Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Stanford Memorial Church, HDR. --King of Hearts 04:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination James H. Clark Center, HDR. --King of Hearts 04:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination James H. Clark Center, HDR. --King of Hearts 04:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former city wall (with cannonball) at Westerholt meadow (Westerholtsche Wiese) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wedding avenue in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination One of the stream sources of the Stever stream in the Stever valley, Uphusen hamlet, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railing of the bridge on Mauritiusstrasse over the Kettbach in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Plaque of Antonio Ricaurte, Villa de Leyva, Colombia --Bgag 03:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Baroque portal of the residential house on Herrengasse #4, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of «Zum Goldenen Bären» on Wiesbadener Strasee #3, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the house of the Gurk Cathedral Chapter on Wiesbadener Strasse #5, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baroque portal of the former state mining authority on Herrengasse #9, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baroque portal of the residential house on Pfarrplatz #2, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Ninna-ji's Golden Hall, front view of the Shingon Buddhist temple, Ukyō-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. Ninna-ji was registered as part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site "Historic monuments of ancient Kyoto", since 1994. Picture shot during a ceremony. Many pairs of shoes wait at the foot of the stairs. --Basile Morin 01:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion FP maybe --Cvmontuy 02:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stanford Memorial Church, HDR. --King of Hearts 23:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stanford Memorial Church, HDR. --King of Hearts 23:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stanford Memorial Church, HDR. --King of Hearts 23:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Wow --Basile Morin 01:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ loft, Stanford Memorial Church, HDR. --King of Hearts 23:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ loft, Stanford Memorial Church, HDR. --King of Hearts 23:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomatoes in a basket -- George Chernilevsky 20:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very nice --Basile Morin 01:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dissen am Teutoburger Wald in Lower Saxony Osnabrück, church: the Mauritiuskirche --Michielverbeek 20:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination near Melle-Wellingholzhausen in Lower Saxony Osnabrück, viwe to the Brandhorstweg --Michielverbeek 20:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Melle-Wellingholzhausen in Lower Saxony Osnabrück, church: the Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche --Michielverbeek 20:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination old Volvo BM 400 --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. How old is the tractor? -- Spurzem 20:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC) from 1964 - 1969 --~~~~
-
- Nomination Congregational House bas-relief, Congregational House, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 15:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 20:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose Already 5 noms by Another believer today --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Furniture in the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, Texas, USA. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 15:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, I think this one isn't sharp enough, either, but feel free to change the "Decline" to "Discuss" if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 15:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose Already 5 noms by Another believer today --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon - Eugene, Oregon, USA. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 15:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 15:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose Already 5 noms by Another believer today --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russian icon in the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon - Eugene, Oregon, USA. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 15:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not sharp enough, and photos of artworks should state the dimensions. If this is a tiny miniature, it could be fair to judge the photo differently. -- Ikan Kekek 15:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose Already 5 noms by Another believer today --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Natural pools of Porto Martins, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Natural pools of Porto Martins, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
The verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 09:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Done --Poco a poco 11:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach of Praia da Vitória, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
The image tilts slightly outwards IMO. --Ermell 09:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Done --Poco a poco 11:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross on the pico Matias Simão, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross on the pico Matias Simão, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arecaceae in Israel. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jaffa Lighthouse. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wadi Saharonim. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wadi Saharonim. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Braiding system--Celeda 08:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Comtois horse head--Celeda 08:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Bottom crop is not well done --Michielverbeek 08:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
-
- Nomination St. Catherine Chapel in Wallersberg in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 07:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
2 small spots --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 09:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic branch church St. Peter and Paul in Unterleinleiter --Ermell 07:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar of the catholic parish church St. Johannes Baptista in Uetzing in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 07:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stucco ceiling of the catholic parish church St. Johannes Baptista in Uetzing in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 07:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of the catholic branch church St. Peter and Paul in Unterleinleiter --Ermell 07:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Saint Walburga church of Veurne, Belgium. --Velvet 07:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination It basically represents the natural heritage of an IcelandThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Dilnoza.bobieva --Elryck 05:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination River Maroullenas near Kalo Chorio Oreinis in Nicosia District, Cyprus. By User:Pavlos1988 --Elryck 05:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sharpening and denoising overdone.Sorry. --Ermell 07:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phrygana on limestones close to Rock of Aphrodite, Southern Cyprus. By User:Kenraiz --Elryck 05:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose There is no detail here, sorry --Poco a poco 08:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harbour, Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus. By User:Podzemnik --Elryck 05:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fossilized Piptoporus betulinus on a dead birch in disrepair. Focus stack of 9 photos.
