This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
{{copyvio|source=https://www.paulweiss.com/professionals/partners-and-counsel/kannon-k-shanmugam}} White whirlwind (talk) 04:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Note: his current photo at Paul Weiss is a crop of this one, it used to be this full one in the past. White whirlwind (talk) 05:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SS. The file contains a screen shot of en:BigBlueButton an free and open-source software distributed under LGPL and user content distributed under CC-BY license. This seems correctly licenses to me so I am trying to understand which part is A1Cafel objecting to and I think what ever the issue it it can be corrected without the speedy deletion. Jarekt (talk) 13:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that part was covered under GFDL/CC-by-4.0, although it is unclear to me who is the photographer in case of screenshots of web conferencing software using web cams. Usually the person pressing the button is the photographer, which to me sounds like the person taking the screenshot, which would be Bert Niehaus; however I am not sure how we dealt with this in the past. In case that is a static photo taken by someone else we would need permission from them. Bert, can you tell us if the image is an user provided photo or a shot of a webcam? Also is that you in that photo? --Jarekt (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We made an oral examination testbed with BBB and I took the screenshot during the testing for documentation in the learning resource in Wikiversity. It was not a real oral examination during COVID-19. I am sitting in front of webcam during the screenshot and I allow also me be visible in the screenshot of BigBlueButton. So what else can I do. I even ask Fred Dixon as a BBB developer to provide an extra permission for taking screenshots of an OpenSource software. I used OpenSource software to document oral examination to avoid any licensing issues of commercial software. --Bert Niehaus (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete This is a derivative, photoshopped work of a Marvel Comics original work. See search results. There is a claim this belongs to "THE BOTS COMICS INDIA Pvt. Ltd.", when in fact it belongs to Marvel Comics. Blatant copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete It has a duplicate. However I am not sure of scope, to RD the other file. Is he a junior politician of Bharatiya Janata? E4024 (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not an "own work", like other uploads by this user. Maybe it can be re-licensed for old age, but I have no idea where this was grabbed from. E4024 (talk) 00:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Questionable "own" claim. Photos have a metadata which start with FBMD, and that indicates it were uploaded from Facebook before contribution here. Микола Василечко (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Historical photo, painting, coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Where does the viciousness to the Santo Domingo region come from? To this image here, I too did not know how to place the author and the source in this image, and even so they do not erase it. None of all images are protected by copyright, and they are in the public domain, however there are users who do not support the city of Santo Domingo, but they can have an image of Virgen del Cisne in Commons. Instead of helping, it is easy to send to delete. By the way. When it is not own work, or don't have a correct license, there is another template, and a maintenance process, but it is not sent to delete. --Berposen (talk) 01:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I do not exist. Berposen does not exist in any lake. I won't get credits for something. From my IP, and from the comfort of my home, I have only fed all this time with information, within my region, every time I get a little time. --Berposen (talk) 01:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my ability no longer helped me correct the following:
You all excuse me my ignorance, and my lack of interest, if not I tell it's laziness, this is the best I can do, I retract my words, so far I do not learn. It was the fever of the moment. kind regards.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
削除 Copyvio; This photo contains FBMD as its metadata and is strongly supposed to have been imported from Facebook without eligible permission by a new user. 毒島みるく (talk) 23:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Duplicate of File:Amazon logo.svg with an incorrect aspect ratio (it's stretched vertically). Sometimes it's useful to have multiple versions of the same logo, but I can't imagine a realistic educational use for an incorrect version. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete: I had previously nominated another very similar image which ended up being deleted. The keep argument doesn't prove that the campaign's sent image is in fact a free image. Username689219:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
