Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 05 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:EIBAND'S_--_Galveston.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination An apartment bldg in Galveston on the National Register of Historic Places --Jim Evans 20:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • The photograph should be improved. Shadows are too dark and sharpness could be better. I'm not sure, but IMO there are JPEG artifacts too. Please improve the categorization. And please add the EXIF data. --XRay 06:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done opened shadows & pushed the sharpening a little more. I tend to over sharpen so I'm reluctant to push. Jim Evans 14:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Shadows are better now. But please have a look to the "EIBAND'S" sign. It's unsharp and it looks like JPEG artifacts. And please improve the categorization. --XRay 04:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment See what you think. If no one reviews this does it just die on the vine? Jim Evans 16:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I think it's better to discuss this image. --XRay 04:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for this version. --XRay 14:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Please give a reason Jim Evans 20:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay, who gave reasons above. -- Ikan Kekek 22:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Neutral In this photo, noise, noise reduction, contrast compensation, and sharpening struggle violently with each other. I do not like such treatments, as there are oftenly denoised image parts next to relatively low-contrasted, noisy image parts and areas that appear blurred next to image parts that look oversharp. Thereby, the whole image impression appears to be unbalanced. Viewed individually, all this probably doesn't contradict the QIC criteria, and the picture is certainly printable in A4 size or larger, but for me, as an old slide photographer, it doesn't look like a photo anymore. Please do not consider this comment as a personal attack, hundreds of such reworked photos are and have been promoted on QIC. It's probably the spirit of the times and I just wanted to moan a little bit. --Smial 22:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 12:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Unterzettlitz_Kapelle_Herz_Jesu-20190217-RM-160239.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chapel of the Heart of Jesus in Unterzettlitz --Ermell 08:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Carschten 08:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
    •  Comment It is just before sunset. The WB is correct.--Ermell 16:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question Is the WB okay? --T.Bednarz 13:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Carschten and Ermell's explanation. Very sharp, big, nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 12:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support as Ikan said. --Aristeas 10:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Tournasol7 16:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 12:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_basking_of_Choaspes_stigmata_Evans,_1932_–_Branded_Awlking_WLB-NEI_DSC_4533.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing basking of Choaspes stigmata Evans, 1932 – Branded Awlking --Rahulbiswas29 16:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood Quality -- --Fischer.H 17:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. over-saturated --Charlesjsharp 20:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chroma noise, lack of detail --A.Savin 14:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 12:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)