich gerne wiederherstellen oder es mir sagen, dann mach ich es. Löschantrag hatte ich übrigens keinen gestellt, um die hiesigen Admins zu entlasten, nicht um irgendwelche Ansichten durchzudrücken. Ich hielt den Fall für sonnenklar. --Flominator (talk) 09:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für das Mail. Ich habe es erst nach obigem Eintrag erhalten. Einen Löschantrag würde ich trotzdem begrüssen. Wenn es so eindeutig scheint, werden die Admins auch nicht so viel Arbeit damit haben. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Frage: Könnte man nicht diese Puppengesichter unkenntlich machen, damit man nur die Bekleidung sieht? Die wollte ich eigentlich auch ablichten und nicht die Puppen. --Böhringer (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Normalen LA gestellt. Die Admins haben trotzdem Arbeit damit, die Löschdiskussion abzuschließen, egal wie eindeutig das Votum ausfällt. Zum Unkenntlichmachen der Gesichter kann ich nichts sagen, aber das kannst du ja gerne in der LD vorschlagen. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

File:021018_bali_bombing.jpg

File:021018_bali_bombing.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Trycatch (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Limburg_Dom_Fenster.JPG

File:Limburg_Dom_Fenster.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GFreihalter (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Irgendwie ist das Bild untendran dasselbe. --Flominator (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

I just created a subpage on your user page. I thought the Flinfo tool uploaded pictures directly from Flickr to the Commons. That's how I understood it from the message that was left on my talk page. I guess I understood wrong and now I know that it only fills out the {{Information}}. I placed a speedy deletion tag on the page so it should be gone soon. My mistake. //Gbern3 (talk) 20:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for mentioning it. --Flominator (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Flinfo issue

Hi! You may very well be already aware of this, but your Flinfo tool seems to be down. Thanks!--Yaksar (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, when looking at [8] I find nothing unusual. Looks good to me. Strange ... --Flominator (talk) 05:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, it looks like it's working again. For the first half of today it wasn't (I don't remember exactly what it said but something along the lines of blah blah blah timed out or can't be found). But seems like that's not an issue anymore, thanks!--Yaksar (talk) 06:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

äh...

Ich weiß, dass sie das Schloss gerade renovieren, aber so extrem wird das Ergebnis hoffentlich nicht ausfallen: File:Meersburg Neues Schloss April 2010 1020087.jpg, File:Meersburg Neues Schloss April 2010 1020089.jpg --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 08:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Gut gebrüllt, Löwe ;) Ist behoben. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Flominator,
da du admin bist, wäre es gut, wenn du in die Babelbox auf deiner Userseite das admin-bit einsetzen könntest, damit andere dich als admin erkennen. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File:FS electrification sign.JPG

Hallo, Flominator,

du hast am 2009-11-29 zum Artikel File:FS electrification sign.JPG eine deutsche Beschreibung hinzugefügt; darin heißt es unter Anderem "Eisenbahnschild in Sóllerl". Der Ort heißt "Sóller" (ohne "l" am Schluss); das würde ich einfach korrigieren; aber ein solches Schild, mit derselben Blase unter dem "SC" von "SCHUCKERT", gleich aussehenden Haken und Wetterflecken an der Wand dahinter, hängt am Bahnhof in Palma, also am anderen Ende der Strecke (ich habe ein Foto davon). Der katalanische Kommentar sagt nichts darüber, wo das Schild hängt; der (knappe) englische Originalkommentar sagt "Sign in Palma".

Wenn du nicht unabhängige Informationen hast, dass das Schild tatsächlich in Sóller und nicht in Palma hängt (kann ja zwei davon geben), würde ich das entweder neutral formulieren oder aber (aufgrund des englischen Kommentars und der Blase im Schild) schreiben, dass es in der Estació del Tren de Sóller de Palma hängt. Was meinst du?