You cannot DR for "scope" files which are in use; although of course I have no idea if it was already being used at the time you opened the DR. regards. --E4024 (talk) 20:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Update: With the exception of Commons, the user has had their creations deleted and has been blocked on those local projects where they occurred. Quakewoody (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Redundant and unused. I doubt any of wiki projects will ever use hard-to-update "day-per-day and history-type COVID-19 progress maps" like this, and as of this writing many external sources are not using Wikimedia Commons-provided maps, but rather are producing their own maps, like en:Channel NewsAsia or Earth Shaker Philippines. If a useful progress map is needed, there are .gif type maps that can be used. Or make a gif type map showing day to day (or other day to other day) progress maps. Its relative lack of usefulness is demonstrated by its idleness (not being used) for more or less 3 monthsThis deletion discussion is also in accordance to, and per precedent with, Category talk:Maps about the COVID-19 pandemic. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)15:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep No humans are depicted. In the United Kingdom, privacy is a personal right deriving from Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. No decided case in English law, which is derived from that Article, has ever stated, or even opined, that it applies to buildings. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Being a picture of a private residence isn't a reason for deletion. I don't think there's anything in this image that could plausibly be considered private. --bjh21 (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unused personal photo, depicted woman is unknown, even country is unknown. Small size, no metadata. That way the photo is out of project scope due to weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Der Uploader ist höchstwahrscheinlich nicht der Autor, da er diesen als unbekannt bezeichnet. Daher passt wohl CC nicht. ペーター (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Dear ZelenkoThe text in question (La Musifiaba) is not of dubious fame, perhaps it is for those who are not compententent on the subject of musical notation, but it is a contribution made by me personally who am a musical instrument teacher with 31 years of experience in high schools of first level
And anyway, if you are not able to appreciate this kind of work, I have called the experts, or don't waste your time. But if you don't like it, I'll take it off the wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nephes (talk • contribs) 19:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is the first deletion request I have responded to ever on Commons so I don't know how to contest the PCP claim for deletion on those marked own work which are of course my own work. The proof of release for the rest under CC-BY is here (in swedish): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vindskydd_i_Norden
Hej jag är aktiv inom Wikidata och OpenStreetMap och brinner för öppen data och delande av information.
Många av vindskydden i gruppen har nu kommit med i OpenStreetMap vilket är jättebra. 😃
Nu tänkte jag ta nästa steg och lägga upp bilder m.m. i Wikidata för varje vindskydd.
Jag har skrivit en kommentar på ett gäng inlägg men det är inte så effektivt.
Jag tänkte att alla som instämmer i följande kunne gilla detta inlägg och därmed ge sitt samtycke?
"Jag samtycker till att släppa text och koordinater i alla mina inlägg och kommentarer i denna grupp som CC0 och bilderna som CC-BY 4.0"
Jag kommer undvika bilder eller dölja ansikten. Om du inte vill ha ditt namn som författare på bilderna på Wikimedia Commons med bilderna då kan du släppa dem som CC0. Kommentera här eller skicka mig ett pm i så fall i stället för att gilla. På wikidata kommer inga namn nämnas eftersom det inte behövs vid CC0.
På förhand för ditt bidrag till fri kultur!
Rough English translation:
Hi I am active in Wikidata and OpenStreetMap and am passionate about open data and information sharing.
Many of the shelters in the group have now been added to OpenStreetMap, which is great. 😃
Now I was going to take the next step and upload pictures and more to Wikidata/Commons for each shelter.
I've posted a comment on a bunch of posts but it's not that effective.
I thought anyone who agrees to the following could like this post and thus give their consent?
"I agree to release text and coordinates in all my posts and comments in this group as CC0 and the images as CC-BY 4.0"
I will avoid pictures or hide faces. If you do not want your name as the author of the images on Wikimedia Commons with the images then you can release them as CC0. Comment here or send me a pm if so instead of liking. On wikidata, no names will be mentioned as it is not needed for CC0.
Thanks in advance for your contribution to free culture!
I have not substituted the template on all the image files as I don't know how to do that in bulk, could you fix that @Gbawden: ?
I have not emailed OTRS as I'm not sure it is needed when the proof of release under CC-BY is now public as screenshots (see link above). Maybe its a bad idea to publish peoples names and public profile photos like that? In that case I can send the proof to OTRS and mark them for deletion.
