User talk:Danyele

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Danyele!

-- 21:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Caricamenti Ternana

[edit]

È dell'utente Vahle e sue reincarnazioni. Già bandito infinito una prima volta, su it.wiki continuate a patrollare la voce Ternana Calcio, di sicuro ci riprova, e io l'aspetto qui con raschietto e mazzuolo. Siccome sono bloccato su it.wiki (sai come sono questi amministratori...) provvedi tu a segnalare il suo nuovo sockpuppet lì, è Vahle1994. Da infinitare senza passare per il via. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juventus Museum - Movies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 08:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Foto in copyviol

[edit]

Ti segnalo che in caso di file sospetti puoi usare il link "Proponi per la cancellazione" nella barra laterale, è tutto automatico e molto semplice. Se come in questo caso sei sicuro del copyviol ("opera propria" lol) puoi apporre il template {{speedydelete |1=motivo}} nella pagina di ogni foto... (anche se hai fatto benissimo a chiedere a Sergio, visto che l'utente andrà randellato) --WikiKiwi 05:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 10:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Collage

[edit]

Per sicurezza assumi sempre che la licenza complessiva sia la più restrittiva tra quelle che compongono il mosaico, ma attribuisci sempre le singole foto all'autore. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juventus 1971-72

[edit]

Mi lascia solo perplesso che partita è. Nel 1971-72 la Juventus ha giocato a Milano il 31 ottobre 1971 e il 2 gennaio 1972, in entrambi i casi a maniche lunghe. A fine campionato ha giocato a Milano in Coppa Italia contro entrambe, e ciò giustificherebbe le maniche corte, ma in porta c'era Piloni, non Carmignani, e in campo c'erano Longobucco, Cuccureddu e Roveta, non Spinosi, Marchetti e Salvadore... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 19:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Controlla i diff. Il template dell'ANEFO che mi hai citato serve a catalogare l'immagine nella flat list dell'archivio olandese. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat)Ï

Caricamento file

[edit]

Ho capito, poichè su wikipedia non si può far nulla, se ti scrivo un messaggio commetto un reato? Forse sì.

--Revolver99 (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Revolver99[reply]

Non si tratta di essere vittime o meno qui.. qui ogni cosa viene vista con cattivo occhio da amministratori.
Saluti, ne ho abbastanza
--Revolver99 (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Revolver99[reply]
Bene, tutto chiaro, ammetto i miei gravi errori, perchè sono un nuovo utente e quindi non sono esperto di ciò ma ci sono molti casi in cui ogni cosa viene malvista da amministratori.
--revolver99 Revolver99 (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Saluti, avrete uno "scartavetracoglioni" in meno Revolver99 (talk) 17:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is very unlike a colleague. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is very unlike a colleague. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Nell'attesa che ti diano il flag di autoverificato che ancora ti manca su commons, ti ringrazio pubblicamente per il lavoraccio sulle immagini che hai fatto. Soprattuto quelle storiche di calciatori. Fra finezze di copyright e altro, mi immagino il logoramento alle volte. Alexmar983 (talk) 04:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foto e modifiche di una pagina

[edit]

Amico non so nemmeno come fare a contattarti, rimuovi quella foto del Direttore se non va bene ma abbi pazienza scrivimi e dimmi come contattarti che ho un po' di robe da chiederti di modificare. La foto tra quelle.

Nazionale

[edit]

Si vede che sei ancora giovane, eh? :D -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 23:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nike advertisement of Juventus FC, 2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Daphne Lantier 00:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadio Olimpico in Turin, 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daphne Lantier 00:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juventus v Real Madrid, Champions League, Stadium, Turin, 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Canopus Grandiflora 13:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okkio, il file in oggetto è sì PD e va bene, ma non era anonimo. Non poteva essere, ovviamente, del 1971 anche se non si poteva dire subito, vedendo solo la mezza foto: c'era Lodetti, che andò via dal Milan nel 1970 (e per tale ragione perse il Mondiale del Messico). In realtà è il derby di ritorno del 1969-70 che si giocò con un insolito nevischio a Milano per essere a marzo inoltrato. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Italy files

[edit]

