Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 12 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lesser_black-backed_gull_Morocco.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lesser black-backed gull in Essaouira harbor, Morocco. By User:Elena Tatiana Chis --Reda benkhadra 23:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment good quality but  Question shouldn't the horizon be horizontal? --Trougnouf 00:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  • The sea leans down on the right. I'm not sure if that's normal when the camera is pointed towards the right (from some very basic home experimentation it's not) or caused by camera tilt, and whether that needs a correction (which can definitely be done, File:Trougnouf's sandbox.jpg) either way (hence the question). --Trougnouf 16:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @Trougnouf: Yes, you're right: by comparing this image with yours, it turns out that in the original there is an inclination of the horizon on the right, what to do in this case, upload your image? --Reda benkhadra 23:40, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  • The version I had in my sandbox was just a proof of concept (tight crop and not perfectly aligned), I overwrote the original with a better alignment and cropped more to the left instead of close to the foot, I hope that's OK otherwise feel free to revert or redo.
  •  Support --Trougnouf 23:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Basotxerri 15:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support -- DerFussi 09:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Eger_JM_9.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church in Eger, Hungary. --Johannes Maximilian 23:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry I think there is too much of a blurry plant in the foreground --Trougnouf 18:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Smial 09:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Trougnouf. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support good enough -- DerFussi 09:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 13:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Guti_Wat_Rachathiwat.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sermon hall of Wat Rachathiwat, Bangkok. --Supanut Arunoprayote 14:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Billy69150 10:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Roof looks as distorted as it does in the other image (and see other photographs of this building; that is not how it was supposed to look --Daniel Case 20:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Daniel. --Peulle 08:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support This is usual ultra wide angle perspective. I don't like it. But QI has tons of images with much more strange perspective (corrections), so I don't understand, why this one should not be a QI. Nevertheless somewhat too high color saturation. --Smial 10:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Too distorted. -- Ikan Kekek 20:55, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose in my eyes too distorted. --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
  • weak  Support as Smial -- DerFussi 09:35, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)