I of course encourage people in the group to upload themselves to Commons, but many of them seem unwilling to do so for reasons I fail to understand.--So9q (talk) 00:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination: Deleted all files from facebook, kept the rest; @Uploader: Please send permission statements for the facebook images via email to COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Still(s) or screenshot(s) from a 2002 horror movie. Clearly such use is a form of fair use. Per Commons:Licensing, fair use files are not allowed on Commons.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
'West Frisian pronunciation' is already in use. The official ISO name is 'Western Frisian' though. 'West Frisian' is a *Hollandic* dialect! PiefPafPier (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Duplicate (or near duplicate) of File:Trattner.jpg, same image, two different authors both claiming 'own work'. Both authors only have this single upload dating back in 2013 and never showed up again. So the second image also is questionable. Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unclear copyright situation. As source we have „Self-scanned, LOK-Report July 2020“. Was this report published under a Creative Commons license? Is the uploader, the person who scanned this image, the original photographer? If yes, the it is okay! 24.134.87.20507:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Good evening from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I bought these cookies and I could taken a farther, farther De Minimis photos, but I took closer, hence I left the matter to the sound discretion of Commons regarding the deletion, and very sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
oppose The Wikicommons logo at top left is a graphic. The photo I took is of a chemists.... its not a graphic. There is no rationale Victuallers (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This has not been my experience on Wiki. 3D art is FOP in the UK, and a contemporary oil painting left in the street for a few minutes isnt, but we have had Banksy all over Wiki. My understanding is that Graffiti and street art are intended to be shared. Victuallers (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Are you absolutely sure about this? If so then the Category:Murals in the United Kingdom and its content should be deleted, which doesn't seem rightArdfern (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Are you absolutely sure about this? If so then the Category:Posters of the United Kingdom and its content should be deleted, which doesn't seem right Ardfern (talk) 23:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Are you absolutely sure about this? If so then the Category:Posters of the United Kingdom and its content should be deleted, which doesn't seem rightArdfern (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Die vier o. g. Bilder wurden anlässlich des Tags des offenen Denkmals 2018 in Dresden in der 1. Etage der 49. Grundschule „Bernhard August von Lindenau“ in Dresden aufgenommen. Das farbige Bleiglasfenster „Die friedliche Eroberung des Weltalls durch den Menschen“ (Kosmonautenfenster) von Klaus Dennhardt war an diesem Tag für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich und damit auch für die Wikipedia-Öffentlichkeit fotografierbar. --SchiDD (talk) 11:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Öffentliche Zugänglichkeit müsste im Sinne der Panoramafreiheit dauernd gegeben sein; die gilt für Innenräume in Deutschland aber nicht. --Martin Sg. (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
despite this being "released" on the website of the subject in the image, it seems unlikely that they would even have the rights to release this image considering it's a screenshot from a television network which does not indicate that this is actually public domain. Praxidicae (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Rijksoverheid's CC0 license was excluded since August 2015. Unfortunately images published in or after August 2015 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement.
Keep Those are stills made by me out of a video. The exclusion for videos was not after Augustus 15, but after 17 October 2018. Also explained in the license template: "A general CC-Zero permission for all work on the website of the Dutch national government (www.rijksoverheid.nl) has been granted unless otherwise noted, with the exception of photographs published after August 2015,[1] and with the exception of videos, infographics or other images published after 17 October 2018.[2]" --Hannolans (talk) 06:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Rijksoverheid's CC0 license was excluded since August 2015. Unfortunately images published in or after August 2015 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement.
Keep Those are stills made by me out of a video. The exclusion for videos was not after Augustus 15, but after 17 October 2018. Also explained in the license template: "A general CC-Zero permission for all work on the website of the Dutch national government (www.rijksoverheid.nl) has been granted unless otherwise noted, with the exception of photographs published after August 2015,[1] and with the exception of videos, infographics or other images published after 17 October 2018.[2]" --Hannolans (talk) 06:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete: there is no evidence this map was even released placed in the public domain by Irish Rail or that the uploader is the author as claimed. Ww2censor (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Do not oppose - have educated myself re COM:FOP. For the record elements of the photographed work are derived from CC-BY works by the New Zealand Government, but unattributed. Quilt Phase (talk) 20:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Do not oppose - have educated myself re COM:FOP. For the record elements of one of the photographed works are derived from CC-BY works by the New Zealand Government, but unattributed. Quilt Phase (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This picture is claimed as own work and in use. This picture is unlikely to be own work of the person that uploaded it, and very likely to be the work of Jacques Tardi, who is the creator of the comics about Adèle Blanc-Sec. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davv69 (talk • contribs) 10:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
