Commons:Deletion requests/Flight Warsaw-Chicago 2009

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Flight Warsaw-Chicago 2009|year=2024|month=December|day=03}} to the description page of each file. Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Flight Warsaw-Chicago 2009|plural}} ~~~~ Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Flight Warsaw-Chicago 2009}} at the end of today's log.

Flight Warsaw-Chicago 2009

• File:Warsaw-Chicago 05 - 600h into the flight.JPG
• File:Warsaw-Chicago 06 - 600h into the flight.JPG
• File:Warsaw-Chicago 07- 600h into the flight.JPG
• File:Warsaw-Chicago 08 - 600h into the flight.JPG
• File:Warsaw-Chicago 09 - 600h into the flight.JPG
• File:Warsaw-Chicago 10 - 600h into the flight.JPG
• File:Warsaw-Chicago 12 - 600h into the flight.JPG

The above images are from this odd category. Other quality images from this category are moved into relevant subcats of Category:Aerial photographs. These images are either out-of-focus, distorted, unrecognizable or is blocked by dirt/marks on the aircraft shutters (as this was taken from an aircraft). Rehman 03:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

• Have you notified the uploader? Trycatch (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Oops! Just did. Rehman 09:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

• If you can show me that those very same landmarks have been photographed in a higher quality, I'll support the removal. If not, I think that it is better to have an imperfect, free photo of something than none. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep per User:Piotrus. Trycatch (talk) 00:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Delete - what landmarks? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Imo out of scope, unusable. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

---

These look to me to be ice floes and ice crystals, but even if they are, in fact, land, they are unidentified and unidentifiable, so out-of-scope. Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)