Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/11/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 3rd, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from a CD cover BrightRaven (talk) 15:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyvio BrightRaven (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a personal photo gallery, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foi mal postado e esta incompleto Droid is my life (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Non-sense (and possible vandalical) Deletion request on a page under Commons: namespace. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope / unclear copyright status.    FDMS  4    23:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold There might be permission, will have to translate it …    FDMS  4    00:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: "My works on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Diego_Weissel".    FDMS  4    15:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santos Henriques Maia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Santos Henriques Maia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Jehovah’s Witnesses brochures. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santos Henriques Maia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some unknown persons, see description, not used, some homepage pictures

Motopark (talk) 06:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name is incorrect (Portuguese error) and there is another similar picture, with the same resolution, uploaded by the same author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zimbres (talk • contribs) 2014-11-03T10:51:32‎ (UTC)


Deleted: as duplicate of File:Passeio Publico main Gate.JPG and redirected. JuTa 21:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no me gusta Nunewu (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zekeskull (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web harvests

Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyrght violations. JuTa 21:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Symbol Nichtionisierende Strahlung.PNG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worse version of Heptan.svg, unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, replaced by a corrected vesion by the same uploader. Leyo 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-01T11:56:11‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-01T11:56:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-01T11:56:22‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedy|permission error}}. Rahulazm (talk) 07:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted earlier. Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedy|permission}} Rahulazm (talk) 07:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted earlier. Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused low-quality personal drawing INeverCry 07:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal artwork INeverCry 07:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:43, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom.# Green Giant (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Nadia.dolot

[edit]

User:Nadia.dolot has uploaded huge gallery of works of artist Vladimir Kutz (more than 40 items), claiming them as "own work", however there's no evidence whatsoever to consider this user the same person as the author of these works (even of different gender as Nadia is female name and this artist is male) or anyone of his family (his wife and son's names are Irina and Dmitry) to have any right to release them under CC-BY-SA license --Tatewaki (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable individual, uploaded, presumably, for the vanity article on ru (no doubt to be deleted soon) Fred the Oyster (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, personal image, not used The Photographer (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not used, out of scope The Photographer (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload of previously deleted (and unspectacular) penis. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sechsneun Fred the Oyster (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pic of non-notable (albeit cute) individual. Out of scope Fred the Oyster (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pic of non-notable person. Out of scope Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vickyta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal CV

Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vickyta (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UllysesGordon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 01:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pic of a non-notable person (probably for the associated vanity article on ru) Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 02:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible test edit, or confusion of Commons with social media, note Description/source/Permission and etc. outside of COM:SCOPE due to lack of educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader mistaking Commons for social media, outside of COM:SCOPE for needing to realistically be useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only image, were this information needed, it could by typed in without using an image. Possible hoax edit, but out of COM:SCOPE for lack of utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imransaifi88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files

37.5.7.38 06:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless without a description (in English please) 37.5.7.38 07:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 37.5.7.38 07:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission issue Rahulazm (talk) 07:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

