User talk:ErwinMeier
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Kategorien
[edit]Hallo Erwin, danke für deine Bilder von Thüringen. Bitte vergiss nicht diese auch zu kategorisieren, um sie besser auffindbar zu machen. Ich habe das für die meisten erstmal gemacht. Falls du ansonsten Lust hast: es gibt eine Menge Orte in Thüringen, vor allem im Osten und Norden, denen nach jegliche Bilder fehlen, siehe hier. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Zaunkönig, vielen Dank für die Hilfe. Ich mache gerne Radtouren und fotografiere gerne. Jetzt, wo Panoramio abbaut, wollte ich meine Fotos weiter der Allgemeinheit zur Verfügung stellen und bin über die Bilderwunschseiten zum Wikipedianer geworden. Bin noch im LearningByDoing und muss mich erstmal in Alles reinlesen. Größere Aktivitäten werden also noch Zeit brauchen. Die bilderfreien Orte werde ich bei meinen Tourenplanungen gerne berücksichtigen. Gruß --ErwinMeier (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo nochmal Erwin, schön, dass du deine Bilder jetzt kategorisierst. Ein kleiner Tipp noch: es reicht nur die jeweils spezifischste Kategorie zu verwenden und alle übergeordneten Kategorie wegzulassen. Deshalb folgende Änderung an einem Beispiel: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=&type=revision&diff=179281420&oldid=177971544. Die zwei verbleibenden Kategorien enthalten schon selbst die von mir gelöschten und sind damit überflüssig. --Arnd (talk) 11:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Einbindung von Fotos
[edit]Hallo Erwin, ich weiß, dass es besonders schön ist, wenn die eigenen Fotos in Wikiartikeln verwendet werden. Jedoch bitte ich dies im Einzelfall abzuwägen. Die Bilder sollten einen Bezug zum Text haben und den Artikel nicht überfrachten. Auch beim Austausch von vorhandenen Bilder sollte man objektiv schauen, welches das passendste Bild ist. Im Übrigen haben auch nicht eigebundene Fotos ihren Wert. Zum Beispiel können sie als frei-lizensierte Bilder für andere Zwecke außerhalb von Wikipedia verwendet werden. Nicht zuletzt ist jedes Foto an sich ein wichtiges Zeitdokument. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Commons:File renaming - Criterions
[edit]If you rename your own uploads, you should use Criterion #1. Read the table on Commons:File renaming page, please ;-)
The proper template is:
{{rename|Kabukicho along Yasukuni Street, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 2011-03-20 (by Peter Stewart).jpg|3|This location is not {{C|Akihabara}}, but {{C|Kabukichō, Tokyo}}. For details, see Note on description.}}
{{rename| ''new name'' | ''the number of the Criterion'' | ''verbal explanation''}}
for example: {{rename|Das westliche Hauptportal der Basilika Vierzehnheiligen.jpg|1|typo}}
Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 03.jpg
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 05.jpg
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 02.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 06.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 04.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 05.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 02.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 03.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 08.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 07.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 05.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 06.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 04.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 03.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 04.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 02.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 03.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 05.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 01.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 06.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 15.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 14.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 13.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 12.jpg
Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (talk) 13:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Es handelt sich bei diesen Fotos um öffentliche Innenräume in Deutschland, wo liegt das Problem?--ErwinMeier (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Die Erlaubnis zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen bei Wikipedia wurde beim jeweiligen Hausherrn, dem zuständigen Pfarrer, vorher telefonisch angefragt und eingeholt. --ErwinMeier (talk) 10:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Burg Scharfenstein
[edit]Hast wieder zahlreiche interessante Bilder auch aus der Eichsfeldregion hochgeladen. Bei der Burg Scharfenstein habe ich einige Kats geändert oder hinzugefügt. Bei einem Kellerbild handlte es sich nicht um den Burgbrunnen (den hat man noch nicht wieder gefunden), sondern um den Stumpf des ersten Bergfrieds, erbaut vor/um 1200. Im Burghof ist der Stumpf des zweiten Bergfrieds freigelegt worden. Diese Relikte hat man erst vor ein paar Jahren wieder entdeckt. Gruß-09:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Unstrut-Leine-Radweg 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 05:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Bilderwünsche
[edit]Hallo Erwin, da ich gerade wieder deine schönen, neuen hochgeladenen Bilder sehe - für folgende Kirchen fehlen gänzlich die Bilder: Dorfkirche Hochstedt, St. Juliana, St. Martini, St. Michaelis. Eventuell liegt das ja in deinem "Einzugsbereich" und du kannst da aushelfen. Viele Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Magdeburg St. Sebastian 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Südeichsfeld-Radweg 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Prenticenauj (talk) 18:04, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Sangerhausen Bahnhof 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Pomfuttge.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Erfurt Dom St. Marien 19.jpg
- File:Erfurt Dom St. Marien 21.jpg
- File:Erfurt Dom St. Marien 22.jpg
- File:Erfurt Dom St. Marien 23.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Die Fotos wurden in Zusammenarbeit und Abstimmung mit dem Hausherren gemacht ErwinMeier (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 07.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 08.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 09.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 10.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Halberstadt Dom 09.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2003:CD:F700:5A00:C932:ADEE:DC7A:A37.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi.