Grüße, Aisano (talk) 12:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, ich habe nur die Übersetzung von User:Marcela organisiert, du suchst den hier, der Sóller eingetragen hat. --Flominator (talk) 16:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Verstehe, aber der anonyme Benutzer sagte damals nur "Cartell al Ferrocarril de Sóller", also "Schild (bei) der Eisenbahn von Sóller", und "Ferrocarril de Sóller" heißt die ganze Linie, nicht nur der Bahnhof ("Estació") von Sóller. Ich werde also die Stelle entsprechend korrigieren. Das Schild habe ich nämlich vor einer Woche selbst gesehen (und fotografiert).

Mach 's gut -- Aisano (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Du auch. Vielleicht willst du ja trotzdem Marcela nochmal ansprechen. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hab' ich soeben gemacht. Danke, Aisano (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Salem April 2010 1010658.jpg

Hallo,

Obengenanntes Bild betrifft keine Flechtmaschine sondern eine Rundwebmaschine. Das Webfach ist deutlich zu erkennen und es gibt keine Klöppel und eine Flechtmaschine ohne Klöppel gibt es nicht.

--Gerrit41 (talk) 17:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Gerrit, vielen Dank für den Tipp. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Text auf dem Schild des Rundwebmaschines

Der Text lautet: Zentralschmierung. Achtung. Vor Arbeitsbeginn sowie nach Betriebschluss zügig betätigen und kurz unter Druck bringen. Oelvorrat rechtzeitig ergänzen. Beim Nachfŭllen niemals Oelsieb herausnehmen. Made In Germany.

--Gerrit41 (talk) 14:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Gerrit, danke auch hierfür. Weißt du zufällig, wer das gute Stück hergestellt hat? --Flominator (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

harpsichords in the Landesmuseum Württemberg Stuttgart

Guten Abend Flominator !
I am interested in any picture of historical harpsichords in the European or American museums, they can be useful for pages such as fr:Clavecin or fr:Histoire du clavecin (a featured article in the French WP which I wrote almost entirely). So, this one could be useful, as well as others if they exist in this museum. If possible, indicate the builder and the year. Thanks a lot. Gérard Janot (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Flominator/Attic, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen_villingen.png

File:Wappen_villingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Der Buckesfelder (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Das hätte man auch unbürokratischer lösen können oder mit Template:Move. --Flominator (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Anna knittel.jpg

Hallo, könntest Du mal nachschauen, ob ich das der richtigen Kategorie zugeordnet habe? (Anna Stainer-Knittel, bekannt als "Geierwally") Wenn ja, bitte das Bild im de.wikipedia-Artikel einfügen. Wenn nein, bitte die versprochene Bildbeschreibung einfach nachreichen... --FA2010 (talk) 12:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Passt. Beschreibung kommt, wenn das Bild an der Reihe ist ;) --Flominator (talk) 12:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Wilhelm Saxesen - Holzfäller im Harz.jpg

Hi Flo, du hast eine andere Quelle eingebaut, wo ich das Bild aber nicht finde. Ein Versehen? --Martina talk 09:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Nein. Doof kopiert :) Danke für die Unterstützung bei den Bilderwünschen. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ich wollte auch mal was Sinnvolles tun. :-D In Wirklichkeit hab ich fast alle Metaseiten von meiner Beo genommen und mehr Zeit für Sinnvolles.--Martina talk 21:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Maxipark Arena innen.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Laura Dekker Den Osse (cropped).jpg

cool, danke

Gropetjes --Neozoon (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Freut mich, dass es dir gefällt. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Habe das Cropped auch in NL und EN ausgetauscht :-) --Neozoon (talk) 12:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

ok

File:Chlyklass 2.jpg

Hi, can you please forward the relevant email for File:Chlyklass 2.jpg (and related files) to OTRS, if you can find it? Thanks, Rd232 (talk) 11:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Actually it's presumably all covered by Ticket#2006050910012049, used on File:Baze 3.jpg. Can you confirm and update all the files? Thanks. Also File:Baze 3.jpg uses {{Attribution}} but doesn't give an author to attribute to... I've used {{Copyrighted free use}} instead of {{PD}} in the files that were labelled PD - but {{Attribution}} may be correct, but then an author is needed. Rd232 (talk) 11:29, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Did. Thanks for checking. --Flominator (talk) 10:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Gartenschlauch