Hi. Your user talk speaks for itself... If a file respects the Italian law for it.wikipedia, It is not said to be the same for Wikipedia Commons (and for the laws of different countries in the world). For example: in it.wikipedia a PD-Italy file must be prior to 1996; in Commons, a similar PD-Italy file must be prior to 1976! Please, stop immediately to transfer files from it.wikipedia --Danyele (talk) 19:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will do as I please with my own user page thank your! I didn't use PD-Italy when i originally uploaded the files, but another user (JuTa) said i needed a tag and edited my uploads and added PD-Italy. Anyway how can you have two different sets of rules for websites that are available worldwide? Italian wikipedia is a worldwide website. It's not restricted to Italy. I can access it in the uk. So the files are available worldwide. --Rcclh (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan redirects

[edit]

Hi Danyele. Please don't tag for speedy deletion redirects that are unused, unless they are also implausibly named. See COM:CSD. The reasoning behind this is that external projects may hotlink to the files on Commons. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 07:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:1965 Eurovision Song Contest - France Gall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battista 'Pinin' Farina and his son Sergio, ca. 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Danyele,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sei un grande

[edit]

Thank you so much for all your work uploading the old Italian photos. Grazie mille.Danieletorino2 (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dubbio su licenza

[edit]

Ciao @Alexmar983: e @Blackcat: , posso chiedervi una consulenza? :-) Sono in dubbio su come licenziare più correttamente il File:1980s-Inspired AC Milan's Wordmark.png che ho appena caricato: essendo ispirato al wordmark utilizzato dall'AC Milan tra gli anni 80 e 90 - ispirato ma differente (vedi font, spaziature e taglio orizzontale) -, ma cmq realizzato materialmente da me, l'ho inserito sotto licenza {{Cc-zero}} con cui rivendico l'esecuzione materiale del file ma rinuncio a qualsiasi pretesa - essendo un file ispirato a un altro creato da altri in passato. Ho poi cmq inserito in più la licenza {{PD-textlogo}}, essendo un logotipo composto da semplici lettere. Tutto a posto così, o posso correggere qualcosa? --Danyele (talk) 17:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Va bene come l'hai fatto, @Danyele: , il testo non è copyrightable a meno non sia un font particolarmente elaborato, ma stiamo parlando di un Helvetica bold inclinato con una riga bianca in mezzo. Niente di originale. Stasera lo passo in SVG magari. - SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:31, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Scusa ma ero a raccogliere olive, o ti avrei risposto prima di cena. Per me quella cobinazione di testo e immagine non è in nessun modo originale, e quindi la tua licenza, confermo, mi sebra appropriata. Mi chiedo peraltro se abbia senso specificare una licenza personale in questo caso oppure no. Secondo me basta la seconda, ogni licenza che richieda un minimo di riconoscimento personale sarebbe incoerente.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie a entrambi. Sulla correttezza o meno della licenza personale cc-zero, mettevevi d'accordo e fatemi sapere :-D (anche se mi par di capire non sia nulla di così problematico); mentre sul convertire il file in .svg, @Blackcat: , l'avrei fatto io stesso se solo capissi come fare... :-) --Danyele (talk) 21:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mah non credo sia un problema. Lasciale pure entrambe, ma ripeto che secondo me non si può mettere una licenza a qualcosa che non è originale.--Alexmar983 (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Juventus TV 2017 logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IagoQnsi (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, IagoQnsi (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa - Filipe.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa - Filipe.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa 10 (cropped).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa 10 (cropped).JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa - Gianluca Nicco.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa - Gianluca Nicco.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa - Gennaro Scognamiglio.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Entella-Perugia Supercoppa - Gennaro Scognamiglio.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Loghi

[edit]

Ti ringrazio, è la prima volta che carico su Wikimedia, comunque avevo letto che i loghi si potessero caricare senza problemi, e non essendo praticamente ho lasciata spuntata la prima casella Overlord CM (talk) 06:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ROKiT Williams Racing Formula One Team, 2019 logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ROKiT Williams Racing Formula One Team, 2019 logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

SITH (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Loghi

[edit]

Non voglio spacciare il logo del cavallino per mio, al momento del caricamento ho spuntato la casella “questo file non è opera mia”, non dovrebbero esserci problemi con i loghi Overlord CM (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rally di Sanremo-Sestriere

[edit]