permission issue Rahulazm (talk) 07:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted earlier. Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the excellent essay at User:Elcobbola/Models, models are not utilitarian objects as their functional counterparts, and should be considered sculptural in nature. Huntster (t @ c) 07:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral. The essay doesn't apply here, as this model was on display in the UK rather than the US. However, as the model was not on permanent display, it (sadly) still falls fowl of the UK FoP law... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 09.2014. Architectural design of a new Brazilian shopping center. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed from Facebook and considering https://www.facebook.com/shoppingjaragua/photos/a.283317348412866.65712.228776057200329/463055417105724/?type=1&theater (2013, official FB of the related Brazilian shopping center) most likely grabbed somewhere from https://www.facebook.com/shoppingjaragua. Also available since 2013 (even in lower res) via http://www.jornalpp.com.br/economia/item/33570-shopping-jaragu%C3%A1-araraquara-concluir%C3%A1-nova-expans%C3%A3o-em-2014 = http://imgs.jornalpp.com.br/711219422d968ee532a2a298036df2e9_XL.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 08:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.7.38 09:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist Aristide Maillol is not in public domain until january 2015 and there is no liberty of panorama in France. Culex (talk) 09:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Culex: The file should be temporarily deleted. I will upload it again in January. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.bellanaija.com/tag/igosave/ (February 2014) 37.5.7.38 09:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 2014 Eric Goulard #nonverbal . All Rights Reserved. 37.5.7.38 09:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2012 Clara e Gigi Padovani , no permission 37.5.7.38 09:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You should ask the photographer for a permission (see OTRS) 37.5.7.38 10:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (9 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.7.38 10:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this Kingswood College crest as it is flawed. I would like to load the corrected crest Smutsd (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason to delete. Click on "Upload a new version of this file" below "File History" .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not supposed to host non-free fair use images (and the crest is apparently outdated although it looks the same to me on the school's website). HelenOnline 10:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have uploaded the logo currently used on the school's website (there are minor differences) directly to Wikipedia with a fair use licence. HelenOnline 10:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I have uploaded another version that was uploaded here in 2013 directly to Wikipedia with a fair use licence and nominated it for deletion here, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingswood crest 2013.jpg. HelenOnline 12:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per COM:PRP. INeverCry 04:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF: Copyright holder SARAH BRUESCHKE 37.5.7.38 10:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 37.5.7.38 11:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 03:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.7.38 11:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not supposed to host non-free images. HelenOnline 11:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded it directly to Wikipedia with a fair use licence. HelenOnline 12:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingswood College Crest.jpg. HelenOnline 12:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 37.5.7.38 11:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is an album cover, then it's not the uploader's own work and it's a copyvio. Neatsfoot (talk) 12:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's also been some "Phines West" record producer hoaxing going on at en.wiki, and I don't know if this is related - I found it when searching for more hoax material - see [1] [2] [3]. Neatsfoot (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.7.38 14:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete DW of a painting by Marcelle Cahn. Copyvio. Undelete in 2052. BrightRaven (talk) 16:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 37.5.7.38 15:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken in 1940. Own work not likely. BrightRaven (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1940 photograph. Own work not likely. BrightRaven (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1910 photograph. Own work impossible. BrightRaven (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1918 photograph. Own work impossible. BrightRaven (talk) 15:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 04:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1918 photograph. Own work impossible. BrightRaven (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is a copyrighted image, and that the uploader has no right to put it under a free license without any proof that he has the rights to do so. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tutto SoFresh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and video clips. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:VITO ALFARANO COREOGRAFO DANZATORE ITALIANO.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. UN works are no longer public domain (per the talk page on the deprecated copyright tag). Furthermore, CTBTO claims copyright on their website. AHeneen (talk) 15:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from all-idol.com

[edit]

Discrepancy in the license: at the end of the articles in the source there are both a CC-BY-2.0-KR icon and a non-free license icon. Some photos from Korean websites with the same problem were already deleted for the Precautionary principle (see here and here), so I propose the deletion of the abovementioned photos for the same reason. --Chiyako92 (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. For what I know, is automatically placed by tistory; however, the owner of all-idol.com added its own license icon, which is , a non-free one. Seeing two conflicting licenses, one shouldn't upload. --EliOrni (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


January 8 uploads

[edit]

As noted above, images from all-idol.com/all-idol.tistory.com were previously deleted because of the contradicting Creative Commons licenses. The no derivatives/noncommercial footer banner license which contracted the post license has disappeared, but it is unlikely that the terms of the photographer have changed. The blog was last updated in May 2016, but the banner was presented as recently as June of last year [4]. It is unclear what resulted in the ND/NC license (The blog owner? A tweak on Tistory's side which disabled it?). Ultimately, we don't really know, so the precautionary principle still needs to be applied here. xplicit 10:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tistory UI revamp in September 2017 removed that CCL banner, as explained at User:-revi/Tistory (it has been, for some time). Only valid CCL measurement method after then is the CCL icon in the bottom right. Anyway,  Delete. — regards, Revi 00:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

November 2020

[edit]

As above, all-idol does not actually release their content under a free license.