--Davv69 (talk) 10:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep per Commons:De minimis. "Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject." Central subject of file is the school and the sign on the gate per description Quilt Phase (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: I agree that we might be able to apply de minimis here. The murals take up a lot of space but they're not the main subject, they're 2 and one of them is cropped. Debatable though but I think it'd be good to keep this as a borderline example for Category:New Zealand FOP cases/kept which is empty at the moment. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
"Small penis" and "porn" difficultly go together well; but we have too many of these unused OoS files, therefore Delete. --E4024 (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Note to admins: Maybe User:DKHayek may look like a new user to some of you, but in the past also images of this gentleman with his small organ were added here and then asked to delete, under similar user names. Therefore either the person himself is moking Commons or someone else is trying to embarrass him. Whichever may be the truth, all these files and following DRs are trolling, IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 01:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Note to Admins" : from User:DKHayek I am a new user. I am also a nudist that happens to have a smaller than average penis. I have post this picture of myself in the nude with a flaccid penis. The purpose is for those that also have a small penis to not feel ashamed. This is IMHO educational and not porn. I am not showing an erect penis.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Hard to tell if we don't know what the threshold is. Whatever it is, the information gleamed from this should be added COM:TOO so it has less chance of happening again. I'd be surprised if there wasn't past deletion discussions about works created in the Philippines. If so, that might be an avenue to get more information. Although it would probably have to be directly related to logos or at least works of art, but probably logos. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any past deletion discussions myself from a basic search that would be relevant. Although, it does seem to be about 50/50 as to if the file was deleted or not, and none of the delete reasons I saw had anything to do with the threshold of originality. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Taken from a book published in 2017. That book states clearly (in chapter 1) that the photo has been reproduced "(Courtesy of M. Alain Croce)". I doubt this makes the photo a free one. The Banner (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Owning what might be the last physical copy of an iconic public domain image entitles the owner of that copy to a certain amount of courting, and respect. They could, after all, destroy the image, or choose not to let it be reproduced. Republishers routinely credit the owner of that physical copy, as above "courtesy of Joe Blow". The often elderly owners of these pictures may be left with the impression that they own all rights to the images. They don't. I have encountered this before literally dozens of times with {{PD-USGov-Military}} images.
Experienced commons contributors should not mistake this kind of courtesy credit for a claim either the owner of the physical copy or the republisher can claim intellectual property rights on the image.
The Mont Blanc's explosion killed almost 2,000 people, in what has been described as the largest man-made explosion prior to the Atomic bomb. It is taking the precautionary principle to bizarre lengths to suggest no one ever published photos of the ship in the first one hundred years since the explosion. Geo Swan (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I challenge your characterization that the book "states clearly" that anyone is claiming this 120 year old image is protected by copyright. I think you are taking the precautionary principle too far. Geo Swan (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Svetlov Artem as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Это выглядит как скан из книги: вверху номер страницы, внизу номер страницы, и вообще виден типографский растр. Тем не менее, написано что это "собственная работа"Svetlov Artem (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Picture not taken by the Author. I took that picture and two others at the same time. The person who uploaded it stole the picture from another website 82.13.0.22513:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, photo uploaded in February 2017. TinEye or Google Imagesearch do not show any web sites using this photo before that date. You still have the option to file a DMCA takedown request, please see Commons:Contact us/Problems. Thuresson (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This building was constructed in 1938. Its main author, Daniil Fridman, died on August 31, 1950. His works in Ukraine will become PD in less than half a year. His co-author was a certain Leonid Metsoyan whose life dates are unknown. If he lived longer than Fridman, all the files in Category:Central Universal Department Store, Kiev have to be deleted, not only this one. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As far as we know nothing of Metsoyan we can safely assume that he can be among 30 million people killed by Nazy or Soviets inbetween 1938 and 1945.--Brunei (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No, it seemed like the images was uploaded as a jpg instead of as a video on accident. If not, I am sorry, but I have run across many of them recently. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The toys are not recognisable as a special type of bear (no Paddington, no Mickey Mouse, etc). They're just general bears, sitting in windows, in European countries with FOP. Ciell (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, people in the Netherlands were asked to put teddy bears in their windows for small children (who were allowed out of doors, but preferably with adut supervision) to "hunt". Any bear spotted this way would count as a "bear caught". These three bears are from our own collection. In fact, this is a picture of our own front window. The blue bear and the panda are over thirty years old, and have been called up for active duty on our becoming grandparents. The small one is a souvenir form a trip to Canada some 20 years ago.