Non so la posizione di FIA o ACI (ma è determinante poi?) ma secondo me andrebbero categorizzati assieme, non tanto per questa fonte, che sono sicuro tu conoscerai bene e converrai sia una "Bibbia" o forse LA bibbia dei risultati, ma per il fatto che proprio nel 70 e 71 il rally era nel campionato del mondo e in qualsiasi parte tu vada a controllare nei resoconti del Campionato Internazionale Costruttori tale presenza è attribuita al "Rally di Sanremo" in generale (a parte il nome che ovviamente per quei due anni è "Sanremo-Sestriere"). Ovviamente quello che tu dici è vero, anche perchè hai più esperienza di me dei rally ante-90 :). Per me metterli separati è complicare le categorie categoria sapendo che in fin dei conti trattasi dello stesso rally anche se negli anni ha subito qualche modifica, ma quello che dici non è sbagliato concettualmente, sia chiaro.--Lou6977 (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Danyele- Why did you make that change to the above image's description? I don't know that template. It seems to push the Italian description down into the metadata section, which doesn't look like an improvement to me. Eric talk 12:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. That template - which I've been using since years, you're the first to give me a similar remark - only show for first the "Italian" description, if you set the access' site through an Italian account; for all the other languages, the English description is shown for first automatically. What's the problem?
Ciao, Danyele- Ok, here goes an attempt in Italian: Mi ho domandato se era (sia?) così! I wondered if it might be something like that, some cross-wiki function that I could not perceive. I have never run into that template before, thanks for informing me. It seems like a helpful convenience in some ways, but I could see where it could also be helpful to have the descriptions visible in more than one language so multilingual editors would notice any discrepancies. Grazie, Eric talk 19:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:1980s-Inspired AC Milan's Wordmark.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert the modest crop of the Ashley Williams picture? I realize I can upload a separate crop, but why do you prefer the version with a few more pixels of wall space to her sides? --GRuban (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Il dolce corpo di Deborah (1968) - Carroll Baker (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danyele

[edit]

What's your problem with everything?, ate last can change to current photos Sánchezgiallorrossi99 (talk) 23:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you put these pictures for discussion. This is a clear copyvio. --Ailura (talk) 12:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:2020 FCA Heritage Icon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2001–02 Serie A - SS Lazio v Inter Milan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alba Parietti

[edit]

Ciao, potresti tagliare la foto del 2020 con Diego delle Palme? Sto aggiornando il profilo e vorrei mettere quella foto in primo piano. --79.25.71.56 09:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao @79.25.71.56: , ecco fatto ;-) — danyele 15:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me @79.25.71.56: , but the guy's name is Diego Dalla Palma, as proved by Wikidata.--151.19.108.240 05:48, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baiardo

[edit]

Ok, però sii gentile, prima falla e poi mettila, perché noi admin dove vediamo categorie rosse le eliminiamo. -- Blackcat 19:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

eh eh noo... qui non c'è il feticcio dei link rossi, se una cosa non c'è non c'è, il link rosso è brutto, serve solo a spingere a fare uno stub che resterà 10 anni con l'avviso -- Blackcat 09:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Catherine Spaak, 1962.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB00:A05:D100:F44D:D09:AFF1:C808 09:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2018 Women's DFB-Pokal Final - Ewa Pajor (Wolfsburg) (cropped).jpg

[edit]

Hello! I noticed you uploaded File:2018 Women's DFB-Pokal Final - Ewa Pajor (Wolfsburg) (cropped).jpg, but only released it under the GFDL. Would you please release it under CC BY-SA 3.0? Thanks! HouseBlaster (talk) 03:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your reply. The original file is dual-licensed under the GFDL and CC BY 4.0. You only licensed your cropped version under the GFDL, which is no longer permitted. If you want to make the cropped version available under the same terms as the original file, you can release the cropped version under CC BY 4.0. HouseBlaster (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the diff, I see that you had originally written {{GFDL|cc-by-4.0}} as the license. Template:GFDL does not take in another license like that, so it displays {{GFDL}} with no alternative license. Mea culpa for not double-checking the actual wikitext, and my apologies. HouseBlaster (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Save the Dream at the Supercoppa (30394071002).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1970 La Scala Gala - Maria Callas and Antonio Ghiringhelli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 06:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Suor Emanuelle (1977) - Monika Zanchi, Gabriele Tinti.JPG

