Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 21st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: an a clear copyright violation. JuTa 10:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

valle de san fernando 187.144.229.57 02:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

??--TUBS 06:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. Wereldburger758 (talk) 06:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep Probable mistaken nomination, no valid deletion criterion cited. Storkk (talk) 09:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion given. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hashmat.merzad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons is not a personnal web host for selfies, Out of project scope :) PierreSelim (talk) 05:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hashmat.merzad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 17:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blocked undef. for spamming. Yann (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this File 123.211.61.74 06:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alwaysbd7849 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has uploaded a lot of band press photos and posters, three of them plainly watermarked, but all uploaded as "CC-By-SA own work". I assume they've all been lifted from different websites.

McGeddon (talk) 11:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely seems to be at least some licence and author falsification e.g. File:Super Seven S7.jpg apparently ripped from [2]. Also see edits by w:User:Taufik1306ID1 e.g. [3] [4] Dl2000 (talk) 22:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 October 21#File:Tripp Eisen.jpg. English Wikipedia upload is from 2008, Commons upload from 2015, and the uploaders differ. Stefan4 (talk) 22:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal drawing INeverCry 19:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - scan of old BnW photo dated 1930s - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SARL PEINTURE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web resolution, no EXIF. Dubious own work.

Stefan4 (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios / advert Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says © Daniel Roos Ariam (talk) 09:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Diego Grez-Cañete as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Featured article's picture's copyright status is unclear.

Unclear sounds line a DR and not a speedy. Natuur12 (talk) 23:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The screenshot is easily replaceable, so, I uploaded another screenshot of another Wikipedia page (namely, Wine, rather than the Portada) until there is a new Feature Article without problems with files displayed. As the file was replaced with totally-free version (including the "winecfg" that is LGPL as part of the whole Wine), this DR should be speedy closed, and the previous version should not be deleted until the dispute of the depicted file is resolved. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still, older revisions should be deleted. Problem was that you did not provide a clear licensing statement regarding the featured article's image. Had you pointed out the license (PD-NASA), or at least the url of it, would have been enough. --Diego Grez return fire 18:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does this matter? The main subject of the screenshot is the Browser itself, and the contents of the Wikipeida are just de minimis.
There are hundred of files in Category:Wikipedia screenshots that don't have the licensing of everything depicted elements (assuming that these elements are freely licensed, and license is already accessible by visiting Wikipedia and following the link to the depicted file). However, why not nominate all of them? Don't forget that the Spanish Wikipedia uses only files from Commons, and rejected to the Fair Use; your reasoning applies only to Wikipedias that have Fair Use, the rest is just Copyright Paranoia buscarle la sexta pata al gato. See this archived threads in the Village Pump. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"There are hundred of files in Category:Wikipedia screenshots that don't have the licensing of everything depicted elements": they should. "assuming that these elements are freely licensed, and license is already accessible by visiting Wikipedia and following the link to the depicted file": usually, screenshots' contents (like webpages) are not supposed to be eternal, and so it may be very difficult to catch up with the pictures that may or may not be copyrighted. The Spanish Wikipedia rejects fair use, yes, but that does not mean you don't have to give proper attribution to images like the ones that appear in the nominated file. As for your "buscarle la sexta pata al gato" and "copyright paranoia" comments, NPA. --Diego Grez return fire 20:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is not Microsoft Internet Explorer, is Wine Web Browser, and is Free Software licensed under the LGPL (see this DR). The issue is with a depicted picture in the Wikipedia screenshot, that is being discused in the Village Pump. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Uploaded new version, again with the Wikipedia/Portada but showing the Wine license. Administrators, feel free to delete the previous versions, keeping this and that shows the Wine article. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, but I see no sense in deleting previous versions, because they do not violate copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source file from EnWiki [5] is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fair use not permitted Denniss (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from enwiki [6] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was deleted several times: 9 April 2013 [7], 24 October 2015, 27 March 2017 [8] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


ReDeleted False license claim (image is clearly not more than 70 years old) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Autobio page en:User:Panditi malhotra deleted. JohnCD (talk) 17:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to low quality making image unusable. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Image of an under-age person Shalbat (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Used for vandalism Ravave (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks indeed like vandalism, see Special:Log/Sasasaul, Special:Log/Federicojr99, Special:Log/Ghbngdfbhdfgh. --Achim (talk) 20:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 04:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsified licensing data, not a free image. Source provided by uploader makes no reference to the image being released as CC-by-SA. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pedro Renzi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvios and scanned image

Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©2015 DIGIPAS USA LLC. All right reserved. Flat Out (talk) 04:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erro no tituto Grouder Otel (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope type meme Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: larger version on instagram Gyrostat (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': larger versions Gyrostat (talk) 08:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': higher versions available Gyrostat (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: [9] Gyrostat (talk) 09:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: larger version Gyrostat (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: larger version Gyrostat (talk) 09:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': larger version Gyrostat (talk) 09:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is out of project scope, because company Encasa is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': larger version (March 8th, 2008, 07:33 PM ) Gyrostat (talk) 09:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': larger version Gyrostat (talk) 09:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': higher version Gyrostat (talk) 09:35, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, per COM:DM where (similar) File:Virgin America airplane interior.jpg "is acceptable as the copyrighted images appearing on the screens are de minimis" — but the nominated photo is focused on the screen. Gunnex (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MadelineTodea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : logo and peoples of a not quite notable company. Advertising. Unused personal images.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source and it's content are copyrighted "© 2015 Lux-Case. All Rights Reserved." http://lux-case.co.uk/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also DW of non-free content Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prolords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old picture, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the Mark Warner campaign has licensed this photo as CC, the copyright belongs to the Associated Press. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong) Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although GoIowaState.com has licensed this photo as CC, copyright belongs to the Associated Press Ytoyoda (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner) Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agerterlumun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, all other files are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atlantis Télévision (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ceccanocalcio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Smal lsize, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wellentech1981 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. Possibly not own work by the uploader. See COM:SCOPE and COM:PRP.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Files are not legitimately in use.

1989 23:26, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PDF files

I created the Cat PDF files in 2009 or 10 and most here can be put into legitimate categories. This person should have done more research WayneRay (talk) 01:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Okay, the DR has been withdrawn and I'm tempted to do a speedy close as kept but for one issue: is there any quick way I can do a mass "Kept" edit on all 418 files in this DR, or do I have to make that edit one at a time on each one?? Tabercil (talk) 04:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deletion request withdrawn by nominator Tabercil (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://images.rapgenius.com/496e56850cb79454e90f7b5072256cca.600x412x1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ianchanceelbanbuena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ianchanceelbanbuena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No clear evidence of notability, probable spam.

Ubcule (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, two logos of non-notable companies (no mention in en.wiki), but one is kept, because it is notable and even used in vi.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE eurodyne (talk) 15:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also COM:DW Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE eurodyne (talk) 15:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is copyrighted and is a registered trademark as an official logo and was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons in error. Rnd1860 (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreita.miller97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

suspested copyvios - small photos without metadata

/St1995 15:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eumol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused PDF file of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an advertisement. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be sourced to something with an ISBN, so OTRS needed. Stefan4 (talk) 16:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the opinion of this user, the following unused media do not possess realistic educational value and/or may be considered promotional material and are thus outside project scope.

Voltteri (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong photo posted Nqquan (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brasilicae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source provided, unlikely that the photographs and the artworks are own works

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Photo Posted Nqquan (talk) 16:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doodle, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper or book scan, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per num -- Geagea (talk) 00:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, from some form of avatar creator software or site. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.deviantart.com/morelikethis/118443629 Derivative work of cartoon face, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MUKESH VADIYAR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these small images are own work of uploader, more likely COM:COPYVIOs. Small sizes, no metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernando Stechinna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

screencap

INeverCry 18:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernando Stechinna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, most probably TV screenshots.

Yann (talk) 20:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anupssp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 19:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prabhusinghdarunda51 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 19:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - no evidence that this is the uploader's own work INeverCry 19:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 20:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gidilson CheZzy Official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images uploaded by sockpuppet

