User talk:Eric Duff

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Bem-vindo ao Wikimedia Commons, Eric Duff!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Primeiros passos

Nossos primeiros passos e nossa FAQ ajudam após o registo. Explicam como colocar a interface do Commons em português, como carregar um arquivo e que licenças usar para carregar arquivos. Você não necessita de habilidades técnicas para contribuir aqui. Seja audaz contribuindo e assuma a boa-fé para com as pessoas. Esta é uma wiki - é realmente fácil.

Ajuda

Mais informação está disponível no Portal comunitário. Se você tiver alguma questão, deixe uma mensagem na Esplanada, na mesa de perguntas (em inglês) ou em #wikimedia-commons, o canal de IRC da Wikimedia. Você pode também contatar um administrador em sua página de discussão. Se você tiver uma pergunta específica sobre o copyright, pergunte em Licenciamento (em inglês).

Como começar no Commons
Fez um erro?
  • Você carregou uma imagem com nome errado? Simplesmente carregue a imagem outra vez e marque a velha como esta tag: {{bad name|Nome correto}}
  • Para mais informação veja Propostas para eliminação
(P.S. Você gostaria de responder esta mensagem?)
Respeite os direitos de autor Image:12 e Demais.jpg foi marcada como uma infracção de copyright. O Wikimedia Commons só aceita conteúdo livre: imagens e outros ficheiros multimédia que possam ser utilizados por qualquer pesoa e para qualquer fim. Para mais detalhes sobre o que é aceitável carregar, leia Commons:Licenciamento, por favor. Se tiver dúvidas poderá dirigir-se à Esplanada.

O arquivo que carregou será eliminado rapidamente. Se achar que não existe uma infracão de copyright, dê a sua explicação na página de discussão, por favor.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Zzyzx11 18:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Covers

[edit]

Hello Nelsondavidd, album, cd, dvd cover and so on are not allowed on commons, please see Commons:Licensing before uploading new images. Thank you. --GeorgHH 19:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Piper Perabo picture

[edit]

The Piper Perabo photo you uploaded has been speedy deleted as a copyright violation, as it is also found at http://www.askmen.com/women/galleries/actress/piper-perabo/picture-1.html where it is clearly labeled "Copyright 1996-2005, IGN Entertainment, Inc."

It is YOUR responsibility to determine the copyright status of any image you upload here. Do NOT upload images found on other websites unless you are certain of their free licence status. Continued uploading of copyright violations will result in your being blocked. -- Infrogmation 03:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, i deleted the image because it was empty. The image on Flickr ([1]) is also not accepted here because it is "all rights reserved". We are only accepting free images that everyone can use for any purpose. Thats images from Flickr licenced cc-by and cc-by-sa (Advanced search: content to use commercially + to modify, adapt, or build upon) --Martin H. (talk) 20:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTV_Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Damiens.rf 13:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pikes_Peak_Raceway.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mark McWire (talk) 00:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Association football logos of Argentina has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Fma12 (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santos FC logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Discovery Channel International.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport news.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport2 hd.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido de uma amigo

[edit]

O amigo, do amigo, do amigo me pediu para postar isso, ai abaixo, então estou postando: Dizem que é um e-mail que esta circulando entre usuários da wiki-pt



Depois de algum tempo, voltei a conversar com o Pé, pois verifiquei que contas suas caíram e ele de disse que estão aferindo, testando comportamentos e me disse para tomar muito cuidado com o Teles e o Érico.

A conclusão que tiveram é que o Teles continua fazendo verificação antecipada e sem solicitação, algo que já foi motivo de paralisação das verificações no passado envolvendo o próprio Teles.

Isso a patotinha do pé concluiu por que, todas as solicitações de verificações do Érico são exatas e daí aparece o Teles para confirmar. Você não acha estranho, num ambiente que sempre aparecem contas novas, o Érico sempre acerta em cheio? Outros do grupo dele, em outras cidades, têm o mesmo tipo de comportamento, mas nunca são indicados para verificação, porque nunca tiveram suas contas verificadas. Também informaram que nem todas as contas são bloqueadas, quando verificadas. A estratégia do Teles é deixar uma livre, desbloqueada e depois, já sabendo de quem é, é só verificar quais as outras novas contas que se juntaram para bloquear todas.

É impossível que o Érico tenha um faro, assim, tão exato das coisas num universo de centenas de contas criadas mensalmente. Ou o cara fica 18 horas monitorando as PN ou tem armação. Depois inventa algumas comparações, que podem ocorrer em dezenas de contas e a verificação é feita. A teoria fica mais evidente quando outros usuários, já consolidados do grupinho do pé, fazem, para testar, solicitações de verificação nas mesmas condições do Érico, daí é colocado que check não é usado para pesca, mas as do Érico o Teles confirma.

Tome cuidado com esses caras, para não se deixar cair.

Tudo isso só comprova que de meios ilícitos e no conluio de bastidores, esses caras não mudam, sempre ignoram as regras para deixar de fora da Wikipédia muita gente que vão desde restrições a muitos outros usuários filtrados e bloqueados indevidamente ou há muito tempo. O Teles é um ser traiçoeiro e com esse exemplo, de suas artimanhas, você deve se cuidar. Ele até faz discípulos que ora é o Érico. Esse cara, amanhã, ta pior que o Teles. Cuida-se com ele também.

