Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 21 2021

• 
  • Nomination Pont de L'Aqueduc --Wilfredor 03:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Charles Cemetery --Wilfredor 03:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Different dice of a set (D4, D6, D10, D12, D20) --XRay 03:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Sharper --Wilfredor 03:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opencast lignite mine “Garzweiler” as seen from the Jackerath viewpoint, Juchen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice environment --Wilfredor 03:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail view of Romanesco broccoli (Brassica oleracea) --XRay 03:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Please make the specie name in italic --Wilfredor 03:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acrylic paint in the Künstlerhof in Lavesum, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Colorfull --Wilfredor 03:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia. Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Ok to me --Wilfredor 03:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A stalactites cave in Shoushan National Natural Park. --和平奮鬥救地球 03:00, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline Striking composition but not good enough quality at 50%, and as an aside, Category:Nature of Kaohsiung is COM:OVERCAT since the park is in Kaohsiung. -- Ikan Kekek 03:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Sankt Veit from castle ruin Taggenbrunn, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle in Niederosterwitz #1, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building in Reipersdorf #16, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fingerposts on Seeberg-Bundesstraße in Unterbruckendorf, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The view of the CN Tower with the building located at 315 Front Street West.--Maksimsokolov 02:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of St. Andrew's Church in Toronto, Canada. --Maksimsokolov 02:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (RV) of Eisenach (1921): Luther as a pupil sings in Frau Cotta's choir. --Palauenc05 20:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boller Wasserfall. (By PantaRhei) --Geoprofi Lars 20:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porte d'En-Bas (Pérouges) en avril 2021. --Benoît Prieur 18:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historical building Krahnenstraße 38 (1713) in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eclectic villa, Rue de Verdun 50 & 52, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 17:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Train Station in Bad Bodendorf. (By Schattenweid) --Geoprofi Lars 17:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support IMO OK. A little bit more space at the bottom could be better, but it is acceptable. --XRay 17:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stein am Rhein (Switzerland): Bay windows and cantilever signs. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fields at Stormossen in Sipoo, Finland --Ximonic 14:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Katronträsk in Sipoonkorpi forest, Sipoo, Finland --Ximonic 14:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The entrance to the Holy Trinity Church in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baroque building Krahnenstraße 39 (18^th century) in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 12:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anser cygnoides --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Some space from the top should be cropped out. --Ermell 19:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pond in Park Bellevue during Bürgerfest des Bundespräsidenten 2019 --MB-one 10:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on Colmar station (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 10:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on Colmar station (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on Colmar station (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hydroelectric power plant in Marckolsheim (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Santo Domingo Convent in Buenos Aires --Ermell 06:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 07:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ of the Christ Church in Kirchrimbach --Ermell 06:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 07:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ in the Catholic Monastery Church of the Nativity of Mary in the Monastery Village in Scheinfeld --Ermell 06:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kanzel in der katholischen Klosterkirche Mariae Geburt im Klosterdorf in Scheinfeld --Ermell 06:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Christuskirche in Kirchrimbach --Ermell 06:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Édouard Herriot depuis la rue des Rondes (Pérouges) en avril 2021. --Benoît Prieur 06:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vineyard with vineyard cottage, Weingarten, Baden, Germany --Llez 05:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Saint Peter church in Lodeve, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 05:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-Rouergue, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in commune of Vézins-de-Lévézou, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Saint Baudilus church in Soumont, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 05:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2021 Mercedes-Benz CLA 220d Estate 2.0 Front Taken in Stratford-upon-Avon --Vauxford 23:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2021 Mercedes-Benz CLA 220d Estate 2.0 Rear Taken in Stratford-upon-Avon --Vauxford 23:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower in Schwarzenberg Castle in Scheinfeld --Ermell 07:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Noise in Sky and Dark areas --IM3847 09:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 14:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --IM3847 21:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building La Coupole, Avenue de la Marne 2, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 06:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The verticals are right but the perspective looks strange. Sending the metadata is always polite and helpful. --Ermell 07:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
    Thank you for your review, but could you be a little more specific about the strange perspective ? I uploaded a new version with EXIF datas (I finally found a way to transfer them after using hugin to correct perspective) --Velvet 17:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
     Support The building looks like it is expanding upwards. There have been many discussions here about this type of perspective correction. But added meta it is ok for me now. --Ermell 06:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luchi, potatoes cooked with just calonji and green chilli and Rosogolla. By User:Nilanjan Sasmal --Bodhisattwa 14:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good quality. @Bodhisattwa: Please add more specific categories for the different items. --Tagooty 09:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC) @Tagooty: , specific category added. -- Bodhisattwa 04:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
     Support Thank you. Good quality. --Tagooty 02:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taraxacum officinale, dandelion in Mar Chiquita, Argentina --Ezarate 12:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Nice composition, and lighting. --Smial 23:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zima w Parku Sieleckim w Sosnowcu w 2021I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stimoroll 15:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice shot, but looks oversharpened. Maybe fixable? --Rhododendrites 03:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fiskaregatan street name sign in Vaxholm, Sweden --Reda Kerbouche 09:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial view of Almería. --Kallerna 06:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Villaviciosa de Córdoba --Kallerna 06:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Upper shopping malls (GUM) --AlixSaz 07:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Is it tilted, or does the building really lean that way? The noisy lack of detail at the far end is very distracting at full size. As I'm not sure whether that was caused in post-processing, I'm not sure if it can be fixed. --Rhododendrites 14:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination I apologize, the image is really poor quality.--AlixSaz 19:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination High-rises in Givatayim. By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit hazy. Could you apply some dehazing? --Tuxyso 19:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Because of the dew it is not clearly (the white rings at the base of antannae-Glieder also being weak), but I would say there is no white border along the elytral sutura, so it won't be cardui. I would say it is Agapanthia cynarae, but I would not bet on it. There is a key hereDone —Ynhockey 13:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
     Support To get things going (the discussion on this photo is stuck now for quite some days) I promote this photo because IMHO it is OK. If you object, feel free to change to ‘discuss’ --Aristeas 06:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
    IMHO better, now. Thanks Aristeas for promoting. --Tuxyso 06:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Marcq_maison_rateau_199_rue_de_la_rianderie.jpg