INeverCry 20:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heliodash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perich.Gons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 20:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francesco Consilvio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 20:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bas25511 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alcachofa138 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xalat-Eng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark says "Leandro Fotoz" but the uploader appears to be called Lucas. Does this mean that the photographer is someone other than the uploader? Stefan4 (talk) 21:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DonaldWDeLoachJr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused userphotos. Out of project scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Persons of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of not notable music group. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sports jersey, Non-free at English Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a modified version of w:File:Malayan Colleges Laguna's new logo.png where a portion of the logo has been rotated by 180 degrees. Out of project scope because of the modification. Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It served its purpose at the time that this was in the news (especially in light of the censorship taking place on Jimmy Wales' Talk page on English Wikipedia). But looking at it again, it was even pointed out to me that the diagram isn't exactly correct, in that there is no known relationship between Kate Garvey and the Belfer Center. - Thekohser (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, notice also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify relevance for Wikimedia Commons as imho very poor quality, and imho rather "out of scope" than p.e. an "educational use" related to Bangalore city, having many much better and representive images, Roland zh (talk) 18:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offense, but as per File:Bangalore - panoramio.jpg (quality and relevance), Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offense, but as per File:Bangalore - panoramio.jpg (quality and relevance), Roland zh (talk) 18:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails WP:ASTROART guideline on enwiki, also derivative work of non-free SOHO image which is also being discussed for deletion here: File:The Sun in extreme ultraviolet.jpg. --189.25.231.188 19:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio -- Geagea (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

News photo contributed by first-time contributor. Previously published in 2012 here credited to photographer Sergio Cejas. Thuresson (talk) 19:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

News photo contributed by first-time contributor. Previously published here in June 2015 credited to photographer Sergio Cejas. Thuresson (talk) 19:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same image on en.wiki shows the photographer to be Donald Camp Photography. We don't have any evidence of permission. Diannaa (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilya V Perevalov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilya V Perevalov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book or something. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doodle, superseded by many better ones at Category:Subduction. P 1 9 9   16:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep refreshingly simple, i would put it into the category. --Ras67 (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's also backwards. This shows the continental plate going under the oceanic plate which does not happen in a subduction arc environment such as implied by the volcano with the little red lines out the top. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal sketch, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsified licensing data, not a free image. Source provided by uploader makes no reference to the image being released as free use. Reviewing the upload history of Ali15uk (talk · contribs) reveals that approximately four dozen different images were uploaded by this user between 2012-2013, all with falsified or otherwise incorrect licensing data. This is the last of 2 remaining improperly licensed files. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 04:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 04:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 04:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like it's taken from the player's Facebook profile: https://www.facebook.com/MalickEvounaOfficiel/photos/pb.1785097358381556.-2207520000.1445389862./1838159663075325/?type=3&theater Ytoyoda (talk) 01:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. The artist, Jean-Michel Folon, died in 2005. BrightRaven (talk) 07:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. The artist, Jean-Michel Folon, died in 2005. BrightRaven (talk) 07:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

source: http://www.xperiablog.net/2014/07/08/sony-details-all-you-need-to-know-about-selfies-in-this-infographic

Deleted: copyvio, from internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Consists copyrighted images from a movie (Kaybedenler Kulübü). Rapsar (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is Frank Ross Photography, uploader is Leo J123. I suspect copyright violation. Frank Ross must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope imo Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is out of project scope. At least description and categorizing are inadequate. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: Uploaded by user with history of copyvio. Claimed as own work but looks like a professional promo image. Google Image Search shows similar images from a set. ed g2stalk 09:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source is here: http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/2014/top-2014-DeLorean-Time-Machine-by-Team-TimeCar.html , no indication the user is either of those people. ed g2stalk 09:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
These are other uploads from that set that I include in this nomination:

Withdrawing. Received an email from the author. Will post more details. ed g2stalk 10:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: When/if a COM:OTRS is accepted from copyright holder, these images may be restored. An email to a user is not an OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you could've waited a few days. Instead we now have a huge amount of work restoring these to various wiki after bots do their work. ed g2stalk 19:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (film cover) Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Félix Schivo is dead in 2006. No FoP in France. 85.171.93.209 09:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider the photo out of project scope. Nothing special here. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Looks like a test edit. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadiqbassam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sadiqbassam (serial copyright violator: Panoramio/etc. grabber, file cropper, watermark remover)