--Famberhorst 05:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Fossilized Piptoporus betulinus on a dead birch in disrepair. Focus stack of 9 photos.
-
- Nomination Coast at Porto Moniz, Madeira --Llez 05:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Observation platform "Ellbachseeblick" near Kniebis, Northern Black Forest --Llez 05:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santissimo Nome di Maria church in Balbiana. --Moroder 05:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Please have a look to the photograph. IMO it is leaning out at the right and there is color noise at the gate. --XRay 06:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Moroder 07:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Santa Lucia church in Balbiana. --Moroder 05:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Reformed church from 1790 De Fontein (Oudemirdum) National monument.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Reformed church from 1790 De Fontein (Oudemirdum) National monument.
-
- Nomination Row of trees. Location: The Famberhorst.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Row of trees. Location: The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Main Building, University of Texas at Austin, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Acceptable for QI. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 06:15, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minute Maid Park, Houston, Texas, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. - ok for me! --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Ürzig, Rathausplatz 7, Tourist-Information --Berthold Werner 18:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. A bit soft at the top, but OK. --Aristeas 09:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building with thatched roof in the heathlands on the Isle of Hiddensee --Kritzolina 08:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poule pondeuse, Cruguel, Morbihan, France --Tsaag Valren 19:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice shot! --Kritzolina 19:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
That's definitely not a rooster? Such a big crown and wattles for a hen! -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
No rooster tail, that's definitely a hen ! --Tsaag Valren 18:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western rustication portal of the Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)@Johann Jaritz: Lässt sich das Portal nicht aufrichten? Mir kippt es für ein QI zu sehr nach hinten. -- Spurzem 09:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment Das hatte ich auch gedacht, aber die Türen im Durchgang passen. Ich vermute, dass die Fassade schräg ist. --XRay 07:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Comment @Spurzem: Die Fassade des Erdgeschoßes des Landhauses ist schräg und „kippt nach hinten“. —- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sunset on amadablam from DingbocheI. By User:Nirojsedhai --Nirmal Dulal 09:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review Is this copyleft if a TV station took it?--Peulle 09:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Comment Corrected. Thank you.--Nirmal Dulal 10:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A350-1000 on flying display at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 07:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Comment The front is soft, can you apply sharpening? --Cvmontuy 13:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Done --MB-one 11:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry is not sharp and it has an halo, but please feel free to discuss to get more opinions --Cvmontuy 01:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Airbus A350-1000 on flying display at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 07:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Young mother and newborn infant sleeping on a bamboo bed near a campfire in the room of a house in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 12:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhododendron "H. Halven" blossom in Dendrological garden in Průhonice, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 23:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 18:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Sangu Wildlife Sanctuary. By User:Foysal Mehedi --RockyMasum 09:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Looks tilted --Poco a poco 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Insufficient quality. Not done. --Moroder 03:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination North-Eastern shore of lake Baikal. Russia, September 2014 --Veteran hiker 09:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Bent horizon --Poco a poco 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Not done. --Moroder 03:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Dream pass to the South. The North-Chuyskiy ridge, Altai. Russia. August 2012 --Veteran hiker 08:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Artifacts/noise in some areas, fixable --Poco a poco 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Not done. --Moroder 03:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western pylon of Köhlbrandbrücke in Hamburg --MB-one 16:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion It is hanging to the right and IMO the shadows are too strong --Michielverbeek 05:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
No reaction within a week --Michielverbeek 05:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Done fixed both. --MB-one 07:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Good quality now --Michielverbeek 07:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spondylus varius. FredD 12:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Review: It has quite a bit of noise. Vincent60030 15:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Support IMHO the noise level is OK for this difficult kind of photography. Feel free to send the image to discussion. --Aristeas 09:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anemone on Beshtau mountain, Russia by Ganzikov --Ludvig14 08:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
