Comment - Please explain why this is a sufficiently notable scope. There's just a stub article on German Wikipedia about this housing development. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info - You're right about the WP article (which is really a lousy stub), but the Wollepark has been in the media up here (including NDR and Bild-Zeitung) for quite a while. Once I've got the time for a rewrite of the article, I'll do this. --Jacek79 (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info You'll find that information in the image metadata. But I'm not very fond of narrowing the scope of this submission even more. --Jacek79 (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not every building needs a cardinal point, but this is a huge complex with several building and it's visible from every side. Maybe, there's another very relevant view from another direction. For this case, the scope should be extended IMHO. --kaʁstnDis/Cat07:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Support - Of course I'm fine with this, but why is the direction truly needed in the scope, with but two Commons photos of this complex and this one obviously best in the original scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