I really don't see why this picture should be deleted. This is just a way of recording for posterity a small detail in the Corona crisis in the Netherlands. MartinD (talk) 12:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should also keep in mind that these toy bears have had a hard time during the COVID-19 crisis. Normally they live indoors, in the company of their owners. Suddenly, they were put in windows and subjected to roving teams of bear hunters. This must have been very stressful for them. I recently met a toy bear living in Zaamdam, about 58 years old, who was quietly enjoying his retirement on the top of a drawer, and suddenly was called up for duty and put in a window. He really looked battle-scarred: frayed fur, one eye missing, one ear hanging by a few treads... I do think that these pictures should be kept, if only to honour their contribution to keeping up the spirits of the Dutch children during the crisis. On behalf of the Society for the Protection of Toy Bears, MartinD (talk) 08:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The owners of the bears depicted in the picture put up for deletion, my grandchildren, have, through their mother as their legal representative, authorized me to issue the following statement: "Two months have elapsed since our teddy bears were accused of having committed a breach of copyright. Since then, no further steps appear to have been taken by A1Cafel. We think that our bears are entitled to a fair trial in an open court, with an impartial judge and a jury of their peers. We urge A1Cafel to either issue a writ against our bears, or drop all charges. The bears continue to plead not guilty to these charges, protest the defamation of their reputation, and will defend themselves in court." On behalf of the Justice to Teddy Bears Campaign, MartinD (talk) 07:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[outdent] Commons:Derivative works says (on utilitarian articles) "only elements, if any, which can be identified separately from the useful article as such are copyrightable". If I interpret that correctly, these bears have no element separable from their utilitarian use of comforting children, as in the duty they now are called up for. –LPfi (talk) 09:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per COM:TOYS and COM:UA, and due to the low quality of the cleaning of the window glass. Comforting children is not a utilitarian function according to US law. But I thank the bears for their service, and their families for their purchase and care of the bears. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me14:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Jeff G. – I know intuitively it feels very wrong, but the rules are really clear here. IANAL, but as far as I understand, it does not really matter whether the bear represents a well known character like Winnie-the-Pooh or just a generic toy bear. It also doesn't matter who designed or produced it, unless it's something like an old original en:Margarete Steiff design (then it may be out of copyright due to age). Ownership doesn't entitle you to create publish a derivative work (here: photograph) of it either, just like with a book or piece of music you've bought. As far as I understand COM:FOP Netherlands, {{FoP-Nederland}} does not apply either, as a) the bears are almost certainly not located in those public windows permanently, and b) toys do not seem to be among the types of work that qualify for FoP in the first place. And yes, unfortunately, that means that many of the files in the event's category have to be deleted as well. --El Grafo (talk) 10:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep These seem the sort of generic designs for which little to no originality would apply, and the news aspect is more than enough to justify it. And if the news aspect doesn't justify it, then how do we justify pictures of consumer tech? Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: "News aspect" may (!) work for local files at Wikinews, but not for Commons. We justify pictures of consumer tech with COM:UA. COM:TOYS makes very clear that this does not apply to toys (unless they are below the threshold of originality, which is not the case for stuffed toy animals → see below). --El Grafo (talk) 13:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is no contradiction. Copyright protection absolutely includes stuffed toy animals, but as with everything else this only comes into effect when they are sufficiently original. These bears are not. Guido den Broeder (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Guido den Broeder: Let me rephrase that question: how do you determine that these bears are not sufficiently original to be copyrightable under US law? Is this based on anything other than personal opinion? Because then we should probably adjust our rules and guidelines for this topic. Unfortunately, actual case law seems to be pretty sparse in this direction. So maybe we should start looking elsewhere – how are professional image repositories handling this? I'll start: A quick search led me to a blog post about "150+ Things You Can't Show in a Commercial Stock Image" that includes Stuffed Animals & Toys, elaborating:
"The majority of stuffed animals & toys have copyright protection."