Abçs


Post feito. L'ami Iami (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Associação Atlética Coruripe logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Diego Comic-Con 2014 - Nintendo Lounge -Amiibo-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gazebo (talk) 09:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Infinito logo.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Infinito logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

[edit]
In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bandeira

[edit]

Pelo amor de Deus irmão, você não tem outra forma de me prejudicar não, só existe essa? O pedido que você fez para eliminação da mesma não tem nem pé e cabeça, desde quando o brasão que está composto na bandeira é falso? O mesmo foi refeito por outro usuário, que carregou o brasão e o adicionou na Wikipédia, e até o momento, não percebi ninguém propor para eliminação o brasão de Juripiranga, já que nas suas palavras se trata de um brasão "falso" Luiz79 (talk) 15:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Errado, se não existe fonte comprovando que a mesma existe, não tem como comprovar que ela é real. Não sou eu que tenho que provar que algo é real, é quem a carregou. O usuário em questão carregou diversas imagens que não condizem com os brasões e bandeiras reais, é só olhar um pouquinho que dá para ver as diferenças entre as imagens reais e as que o mesmo carregou, muitas são bizarramente diferentes, tanto que o mesmo já foi bloqueado na Wikipédia lusófona. Eric Duff (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello can you please delete this old logo of MTV Films because it was folded into MTV Studios in 2020. 85.255.234.207 13:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yahoo Finance Logo 2019.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IagoQnsi (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

inconsistência nas atribuições de termos de imagens de partidos.

[edit]

Saudoso colega editor, vejo que o senhor se mostra como um garante do bom atributo dos direitos de imagem na Wikipédia e o agradeço desde logo pela sua atuação nesta enciclopédia. Entretanto, as suas excursões paladinas contra a uniformização da Wikipédia são no mínimo contraditórias. Eu gostaria de entender o porquê de File:Letras PS (Portugal).png File:Logo Chega!.png e File:PPD PSD Icon.png estarem como domínio público enquanto File:Símbolo principal do CHEGA.png File:Icon do PS.png File:Icon do PAN.png estão como conteúdo restrito. Todas essas imagens foram retiradas dos sítios dos diferentes partidos e eu verifiquei atenciosamente cada um deles e nenhum sequer menciona a questão da atribuição dos direitos de imagem. Inclusive File:Icon do PAN.png File:PPD PSD Icon.png são evidentes CROPS do logotipo original presente na página inicial de cada partido. Nesta senda, eu gostaria de lhe sugerir, se for o caso, verificar se seu esforços não seriam melhor direcionados quando na vereda de retificar os códigos de atribuição de direitos de imagem que foram incorretamente adicionados em alguns destes logotipos. Alternativamente, gostaria que o senhor me esclarecesse o motivo de tamanha inconsistência, pois é bastante claro que ou TODOS devem ser conteúdo restrito ou nenhum deles, do jeito que está não faz qualquer sentido.Przelijpdahl (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As imagens citadas que estão carregadas no Commons são imagens simplificadas que contém apenas imagens geométricas simples ou apenas letras, que se pode carregar com uma licença válida no Commons (mesmos endo parte de outra imagem), já as demais que estão carregadas na Wikipédia lusófona não entram em imagens simples ou apenas textos, e não tem uma licença válida pois são imagens com direitos autorais. Eric Duff (talk) 00:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Eric Duff: o critério para definir a atribuição de direitos é então a “simplicidade” das imagens? Mesmo que elas sejam provenientes DA MESMA FONTE? (in casu, dos sites oficiais dos partidos). Quem afere quais imagens são simples o suficiente para serem protegidas por direitos e quais não são? onde posso ler essas regras da Wikimedia? Obrigado Przelijpdahl (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:CEO logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: CC does not apply to this file, it's the official logo of the active association football club Centro Esportivo Olhodaguense

https://www.facebook.com/CEOfutebolAL/ https://www.instagram.com/ceooficial/

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vítor (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric, why do you carelessly file a speedydeletion request, without reading the file description page? See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo FC Paradiso.png. Admin Yann must also have slept. Leyo 18:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I converted this to a regular DR. Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gostaria da sua ajuda

[edit]

Oi Eric Duff, tudo bem? Pode me ajudar com uma questão se tiver disponibilidade, por gentileza? Eu fiz o upload de um vídeo sob a extensão WEBM, mas logo depois vi que ele estava sem o áudio. Então, eu o converti para MPEG e fiz o upload. No entanto, parece que nenhum dos dois jeitos ficou bom. Vc saberia me orientar qual que é a melhor extensão? (File:Valdemar Costa Neto CPMI do Mensalão.mpg e File:Valdemar Costa Neto CPMI do Mensalão.webm) E, se possível, me ajudar a deletar um ou os dois arquivos aqui da Commons? Agradecido, Przelijpdahl (talk) 23:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grupo Ultra logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Komuh Ultra (talk) 17:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]