User talk:Benrr101
Benrr101
I noted that you redrew this image, converting it from .jpf to svg format (thanks!):
Could you be tempted into redrawing the rest of these into svg format (and in the same style), so as to improve the look of the stable carbene article? Maybe the images are more useful without the Deta-13C and N-C-N angles values on the image?:
1991: Hindered N,N'-diadamantyl-imidazol-2-ylidene. (external viewer) | 1992: Less hindered tetramethyl-imidazol-2-ylidene | 1995: Cyclic diaminocarbene 1,3-dimesityl-imidazol-4,5-dihydro-2-ylidene (external viewer) | 1996: Acyclic diaminocarbene bis(diisopropylamino)carbene | 1997: Air-stable 1,3-dimesityl-4,5-dichloroimidazol-2-ylidene. (external viewer) |
thanks for your consideration
Quantockgoblin 20:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
1991: Hindered N,N'-diadamantyl-imidazol-2-ylidene. (external viewer) | 1992: Less hindered tetramethyl-imidazol-2-ylidene | 1995: Cyclic diaminocarbene 1,3-dimesityl-imidazol-4,5-dihydro-2-ylidene (external viewer) | 1996: Acyclic diaminocarbene bis(diisopropylamino)carbene | 1997: Air-stable 1,3-dimesityl-4,5-dichloroimidazol-2-ylidene. (external viewer) |
- Done - I uploaded the images to the stable carbene page! Thanks!!!!!!!!
- There is a few more images on that page if you are brave enough!!!! - thanks again -- Quantockgoblin 18:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Levocetirizine_vector.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:2c general structure.svg is disputed
[edit]Dispute notification | The chemical structure Image:2c general structure.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 14:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC) |
File:Arduengo3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Cwbm (commons) (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Please have a look at this page. Thank you. --Leyo 22:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]Damnit autocatogorize bot, I know how to categorize images... I just made a mistake, lol.
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Amfepramone.svg is disputed
[edit]Dispute notification | The chemical structure File:Amfepramone.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 14:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks for pointing that out! A corrected version has been uploaded and the links to the png version hve been replaced with a link to the new svg version. Omega (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick fix. Ed (Edgar181) 15:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Amphotericin B-skeletal.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 15:53, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Tobramycin vector.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yikrazuul (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Diethyl-ether-2D-skeletal.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DMacks (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Mesulergine.svg is disputed
[edit]Dispute notification | The chemical structure File:Mesulergine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Mykhal (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
File:Methyl-acetate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Ajulemicacid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marbletan (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Digoxin structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |