Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 26 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:View_of_Stockholm-170349.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from Stockholm City Hall, Stockholm, Sweden. --Josve05a 04:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong oppose. Insufficient quality. The alignment isn´t correct. And it´s full of artefacts. Especially the sky is very noisy. --Milseburg 13:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg. -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Milseburg.--Peulle 15:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img2 Amtsgericht.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Senftenberg (Brandenburg): courthouse --A.Savin 10:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The lens flare in the sky should be removed IMO--Ermell 10:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't understand the objection and hereby ask for third opinion. --A.Savin 22:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support ... as I can't see any lens flare. @Ermell: Could you mark the lens flare with a note, please? This could make me change my mind and would help to fix the image if necessary. Thanks in advance! --Basotxerri 08:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks Johann Jaritz for the note. --A.Savin 09:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
U r welcome A.Savin-- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Johann Jaritz! I thought it was a cloud --Basotxerri 17:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Ermell 10:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Very good now. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 16:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)