ƏXPLICIT 11:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: I clicked on the source in the file for the 2NE1 GD concert image, and there is a CC by 4.0 license icon? I see the threads above mentioning a second icon that is non-free but I don't see it, is this located somewhere else on the page? (I was looking at this user's images earlier today trying to find an image for an article which is why I ask) Alexanderlee (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As -revi noted above, Tistory removed the second method to license content from their blogs in 2017; it can viewed in this archived link, for example: "이 저작물은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 코리아 저작자표시-비영리-변경금지 2.0 대한민국 라이선스에 따라 이용하실 수 있습니다." This was a single notice displayed throughout the entire blog, as opposed to the only option it offers now, which is licensing through each and every blog post. ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh.. I thought that it would be ok as this file File:Kim Ji-soo at Incheon Airport, heading to Amsterdam on May 16th, 2019 21.png was used on the Jisoo article, and when I clicked on the source website a CC 4.0 icon was there but the website bottom states (C) Copyright, All Rights Reserved. My apologies! I don't want to infringe any copyright laws


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused ?logo for non-notable person Richard Avery (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity or promo image for non-notable person. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, vanity shot of non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused, somewhat diffuse, image of a non-notable person. Richard Avery (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, tiny image of logo of non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO On page this image is used it reads "Maestro Artist Sri Mrinal Kanti Das 'Born : 07-01- 1928 Died : 27-06-1990'", but here on Commons a painting by artist who died in 1990 is claimed as own work with a 2009 upload date and no OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From first upload, it is obvious this is a rephotograph of prior photograph due to first upload being in a picture frame. Highly unlikely that the source image, portrait of Indian painter who died in 1990, is own work of uploader and more likely a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, per nom: Most likely professional passport-style portrait photo from the 1970ies or 1980ies, unlikely to be the uploader’s own work and therefore unlicensed (rather mis-licensed). I just cropped it, one of several I cropped that day — should have paid closer attention. -- Tuválkin 19:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo image on tee shirt is not deminimus nor the own work of the uploader. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster, needs source of background image to accept claim of own work. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is at source, but no evidence of permission, author name is different than uploader name and this image is considerably smaller than source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madelyn Smith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wikimedia Commons is not a place for self-promotion, promotion or advertising. A careful read of the information on this page show that the intent is to advertise the clothes. Out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, authors name has no connection to uploader's name, probable COM:COPYVIO esp. with notation "album privato" Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that this image from 1951 is user's own work instead more likely copied from some other source without attribution, and thus COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text document outside of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhimanyu Sheoran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both hands of subject visible in the three pictures here nominated for deletion, no evidence of own work and probable COM:COPYVIOs. The last (unnominated) image has an overprinting which may show work of another but it is ambiguous due to angle of white in foreground of image.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google search here shows multiple uses of this image at YouTube prior to upload on Commons, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nash-teatr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photographic album, there is no educational utility to this series of model shots. Out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absolutely not own work of uploader, dated 1937 book cover Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people at an unidentified location, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worse version of 2-methylhexane-2D-skeletal.png, unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete We do not need to be nostalgic in such a case. --Leyo 22:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: https://www.flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2682445393. Thanks 88.14.9.3 18:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: http://flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2652735008 88.14.9.3 19:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: http://flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2349924983 Thanks. 88.14.9.3 19:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: http://flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2683254810 Thanks 88.14.9.3 19:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: http://flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2651903441 Thanks 88.14.9.3 19:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: http://flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2682429143 Thanks 88.14.9.3 19:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: http://flickr.com/photos/24951263@N08/2683230976 Thanks 88.14.9.3 19:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lanoguera/2682421129/ Thanks 88.14.9.3 19:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 04:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm the owner and I decided that all rights are reserved, as the source says: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lanoguera/2682421129/ Thanks 83.60.147.0 18:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: As we mentioned in the previous DRs, CC license are irrevocable. DR from an unidentified user under an IP address. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photography has all rights reserved, as the source says (https://www.flickr.com/photos/lanoguera/2682421129/ ) why you insist to maintain in this web???? 83.60.147.0 18:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Creative Commons licenses are not revocable. See this link. Revent (talk) 06:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"my computer" is insufficient source information, published before for example at http://vk.com/rpcmp_ekb?z=photo-56824399_308676026%2Falbum-56824399_0%2Frev.    FDMS  4    20:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Journal is under a noncommercial-only license; I cannot find any evidence that it was under a free license previously. Anon126 ( ) 17:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vacation photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/goodbye-seattle-hello-toronto-210714/ Mattythewhite (talk) 20:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion requested as this is a copyright violation. -- Milad A380 talk? 18:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.hullcitytigers.com/team/player-profile/michael-dawson/21 Mattythewhite (talk) 20:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion requested as copyright violation. -- Milad A380 talk? 18:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license tag (PD-old while author unknown); possibly still copyrighted photo. Probably taken in 1920-ties and not published befole 1989. Unlikely to be PD in US. Ankry (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful that the uploader owns the copyright of the map. Also the only source is "PD-self". Josve05a (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyviol:gamaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear indication as to what software program this image depicts, and no evidence that a screenshot of said program is available under a Commons-compatible license. Regardless, it is unused and appears to have no encyclopedic value. 99.118.34.43 21:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, --Neptunia (talk) 21:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Palosirkka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: proprietary software Krd 21:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? Yann (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license / copyright status:

The description status copyright (c) + a real name, whereas the auther field is different, and the license is cc-by-sa. So unclear author, unclear status of copyright vs license, etc. Either this should be clarified, or else this image can't be kept, unfortunately. LimoWreck (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion photograph, alternate (duplicate) deleted, not within scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted by ESA. Not NAVCAM image. Must be deleted on Commons. Neptunia (talk) 22:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as Rosetta's CIVA images (and all others save for NavCam images) are not exempt from ESA's All Rights Reserved policy. Huntster (t @ c) 05:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ESA copyrighted image. Not NAVCAM CC image. Must be deleted... Neptunia (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as Rosetta's OSIRIS images (and all others save for NavCam images) are not exempt from ESA's All Rights Reserved policy. Huntster (t @ c) 05:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that uploader owns rights to image. Image apears to derive from http://media.wnyc.org/media/photologue/photos/On%20Caffeine.jpg, Website is copyright WNYC, and per Terms of Use: The digital platforms and contents and elements of the digital platforms (including, e.g. both editorial content and the code used in programming the platforms) are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Except as explicitly provided in these Terms of Service, you may not reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, prepare derivative works, perform, or use in any other way that is prohibited by copyright law without consent of the copyright holder, any copyrighted material found on or in NYPR's digital properties. You may copy and print content for your personal, noncommercial use only, provided that you include all copyright and other notices contained in the content and that you do not modify the content. Animalparty (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown source. No true license Neptunia (talk) 13:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Извините, но я, по-моему, нарушила авторские права. Это по неопытности. Не смогла сразу разобраться со свободой панорамы. Удалите, пожалуйста. Елена Ч. (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While PD in US (PD-1923), it is not PD in France, its origin country as the translator, Georges Jean-Aubry, died in 1950. I suggest moving to frwikisource (if it is allowed by local rules) and delete in commons (till 2021 - 70 pma) Ankry (talk) 23:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 04:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope (missing source/permission).    FDMS  4    23:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And also

Deleted: INeverCry 04:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not convinced the giant Coca Cola advert is de minimis. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It can be blurred I think.Anatoliy (talk) 23:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think it meets all criteria of COM:DM:
    • it was uploaded to illustrate the building, not Coca-Cola adverts
    • an advert is an unwanted intrusion into the image
    • removing the advert would not make the file unusable, it will probably even increase its value
    • it is neither used nor categorised in relation with Coca-Cola
    • Coca-Cola is subject of neither name nor description
    • it is very hard to picture this building without picturing the advert (unless you ask owners to remove the advert)
    Thus it is definitely DM, the only question is whether anyone will really want to remove it without damaging the file — NickK (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per NickK, looks to be DM. INeverCry 04:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be Own work (available in higher resolution, …).    FDMS  4    23:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution, poor-colour image of a building of which Wikimedia Commons has a much better photograph. Motacilla (talk) 08:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion;; both pics were by me. (For the photo in question, the camera had developed a fault just beforehand.) Hassocks5489 (talk) 16:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

proper file format version at File:Cary Lee Peterson 2014 at UNODC - ECCO2(C)2014.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-02T16:18:48‎ (UTC)


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

proper file format version at File:Cary Lee Peterson Wikipedia Profile Article - ECCO2(C)2014.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-02T16:19:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better version at File:Casadaculturacaicorn.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-02T16:35:59‎ (UTC)


Kept: hard to tell. Materialscientist (talk) 04:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a proper version of this file at File:CEB name banner.png (file type, bottom of image) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-02T18:00:38‎ (UTC)


Kept: this one is of higher resolution. Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of now up-to-date File:Mageia_logo.svg. The latter is more widely used than this one, and they serve the same purpose. Akien (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok for deletion 193.251.46.146 12:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: distorted low-res image without EXIF, which image was grabbed from the Internet back in 2013. Materialscientist (talk) 04:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-11-02T16:54:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Personal art, not in use and out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Quality looks good to me -- lack of quality is not usually a reason to delete unless we have many other images of an important location. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" jak również z wpisem Pana Adama Kliczka przewodniczącego komisji o następującej treści: „ – (…)potrzebujemy dobrych zdjęć zabytków, a nie zalewu fotografii o wątpliwej wartości technicznej i merytorycznej” „(…). Te słabe fotografie będę latami leżeć na Commons i prawdopodobnie nikt ich nigdy nie wykorzysta.(…). https://www.facebook.com/WikiLubiZabytki?fref=ts zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Ponadto uważam że Wikimedia Commons nie dotrzymała warunków licencji na jakiej udostępniłem zdjęcie. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons polar123 (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Quality looks good to me -- lack of quality is not usually a reason to delete unless we have many other images of an important location. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" jak również z wpisem Pana Adama Kliczka przewodniczącego komisji o następującej treści: „ – (…)potrzebujemy dobrych zdjęć zabytków, a nie zalewu fotografii o wątpliwej wartości technicznej i merytorycznej” „(…). Te słabe fotografie będę latami leżeć na Commons i prawdopodobnie nikt ich nigdy nie wykorzysta.(…). https://www.facebook.com/WikiLubiZabytki?fref=ts zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Ponadto uważam że Wikimedia Commons nie dotrzymała warunków licencji na jakiej udostępniłem zdjęcie. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons polar123 (talk) 17:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupt file. (not valid vorbis; aac?) 50.188.157.12 01:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution image is on subject's campaign website, uploader has added a number of images of her which were clear copyright violations or without evidence of permission. (Is this a re-creation?) —innotata 03:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't see this image at the loacation cited by innotata -- there is an image that was probably taken at the same time (same location, clothes, dog), but not this one. I am inclined to assume good faith here and accept the claim of own work. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this image in Commons scope? I don't know. Leoboudv (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep:Although I don't know where the picture of Dalai Lama comes from, I don't see unacceptable problem to upload free image from SFT newsletter concerning SFT event in SFT's place or a place SFT decorated, either. SFT is one of the most important and active groups to advocate Tibet and Tibetans' rights. There is no doubt they have lots of opportunity to access Dalai Lama and take picture for him or take free picture from the Exiled Tibetan Government. I cannot image who or whose rights will be hurt to keep this image. --Wildcursive (talk) 04:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Museum logo © Copyright 2008-2014 Stichting Museum 1940-1945 ErikvanB (talk) 04:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be a flickrwash as this is the only image on this flickr account. Leoboudv (talk) 05:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is mine, but not sure why remove it, I carried the account of flicker showing that I'm releasing the image. Dir3itista (talk) 04:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: So, this uploader has two different flickr accounts with separate names and few images? This sounds very suspicious and the images likely cannot be kept on the precautionary principle. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because of this confusion we need proper documentation, besides Flickr, in order to use this image. Dman41689 (talk) 07:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there proof that this image is own work as there is only 1 photo on this flickr account. Leoboudv (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image is mine. Dir3itista (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account is also my flickr. Dir3itista (talk) 04:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image same as Twitter social media image https://twitter.com/michellecherrys. The only page linked to this image is a self-promotional Wikipedia page. Probable COM:COPYVIO because this isn't a selfie and the person is advertising their modeling services. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

note comment on discussion page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to  Oppose a deletion. Viewing the image here will explain why I am opposing this. The main information you should see is to the right of the image. Also, it will come up instantly when the page loads. DLindsley (My talk page) 22:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The uploader could provide a normal color image of this file in larger or clearer format to show provenance. It's photoshopped and color shifted which makes it harder for Google or Tineye to find the original image (if such). Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment We would have to ask him on his talk page if he had a normal colored version of this image. DLindsley (My talk page) 12:48, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have left the uploader a message on their talk page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any rule that states that an image should have "normal" colors or that it should not be photoshopped? If you think about it, you should come to the conclusion that most of the artwork and images here are photoshopped and that there is no such thing as "normal" colors. It's the artist's liberty to decide. Most of the times the raw photo directly from the camera is just a base for further work, and not published. So, keep your suspicious minds boiling, but you won't find any "original" version of this image on the internet. This is it. Gotnonames (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gotnonames. Wikimedia Commons does not appear to have a rule saying that images must be their normal colors. If you are to think about it, it would sound unfair, wouldn't it? I would think so too. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:45, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The image is in use here please note the absence of citations on this biography , only external links. It's not a user page. If this image is retained, a better description than "Summer Lady" is needed, as is a valid category, and some metadata. The fastest and simplest way to prove this is a real photo and not just a highly colorized image from somewhere else uploaded at 400x400 size of the image, would be to upload a larger one in normal colors. This is done to protect the artist's copyright, as without any form of metadata at all and no source, its impossible to tell whose work it is, and the appearance of the image suggests it may be an edited selfie. No one here is being suspicious. What we do is protect artists copyrights on their materials when people make uploads in error and a very few people who attempt to game the system. One of the ways that is done is to false-color-gradient images so they cannot be searched. I'd suggest also reading the page's history where there is an entry " 31. okt. 2014 kl. 01:30‎ CommonsDelinker (diskusjon | bidrag)‎ m . . (4 484 bytes) (-14)‎ . . (Fjerner IdaLøken.jpg, slettet på Commons av INeverCry: Copyright violation, see commons:Commons:Licensing) (Fjern denne endringen | takk)". Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted:

First, Gotnonames is a sock of Kjetil Prestesæter, so all of the comments above are from one person. He also had another sock, Imagist, which had only one upload, an obvious copyvio.

Second, there is a Commons rule which speaks to images such as this -- the rule that puts personal art out of scope unless the artist is notable. The only image manipulation routinely permitted is that which makes the image more representative of the subject -- minor color correction, removing tilts, etc.

Given the sock here, it is clear that "Assume Good Faith" is not applicable, so I am deleting this both because it is out of scope and because there is significant doubt of its copyright status.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, unused image. Likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note this upload by "Wenddycharlie", identical image File:Willan Cardenas.jpg uploaded by "Systemcars". A single image cannot have two owners! Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this larger copy either, possible COM:COPYVIO, no metadata, unused image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note this upload by "Systemcars", identical image File:Willian Cárdenas.jpg uploaded by ""Wenddycharlie. A single image cannot have two owners! Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remplacé par celui du 17/01/2014 Andreal90 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier remplacé le 17 janvier 2014 à 10:06. Andreal90 (talk) 07:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I do not understand. Yes, this image replaced an earlier version on 17 January, but there is no reason now to delete it. Also, we do not generally delete earlier versions of images unless they are copyvios, so I see no reason to do anything here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader has added "keine kommerzielle Nutzung" to his licence 37.5.7.38 11:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and undescribed image with little educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is the Taj Mahal. With a closer look, you can even guess the picture was taken from North-East corner. BrightRaven (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Public Domain (due to age) in Germany. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=138531207#Regarding_all_1185_files_in_Category:Die_erste_deutsche_Bibel_I

Files affected; 1 185

Josve05a (talk) 19:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • NO DELETION. It is pd because it is a reprint of the first German Bible of from 1466 as it is statet in the first sentence of the Preface - File:Die_erste_deutsche_Bibel_I_0010.jpg. The publisher Kurrelmeyer has worked in the US from 1882 and made his PHD at the John Hopkins University an teached there until 1944. The only parts which are from Kurrelmeyer may be the preface. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 20:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It's in fact not a "reprint" in the sense of a photomechanical reproduction of the first German Bible, but a scholarly edition of the text. However, that doesn't make the text copyrighted, I suppose that any possible publication right has long expired. Still, the preface by Kurrelmeyer is probably copyrighted in Germany, as Kurrelmeyer died less than 70 years ago and the book was published in Tübingen, Germany. So I think maybe the pages containing the preface must be deleted and the rest can be kept. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Silly deletion request  Keep --FrobenChristoph (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, except the Preface, pp.10 to 33. Yann (talk) 20:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC BY-SA IGO 3.0. Yann (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since today Navcam images have been released under CC BY-SA IGO 3.0: http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2014/11/04/rosetta-navcam-images-now-available-under-a-creative-commons-licence/ . I'm not sure if the image in question applies to this (although the filename states 'NavCam') but if so the license just needs to be added. And see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Comet on 24 September NavCam.jpg for a similar image deletion request. --XZise (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC BY-SA IGO 3.0. Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by European Space Agency (ESA) and it's not free or public domain. Sorry... cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Prise_de_d%C3%A9cision/Images_en_provenance_de_l'ESA & http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Industry/Intellectual_Property_Rights/ESA_copyright_notice . Your sincerely, Neptunia Neptunia (talk) 22:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since today Navcam images have been released under CC BY-SA IGO 3.0: http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2014/11/04/rosetta-navcam-images-now-available-under-a-creative-commons-licence/ . I'm not sure if the image in question applies to this (although the filename states 'NavCam') but if so the license just needs to be added. And see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Comet on 21 September NavCam.jpg for a similar image deletion request. --XZise (talk) 10:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC BY-SA IGO 3.0. Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque me confundi Anonimaton (talk) 23:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope, privacy issues. Yann (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, too low file size, unlikely to be own work.  revimsg 17:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Except, of course, (see Special:Contributions/Caseylartigue) uploader also uploaded File:Yeonmi_Park.JPG, which does have plenty of metadata and high file size. And, from name at least, uploader seems to be one Casey Lartigue, International Adviser to the Mulmangcho School for adolescent North Korean refugees in Yeoju, South Korea and Helping Others Prosper Through English (HOPE) based in Seoul, and even more relevantly of http://caseyandyeonmi.com/, which is dedicated to his interactions with the photo subject. So it seems quite reasonable that he could get his hands on numerous photos, and happened to pick one he cropped and otherwise edited to make it look good. --GRuban (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think 3**kb is a high size, but good to have metadata. I'm still not sure whether we should ask OTRS or not. (Too low file size still make me doubtful.)  revimsg 23:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept for now. ( I withdraw my nomination) If it fails OTRS process, it will be deleted, and if OTRS confirmed, good result.  revimsg 23:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer required by owner Highlanderbagpiper (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Images released into the public domain are irrevocably released. The fact the owner no longer needs it is neither here nor there. Green Giant (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo to fota mojej gęby, wyglądam tu obleśnie, nikomu nie udzielałem zgody na publikację mojej podobizny (tym bardziej na CC). Proszę to usunąć lub wrzucić coś ładniejszego. Pozdrowienia, Łukasz Kozak 91.238.85.132 11:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo to fota mojej gęby, wyglądam tu obleśnie, nikomu nie udzielałem zgody na publikację mojej podobizny (tym bardziej na CC). Proszę to usunąć lub wrzucić coś ładniejszego. Pozdrowienia, Łukasz Kozak 91.238.85.132 11:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need to download a version of SVG images named Bronze star, similar to File:Golden star.svg and File:Silver star.png Мики32 (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Green Giant (talk) 00:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need to download a version of SVG images named Silver star, similar to File:Golden star.svg and File:Bronze star.svg Мики32 (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Green Giant (talk) 00:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons.polar123(talk) 19:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons. polar123 (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Appears to be an attempt to revoke the license. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution image is on subject's campaign website, uploader has added a number of images of her which were clear copyright violations or without evidence of permission. —innotata 03:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Google does not find this image on the Web at this resolution. The resolution is, in fact, high enough so that it is unlikely to be a Web image. I am inclined to believe that this may be "own work" as claimed. See also the next DR. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 03:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture using a Public Domain licence and then after an email exchange with the business we decided it would be better using a Creative Commons licence v4 so I put it forward for an OTRS permission decision. It has been refused and the photographer will not want it in the Public Domain. If we use the photo again, the copyright holder will have to be involved in the process. Best delete as soon as possible. Richard Nowell (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:31, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small image of no particular distinction of an apparent children's entertainer, again though no context to fit within scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further noting that the image is used on a user sandbo article at enWP which is advertisement. Has been nominated or deletion at enWP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete used only in promotional draft deleted at en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thechubstershow/sandbox. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quite identical to File:14-02-02-straszburg-RalfR-298.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Although I do not like the idea of flooding Commons with similar images instead of doing the selection of best images at home on your hard disk before uploading the selected few, this is not a valid reason for deletion. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe dieses fast identische Bild einfach übersehen. Beim Einsatz im Europaparlament war es etwas hektisch, sorry. --Ralf Roleček 11:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Ralf, vielleicht magst du ja als Uploader auf löschen eines der beiden Bilder plädieren. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Of course it is a valid reason for deletion, this is called a duplicate and there even is a template to request a fast deletion of duplicates.--Edelseider (talk) 07:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Deleted as uploader request, close but not exact duplicate.--KTo288 (talk) 07:56, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the website of the museum. Uploader is not authorized. Eingangskontrolle (talk) 07:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image source is explicity released in a Pressemitteilung/Press release by the museum website. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Press releases are generally not free enough for Commons. This one is no exception since it prohibits commercial use. Commons requires that images be free for any use, including commercial. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo renouvlée K1saïd2005 (talk) 00:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 09:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 21:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, same view as "NørreNebelNymindegab29Afgrening" Beethoven9 (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Same view, but not same picture. Differences in brightness and contrast, for example. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Krd 13:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dont look like a own work photograph. Its more likely a scaled version of the one found at http://www.goswamiyogainstitute.com/sri-goswami/ Hangsna (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is correct , it's the same picture. I have written the article (my first, so I am learning) and as the manager of Goswami Foundation I have permission from the founder Basile Catoméris, who is Sri Goswami's heir, to use this picture.

Hi, GYIevao. The institute should send an OTRS permission in order to verified what you said. Till that happend, I suggest  Delete. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, COM:OTRS required Krd 13:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]