Schau mal auf den Blödsinn hier http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/works_by_Claes_Oldenburg --Jörgens.Mi ^Talk 15:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Schon bei de:WP:UF gesehen und von Andreas drauf gestupst worden, dennoch danke. --Flominator (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

@ at your inbox

Hi, please advice. best matanya • talk 09:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

your upload

Hi - this pic http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Valancecrop.jpg - from http://www.flickr.com/photos/erinbowland/32450403/

You uploaded it under a different copyright status - it was at a non commons compatable http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en and you uploaded it as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en - ? - Youreallycan (talk) 19:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Please check the Flickr review box at the end of the image description. The uploader at Flickr must have changed the license. --Flominator (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Judas cradle

This one

Dear Flominator,

I am an assistant producer from Infocus Asia, a production house based in Singapore producing documentaries for networks all over the world. We are currently producing a documentary series for the National Geographic channel on urban legends and history of locations around Asia.

One of the stories I’m focusing on in my episode is the European inquisition. I was searching for archives/images of the inquisition torture and came across your image of torture devices on wikimedia of the Judas cradle - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fomfr_judas_cradle.jpg

I was wondering if you would be keen to let us use the image in our film? And if you would have more images of torture devices or the inquisition tortures? Our main character is an investigator of sorts, and he goes back in various scenes to a headquarters to check out a board of archives or webpage of information, where he sees strong images like the one you have which helps him in his investigations.

We won't be able to pay you for the images unfortunately, but we will definitely credit you in the endshow credits. The show airs on the Nat Geo Channel on all media and worldwide, which is great exposure.

Thank you, look forward to hearing from you.

Kindest regards, Candice (email removed)

Replied via mail. --Flominator (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Image:ICCF Women World Correspondence Championship I.jpeg

Hallo Flominator, wir kennen uns vom Freiburger Stammtisch. Heute habe ich eine Bitte an Dich. Ich lud obiges Dokument nach Commons. Es ist ein offizielles Dokument der ICCF (International Correspondence Chess Federation) und betrifft die erste Fernschachweltmeisterschaft der Frauen (1968 bis 1971). Der ICCF-Präsident Eric Ruch gab mir die Erlaubnis, das Dokument in Wikipedia zu nutzen. Er sandte mir vor zwei Monaten eine entsprechende E-Mail. Kann ich Dir diese E-Mail senden, damit das Dokument eine OTRS-Nummer erhalten kann? Gruß Gerhard --GFHund (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Gerhard, die Genehmigung muss uns explizit erlauben, das Bild unter einer freien Lizenz zu nutzen (siehe WP:FAQB). Wird das in deiner Mail explizit erwähnt? Ist Ruch überhaupt der Inhaber des Urheberrechts bzw. des ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechts? Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 07:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Flominator, es ist ein offizielles Dokument der ICCF, dessen Präsident Eric Ruch mir die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentichung gab. Siehe hierzu, wo ein entsprechendes E-Mail von Eric Ruch abgebildet ist. Du kannst ihn gerne anmailen, ob alles seine Richtigkeit hat. Welche Lizenz sollte ich beim Dokument wählen, damit sie Wikipedia gerecht ist? Gruß Gerhard --GFHund (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Leite mir bitte die dort verlinke Mail weiter. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Ist gestern erfolgt. Gruß --GFHund (talk) 08:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Mail an Ruch ist raus. --Flominator (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank bisher. Gerhard --GFHund (talk) 16:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Erledigt :) --Flominator (talk)

User:OgreBot/gallery

Hallo

du hast beim hinzufügen der Kategorie:Churches in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Freiburg einen „:“ vergessen. Ich kann die Seite leider nicht bearbeiten. -- Vuxi (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Danke. --Flominator (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)