Gunnex (talk) 09:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is it? Unused fan art is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. It can be use on another article, because it will be original research in another context. Viuser (talk) 10:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. Viuser (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. Viuser (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. Viuser (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. Viuser (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. Viuser (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image, the article was erased. Viuser (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It can be used wrong, useless. Viuser (talk) 10:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the user's last remaining upload. It is uploaded in 2015 and claimed own work, but http://infolaliesposito.blogspot.com.ee/2014/07/9-de-julio-en-el-opera-lali-arg.html gives almost the same photo from 2014. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's clearly a copyrighted picture, as mentioned above. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My sources hit a dead end, it has some sources but not a primary source, so it could use wrong, even it is not used now. Viuser (talk) 10:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused file from deleted article. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a reconstruction from some sources, but i hit a dead end in research of a primary source. Viuser (talk) 10:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no description or information to make it usable. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the license is incorrect (dated 1986 or more recent)-it is also used in commercial documentation Donan.raven (talk) 11:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://www.charterworld.com/index.html?sub=yacht-charter&charter=sychristianne-b-1626 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this is below COM:TOO in Thailand. It wouldn't be below the threshold in most countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Magog Alan (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now missing one source image, which was deleted as a copyright violation. As the file is widely used, we may want to replace the image and just delete the old revisions instead of deleting the whole file. Didym (talk) 02:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The threshold of originality in Commonwealth Nations is extraordinarily low, almost to the point that it doesn't exist. Any creativity, including minor alterations to a single letter in a font, count as creative enough for copyright. All of these logos fall above that threshold. See COM:TOO#Common law countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Brazilian government does not release its works free of copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by the sculptor France Gorše (d. 1986). Eleassar (t/p) 11:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-GermanGov}} only applies to literary works and not to works of art like this one. Also, the claim that copyright becomes void if the publisher closes is nonsense. Liliana-60 (talk) 11:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pokéfan95 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo of a TV channel Yann (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Too complex: shadow, ... not only text Alan (talk) 22:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted Alan (talk) 22:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 15:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is claimed to have come from a field manual, the actual "source" given in the description field is Copyright © 2000-2015 GlobalSecurity.org All rights reserved. at source. At source there is no mention of the name of the field manual. Proper sourcing might prevent deletion of this image, but at present there is no indication that it was created by the U.S. military other than it's some guy in fatigues striking a pose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This older image is credited to Annaliese Beery, but the uploader seems to have no connection with nor to be Ms. Beery. An OTRS would be required for retention of the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: If you see the description closer, there says From w:en. Then, assuming that the flie was transferred from the English Wikipedia, the logs indicates that the original file was uploaded the March 6, 2006 by User:Annaliese (who don't have a global account, but Annaliese Beery seems to be very likely both the photographer and the uploader, who taken the photo in December 2005). Then, Taragui just transferred the file to Commons the May 2, 2006, and then, deleted from en:Wikipeida by User:Fran Rogers the November 5, 2007 (as file existing in Commons).
Making a Google Image Search with results filtered by date before May 1, 2006, the only results found are Wikipedia, and http://www.territorioscuola.com/enhancedwiki/, that is just a Wikipedia Mirror (namely, this result seen in the Google Cache captured in September 30, 2015, confirms that). When the oldest result is the Spanish Wikipedia (2001), the photographer did not taken the picture yet, therefore, the oldest result inside the Contextualized domain is the English Wikipedia, where the file has been uploaded first (2006).
Also, the latest activity from Annaliese (as her username) was in 2006, therefore, is very hard to get OTRS permission. But, should this EVID be enough?... --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use Alan (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE. Unused, low quality, small image with no source bot-moved from nl.wiki. It is not a duplicate of - but a lower quality image of - the same 14th century altarpiece by di Jacopo. There is additionally another image of this altarpiece in very large format photograph by a different uploader which could be adjusted to this flat view if needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Larger version available at File:Meliore, Christ the Redeemer and Four Saints.jpg and much larger at File:Meliore Il Redentore 1271 Uffizien Florenz-01.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom and cmts Alan (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 16:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this discussion. OTRS permission was granted by a person or an organization which do not hold the copyright of the image. The legitimate holder of the copyright of the image is the Comune of Legnano. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent link to the above referenced discussion. If this isn't PD for some reason, and if the legitimate copyright holder is the Comune of Legnano, then it appears we have to  Delete. Storkk (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Evidentemente l'associazione ha concesso il permesso (sicuramente in buona fede) senza approfondire adeguatamente la questione (mi aveva colpito la velocità di risposta).  Delete -- Fulvio 314 17:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per exposed arguments Alan (talk) 22:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Iran. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern fresco (Mario Lannes, d. 1983). Eleassar (t/p) 17:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, and probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - You have not specified what is "derivative" about the work. If, as I suspect, you're talking about the photographs on the document that is being punched, you're not reading carefully enough the letter of COM:DW, I suspect. Note two specific exceptions:
  1. having a subject which is a non-artistic object with utilitarian functions
  2. being freely licensed
Nominator should provide more clarification, and until then, this is a "keep". - Thekohser (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was able to assign a source to most elements of the photo, and I'm hoping to learn about the origin and nature of the Harej photo. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Harej has apparently opted not to answer. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – The nomination is probably motivated by the title of the paper being hole-punched in the demonstration. I believe that the nomination of this file for deletion amounts to an attempt at censorship. The demonstration is instructive and thus suites Commons' educational mission. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the Harej photo from Thekohser's image. @Thekohser: If you wish, you may recreate your image using a free image from Category:James_Hare or its subcategories. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Michael. I will consider whether I should re-do this exercise with a free image of James Hare, given that he was personally involved in misrepresenting the openness of Wikimedia DC conferences. - Thekohser (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks. Now the derivative work issue is fixed. I am not sure it is in scope, but if someone finds this useful, fine. Yann (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me that it is eminently useful, as there is not a single photo on all of Commons of a three-hole punch being used to do what it is intended to do. There are dozens of photos of punch tools, but none actually being used. This one comes close, but it contains the "Swingline" logo on the device, which may be a usage rights problem. - Thekohser (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If one wants an image of "3-hole punching", it would be much better with a blank sheet of paper. It is quite dishonest to present this as "about 3-hole punching", where it is a disguised complain about some Wikimedia D.C. event. Just my 2 Rs. Yann (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So censorship is one of your motivations here and at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Kohs-MyWikiBiz_VIP.ogg. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Michael, could you stop nonsense, and answer on topic? Yann (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If in doubt about the relevance, keep Alan (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope Alan (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. This map is fake. Real Remezov's maps here. Draa kul (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First 3 images(inc above) are bad quality and to be totally honest are useless
The 2nd lot are extremely blurry images and would never be used anywhere.
The third lot are just useless images of coach loos & coach tvs! –Davey2010Talk 19:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0343 (9060949468).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0357 (9060948758).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0358 (9060948776).jpg