"Isolated images are unacceptable for commercial use unless a property release is obtained." (we don't care about this)
"Images are acceptable where the toy is incidental to the composition." (would be fine here too → de minimis
Here are some reports from photographers who got their submissions rejected from Shutterstock because they contained stuffed bears (mildly NSFW, contains pictures female buttocks): [1]. But these examples are both old, maybe better to have a look at the actual rules the companies use today … --El Grafo (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Logo AlfaRomeo 1982 2015 original@Ytoyoda: this Badge is an original Sparepart for an 1983 Alfa Romeo (please see serial-Nr. on the backside), and my personal property. I shot the photo by myself. The background is the surface of my writing desk, - and I think it could be nobody's intention to publish the picture in that way... Best regards,
@Auge=mit: This is a textbook case of COM:DW. If you take a picture of a copyrighted logo, you can license the photo however you want, but the rights to the copyrighted element still belongs to the whoever owns/created the logo. You own the rights to the photograph and the physical object, but Alfa Romeo still retains the rights to the logo. It's the same way I can't take a photograph of a famous painting and claim that I own the rights. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep This deletion request is nonsense. The logo of Alfa Romeo is just a combination of elements of the coat of arms of Milan and the coat of arms of the Duchy of Milan. Both used elements are centuries old. Thus the logo is clearly de-minimis. Chaddy (talk) 18:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Chaddy: I don't think we're using the same definition of Commons:De minimis here. The logo is the only graphical element in this image, so I don't know how you can argue that it's de minimis.
Oh, you are right according "de minimis". I didn't want to refer to that but to threshold of orginality.
But back to what I want to say: The logo only consists of already known heraldic elements. Also the combination of these two symbols isn't a creative enough effort to reach the threshold of orginality. The stylization doesn't matter that much when it is up to heraldic elements. Heraldic elements rarely have an exactly determined appearance. They rather base on a blazon, a text description. The person that creates a coat of arms has some freedom in how exactly he draws it. But it is not important in heraldry how exactly the symbols look but what they represent. Of course the Alfa Romeo logo is not a coat of arms but a logo. But it still has the function to represent the city of Milan and the old Duchy. Chaddy (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ytoyoda, okay, I understand what you mean. I would lie, if I say I'm happy with that, but I have to accept... I like to inform you, that there is a third Alfa Romeo-badge, that got a “make-over” by myself... best regards, --Auge=mit (talk) 09:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment: I don't know what do you mean with "watermarks and uploader has not proved ownership". In my knowledgment, Daddy Yankee YT channel is a verified account and this video has an acceptable license for our purposes in accordance with this part and this one. And finally, watermarks are: typography —which is simple text— of his tour and his official YT channel icon. Maybe, it could be uploaded without the icon or edit that part?. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Здравствуйте, уважаемая коллега PlanespotterA320. Я не очень понимаю, зачем вы выдвинули этот файл на удаление? Это изображение мною было вырезано из следующего изображения. Сделано это было для этой статьи. Нужно было изображение Алексия в сане патриарха — в куколе, а были изображения Алексия только в сане митрополита — в митрополичьем клобуке. Это было давно, когда я писал статьи в Википедии , еще до моей бессрочной блокировки там. Если вы считаете, что это изображение нарушает авторские права, то мне возразить нечего. Единственная просьба, если возможно, заменить это изображение на любое другое Алексия, но только в куколе. Wlbw68 (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wlbw68: There is no evidence that this photo meets Commons licencing requirements. Do not worry that we will be without a photo of the person in question though. Before filing this deletion request I found a public domain photo-portrait of him that is better than this one (File:Патриарх Алексий I.jpg, published in Izvestiya February 1945 without attribution per PD-Russia-1996). I see no reason that we should insist on keeping File:BASA-1735K-1-410-2-Патриарх Алексей Симанский.jpg considering the low quality and insufficent sourcing for copyright reasons when we have a better photo available with a much safer copyright status. I have already put Патриарх Алексий I.jpg in the infobox of several articles and will continue to do so to streamline the deletion nomination process of the other low-quailty insufficiently sourced questionably licenced photos of Patriarch Aleksey I. Soon all the bad copyvio images will be replaced by the image with a confirmable publication. There is no need to panic here. This is a good thing.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Если вы, PlanespotterA320, хотите заменить на это изображение, то оно не годится, здесь Алексей в сане митрополита — в митрополичьем клобуке. Нужно изображение Алексия в сане патриарха — в другом головном уборе — в патриаршем куколе. Это как погоны у военных, сколько звезд — такое и звание, так и здесь: какая шапка, такой и сан у человека.Wlbw68 (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons does not allow exceptions to basic licencing rules on the grounds of wanting different photo of someone showing their higher rank. Church ranks bear no relation to Commons:Licencing. Fact remains that there is no evidence that this photo is allowed on Commons, and the need for a photo of the Patriarch with a certain rank does not magically change the licence it is currently under or render it permissable for Commons. If you really want a freely licensed photo of the patriarch with a specific rank, you should find the copyright holder of a photo of him that you like and ask them to release it under a permitted licence via OTRS. I contend that it is still better to use a quality photo of someone with a lower rank in an infobox than a photo of them with a higher rank that is lower quality, but that has nothing to do with the fundamental fact that as far as we know this photo cannot be on Commons.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is evidence that the photo is permitted on Commons: The Bulgarian Archives State Agency only digitized works they determined to be not covered by copyright, the work was digitized, thus the Bulgarian Archives State Agency determined that the work is not covered by copyright. We normally (safely) assume such institutions know what they're doing absent at least some evidence to the contrary (see, e.g., {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}) because they are more knowledgeable about the background of each photo (and often the laws that apply) than we are. Absent any reason to believe that the Bulgarian Archives State Agency was wrong in their determination that this work is in the public domain, it should be kept. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Digitization of a photo is not sufficient grounds to consider a photo safe for Commons. We need proof that this file fits the requirements of a permitted Commons licensing tag, and right now, it is abusing the PD-old tag despite not meeting the tag's requirements.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Just because the institution let you scan them does not mean they are allowed on Commons. Did the institution release them under a permitted creative commons licence - and if so, why was that not mentioned in the file information? The only licence indicated did not correspond to the source of the photo given the lack of early enough publication for it to be PD. If photos from the institution were released under one of the CC licences permitted by Commons, then it should be made very clear on the file pages. But if not, then either an early enough publication to be PD must be found or the photo will have to be deleted - even if the photos were provided to you. Please read Commons:Licensing. Remember, Commons does not allow fair-use - a copyright holder/photographer/institution simply letting Commons use a photo is not enough, the photo(s) must be under a specific licence permitted by Commons.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is evidence that the photo is permitted on Commons: The Bulgarian Archives State Agency only digitized works they determined to be not covered by copyright, the work was digitized, thus the Bulgarian Archives State Agency determined that the work is not covered by copyright. We normally (safely) assume such institutions know what they're doing absent at least some evidence to the contrary (see, e.g., {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}) because they are more knowledgeable about the background of each photo (and often the laws that apply) than we are. Absent any reason to believe that the Bulgarian Archives State Agency was wrong in their determination that this work is in the public domain, it should be kept. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Digitization of a photo is not sufficient grounds to consider a photo safe for Commons. We need proof that this file fits the requirements of a permitted Commons licensing tag, and right now, it is abusing the PD-old tag despite not meeting the tag's requirements.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain as required by PD-RusEmpire (nor any evidence of qualifying for any PD-Russia tag) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Just because the institution let you scan them does not mean they are allowed on Commons. Did the institution release them under a permitted creative commons licence - and if so, why was that not mentioned in the file information? The only licence indicated did not correspond to the source of the photo given the lack of early enough publication for it to be PD. If photos from the institution were released under one of the CC licences permitted by Commons, then it should be made very clear on the file pages. But if not, then either an early enough publication to be PD must be found or the photo will have to be deleted - even if the photos were provided to you. Please read Commons:Licensing. Remember, Commons does not allow fair-use - a copyright holder/photographer/institution simply letting Commons use a photo is not enough, the photo(s) must be under a specific licence permitted by Commons.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is evidence that the photo is permitted on Commons: The Bulgarian Archives State Agency only digitized works they determined to be not covered by copyright, the work was digitized, thus the Bulgarian Archives State Agency determined that the work is not covered by copyright. We normally (safely) assume such institutions know what they're doing absent at least some evidence to the contrary (see, e.g., {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}) because they are more knowledgeable about the background of each photo (and often the laws that apply) than we are. Absent any reason to believe that the Bulgarian Archives State Agency was wrong in their determination that this work is in the public domain, it should be kept. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That does not compensate for the lack of required publication information or release by copyright holder. Either the museum should share the information about publication that would render it PD (if true), or release it (if they are the copyright holder), or else it will have to be deleted. "Somebody digitized it and assumed it was PD" is not a Wikimedia-compatible licence.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Digitization is done through a legal document - a formal agreement that allows digitized photos to be used on Wikipedia. Any other suggestions are inappropriate. Please withdraw your offer to delete, because you have no reason to claim the deletion of photos from the State Archives of Bulgaria! --Spasimir (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Documentation simply allowing photos to be on Wikipedia is not sufficient. Copyright holders must release them under one of the few specific Commons-compatible licenses available (one of the permitted CC licences, NOT fair-use, NOT general use permission), and there is no evidence of that being the case.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The file STILL has the Anonymous-EU licence tag, which is completely unsupported given the lack of required publication information. In order to be permissble on Commons, the file MUST have an acceptable licence tag that is compatible with the circumstance of the file, but it does not appear that the file meets the requirements of any such tag given how doubtful it is the file is actually permissible on Commons. Whatever the result of this nomination, the Anonymous-EU tag MUST be removed because it is a groundless claim unsupported by publication information required for use of such tag.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: it is highly unlikely that this photo has not been distributed in the 19th century; it is highly unlikely that this photo is not in PD. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Are you absolutely sure about this? This is part of a mural, but could also be called graffiti. If you are right then the Categories:Murals in the United Kingdom and Graffiti in the United Kingdom and their contents should be deleted, which doesn't seem rightArdfern (talk) 23:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This looks like a case of License laundering, but the video linked above dates from 2018-02-25 while our source is dates 2018-01-06. On the other hand, the video has an "OKG" watermark and the "OKG Green Baby" channel has many older videos in the same style. --bjh21 (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Данное произведение находится в общественном достоянии в России в соответствии со статьей 1281 книги IV Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации № 230-ФЗ от 18 декабря 2006 г., статьями 5 и 6 Закона Российской Федерации № 231-ФЗ. от 18 декабря 2006 г. (Закон о введении в действие книги IV Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации).
This work is in the public domain in Russia in accordance with Article 1281 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006, Articles 5 and 6 of the Law of the Russian Federation No. 231-FZ. of December 18, 2006 (the Law on the Entry into Force of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). - Лариса94 (talk) 08:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete I also see other matching results at Google Images. This is definitely a copyvio and not own work. --pandakekok9 03:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete This is a derivative, photoshopped work of a Marvel Comics original work. See search results. There is a claim this belongs to "THE BOTS COMICS INDIA Pvt. Ltd.", when in fact it belongs to Marvel Comics. Blatant copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Support Should be deleted for above reasons. Bibeyjj (talk) 18:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment It's possible that the poster here falls under {{OGL3}}. --bjh21 (talk) 10:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020070510002278 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![126 File:Флаг "группы Чарли".jpg](#File:Флаг_"группы_Чарли".jpg){kind=link}
_der_globalen_COVID-19-Verbreitung.png){kind=link}
_Opernsängerin.jpg){kind=link}
![150 File:"only these followers...".jpg](#File:"only_these_followers...".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Феодор_(Поздеевский),_Сергий_(Страгородский),_Ювеналий_(Масловский),_Алексий_(Симанский),_Корнилий_(Соболев).jpg){kind=link}
_(0,40_seg).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_на_2-м_курсе_Московской_Духовной_академии.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1913.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy keep This deletion request is nonsense. The logo of Alfa Romeo is just a combination of elements of the coat of arms of Milan and the coat of arms of the Duchy of Milan. Both used elements are centuries old. Thus the logo is clearly de-minimis. Chaddy (talk) 18:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Oppose There is evidence that the photo is permitted on Commons: The Bulgarian Archives State Agency only digitized works they determined to be not covered by copyright, the work was digitized, thus the Bulgarian Archives State Agency determined that the work is not covered by copyright. We normally (safely) assume such institutions know what they're doing absent at least some evidence to the contrary (see, e.g., {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}) because they are more knowledgeable about the background of each photo (and often the laws that apply) than we are. Absent any reason to believe that the Bulgarian Archives State Agency was wrong in their determination that this work is in the public domain, it should be kept. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