Per your request, I have requested deletion of this page. Poudou99 (talk) 10:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- It has been done. --Poudou99 (talk) 13:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Dankeǃ ErwinMeier (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Bodenfelde 02.jpg
[edit]Hallo Erwin, Danke für die Datei File:Bodenfelde 02.jpg. Kannst du genauer angeben, wo in Bodenfelde die Objekte zu finden sind? -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 08:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Leider komme ich da nicht mehr nach. Auf dem Schild links steht "Reinhardt Feinmechanik" - vielleicht bekommst Du dort was raus. ErwinMeier (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bad Hersfeld Stadtkirche 05.jpg
- File:Bad Hersfeld Stadtkirche 06.jpg
- File:Bad Hersfeld Stadtkirche 07.jpg
- File:Bad Hersfeld Stadtkirche 08.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
File:NDH St. Blasii 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Jahreskategorisierungen
[edit]Bilddateien nach Aufnahmejahr zu kategorisieren, ist bei Commons absolut üblich und habe ich in den letzten >10 Jahren auch bei tausenden anderen Dateien gemacht. Du persönlich musst das ja nicht sinnvoll finden (ich finde auch bei weitem nicht alle Arten von Kategorisierungen sinnvoll), aber das hier ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt und da finde ich schon, dass die Regeln und Gepflogenheiten für alle gelten sollten, auch wenn es "deine" Bilder sind. --slg (talk) 21:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- für sowas gibt es doch Versteckte Kategorien ErwinMeier (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Was genau hat diese Antwort mit meiner Frage zu tun? Fakt ist jedenfalls, dass es nun tausende von Jena-Bildern gibt, die nach Aufnahmejahr kategorisiert sind, nur deine nicht. --slg (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Orgelfotos Mansfeld
[edit]Lieber ErwinMeier,
gerne möchte ich fragen, ob Sie noch weitere Fotos vom Spieltisch der Furtwängler-&-Hammer-Orgel in St. Georg Mansfeld haben? Hintergrund ist, dass die Disposition der Orgel bisher nirgends zu finden ist und es deshalb ein absoluter ein Glücksfall wäre, wenn Sie diese Infos zufällig lesbar mit abgelichtet hätten. Auf dem nebenstehenden Spieltischfoto gelingt mir das Lesen der Register leider nur teilweise. Ich freue michjedenfalls sehr über ihre zahlreichen Orgelfotos hier auf Commons!
Herzliche Grüße --Cmcmcm1 (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Rückfrage zu Eisenach...
[edit]Hallo Erwin Meier, ich freue mich sehr über Deine zahlreichen Innenaufnahmen von Kirchen im WAK, die ich in den letzten Tagen gesichtet habe. Ich bin im WAK beheimatet und kümmere mich nun schon ein Jahr lang überwiegend um die Kategorien der jeweiligen Städte und Gemeinden des Landkreises, dabei wird eine möglichst synchrone Struktur zu den in Baden-Würtemberg und Bayern, tlws. auch NRW von mir erstellt. Das macht im ersten Moment viel Arbeit, hilft aber allen Benutzern, die gezielt etwas "benötigen", doch viel einfacher auf passende Bilder zu treffen. Die Ergebnisse sind stets systematisch nach Gemeinde (OT weise sortiert) und dann Landkreis - Bundesland strukturiert. Die zahlreichen anderen Sortierkriterien wie Kirchenkreise, Baugeschichtliches oder architektonische Merkmale sind selbstverständlich unangetastet geblieben bzw. werden - wenn vakant - auch nach und nach eingearbeitet. Das Programm läuft auch zu Kapellen und Klöstern, aber Gut Ding will Weile haben. Meine Veranlassung zu diesem Post ist: ich hatte letzte Woche die Thematik Kruzifixe im Wartburgkreis angefasst und diverse eigene Fotos aus den letzten 15 Jahren von Touren in die Geisaer Rhönorte ergänzt. Die hiesigen Kirchen haben die Kruzifixe im Gebäude und folglich habe ich dann fast alle Kapellen und Kirchen gesichtet und auch etliche Treffer verzeichnet. Aber dann habe ich was sehr Merkwürdiges festgestellt: in Eisenach gibt es eine Clemenskapelle - dort hatte ich schon vor Jahren alle vorhandenen Fenster und Türen als separates Bild erstellt und hochgeladen - fast alle sind verschwunden, nur die Erläuterungstafel ist aus dem Set verblieben. Und auch Deine Bilderserie - ich glaube es waren 15 Motive- waren zunächst bis auf #14 und #15 verschwunden, seit gestern - als ich erneut den Fall mit einem Bekannten auswerten wollte - waren auch diese zwei restlichen Motive verschwunden. Hast Du eine Erklärung dafür? Hast Du sowas schon zu anderen Orten bemerkt? Das ist nur die Spitze eines Eisberges - ich habe auch mehrere Friedhöfe wo plötzlich alle Dateien entfernt wurden. Beim Ort Meimers in Bad Liebenstein ist das auch passiert. Am 31.12.23 waren da noch drei-vier Dateien vorhanden. Wer macht so was??? Category:Friedhof (Meimers) Viele Grüße 17:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC) EACC80 (talk) 17:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)