File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 (9060949106).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 RSU585 (9060949292).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0348 (9060949194).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 edinburgh coachlines PSU619 (9060948926).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 HSK954 (9058723133).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0345 (9058723697).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0342 (9060949488).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0355 (9058723079).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0350 (9058723263).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0352 (9060948966).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0359 (9060948662).jpg
File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0346 (9060949324).jpg

File:MW11HOL (12253267713).jpg
File:FUS395 (12253110825).jpg
File:MX07BVA (13133899683).jpg
File:Stagecoach fife IMAG2389 (8600199280).jpg


Deleted: per nom and no opposition after 1 week Alan (talk) 22:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: frescos in the church are work by Tone Kralj (d. 1975). Eleassar (t/p) 23:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: frescos in the church are work by Tone Kralj (d. 1975). Eleassar (t/p) 23:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to File:Meetmade startup.jpg (same uploader, same use). DS (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kejaksaan+Negeri+tampak+Depan.jpg Ilzhabimantara (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files that are not used Ilzhabimantara (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 02:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alkab as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Horrible quality, no informationen about source or author, contributor has only one edit (maybe license wrong) and better image is avaible under File:UKElogo-roed.png.. All this is correct, but the file is nevertheless usable and proposed replacement is significantly different. If the nominated file is wrong, then it should be deleted, of course. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no info about author and source, no permission for given license. Wdwd (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic use. Logo of a not notable chinese (!) website, frequently deleted on de-wp. This is not really a newspaper (as categorized) Hyperdieter (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also: m:User:COIBot/XWiki/berlinertageszeitung.de and de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/7._Mai_2007#Berliner_Tageszeitung_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29. --Hyperdieter (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: simple text logo, used in at least one wiki project. Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work in this 1965 portrait. No metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Ellin Alan (talk) 23:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunyuantechnology (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commercial material, marked (c) at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason provided that the uploader is the copyright holder. i inquired a month ago of the uploader at w:User_talk:83d40m#File:Clare_Potter_83d40m_fgi_founder_1939.jpg and his response was very vague. he said, "[This] file records indicates quite clearly that the photograph was inherited. Why would you ask me to divulge information that would expose my identity? The status of [ w:File:Clare Potter 83d40m fgi founder 1939.jpg ] is a similar situation, with the photograph being an autographed promotional photograph (distributed and published widely) given to the person who gave it to me." it is clear from this and other discussions that the uploader does not understand that just because he has a copy of the photo, he does not necessarily own the copyright. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
was incomplete DR,

request by autor user:JanB46


Kept: no valid reason for deletion given Krd 15:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemigo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both images are a derivative work of the Estrella Galicia logo. However, it should be assessed whether such a logo goes beyond the threshold of originality (I think so as it's not comprised by mere geometrical shapes)

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are derivative work of Deportivo de La Coruña logo, too. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 01:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 04:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemigo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Probably replaced with other versions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Football club logos uploaded by Nemigo

[edit]

Spanish football club logos. Even if they were handcrafted by the uploader they are copyrighted by their respective owners. Banjo (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Escudo Racing de Ferrol deseño.svg, File:Escudo Deportivo da Coruña, Riazor vesion.svg and File:Deseño Deportivo Lugo.svg, as per

they are handcrafted drawings of the "definition" of the team logos, not copied from any site. Same as what is done with galician council emblems. Copyright of the logos resides in the original images from those teams posted in their websites/shirts/etc., copyright that applies to the images themselves but not to the definition

 Keep --Elisardojm (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete File:Escudo Racing de Ferrol versión.svg and File:Escudo Racing de Ferrol.png as duplicates. Banjo (talk) 06:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Español:  Delete No es el mismo caso de los escudos de los organismos públicos (como ayuntamientos, etc). Las descripciones heráldicas de los organismos públicos son de dominio público (Artículo 13. Exclusiones: No son objeto de propiedad intelectual las disposiciones legales o reglamentarias y sus correspondientes proyectos, las resoluciones de los órganos jurisdiccionales y los actos, acuerdos, deliberaciones y dictámenes de los organismos públicos, así como las traducciones oficiales de todos los textos anteriores). Los escudos de los clubs deportivos no. Son diseños, propiedad de los diseñadores y de los propios clubs, y están protegidos por las leyes que regulan la propiedad intelectual. Los archivos cargados por el User:Nemigo son obras derivadas (véase Wikimedia:Derivative works)
--. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both arguments have their weight. I'm keeping my initial proposition as it was and abstaining from voting either way (except on duplicated files). I leave the final decision to the more experienced admins here in commons. ☣Banjo tell me 17:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Español: Los blasones de los equipos de fútbol simplemente son definiciones que luego un artista interpreta, por ejemplo uno podría ser: "cruz de Santiago con un escudo azul claro encima, dos C's dentro del mismo y encima una corona real cerrada" (definición "traducida" del blasón del Celta de Vigo: "en campo de azur, doble orla de prata aberta á sinistra que son as iniciais do Club Celta. O escudo leva de fondo a Cruz de Santiago de goles. Ó timbre coroa real pechada.") Las definiciones son tan simples que no llegan al umbral de originalidad, por lo tanto es válido hacer una versión interpretándolos y liberar los ficheros para subirlos a Commons.

Por otra parte, los derechos de autor que tienen los escudos de los equipos de fútbol se mantienen en las "interpretaciones" que hacen sus artistas de estos blasones, por eso no se pueden copiar de sus páginas web ni de otras páginas de internet para subirlos a Commons.

Y la última parte, existen también unos derechos comerciales, la marca comercial, pero que son derechos que no afectan a Commons porque no son derechos de autor. Ejemplos de estos casos los tenemos en los cientos de logotipos de marcas comerciales que están subidos a Commons porque no superan el umbral de originalidad pero que mantienen sus derechos comerciales para los usos en los que se aplica esa legislación. Saludos,
--Elisardojm (talk) 17:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

______________

Deleted not own work, no sources given. If these are indeed logos of these various places, they're not own work of uploader. If someone wishes to upload properly attibuted images with links to the license pages of the website from which they were taken, that permits Commons admins to understand the intention of the property owner. With only own work as source, these do not fulfill the requirements of COM:EVID. Deleted COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Football club logos uploaded by Nemigo

[edit]

Spanish football club logos. Even if they were handcrafted by the uploader they are copyrighted by their respective owner.

 Delete --. HombreDHojalata.talk 08:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The logos hasn't surpass the threshold of originality and them are in PD, it are only trademarks. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 12:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I doesn't make sense to have a non-original logo that does not distinguish the club from other club logos. Uploader claim to be the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 20:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Recht am eigenen Bild von Jan-Peter Frahm liegt nicht vor. Personenfotos dürfen nur mit Zustimmung es abgebildeten hochgeladen werden. {{No permission since}} (no/missing permission, Recht am eigenen Bild verletzt, 2015-06-15) 188.109.145.19 16:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No violation. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture has been uploaded without portrait rights after he passed away. Before he died, Jan-Peter did not give the permission for this picture. The picture has been proposed for deletion but was kept with the following argument (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Jan-peter-frahm.jpg): "Zur Erklaerung: Das Bild wurde von Flechtenmikroskopie 2014 aufgenommen. Es liegt nahe, dass dieses Bild a) auf oeffentlichem Grund und b) mit Einverstaendnis gemacht wurde. Prof. Frahm sieht nicht ueberrascht aus, sondern als wenn er absichtlich hat fotografieren lassen. Augenscheinlich sind Prof. Frahm und der Fotograf zumindest entfernt bekannt, Einverstaendnis offenbar gegeben." When I translate the important part into English, it says that "it seems that the permission has been given" and that "he did not look surprised as if he wanted to be photographed". But - as explained above, this is not the case. Furthermore, a person that would like to be photographed, would look into the camera and not into another direction with a 'grumpy' expression. In addition, this picture is not the whole photograph but an extract from a photo showing much more than Jan-Peter Frahm itself. Also if the argument of permission / portrait rights is not valid in some countries outside Germany, there are more reasons for deleting this picture: This picture shows the person with a rather 'grumpy' expression. One would certainly choose another picture for upload. Besides, persons that knew Jan-Peter Frahm also know that he did not like to be photographed during his life. So I would like to ask to respect his wish also after he passed away. If someone insists on uploading a picture from Jan-Peter, a much more appropriate picture could be found. So I would like to ask to delete this picture. Thank you very much in advance. 2001:638:505:102:0:0:0:90 06:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The original photographer should comment this. I've notified him. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Das Foto entstand bei einer Exkursion 2013 in Nitztal, Rheinland-Pfalz. Wir hatten uns hin gesetzt und was gegessen, dabei hatten wir gesprochen. Auf dem Bild sind ursprünglich noch zwei weitere Personen. Ich hatte nur den Ausschnitt heraus genommen. Es war eine Runde Diskussion wenn man so möchte. Es gibt sogar ein Gruppen Foto, wo wir nur zu Weit weg stehen, da hat er auch dabei gestanden. --Flechtenmikroskopie (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag, ich weis das der Sohn das Bild nicht sehr Vorteilhaft findet und möchte es gerne gelöscht haben. Ich habe nichts dagegen und würde vielelicht der Bitte nach kommen. --Flechtenmikroskopie (talk) 08:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Flechtenmikroskopie, hast du ihm denn damals (oder später) gesagt, dass du das Foto gern veröffentlichen bzw. für die Wikipedia verwenden würdest? Falls ja, wie hat er reagiert? Falls nein, siehst du eine Chance vom erwähnten Sohn ein "besseres" Foto zu erhalten? --Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ob ich Jan-Peter gefragt hatte oder nicht, kann ich heute echt nicht mehr sagen. Sein Sohn hatte mich mal angerufen, aber leider habe ich keine Daten. --Flechtenmikroskopie (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
O.k., wenn das so ist, haben wir auf Basis der de-Rechtsprechung zum Recht am eigenen Bild keine Wahl, sondern müssen löschen, zumal das Foto nur auf :de gebraucht würde.  Delete --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion --Krd 16:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Søren Johansen, see [10] Dansker (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This halftoned image looks as if it were previously published, but is claimed own work by uploader although rephotograph may be theirs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator's stated position. MBisanz talk 01:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Photographer as no source (No source since). Copyright violation "ArcGIS" . Please read terms of use The Photographer (talk) 13:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't use anything related to do with an ESRI map!!! The shapefiles and other stuff are done by myself, I just use the software to map my stuff... why is it a copyright violation??? It's like if someone will delete a picture you uploaded just because of Copyright violation of "Canon" --Gabrielsanchz (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please read Licensing Terms of Use of data images used in ArcGIS, and in consequence ESRI terms of use. --The Photographer (talk) 17:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't see where I have violated the rights? If so, please show me exactly where... and how can I do then, if a lot of maps done here are partially made with ArcGis or other software... Should I put this etiquete? {{Igen|Arcmap|n|+}} --Gabrielsanchz (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The software is not the problem, the problem is the data source map used, I can use Gimp, Photoshop or whatever software, however I cant edit a image copyrighted with this software and upolad that here --The Photographer (talk) 10:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Using ESRI's ArcGIS software to produce maps is fine, so long as all datasets, including basemaps, are the work of the uploader, public domain, or freely licensed. This map appears to make use of a terrain map based on an elevation dataset that does not appear to be public domain or freelly licensed. —RP88 (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The threshold of originality in Commonwealth Nations is extraordinarily low, almost to the point that it doesn't exist. Any creativity, including minor alterations to a single letter in a font, count as creative enough for copyright. All of these logos fall above that threshold. See COM:TOO#United Kingdom.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, "minor alterations to a single letter in a font" is not nearly as true as you suggest, as we discovered with the BBC logo. These are PD except possibly some with extra fancy gradients.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 03:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What have German and Italian Logos to do with the Copyright of the Commonwealth Nations? Neither Germany nor Italy are Part of the Commonwealth! They are using their own copyright acts, realating to the European Union and their national law. And reflecting to that, it isn't a copyright on that logos, cause the logos are from low geometric shape or design. So turn down the deletion request for that kind of Logos. You cannot argue with the restrictions of Commonwealth on German and Italian Logos.  Keep 46.142.63.76 eh? 16:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and restore File:Sky Logo 2004 Transparent.png which was speedied by BrightRaven (talk · contribs) --SVTCobra (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The source country seems to be the United Kingdom, and as we know from this case, a very simple modification to a letter is sufficient to attract copyright protection in the United Kingdom. These logos contain a lot more complex text modifications than the logo shown on the mentioned page, which the British court found to be copyrighted. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stefan2 ... that's for commercial use of a logo. --SVTCobra (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about? The page I linked to discusses the threshold of originality of the United Kingdom, and mentions a case where the depicted logo was found to be copyrighted. Commons can only accept files which can be used for both commercial and non-commercial purposes. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I did not speedy-delete File:Sky Logo 2004 Transparent.png: I deleted it when closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sky Logo 2004 Transparent.png. BrightRaven (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, BrightRaven. Either way, I don't agree that it should have been deleted.--SVTCobra (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It seems to me that Magog and Stefan are correct. The UK has a really low TOO and therefor we just have to assume that they are copyrighted per com:PCP. Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The museum releases the content of their website under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.[11] On the description page of this item no mention of copyright exists. However, the artist Wiegman died in 1963, and it is not plausible that the museum owns the copyright of this item. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep A Dutch museum indeed has released the image under CC-BY-SA, and if there is any problem with the license, they are the first responsable here. Why nominate such an image based on a hunch? Is it our task to supervise musea and their CC policy? An other thing is, that objects of applied art don't fall under copyright according to American copyright. Yet this doesn't seem to apply to images, which can be seen as a separate part of the object of applied art. Now we are dealing with a tile here, which is produced in large series. yet it is inconclusive whether or not the image on the tile should be considered as separate image. -- Mdd (talk) 13:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I do agree with the nominator that there is reason for concern here. Now I just noticed in a different case (with some similarities), see here, there is a specific licence designed, which actually gives the institute the benefit of the doubt. I think this should be the prefered attitude here as well. Yet, an additional tag could be designed for this kind of situations, for example also requesting: Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined.... -- Mdd (talk) 20:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete There are certainly many situations where the museum may have the right to publish photos of this artwork under this license, as if the author have legally bequeathed these rights to the museum at his death, unfortunaly we have no evidences thus I would apply the precautionary principle. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I contacted the museum. Unfortunately, they do not have a record of a copyright assignment from Piet Wiegman to the museum. While any creative expression unique to the photo itself is CC BY-SA 3.0 NL, it is nonetheless a derivative work of a work protected by copyright until January 1, 2034, and thus non-free until January 1, 2034. —RP88 (talk) 09:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]