It is probably Anemone narcissiflora. I recommend you to crop for the plant --Zcebeci 12:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I think so, I've corrected --Ludvig14 07:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC) - Good quality. --Elryck 06:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
_at_Reykjavik,_Iceland.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]File:Yoneshiro_River_from_Yoneshiro-Shinbashi_Bridge.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination 秋田県能代市、米代川。米代新橋より上流方を望む。En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:掬茶 --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Blown parts --Podzemnik 01:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I disagree , only one small defect : a very small white strip in th lower right corner --Celeda 07:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Podzemnik, probably fixable if it was shot with RAW Poco a poco 12:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → 
Declined --Peulle 13:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Peulle 13:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:Iglesia_de_la_Soledad,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_65.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Church of Loneliness, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 15:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think this is sharp enough for a 2020 photo of a church interior. -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- ...with extreme poor lighting and were tripods are not welcome Poco a poco 20:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Therefore, it may be a useful VI if it's best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan. --Smial 19:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Peulle 07:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:Burwood_Anglican_Cemetery,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand_04.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Burwood Anglican Cemetery --Podzemnik 10:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose I disagree. Belle photo mais je trouve que la présence du bâtiment à gauche déséquilibre l'ensemble. Peut-être qu'en rognant un peu à gauche et en centrant sur l'allée principale, l'image serait bien meilleure ? --Elryck 13:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly OK and good quality. Elryck, you can make those kinds of high-level critiques of compositions at COM:FPC. Here, unless a composition is really bad, it's fine, and I don't see how the building is a problem. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support As above with the "unsubstituted signature". For me is it QI -- Spurzem 06:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, nice colours and light. --Aristeas 08:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --Peulle 13:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Peulle 13:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:Mainspitze_LSG.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Ginsheim-Gustavsburg, Mainspitze --KaiBorgeest 21:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose overexposed and very much haze --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am sorry, that the air has been hazy that day, but where exactly is it overexposed? --KaiBorgeest 21:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nothing is overexposed. QI for me. --Palauenc05 09:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Ich verstehe die Kritik nicht. -- Spurzem 20:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Moroder 05:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Leinleitertal_trocken-20200403-RM-165039.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Dry valley above the Leinleiterquelle --Ermell 07:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose composition, main object in background, no horizon --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree. --Ermell 15:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Not an interesting photo, but the technical quality is good --Michielverbeek 05:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, composition is acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Obige Kritik verstehe ich nicht: Im Wald ist oft kein Horizont zu sehen. -- Spurzem 11:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition is uninteresting. The image lacks sharpness: the grass in foreground and the trees in the background. Given the static subject, a smaller aperture would have given greater DoF. Not a QI. --Tagooty 09:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality and an adequate representation of the suject. --Aristeas 08:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 13:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Peulle 13:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:Carcasse_de_planeur_utilisé_par_les_Nazi_02.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Vassieux en Vercors, glider used by Nazi--Celeda 08:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I think we should discuss this one. I'm not sure the camera can handle QIC standards; the glare from the flagpoles give off CA, and there is a general lack of sharpness and detail in the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peulle (talk • contribs) 10:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Poco a poco 09:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Removed, signature missing. --Palauenc05 09:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment restored after looking for the authorship of the comment in the history. It took me 30 seconds to find the author as the time window between Micheilverbeek's and Spurzem's comment was pretty short Poco a poco (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Removed, signature missing. --Palauenc05 09:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Spurzem 10:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of detail, overexposed (the texture on the bottom "shelf" can only be seen from the shadow of the edge, otherwise it looks flat white), CA. --Trougnouf 11:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC))