[edit]

Ciao Danyele, scusami, è stata una mia svista: avevo guardato male l'anno, l'ho ripristinata su it.wiki e ne ho chiesto la cancellazione immediata su Commons. Solo vorrei precisare che dalla cronologia su Commons era chiaro che tu l'avevi caricata su it.wiki e che io l'avevo esportata su Commons (il tuo nome risultava perché l'esportazione mantiene anche la cronologia originale) quindi se tu non mi avessi segnalato l'errore la responsabilità sarebbe rimasta unicamente mia. Grazie di nuovo e a presto. Spinoziano (talk) 07:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sì ma infatti l'esportazione in genere non è consigliabile, perché può generare confusione, io negli ultimi giorni l'avevo provata perché non funzionava CommonsHelper (ora funziona di nuovo) ma che io sappia non è una pratica standard. Comunque davvero non mi ero accorto dell'anno, per qualche ragione ieri sera avevo in testa "PD 1998" anziché "PD 1996", sarà stata la stanchezza, per fortuna me l'hai fatto notare subito tu. A presto ;-) --Spinoziano (talk) 14:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, IagoQnsi (talk) 01:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating bulk files for deletion

[edit]

Hi. I recently closed a number of your DR's - if possible, use the bulk method of nominating files with the same DR reason - like File:Incidente di Ayrton Senna a Imola 1994 - 02.jpg - its a lot easier for the closing admin. TIA Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Association of Football Federations of Azerbaijan - Logo 2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Above COM:TOO, copyright from AFFA "Saytda hər hansısa bir məlumatdan istifadə zamanı istinadın qeyd olunması vacibdir. Bütün hüquqlar Azərbaycan Respublikasının qanunvericiliyinə uyğun olaraq qorunur. Azərbaycan Futbol Federasiyaları Assosiasiyası."
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Wutkh (talk) 07:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of PD-Italy photos taken before 1976

[edit]

Ciao Danyele !

My Italian is poor so I prefer to write in English (sono francese).

I published several photos taken in Italy before 1976 and sometimes someone ask for their deletion. They pretend that the origin of the photographer or agency matters and also if the first publication was not in Italy is essential. But the official italian law (Legge 22 aprile 1941 n. 633) does not make a difference or does not précise these matters. According to this rules, any "non artistic" photography taken in Italy before 1976 is PD.

You analized the same problem here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1965_Eurovision_Song_Contest_-_France_Gall.jpg

Could-you please confirm this ?

The files are here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Le_Corniaud

Have a nice day. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aprilia Racing - Logo 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Francesca Mannocchi

[edit]

Ciao, cortesemente, non annullare le mie modifiche alla foto che ho caricato io. So benissimo che si può caricare una nuova versione, ma non è obbligatorio (oppure, se È obbligatorio, indicami cortesemente dov'è la policy). Il taglio largo è inutile e brutto. Grazie, ciao. M&A (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Al contrario, ritengo che il ritaglio sia esattamente una modifica marginale, perché elimina un microfono sfocato in primo piano e basta. Evidentemente non è un elemento che possa apportare alcuna utilità. --M&A (talk) 08:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Associazione Calcio Perugia 2003-08-06.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Panini sticker published in 2003. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 23:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Günther Frager: , I'm not the uploader on Commons. I only uploaded the file in it.wikipedia, legally under the Italian law. Then, the file was illegally copied in Commons by @Grifomaniacs: ; so, ask him about it... — danyele 02:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again 2 PD-Italy files to be deleted...

[edit]

Ciao Danyele !

As before, someone wants to delete two photographs taken in Italy before 1996 :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marie-Trintignant-Italie-1979.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Berger-Gall-Italie-1984.png

Could-you help me again for this case ?

Best regards. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 08:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Società Sportiva Lazio 1998-99.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo published in Italy in 1998. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 21:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Günther Frager: again, I'M NOT the uploader on Commons! I uploaded those files ONLY in it.wikipedia, LEGALLY under the Italian law. Then, if those files was copied illegally in Commons by others, isn't my bad... — danyele 18:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Danyele, I will try to see if the files were being imported from itwiki and avoid sending the notification. I didn't create this notification manually, but the widget I used for tagging this file. Günther Frager (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Uefa european championship trophy (edited).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]