• Nomination The former Maison Rateau, Clinique du Croisé-Laroche, Rue de la Rianderie 199, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 06:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion Good image, but in my opinion the gate in the foreground should either be completely in frame or not at all. What do others think? -- Discostu 12:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The bottom and right crops are not ideal, but I think it's quite likely that if the photo were shot from the other side of the gate, it wouldn't be possible to get the entire building in the frame. I also think backing up would worsen the image, as more of the building would be blocked on the left and eventually the right. But did you really want to require a majority vote in Consensual Review? An alternative would have been not to vote and to just leave a review (which happens when you post a comment without changing "Nomination"), letting someone else make a decision. I'd rather just promote. If you disagree, Discostu, I think you should oppose. -- Ikan Kekek 01:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes Ikan Kekek, the gate is framed by walls, on the right and on the left. However, Discostu did not change review to discuss; I did, assuming it was implied by the question at the end. Was it a misinterpretation ? --Velvet 06:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

There was no need to do that. As long as no-one opposes, you can leave the status as is (Nomination). I would have simply changed the status to Promotion. -- Ikan Kekek 20:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality and composition. --Tagooty 09:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
• I did not change "Nomination" to "Discussion", someone else did it after I added my comment. -- Discostu 20:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

• Yes, that was explained above. It didn't occur to me that the nominator would have done so. I started a thread at Commons talk:Quality images candidates#Confusion over the use of "Discuss" to see if we might remedy that. -- Ikan Kekek 20:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --LexKurochkin 19:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Umbrella_Pines_Vatican_Gardens_Rome_Sep19_D72_11717.jpg

• Nomination Umbrella pines (Pinus pinea), Vatican Gardens, Rome --Tagooty 02:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose strong halo effect, dark shadows. --Kallerna 08:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Kallerna: I have brightened the shadows. There is slight white fringing along the right side of the trunk -- is this the halo you mentioned? It is now slightly reduced, though I am not able to eliminate it totally. --Tagooty 08:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Looks pretty good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan --Moroder 06:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 16:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support After the changes it is really good now. --Aristeas 06:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Adra_1.jpg

• Nomination Aerial view of Adra. --Kallerna 06:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality for an aerial photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp for me,please discuss --Commonists 17:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Sharpness is imho good enough for such a shot. However, I am unsure if the image would need some CCW rotation. --Smial 12:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment QI but it needs better categorization --Moroder 03:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Yeah, I agree. -- Ikan Kekek 09:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I've temporarily rescinded my supporting vote. Kallerna, please work on the categories. -- Ikan Kekek 02:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I added a category --Christian Ferrer 20:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks, Christian. I've restored my supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek 20:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --LexKurochkin 19:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)