- Oppose I agree with Trougnouf. --Augustgeyler 11:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't understand where the problem is with this photo. The subject, the glider is sharp. In fact the photo is much better than reality because that day the light was very violent, the wind too--Celeda 09:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sure that the UNSIGNED comments (in addition to this one is, for a part, off topic and at the limit of correction) MUST BE DELETED. Trougnouf, could you please, write: 2 support, 2 oppose.--Celeda 07:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- First time ever I see that unsigned vote is just discarded instead of looking for the author. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 11:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose due to lack of detail and overexposed areas, the compo is good here, though Poco a poco (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 13:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Peulle 13:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:Mont_Blanc_Panorama_beschriftet.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Labeled 360° panorama from Mont Blanc --Capricorn4049 04:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. Special!--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Very instructive from a prominent mountain. Surely it made a lot of work and sweat. It is a Valued Image. But technically it doesn't reach the QI bar in my eyes. The horizon is rather bent and it´s not very sharp. Sorry. --Milseburg 16:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Sharp enough regarding the resolution. --Smial 11:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Smial: The bent horizon never mind you? --Milseburg 14:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- I do not own a 41:4 wide screen tft. Watched at standard screen at full height the waves are not disturbing. --Smial 09:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose It is a Valued Image. But due to the lack of sharpness it doesn't reach the QI standards.--Augustgeyler (talk) 22:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support good work. sharp enough regarding the resolution.--Staublex 10:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Iglesia_de_San_Juan_Bautista,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_72.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Church of John the Baptist, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 08:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Problem with vertical lines, sorry --Celeda 09:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- I see no problem here, your comment is not specific enoug --Poco a poco 11:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Poco a pcoco, really you dont see that the vertical lines are not parallel ? and horizontal lines not horizontal ? --Celeda 06:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC) *:Sincerly sorry if I could seem rude. I'm not young too and English is not my language. I don't like your photo, it hits me, maybe because I worked as a mason. Be pleased, my wife like it!--Celeda 07:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep cool Celeda, in spite of my age, I've no problem with my vision, if that's what you suggest. I've applied a slight tilt (0,3 degrees) and perspective correction (2). I mostly agree that verticals should be vertical, but why should horizontals be horizontal? that depends of the POV Poco a poco 11:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment When looking up, the human eye expects some vertical distortion. So if the effect is corrected by the book, it may be measurable perfect, but it can look disturbing. Expecially, if it is combined with an uncorrected (small) cushion distortion, as here. So by correcting this and staying a bit under the perfect vertical lines, this could look more harmonic. I know, it's not easy to find the perfect compromise, where the necessary remaining small vertical distortion is so unremarkable that not any grumbler (or personal opponent) will even try to measure and find out it's not 100% vertical ... --PtrQs 12:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Poco a pcoco, really you dont see that the vertical lines are not parallel ? and horizontal lines not horizontal ? --Celeda 06:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC) *:Sincerly sorry if I could seem rude. I'm not young too and English is not my language. I don't like your photo, it hits me, maybe because I worked as a mason. Be pleased, my wife like it!--Celeda 07:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I see no problem here, your comment is not specific enoug --Poco a poco 11:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I think this meets QI requirements. --ReneeWrites 11:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose due to distortion --Augustgeyler 08:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I’m old and don’t see all that distortion.--Moroder 15:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I do not have any problem with distortion here. Perspective correction, as applied correctly here, has its tradeoffs with respect to visual impression. But this is not disturbing here. What keeps me from supporting the image is that it looks rather dull for such a presumably high-contrast scene. Even on the white walls the upper RGB values are not used by the JPEG file and shadows look as if overly brightened up in post processing. I would support, if you could correct this and adds some contrast. --Johannes Robalotoff 07:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Johannes Robalotoff: I've increased the constrast a bit Poco a poco 16:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. It is slightly better now. But since there is still a region of nearly no pixels at the upper as well as at the lower end of the histogram, even a simple one-minute curve correction could make your image look much more brilliant without losing detail in the shadows or highlights. I could show you, but do not know where to upload such a sample. --Johannes Robalotoff 08:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Johannes Robalotoff: I've increased the constrast a bit Poco a poco 16:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support As noted above, I was not happy with the verticals. But a closer inspection showed that the walls of the left gate are, whilst those of the main tower are partially leaning back a bit. So so problem might be rather architectural. --PtrQs 23:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas 08:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 13:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Peulle 13:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:2017-08-27 Icelandair Douglas DC-3 (TF-NPK) at Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Icelandair Douglas DC-3 (TG-NPK) at Reykjavik Airport, Iceland --GRDN711 14:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose The angle gives the impression that the fence and the airstrip descends to the left. I agree it is not a big problem. But i was thinking that the pictures must be perfect!? --Celeda 06:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I don't see the buildings leaning to the left. For me it is a quality picture, although the sharpness might be a bit better in a larg view. -- Spurzem 17:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Every single fence post is straight. I do not understand the problem. --Stepro 14:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Celeda: @Spurzem: @Stepro: @PtrQs: Went back to the RAW image file and made tweaks for perspective and CA correction. Please review to see if this is more acceptable. --GRDN711 15:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Due to the f/5.6 still not as sharp as possible, but all the other flaws are gone now. --PtrQs 21:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose For a Quality picture an historic airplane should be taken without a fence in front and disturbing background. Perhaps this is a Valued picture... --Augustgeyler 22:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Augustgeyler, mir fällt auf, dass Du an ungewöhnlich vielen hier vorgestellten Foto etwas auszusetzen hast und sie aus kaum nachvollziehbaren Gründen für unbrauchbar erklärst. Warum soll zum Beispiel ein historisches Flugzeug nicht auf einem Flugplatz hinter einem Zaun und vor Gebäuden stehen dürfen? Ich sehe nichts, was stören könnte. Das Bild passt absolut zur Bildbeschreibung. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 19:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Per Spurzem --Palauenc05 09:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Too blurry at the front of the plane. --Johannes Robalotoff 07:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. --MB-one 11:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 07:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Peulle 07:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)File:War_cemetery_for_World_war_II_on_the_cemetery_Kalksburg_in_Vienna,_Austria-large-grave_stone-right_detail_PNr°0617.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination The cemetry for the fallen russian soldiers of the second world war on the cemetery Kalksburg in Vienna, Austria --D-Kuru 22:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion leaning to the left --Celeda 16:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC) I was wrong, in fact it's the wall that goes up to the right, sorry--Celeda 06:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
I just checked this file and I disagree. GIMP shows that the gravestone is not leaning to any side. @Celeda: May you can explain a bit more. --D-Kuru 20:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC) - Comment I know Austria and Vienna were divided in 4 zones until 1955, but Nikolai Vaselivich Borobev did not die in WWII. He died in 1950, which is clearly marked on the grave. Maybe he died of disease or accident during the occupation. Seven Pandas 21:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- As far as I know soldiers who died in the war were burried in mass graves most of the time (sometimes single graves eg. for officers). Soldiers who died during the occupation of Austria (from 1945 to 1955) were also burried in these war cemeteries, but got a single grave (The full mass grave can be seen here). I think this is such a case here. This soldier died during the occupation time and he was burried here and got a single grave. --D-Kuru 22:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support That's what I figured. This is a good documentary photo. Seven Pandas 20:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose technically it can*t be seen as a quality picture due to the sunlight and its very low contrast--Augustgeyler 08:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Lightning is acceptable, although the OOF foreground is a bit distracting. Still a QI for me. --C messier 16:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 04:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 07:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Peulle 07:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)